Rose Katz

Reciprocal inhibition between wrist flexors and extensors in man: a new set of interneurones?

1. Interneurones mediating reciprocal inhibition between wrist flexors and extensors in man are characterized using both Renshaw cells and transarticular group I afferent activation. 2. Renshaw cells were activated by reflex discharges evoked by a tendon tap. The tendon tap was applied to the tendon of the muscles from which the Ia fibres responsible for the reciprocal inhibition originated. Contrary to what was observed both in the cat hindlimb and in human elbow muscles, this Renshaw cell activation never resulted in a long depression of the reciprocal inhibition between wrist flexors and extensors. 3. Convergence from group I elbow muscle afferents and antagonistic group I afferents onto interneurones mediating reciprocal inhibition between wrist muscles was revealed in post‐stimulus time histogram (PSTH) experiments using the technique of spatial facilitation. 4. The characteristics of the interneurones mediating reciprocal inhibition between wrist flexors and extensors could therefore be summarized as follows: (a) they are fed by antagonistic group I afferents and group I afferents originating from both flexor and extensor elbow muscles; (b) they are not inhibited by Renshaw cells; (c) they are not excited by low threshold cutaneous afferents; and (d) they are probably interposed in a disynaptic pathway. 5. It is therefore concluded that interneurones mediating reciprocal inhibition between wrist flexors and extensors in man differ both from Ia interneurones and from interneurones interposed in the Ib reflex pathways and these characteristics are related to the complex circumduction movements developed in the wrist.

Multi-parametric spinal cord MRI as potential progression marker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Objective To evaluate multimodal MRI of the spinal cord in predicting disease progression and one-year clinical status in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Materials and Methods After a first MRI (MRI1), 29 ALS patients were clinically followed during 12 months; 14/29 patients underwent a second MRI (MRI2) at 11±3 months. Cross-sectional area (CSA) that has been shown to be a marker of lower motor neuron degeneration was measured in cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord from T2-weighted images. Fractional anisotropy (FA), axial/radial/mean diffusivities (λ⊥, λ//, MD) and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) were measured within the lateral corticospinal tract in the cervical region. Imaging metrics were compared with clinical scales: Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and manual muscle testing (MMT) score. Results At MRI1, CSA correlated significantly (P<0.05) with MMT and arm ALSFRS-R scores. FA correlated significantly with leg ALFSRS-R scores. One year after MRI1, CSA predicted (P<0.01) arm ALSFSR-R subscore and FA predicted (P<0.01) leg ALSFRS-R subscore. From MRI1 to MRI2, significant changes (P<0.01) were detected for CSA and MTR. CSA rate of change (i.e. atrophy) highly correlated (P<0.01) with arm ALSFRS-R and arm MMT subscores rate of change. Conclusion Atrophy and DTI metrics predicted ALS disease progression. Cord atrophy was a better biomarker of disease progression than diffusion and MTR. Our study suggests that multimodal MRI could provide surrogate markers of ALS that may help monitoring the effect of disease-modifying drugs.

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects

Non‐technical summary  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces modifications of motor cortex excitability depending on the polarity. However, the impact of tDCS applied to lower limb motor cortex on lumbar spinal network excitability has been unknown up to now. This study was performed in order to assess the effects of anodal tDCS compared to sham stimulation on three lumbar spinal circuits, namely reciprocal Ia inhibition, homonymous recurrent inhibition and presynaptic Ia inhibition, in healthy subjects. The results indicate that anodal tDCS modifies the behaviour of 2 of the 3 spinal circuits studied. Effects of anodal tDCS when applied over lower limb motor cortex should be considered with regard not only to cortical circuits but also to spinal motor circuits. The results also suggest that the effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar spinal circuits are similar to those observed during voluntary muscle co‐contractions.

Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) when applied over the motor cortex, modulates excitability dependent on the current polarity. The impact of this cortical modulation on spinal cord network excitability has rarely been studied. In this series of experiments, performed in healthy subjects, we show that anodal tDCS increases disynaptic inhibition directed from extensor carpi radialis (ECR) to flexor carpi radialis (FCR) with no modification of presynaptic inhibition of FCR Ia terminals and FCR H‐reflex recruitment curves. We also show that cathodal tDCS does not modify spinal network excitability. Our results suggest that the increase of disynaptic inhibition observed during anodal tDCS relies on an increase of disynaptic interneuron excitability and that tDCS over the motor cortex in human subjects induces effects on spinal network excitability. Our results highlight the fact that the effects of tDCS should be considered in regard to spinal motor circuits and not only to cortical circuits.

Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS).

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS) are indirect and non-invasive methods used to induce excitability changes in the motor cortex via a wire coil generating a magnetic field that passes through the scalp. Today, TMS has become a key method to investigate brain functioning in humans. Moreover, because rTMS can lead to long-lasting after-effects in the brain, it is thought to be able to induce plasticity. This tool appears to be a potential therapy for neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying the effects induced by TMS and rTMS have not yet been clearly identified. The purpose of the present review is to summarize the main knowledge available for TMS and rTMS to allow for understanding their mode of action and to specify the different parameters that influence their effects. This review takes an inventory of the most-used rTMS paradigms in clinical research and exhibits the hypotheses commonly assumed to explain rTMS after-effects.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: an update.

Stroke is a leading cause of adult motor disability. The number of stroke survivors is increasing in industrialized countries, and despite available treatments used in rehabilitation, the recovery of motor functions after stroke is often incomplete. Studies in the 1980s showed that non-invasive brain stimulation (mainly repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS] and transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]) could modulate cortical excitability and induce plasticity in healthy humans. These findings have opened the way to the therapeutic use of the 2 techniques for stroke. The mechanisms underlying the cortical effect of rTMS and tDCS differ. This paper summarizes data obtained in healthy subjects and gives a general review of the use of rTMS and tDCS in stroke patients with altered motor functions. From 1988 to 2012, approximately 1400 publications were devoted to the study of non-invasive brain stimulation in humans. However, for stroke patients with limb motor deficit, only 141 publications have been devoted to the effects of rTMS and 132 to those of tDCS. The Cochrane review devoted to the effects of rTMS found 19 randomized controlled trials involving 588 patients, and that devoted to tDCS found 18 randomized controlled trials involving 450 patients. Without doubt, rTMS and tDCS contribute to physiological and pathophysiological studies in motor control. However, despite the increasing number of studies devoted to the possible therapeutic use of non-invasive brain stimulation to improve motor recovery after stroke, further studies will be necessary to specify their use in rehabilitation.

Impact of precision grip tasks on cervical spinal network excitability in humans

Non technical summary  Motor skill acquisition may induce modifications of spinal network excitability. We studied the impact of two different precision grip force control tasks on cervical spinal network excitability in healthy subjects. The results show that the nature of the motor task performed has a specific impact on the excitability of these cervical spinal circuits and that presynaptic Ia inhibition may play an important role for acquisition of a new motor task. The results strongly suggest that early motor adaptations induced by a motor task are not only cortical but also spinal in origin.

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses spinal motoneuron activity in parkinsonian patients

Although a cardinal symptom of Parkinsonian disease, up to now, rigidity has been investigated much less than spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Many pathophysiological mechanisms may at least theoretically contribute to Parkinsonian rigidity, from altered viscoelastic muscle properties to inability of parkinsonian patients to relax. However, as demonstrated many years ago, motoneuron responses to muscle afferent volleys are involved in rigidity since afferent volleys are suppressed after dorsal root section. To our knowledge, homosynaptic depression (i.e. the fact that motoneuron responses to Ia afferent volleys exhibit a frequency-related depression) has not been studied in parkinsonian disease, despite the fact that in spastic patients, changes in homosynaptic depression are significantly correlated at wrist and ankle levels with the severity of spasticity. Thus, in the present series of experiments, we investigated in parkinsonian patients with chronic implantation of both subthalamic motor nuclei, the amount of homosynaptic depression at wrist and ankle levels on and off deep brain stimulation. Off deep brain stimulation, the frequency-related depression disappeared, the patients became rigid and the amount of homosynaptic depression was significantly correlated with the severity of rigidity. On deep brain stimulation, the frequency-related depression was restored and the rigidity suppressed, suggesting that homosynaptic depression is one of the mechanisms underlying rigidity in Parkinsons disease. Moreover, the unexpected finding that changes in the rigidity score and the amount of homosynaptic depression are time-locked to the onset of deep brain stimulation leads us to reconsider the mechanisms underlying changes in homosynaptic depression.

Changes in spinal inhibitory networks induced by furosemide in humans.

It has been demonstrated in humans that furosemide crosses the blood–brain barrier and blocks activity in the epileptic brain. In this study, we demonstrated using non‐invasive electrophysiological techniques in healthy human subjects that furosemide, a cation‐chloride co‐transporter blocker, orally administered at doses commonly used in the clinic (40 mg), reduces the efficacy of pre‐ and postsynaptic inhibition of soleus motoneurons in the spinal cord. Furosemide can be a useful tool to detect the intrinsic functioning of inhibitory synapses and to explore if the reduced inhibitory interneuronal activity that probably contributes to spasticity also exists in humans with spinal cord injury.