Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rosario Isasi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rosario Isasi.


Nature Biotechnology | 2015

CRISPR germline engineering—the community speaks

Katrine S. Bosley; Michael R. Botchan; Annelien L. Bredenoord; Dana Carroll; R. Alta Charo; Emmanuelle Charpentier; Ron Cohen; Jacob E. Corn; Jennifer A. Doudna; Guoping Feng; Henry T. Greely; Rosario Isasi; Weihzi Ji; Jin-Soo Kim; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Edward Lanphier; Jinsong Li; Robin Lovell-Badge; G. Steven Martin; Jonathan D. Moreno; Luigi Naldini; Martin F. Pera; Anthony C.F. Perry; J. Craig Venter; Feng Zhang; Qi Zhou

Nature Biotechnology asks selected members of the international community to comment on the ethical issues raised by the prospect of CRISPR-Cas9 engineering of the human germline.


Cell | 2009

iPS Cells: Mapping the Policy Issues

Amy Zarzeczny; Christopher Thomas Scott; Insoo Hyun; Jami Bennett; Jennifer A. Chandler; Sophie Chargé; Heather L. Heine; Rosario Isasi; Kazuto Kato; Robin Lovell-Badge; Kelly M. McNagny; Duanqing Pei; Janet Rossant; Azim Surani; Patrick L. Taylor; Ubaka Ogbogu; Timothy Caulfield

Given the explosion of research on induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, it is timely to consider the various ethical, legal, and social issues engaged by this fast-moving field. Here, we review issues associated with the procurement, basic research, and clinical translation of iPS cells.


European Journal of Health Law | 2006

Mind the Gap : Policy Approaches to Embryonic Stem Cell and Cloning Research in 50 Countries

Rosario Isasi; Bartha Maria Knoppers

This article provides an overview of (I) the moral and legal status of the human embryo and of the (II) regulatory approaches to embryonic stem cells and cloning research by comparing the regulatory frameworks of 50 countries. The major goal of this study is to provide and analytical understanding of the policy landscape around the globe, with an aim to contribute to worldwide policy debates. The comparison of these policies underscores the hurdles that scientific consortia involving international jurisdictions and policy frameworks have to confront, as well as the challenges facing the international harmonization of such policies.


Stem Cell Research | 2009

Governing stem cell banks and registries: Emerging Issues

Rosario Isasi; Bartha Maria Knoppers

The expansion of national and international research efforts in stem cell research is increasingly paired with the trend of establishing stem cell banks and registries. In jurisdictions crossing the spectrum of restrictive to liberal stem cell policies, banks and registries are emerging as an essential resource for transnational access to quality-controlled and ethically sourced stem cell lines. In this study, we report the preliminary findings of a survey of stem cell banks participating in the International Stem Cell Forums International Stem Cell Banking Initiative (ISCBI). The questionnaire circulated to all ISCBI members addressed both general issues surrounding research policies (e.g., national policies regulating the permissibility of conducting embryonic stem cell research (hESCR)) and, more specifically, issues relating to the governance of stem cell banking projects. The results of the questionnaire were complemented by scholarly research conducted by the authors. This article provides an overview of the current international hESC banking landscape (I). For this purpose, the policy and governance approaches adopted in the surveyed stem cell banks at the national level will be analyzed and areas of convergence and variance will be identified (II). It is beyond the scope of this paper to provide a comprehensive analysis of the wide range of possible governance approaches, policy responses, and their implications. However, we want to provide a starting point for discussion surrounding key questions and challenges as concerns provenance, access, and deposit of hESC lines (III). Finally, while our analysis is focused on research grade hESCs, the lessons to be gleaned from this examination will encourage further thought, analysis, and research into the issues raised in the banking and governance of other sources of stem cell lines (e.g., SCNT, parthenogenesis, iPs) (IV).


Regenerative Medicine | 2015

Points to consider in the development of seed stocks of pluripotent stem cells for clinical applications: International Stem Cell Banking Initiative (ISCBI)

Peter W. Andrews; Duncan Baker; N Benvinisty; B Miranda; Kevin Bruce; Oliver Brüstle; M Choi; Ym Choi; Jeremy Micah Crook; P.A. De Sousa; Petr Dvorak; C Freund; Meri T. Firpo; Miho K. Furue; Paul J. Gokhale; H-Y Ha; E Han; Simone Haupt; Lyn Healy; Derek J. Hei; Outi Hovatta; Charles J. Hunt; S-M Hwang; Inamdar; Rosario Isasi; Marisa Jaconi; V Jekerle; P Kamthorn; Mc Kibbey; I Knezevic

In 2009 the International Stem Cell Banking Initiative (ISCBI) contributors and the Ethics Working Party of the International Stem Cell Forum published a consensus on principles of best practice for the procurement, cell banking, testing and distribution of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines for research purposes [1], which was broadly also applicable to human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines. Here, we revisit this guidance to consider what the requirements would be for delivery of the early seed stocks of stem cell lines intended for clinical applications. The term ‘seed stock’ is used here to describe those cryopreserved stocks of cells established early in the passage history of a pluripotent stem cell line in the lab that derived the line or a stem cell bank, hereafter called the ‘repository’.


Journal of Leukocyte Biology | 2014

A review of the key issues associated with the commercialization of biobanks

Timothy Caulfield; Sarah Burningham; Yann Joly; Zubin Master; Mahsa Shabani; Pascal Borry; Allan B. Becker; Michael M. Burgess; Kathryn Calder; Christine Critchley; Kelly Edwards; Stephanie M. Fullerton; Herbert Gottweis; Robyn Hyde-Lay; Judy Illes; Rosario Isasi; Kazuto Kato; Jane Kaye; Bartha Maria Knoppers; John Lynch; Amy L. McGuire; Eric M. Meslin; D Nicol; Kieran O'Doherty; Ubaka Ogbogu; Margaret Otlowski; Daryl Pullman; Nola M. Ries; Christopher Thomas Scott; Malcolm R. Sears

A review of the key issues associated with the commercialization of biobanks Timothy Caulfield∗, Sarah Burningham, Yann Joly, ZubinMaster, Mahsa Shabani, Pascal Borry, Allan Becker, Michael Burgess, Kathryn Calder, Christine Critchley, Kelly Edwards, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Herbert Gottweis, Robyn Hyde-Lay, Judy Illes, Rosario Isasi, Kazuto Kato, Jane Kaye, Bartha Knoppers, John Lynch, AmyMcGuire, Eric Meslin, Dianne Nicol, Kieran O’Doherty, Ubaka Ogbogu, Margaret Otlowski, Daryl Pullman, Nola Ries, Chris Scott, Malcolm Sears, HelenWallace andMa’n H. Zawati†


Stem Cell Reviews and Reports | 2009

The Stem Cell Research Environment: A Patchwork of Patchworks

Timothy Caulfield; Amy Zarzeczny; Jennifer B. McCormick; Tania Bubela; Christine Critchley; Edna Einsiedel; Jacques Galipeau; Shawn Harmon; Michael Huynh; Insoo Hyun; Judy Illes; Rosario Isasi; Yann Joly; Graeme Laurie; Geoff Lomax; Holly Longstaff; Michael P. McDonald; Charles Murdoch; Ubaka Ogbogu; Jason Owen-Smith; Shaun D. Pattinson; Shainur Premji; Barbara von Tigerstrom; David E. Winickoff

Few areas of recent research have received as much focus or generated as much excitement and debate as stem cell research. Hope for the therapeutic promise of this field has been matched by social concern associated largely with the sources of stem cells and their uses. This interplay between promise and controversy has contributed to the enormous variation that exists among the environments in which stem cell research is conducted throughout the world. This variation is layered upon intra-jurisdictional policies that are also often complex and in flux, resulting in what we term a ‘patchwork of patchworks’. This patchwork of patchworks and its implications will become increasingly important as we enter this new era of stem cell research. The current progression towards translational and clinical research among international collaborators serves as a catalyst for identifying potential policy conflict and makes it imperative to address jurisdictional variability in stem cell research environments. The existing patchworks seen in contemporary stem cell research environments provide a valuable opportunity to consider how variations in regulations and policies across and within jurisdictions influence research efficiencies and directions. In one sense, the stem cell research context can be viewed as a living experiment occurring across the globe. The lessons to be gleaned from examining this field have great potential for broad-ranging general science policy application.


Canadian Medical Association Journal | 2007

Informed consent in embryonic stem cell research: Are we following basic principles?

Timothy Caulfield; Ubaka Ogbogu; Rosario Isasi

The question of whether stem cell research involving human embryos is morally acceptable has dominated much of the national and international dialogue, including parliamentary debates in Canada.[1][1],[2][2] Many of the policies surrounding the ethics of stem cell research were developed in this


Cell Stem Cell | 2014

Identifiability and Privacy in Pluripotent Stem Cell Research

Rosario Isasi; Peter W. Andrews; Jay M. Baltz; Annelien L. Bredenoord; Paul R. Burton; Ing-Ming Chiu; Sara Chandros Hull; Ji-Won Jung; Andreas Kurtz; Geoffrey Lomax; Tenneille E. Ludwig; Michael McDonald; Clive Morris; Huck-Hui Ng; Heather M. Rooke; Alka Sharma; Glyn Stacey; Clare Williams; Fanyi Zeng; Bartha Maria Knoppers

Data sharing is an essential element of research; however, recent scientific and social developments have challenged conventional methods for protecting privacy. Here we provide guidance for determining data sharing thresholds for human pluripotent stem cell research aimed at a wide range of stakeholders, including research consortia, biorepositories, policy-makers, and funders.


Stem Cells International | 2011

From Banking to International Governance: Fostering Innovation in Stem Cell Research

Rosario Isasi; Bartha Maria Knoppers

Stem cell banks are increasingly recognized as an essential resource of biological materials for both basic and translational stem cell research. By providing transnational access to quality controlled and ethically sourced stem cell lines, stem cell banks seek to foster international collaboration and innovation. However, given that national stem cell banks operate under different policy, regulatory and commercial frameworks, the transnational sharing of stem cell materials and data can be complicating. This paper will provide an overview of the most pressing challenges regarding the governance of stem cell banks, and the difficulties in designing regulatory and commercial frameworks that foster stem cell research. Moreover, the paper will shed light on the numerous international initiatives that have arisen to help harmonize and standardize stem cell banking and research processes to overcome such challenges.

Collaboration


Dive into the Rosario Isasi's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judy Illes

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy Zarzeczny

Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Insoo Hyun

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sara Chandros Hull

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge