Rosanna Chan

Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND Treatment of in-stent restenosis presents a critical limitation of intracoronary stent implantation. Ionizing radiation has been shown to decrease neointimal formation within stents in animal models and in initial clinical trials. We studied the effects of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy versus placebo on the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred thirty patients with in-stent restenosis underwent successful coronary intervention and were then blindly randomized to receive either intracoronary gamma-radiation with (192)Ir (15 Gy) or placebo. Four independent core laboratories blinded to the treatment protocol analyzed the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound end points of restenosis. Procedural success and in-hospital and 30-day complications were similar among the groups. At 6 months, patients assigned to radiation therapy required less target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization (9 [13.8%] and 17 [26.2%], respectively) compared with patients assigned to placebo (41 [63.1%, P=0.0001] and 44 [67.7%, P=0.0001], respectively). Binary angiographic restenosis was lower in the irradiated group (19% versus 58% for placebo, P=0.001). Freedom from major cardiac events was lower in the radiation group (29.2% versus 67.7% for placebo, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intracoronary gamma-radiation used as adjunct therapy for patients with in-stent restenosis significantly reduces both angiographic and clinical restenosis.

Intracoronary β-Radiation Therapy Inhibits Recurrence of In-Stent Restenosis

Background —Intracoronary γ-radiation therapy reduces recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study, BETA WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial) was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of the β-emitter 90-yttrium for the prevention of recurrent ISR. Methods and Results —A total of 50 consecutive patients with ISR in native coronaries underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, laser angioplasty, rotational atherectomy, and/or stent implantation. Afterward, a segmented balloon catheter was positioned and automatically loaded with a 90-yttrium, 0.014-inch source wire that was 29 mm in length to deliver a dose of 20.6 Gy at 1.0 mm from the balloon surface. In 17 patients, manual stepping of the radiation catheter was necessary for lesions >25 mm in length. The radiation was delivered successfully to all patients, with a mean dwell time of 3.0±0.4 minutes. Fractionation of the dose due to ischemia was required in 11 patients. At 6 months, the binary angiographic restenosis rate was 22%, the target lesion revascularization rate was 26%, and the target vessel revascularization rate was 34%; all rates were significantly lower than those of the placebo group of γ-WRIST. Conclusions —β-Radiation with a 90-yttrium source used as adjunct therapy for patients with ISR results in a lower-than-expected rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis.

Five-year follow-up after intracoronary gamma radiation therapy for In-stent restenosis

Background—The Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial is a double-blinded randomized study evaluating the effects of intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods and Results—One hundred thirty patients with ISR (100 native coronary and 30 vein grafts) underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, laser ablation, rotational atherectomy, or additional stenting (36% of lesions). Patients were randomized to either 192-Iridium IRT or placebo, with a prescribed dose of 15 Gy to a 2-mm radial distance from the center of the source. Angiographic restenosis (27% versus 56%, P =0.002) and target vessel revascularization (26% versus 68%, P <0.001) were reduced at 6 months in patients treated with IRT. Between 6 and 60 months, patients treated with IRT compared with placebo had more target lesion revascularization (IRT, 21.6% versus placebo, 4.7%; P =0.04) and target vessel revascularization (IRT, 21.5% versus placebo, 6.1%; P =0.03). At 5 years, the major adverse cardiac event rate was significantly reduced with IRT (46.2% versus 69.2%, P =0.008). Conclusions—In the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial, patients with ISR treated with IRT using 192-Iridium had a reduction in the need for repeat target lesion and vessel revascularization at 6 months and 5 years.

Edge stenosis and geographical miss following intracoronary gamma radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the relationship between geographical miss (GM) and edge restenosis (ERS) following intracoronary radiation therapy. BACKGROUND Edge restenosis may be a limitation of intracoronary irradiation to prevent in-stent restenosis (ISR). Inadequate radiation source coverage of the injured segment (GM) has been proposed as a cause of ERS. We studied the relationship between GM and ERS following 192Ir treatment of ISR. METHODS There were 100 patients with native vessel ISR in WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial), in which patients with ISR were first treated with conventional techniques and then randomized to gamma irradiation (192Ir) or placebo. Geographical miss was defined as segments proximal or distal to the treated lesion that were subjected to injury during primary intervention but were not covered by the radiation source. RESULTS Geographical miss was documented in 56 of 164 edges (34%). Edge restenosis was noted at eight of 80 radiated edges and in four of 84 placebo edges. In the irradiated group, ERS was observed in 21% of edges with GM and in 40% of edges without GM (p = 0.035). In contrast, in the placebo group, ERS was observed in only 7% of edges with GM and in 4% of edges without GM (p = NS). The late edge lumen loss was higher in the irradiated group with GM as compared to placebo with GM (0.74 +/- 0.57 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.50 mm, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Edge restenosis following gamma irradiation treatment of ISR is related to GM: a mismatch between the segment of artery injured during the primary catheter-based intervention and the length of the radiation source.

Effects of Intracoronary Radiation on Thrombosis After Balloon Overstretch Injury in the Porcine Model

BACKGROUND The main complications of PTCA remain thrombosis and restenosis. Recent studies have demonstrated reduction in the neointimal hyperplasia after intracoronary radiation (IR) with doses of 10 to 25 Gy of ionizing radiation delivered by either beta- or gamma-emitters to injured vessels. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ionizing radiation on the thrombosis rate (TR) of injured porcine coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-four juvenile swine (63 coronary arteries) were subjected to overstretch balloon injury followed by IR with doses of 0 to 18 Gy of either beta- or gamma-radiation. Two weeks after treatment, tissue sections were perfusion-fixed, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Verhoeff-van Giesons stain, and analyzed for presence of a thrombus, thrombus morphology, and neointima formation by computer-assisted histomorphometry techniques. Although the overall TR increased dose-dependently from 0 to 18 Gy prescribed dose, luminal thrombi decreased. Thrombus area also decreased with increasing radiation dose, whether assessed at the prescription point or at the luminal surface, which corresponded to decreased intimal area. Furthermore, luminal thrombi present after IR tended to consist mostly of fibrin and thus were less organized than in controls. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that IR induces thrombosis but does not necessarily compromise the lumen. Strategies for reducing TR may further decrease intimal area as well as increasing the safety of this therapy.

Time Course of Stent Endothelialization After Intravascular Radiation Therapy in Rabbit Iliac Arteries

Background—Late total occlusion after vascular brachytherapy (VBT) continues to be a serious complication. Delayed reendothelialization was suggested as a pivotal cause, but the time course for complete healing is unknown. Methods and Results—Seventy-two rabbit iliac arteries underwent stent implantation and were treated with &ggr;-radiation using 192Ir. The prescribed doses were 0 Gy (controls, n=24 arteries), 15 Gy (n=24), or 30 Gy (n=24) at 2 mm. Animals were killed at 1 month (n=24), 3 months (n=24), or 6 months (n=24) and were analyzed for histomorphometry or scanning electron microscopy. Intimal area was reduced after VBT at 3 months with 15 and 30 Gy (0.66±0.07 and 0.66±0.04 mm2, respectively) compared with controls (1.01±0.11 mm2, P <0.05) and at 6 months with 30 Gy (0.75±0.09 versus 1.28±0.26 mm2 in controls, P <0.01). Intimal area was similar at 6 months between 15 Gy and controls. At 1 month, 92±4% of the control stented segment was covered with endothelial cells, whereas only 37±4% and 37±8% was covered in the 15- and 30-Gy arteries, respectively. Similarly, at 3 and 6 months, there was a difference in the extent of reendothelialized areas (at 3 months, 95±2%, 32±12%, and 29±13%; and at 6 months, 98±2%, 40±8%, and 35±12% in control, 15-Gy, and 30-Gy arteries, respectively). Excess platelets and leukocytes were seen in irradiated arteries without complete coverage of endothelium. Conclusions—Reendothelialization after VBT is not completed at 6 months after VBT. Special care with prolonged antiplatelet therapy should be considered beyond that time point.

Radiation-induced atherosclerotic plaque progression in a hypercholesterolemic rabbit: a prospective vulnerable plaque model?

PURPOSE Human observations provide rich soil for making hypotheses, but good animal models are essential for understanding the disease and to test treatment modalities. Currently, there is no standard animal model of vulnerable plaque; therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a pathophysiologically relevant vulnerable plaque model. METHODS New Zealand White rabbits were fed with 1% hypercholesterolemic (HC) diet for 7 days, followed by balloon denudation of both the iliac arteries, and continued on 1% HC diet. Four weeks later, in 12 rabbits one of the iliac arteries was radiated (192-Ir, 15 Gy), and in five rabbits both the iliac arteries were sham treated. Following that, rabbits were fed with 0.15% HC diet. Four weeks later, arteries were processed for histomorphometry or immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Serum cholesterol levels were similar in all the groups. In radiated arteries, plaque area was significantly larger (32% larger then in sham). Macrophage-positive area in radiated arteries was 2.4 times greater than the macrophage-positive area in the nonradiated arteries. The area positive for macrophages is also positive for metalloproteinases (MMP)-1. The extent of alpha-actin positive area was significantly less (2.3-fold) in radiated arteries. CONCLUSION The atherosclerotic plaque developed in the current model is predominantly composed of macrophages expressing metalloproteinases with few smooth muscle cells (SMC)--a characteristic of vulnerable plaque. The animal model presented in this study can elucidate at least part of the mechanism of plaque vulnerability and could be used to test treatment modalities to test plaque stability.

Intravascular radiation accelerates atherosclerotic lesion formation of hypercholesteremic rabbits.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of intravascular radiation (IR) on the arterial wall of uninjured vessels in the hypercholesteremic rabbit model. METHODS Aortas of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were treated with either intravascular 192-Ir gamma-radiation (15 Gy at 2 mm from the center of the source) or were exposed to the source catheter without radiation (sham controls). Following the radiation treatment, the animals were fed a 2% cholesterol diet until euthanasia at 2 (n=8) or 6 (n=16) weeks. Arteries were analyzed using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) 1, a promoter of connective tissue deposition, was also monitored. RESULTS At 2 weeks, SEM analysis showed well-aligned endothelial cells in nonradiated segments, whereas irradiated arteries consistently contained adherent and subendothelial macrophages with focal areas of endothelial disruption. Further radiated segments at 2 weeks showed a 7-fold increase in active TGF beta-1 over nonradiated segments. At 6 weeks, there was a significant increase in plaque and vessel wall area relative to control arteries, however, no differences were noted in the density of actin-positive smooth muscle cells (SMCs) or macrophages. Similarly, no differences were noted in cell proliferation between groups as evidenced by the marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). In contrast, nonirradiated segments frequently contained cellular areas with extracellular lipid. CONCLUSION Exposure of previously uninjured vessels to IR and hypercholesterolemia is associated with increased plaque burden and leads to more advanced plaque types. Special care should be taken to minimize radiation exposure in normal vascular segments in hypercholesterolemic patients undergoing radiation therapy.

How to Fix the Edge Effect of Catheter-Based Radiation Therapy in Stented Arteries

Background—Edge stenosis remains a serious limitation of catheter-based vascular brachytherapy (VBT). This study aims to identify the mechanisms and evaluate strategies to minimize edge restenosis in patients treated with VBT. Methods and Results—Thirty-four porcine stented coronary arteries were irradiated (doses of 15 or 22 Gy) with 192Ir trains of either 6 seeds (23 mm) with 0 mm coverage at the distal stent edge and 10 mm at the proximal stent edge or 14 seeds (55 mm) centered at the distal edge of the stent with 27.5 and 14.5 mm coverage at the distal and proximal edges, respectively. After VBT, an additional 13-mm stent was positioned overlapping the distal margin of the first stent. Animals were killed at 28 days, and arteries were analyzed. Longer radiation margins were associated with reduced intimal area (IA) at the stent edge: 2.3±0.9, 3.6±2.0, and 5.3±2.2 mm2 with 15 Gy for a radiation margin of 14.5, 10, and −13 mm (−13 versus 10, P =0.06; 10 versus 14.5, P =0.06). Additional stenting was associated with an increase of IA: 4.0±2.3 mm2 at the overlapped segment. Increasing the dose to 22 Gy resulted in a reduction of the IA at the overlap segment to 1.31±0.57 mm2 with 14 seeds (27.5 mm coverage) but was not helpful with 6 seeds (0 mm coverage): IA, 5.56±2.28 mm2. Conclusions—Extending the radiation margins to 14.5 mm from each end of the stent minimized the edge-effect phenomenon. A higher dose is essential to eliminate further increases in IA at the overlapped segment with additional stents.

Repeat Intracoronary Radiation for Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis in Patients Who Failed Intracoronary Radiation

Background—Intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) is the only proven treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). It is, however, associated with a significant failure rate. The present study evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent repeat intracoronary radiation for recurrent ISR. Methods and Results—Fifty-one consecutive patients who failed a previous radiation treatment, presented with angina and angiographic evidence of ISR, and were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and repeat radiation to the same segment were studied. Twenty-five patients were treated with gamma radiation in a dose of 15 Gy, and 26 were treated with beta radiation doses of 18.3 to 23 Gy. The mean cumulative dose for this cohort was 39.5±11.9 Gy (range, 29 to 75.6 Gy). The outcomes of those patients were compared with outcomes of 299 patients who also failed initial radiation but were treated with repeat conventional PCI to a previously irradiated segment without repeat radiation. At 9 months after treatment, the repeat-IRT group had lower rates of target lesion revascularization (23.5% versus 54.6%; P <0.001) and major adverse cardiac events, including target vessel revascularization (29.4% versus 61.3%; P <0.001). At 9 months, patients with repeat IRT were free of angiographic and clinical events related to the radiation therapy. Conclusions—Repeat gamma or beta radiation to treat failed IRT for ISR after conventional PCI is safe and effective at 9 months and should be considered as a therapeutic option for this difficult patient subset.