Rosemary Shrestha
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rosemary Shrestha.
Plant and Cell Physiology | 2013
Laurel Cooper; Ramona L. Walls; Justin Elser; Maria A. Gandolfo; Dennis W. Stevenson; Barry Smith; Justin Preece; Balaji Athreya; Christopher J. Mungall; Stefan A. Rensing; Manuel Hiss; Daniel Lang; Ralf Reski; Tanya Z. Berardini; Donghui Li; Eva Huala; Mary L. Schaeffer; Naama Menda; Elizabeth Arnaud; Rosemary Shrestha; Yukiko Yamazaki; Pankaj Jaiswal
The Plant Ontology (PO; http://www.plantontology.org/) is a publicly available, collaborative effort to develop and maintain a controlled, structured vocabulary (‘ontology’) of terms to describe plant anatomy, morphology and the stages of plant development. The goals of the PO are to link (annotate) gene expression and phenotype data to plant structures and stages of plant development, using the data model adopted by the Gene Ontology. From its original design covering only rice, maize and Arabidopsis, the scope of the PO has been expanded to include all green plants. The PO was the first multispecies anatomy ontology developed for the annotation of genes and phenotypes. Also, to our knowledge, it was one of the first biological ontologies that provides translations (via synonyms) in non-English languages such as Japanese and Spanish. As of Release #18 (July 2012), there are about 2.2 million annotations linking PO terms to >110,000 unique data objects representing genes or gene models, proteins, RNAs, germplasm and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from 22 plant species. In this paper, we focus on the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO, describing the organizing principles, resources available to users and examples of how the PO is integrated into other plant genomics databases and web portals. We also provide two examples of comparative analyses, demonstrating how the ontology structure and PO-annotated data can be used to discover the patterns of expression of the LEAFY (LFY) and terpene synthase (TPS) gene homologs.
Frontiers in Physiology | 2012
Rosemary Shrestha; Luca Matteis; Milko Skofic; Arllet Portugal; Graham McLaren; Glenn Hyman; Elizabeth Arnaud
The Crop Ontology (CO) of the Generation Challenge Program (GCP) (http://cropontology.org/) is developed for the Integrated Breeding Platform (IBP) (http://www.integratedbreeding.net/) by several centers of The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR): bioversity, CIMMYT, CIP, ICRISAT, IITA, and IRRI. Integrated breeding necessitates that breeders access genotypic and phenotypic data related to a given trait. The CO provides validated trait names used by the crop communities of practice (CoP) for harmonizing the annotation of phenotypic and genotypic data and thus supporting data accessibility and discovery through web queries. The trait information is completed by the description of the measurement methods and scales, and images. The trait dictionaries used to produce the Integrated Breeding (IB) fieldbooks are synchronized with the CO terms for an automatic annotation of the phenotypic data measured in the field. The IB fieldbook provides breeders with direct access to the CO to get additional descriptive information on the traits. Ontologies and trait dictionaries are online for cassava, chickpea, common bean, groundnut, maize, Musa, potato, rice, sorghum, and wheat. Online curation and annotation tools facilitate (http://cropontology.org) direct maintenance of the trait information and production of trait dictionaries by the crop communities. An important feature is the cross referencing of CO terms with the Crop database trait ID and with their synonyms in Plant Ontology (PO) and Trait Ontology (TO). Web links between cross referenced terms in CO provide online access to data annotated with similar ontological terms, particularly the genetic data in Gramene (University of Cornell) or the evaluation and climatic data in the Global Repository of evaluation trials of the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security programme (CCAFS). Cross-referencing and annotation will be further applied in the IBP.
Aob Plants | 2010
Rosemary Shrestha; Elizabeth Arnaud; Ramil Mauleon; Martin Senger; Guy Davenport; David Hancock; Norman Morrison; Richard Bruskiewich; Graham McLaren
The ‘Crop Ontology’ database we describe provides a controlled vocabulary for several economically important crops. It facilitates data integration and discovery from global databases and digital literature. This allows researchers to exploit comparative phenotypic and genotypic information of crops to elucidate functional aspects of traits.
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics | 2016
Jiafa Chen; Rosemary Shrestha; Junqiang Ding; Hongjian Zheng; Chunhua Mu; Jianyu Wu; George Mahuku
Fusarium ear rot (FER) incited by Fusarium verticillioides is a major disease of maize that reduces grain quality globally. Host resistance is the most suitable strategy for managing the disease. We report the results of genome-wide association study (GWAS) to detect alleles associated with increased resistance to FER in a set of 818 tropical maize inbred lines evaluated in three environments. Association tests performed using 43,424 single-nucleotide polymorphic (SNPs) markers identified 45 SNPs and 15 haplotypes that were significantly associated with FER resistance. Each associated SNP locus had relatively small additive effects on disease resistance and accounted for 1–4% of trait variation. These SNPs and haplotypes were located within or adjacent to 38 candidate genes, 21 of which were candidate genes associated with plant tolerance to stresses, including disease resistance. Linkage mapping in four biparental populations to validate GWAS results identified 15 quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with F. verticillioides resistance. Integration of GWAS and QTL to the maize physical map showed eight colocated loci on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10. QTL on chromosomes 2 and 9 are new. These results reveal that FER resistance is a complex trait that is conditioned by multiple genes with minor effects. The value of selection on identified markers for improving FER resistance is limited; rather, selection to combine small effect resistance alleles combined with genomic selection for polygenic background for both the target and general adaptation traits might be fruitful for increasing FER resistance in maize.
F1000Research | 2017
Esther Dzale Yeumo; Michael Alaux; Elizabeth Arnaud; Sophie Aubin; Ute Baumann; Patrice Buche; Laurel Cooper; Hanna Ćwiek-Kupczyńska; Robert Davey; Richard Fulss; Clement Jonquet; Marie-Angélique Laporte; Pierre Larmande; Cyril Pommier; Vassilis Protonotarios; Carmen Reverte; Rosemary Shrestha; Imma Subirats; Aravind Venkatesan; Alex Whan; Hadi Quesneville
In this article, we present a joint effort of the wheat research community, along with data and ontology experts, to develop wheat data interoperability guidelines. Interoperability is the ability of two or more systems and devices to cooperate and exchange data, and interpret that shared information. Interoperability is a growing concern to the wheat scientific community, and agriculture in general, as the need to interpret the deluge of data obtained through high-throughput technologies grows. Agreeing on common data formats, metadata, and vocabulary standards is an important step to obtain the required data interoperability level in order to add value by encouraging data sharing, and subsequently facilitate the extraction of new information from existing and new datasets. During a period of more than 18 months, the RDA Wheat Data Interoperability Working Group (WDI-WG) surveyed the wheat research community about the use of data standards, then discussed and selected a set of recommendations based on consensual criteria. The recommendations promote standards for data types identified by the wheat research community as the most important for the coming years: nucleotide sequence variants, genome annotations, phenotypes, germplasm data, gene expression experiments, and physical maps. For each of these data types, the guidelines recommend best practices in terms of use of data formats, metadata standards and ontologies. In addition to the best practices, the guidelines provide examples of tools and implementations that are likely to facilitate the adoption of the recommendations. To maximize the adoption of the recommendations, the WDI-WG used a community-driven approach that involved the wheat research community from the start, took into account their needs and practices, and provided them with a framework to keep the recommendations up to date. We also report this approach’s potential to be generalizable to other (agricultural) domains.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics | 2016
George Mahuku; Jiafa Chen; Rosemary Shrestha; Luis Narro; Karen Viviana Osorio Guerrero; Alba Lucia Arcos; Yunbi Xu
Nature Precedings | 2010
Rosemary Shrestha; Hector Sanchez; Claudio Ayala; Peter Wenzl; Elizabeth Arnaud
Nature Precedings | 2009
Rosemary Shrestha; Ramil Mauleon; Reinhard Simon; Jayashree Balaji; Stephanie Channelière; Adriana Alercia; Martin Senger; Kevin Manansala; Thomas Metz; Guy Davenport; Richard Bruskiewich; Graham McLaren; Elizabeth Arnaud
F1000Research | 2017
Hanna Ćwiek-Kupczyńska; Robert Davey; Esther Dzale Yeumo; Richard Fulss; Hadi Quesnevilles; Rosemary Shrestha
Archive | 2016
Léo Valette; Julian Pietragalla; M-A. Laporte; A. Afolabi; O. Boukar; Steven B. Cannon; D.W. Diers; Kate Dreher; Pooran M. Gaur; A.F. Guerrero; Charles Tom Hash; Vilma Rocio Hualla; D. Inoussa; Scott R. Kalberer; C. Kondombo-Barro; Shiv Kumar; Antonio Lopez-Montes; Naama Menda; Randall L. Nelson; Sam Ofodile; Sujata Patil; P. Prasad; Karthika Rajendran; J-F. Rami; Abhishek Rathore; N.R. Sackville Hamilton; S. Reinhard; Niaba Teme; E. Weltzien-Rattunde; Elizabeth Arnaud