Ross Elledge

The role of alcohol in maxillofacial trauma—a comparative retrospective audit between the two centers

Alcohol abuse and maxillofacial trauma, particularly that due to interpersonal violence, have a well-established relationship in the literature. We present a retrospective audit comparing the role of alcohol in maxillofacial trauma between Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham, United Kingdom and Westmead Hospital in Sydney, Australia, and the association between alcohol involvement and patient demographics, including age, sex, marital status, and employment status. Also presented are the differences between the two centers in terms of mechanisms and types of injuries and the locations where these injuries were sustained. Alcohol was involved in 34.78 and 30.77% of patients at Westmead and Birmingham, respectively. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed a reduced likelihood of alcohol involvement in episodes of maxillofacial trauma where patients were unemployed (P=.04), and where injuries were sustained secondary to mechanisms other than assault (P<.001) and in locations other than pubs and nightclubs (P=.024). There appeared to be no statistically significant contribution to the likelihood of alcohol involvement by treating center, marital status, patient sex, or age. Alcohol continues to be a strong driving factor in cases of maxillofacial trauma, particularly those due to alleged assault, with a typical patient demographic of the gainfully employed frequenting drinking establishments being most at risk for alcohol-related trauma, most commonly sustaining their injuries secondary to assault. Identifying patient groups most at risk is a key step in developing public health strategies aimed at prevention, and our findings would appear to suggest this group of patients as being the most worthwhile to target with measures aimed at reducing alcohol-fueled maxillofacial trauma.

A library-based ecological study to investigate the contribution of ethnicity to the incidence of oral cancer within health authorities in England and Wales

Our aim was to investigate the incidence of oral cancer in three ethnic groups, Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi residents of the UK, to try to establish a link between ethnic background and the incidence of oral cancer. We used data from the 1991 and 2001 censuses to calculate approximate percentages of the number of Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi residents in each Health Authority (HA) region and correlated these with rates of oral cancer from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) cancer atlas for the same period. Data about lung cancer and oesophageal cancer were used as proxies for the confounding variables of smoking and alcohol, respectively, in a multiple regression analysis. There was a strong significant correlation between figures for lung cancer and variations in oral cancer rates among HAs (p<0.001). Ethnicity contributed weakly and insignificantly to variations in rates of oral cancer among HAs. In summary, we found only a weak correlation between ethnicity and oral cancer in the UK population, unlike previously published studies, while simultaneously showing a stronger relation with the proxy for smoking trends. There are various drawbacks inherent in library-based ecological studies in general, and in this study in particular, that may have been responsible for this.

Use of a virtual learning environment for training in maxillofacial emergencies: impact on the knowledge and attitudes of staff in accident and emergency departments.

Many graduates will take up junior roles in accident and emergency (A&E) departments to which a large proportion of patients present with facial injuries caused by interpersonal violence. However, it is widely recognised that undergraduates and postgraduates have few opportunities for training in oral and maxillofacial surgery. We aimed to assess the impact of a specifically designed maxillofacial emergencies virtual learning environment (VLE) on the knowledge and confidence of junior doctors in two A&E departments. They were given free access to the VLE for one month, and were asked to complete multiple choice questions and to rate their confidence to deal with 10 common situations on visual analogue scales (VAS) at baseline and one month after training. A total of 29 doctors agreed to pilot the website, 21 (72%) completed both sets of questions, and 18 (62%) completed both VAS assessments. The mean (SD) multiple choice score improved from 10 (2.52) to 13 (3.56) out of a maximum of 20 (p=0.004) and the mean (SD) VAS improved from 29.2 (19.2) mm to 45.7 (16.6) mm out of a maximum of 100 mm (p=0.007). This was a small pilot study with limited numbers, but it showed improvements in the knowledge of maxillofacial emergencies and in confidence, although the latter remained low. Further work is needed to examine how these brief educational interventions affect the attitudes of frontline staff to maxillofacial emergencies.