Rose Cuison Villazor

Loving v. Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Rethinking Race, Sex, and Marriage

unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. Although this case promotes marital freedom and racial equality, there are still significant legal and social barriers to the free formation of intimate relationships. Marriage continues to be the sole measure of commitment, mixed relationships continue to be rare, and same-sex marriage is legal in only eight out of fifty states. Most discussion of Loving celebrates the symbolic dismantling of marital racial discrimination. This book, however, takes a more critical approach to ask how Loving has influenced the “loving” of America. How far have we come since then, and what effect did the case have on individual lives?

Loving vs. Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Acknowledgments

unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. Although this case promotes marital freedom and racial equality, there are still significant legal and social barriers to the free formation of intimate relationships. Marriage continues to be the sole measure of commitment, mixed relationships continue to be rare, and same-sex marriage is legal in only eight out of fifty states. Most discussion of Loving celebrates the symbolic dismantling of marital racial discrimination. This book, however, takes a more critical approach to ask how Loving has influenced the “loving” of America. How far have we come since then, and what effect did the case have on individual lives?

Loving vs. Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Loving v. Virginia in a Post-Racial World

unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. Although this case promotes marital freedom and racial equality, there are still significant legal and social barriers to the free formation of intimate relationships. Marriage continues to be the sole measure of commitment, mixed relationships continue to be rare, and same-sex marriage is legal in only eight out of fifty states. Most discussion of Loving celebrates the symbolic dismantling of marital racial discrimination. This book, however, takes a more critical approach to ask how Loving has influenced the “loving” of America. How far have we come since then, and what effect did the case have on individual lives?

Loving vs. Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Historical Antecedents to Loving

unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. Although this case promotes marital freedom and racial equality, there are still significant legal and social barriers to the free formation of intimate relationships. Marriage continues to be the sole measure of commitment, mixed relationships continue to be rare, and same-sex marriage is legal in only eight out of fifty states. Most discussion of Loving celebrates the symbolic dismantling of marital racial discrimination. This book, however, takes a more critical approach to ask how Loving has influenced the “loving” of America. How far have we come since then, and what effect did the case have on individual lives?

Teaching Property Law and What It Means to Be Human

INTRODUCTION In the 2009 Disney/Pixar movie, Up, grumpy old man Carl Fredricksen refused to sell his house to commercial developers. Technically not a holdout, Carl eventually becomes the last person to remain in the neighborhood, with his modest home surrounded by new buildings being constructed. Eventually forced by a court to leave his house and move to a retirement home, Carl, who does not want to lose his house, came up with a plan. Having been a balloonseller for years, Carl decided to tie thousands of balloons to his house, causing the house to go up to the sky and taking Carl with it.