Rossana Berardi

Randomized Active-Controlled Phase II Study of Denosumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Bone Metastases

PURPOSE Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, suppresses bone resorption. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of five dosing regimens of denosumab in patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases not previously treated with intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BPs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible women (n = 255) with breast cancer-related bone metastases were stratified by type of antineoplastic therapy received and randomly assigned to one of six cohorts (five denosumab cohorts [blinded to dose and frequency]; one open-label IV BP cohort). Denosumab was administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks (30, 120, or 180 mg) or every 12 weeks (60 or 180 mg). The primary end point was percentage of change in the bone turnover marker urine N-telopeptide corrected for urine creatinine (uNTx/Cr) from baseline to study week 13. The percentage of patients achieving more than 65% uNTx/Cr reduction, time to more than 65% uNTx/Cr reduction, patients experiencing one or more on-study skeletal-related events (SRE), and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS At study week 13, the median percent reduction in uNTx/Cr was 71% for the pooled denosumab groups and 79% for the IV BP group. Overall, 74% of denosumab-treated patients (157 of 211) achieved a more than 65% reduction in uNTx/Cr compared with 63% of bisphosphonate-treated patients (27 of 43). On-study SREs were experienced by 9% of denosumab-treated patients (20 of 211) versus 16% of bisphosphonate-treated patients (seven of 43). No serious or fatal adverse events related to denosumab occurred. CONCLUSION Subcutaneous denosumab may be similar to IV BPs in suppressing bone turnover and reducing SRE risk. The safety profile was consistent with an advanced breast cancer population receiving systemic therapy.

Arterial hypertension correlates with clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line bevacizumab

BACKGROUND Arterial hypertension occurring during antiangiogenic therapy has been correlated with the biological inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor-related pathway and may represent a possible clinical marker for treatment efficacy. The aim of our study was to retrospectively assess if grades 2-3 hypertension were associated with response to bevacizumab, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically proven, metastatic colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab as first-line therapy in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil were eligible for our analysis. RESULTS Thirty-nine metastatic colorectal cancer patients were eligible. Eight patients (20%) developed grades 2-3 hypertension. A partial remission was observed in six of eight cases with bevacizumab-related hypertension (75%) and in 10 of 31 (32%) patients with no hypertension (P = 0.04). Median PFS was 14.5 months for patients showing bevacizumab-related hypertension, while it was 3.1 months in those without hypertension (P = 0.04). Median overall survival was not reached in patients with hypertension while it was 15.1 months in the remaining cases (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that bevacizumab-induced hypertension may represent an interesting prognostic factor for clinical outcome in advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line bevacizumab.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Status in Primary Colorectal Tumors Does Not Correlate With EGFR Expression in Related Metastatic Sites: Implications for Treatment With EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies

PURPOSE We hypothesized that the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression performed in primary tumors for treatment with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies could not always correlate with EGFR status in metastatic sites, thus making cancer cells in these sites resistant to therapy. The aim of our study was to correlate EGFR expression on primary tumors and related metastases in order to find out whether assessing EGFR status on primary cancer is to be considered an effective tool for planning treatment with EGFR-targeted antibodies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated EGFR immunohistochemistry from primary tumors and related metastatic sites in 99 colorectal cancer patients. The site of primary tumor was colon in 77 patients (78%) and rectum in 22 patients (22%). Metastatic sites analyzed were liver in 84 patients (81%), lung in 13 patients (13%), bone in one patient (1%), and brain in five patients (5%). EGFR status was defined as positive if the percentage of malignant cells stained was > or = 1%. RESULTS EGFR status was positive in 53 primary tumors (53%). In 19 primary tumors expressing EGFR (36%), the corresponding metastatic site was found negative, whereas it was found positive in seven metastases (15%) from EGFR-negative primary cancers. The difference between these two groups of patients (ie, EGFR-positive to EGFR-negative v EGFR-negative to EGFR-positive) was statistically significant (P = .036). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the detection of the EGFR in primary colorectal cancer could be inadequate for planning therapy with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies in a considerable proportion of both EGFR-positive and -negative primary tumors (36% and 15%, respectively).

Extended Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases Not Receiving Prior Bisphosphonate Therapy

Purpose: Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, suppresses bone resorption. This study evaluated the effects of denosumab in i.v. bisphosphonate (IV BP)–naïve patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases. Experimental Design: Eligible women (n = 255), stratified by type of antineoplastic therapy, were randomized to 1 of 5 blinded denosumab cohorts or an open-label IV BP cohort. Denosumab was administered s.c. every 4 weeks (30, 120, or 180 mg) or every 12 weeks (60 or 180 mg) through 21 weeks. Final efficacy results for up to 25 weeks are reported, including percentage change from baseline in urine N-telopeptide corrected for creatinine (uNTx/Cr) and incidence of skeletal-related events (SRE). Safety results are reported through the end of follow-up (up to 57 weeks). Results: At week 13 and 25, the median percent changes in uNTx/creatinine (Cr) among patients with measurable uNTx were −73% and −75% for the pooled denosumab groups and −79% and −71% for the IV BP group. Among patients with ≥1 postbaseline measurement of uNTx at week 25, 52% (109 of 208) of denosumab-treated patients and 46% (19 of 41) of IV BP–treated patients achieved >65% uNTx/Cr reduction. On-study SREs occurred in 12% (26 of 211) of denosumab-treated patients and 16% (7 of 43) of IV BP–treated patients. Overall rates of adverse events were 95% in denosumab and IV BP groups. No denosumab-related serious or fatal adverse events occurred. Conclusions: In IV BP–naïve breast cancer patients with bone metastases, denosumab suppresses bone turnover and seems to reduce SRE risk similarly to IV BPs, with a safety profile consistent with an advanced cancer population receiving systemic therapy.

Nuclear factor-kB tumor expression predicts response and survival in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab-irinotecan therapy

PURPOSE NF-kB expression has been shown to be responsible for resistance to antineoplastic agents and it also plays a part in the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor downstream signaling pathway in colorectal tumors. The aim of our analysis was to investigate a correlation between NF-kB expression, response rate, time to progression, and survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving cetuximab and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed retrospectively the immunoreactivity for NF-kB in irinotecan-refractory patients receiving cetuximab and irinotecan. Results Seventy-six patients were analyzed. Cetuximab and irinotecan were administered as second-line chemotherapy in 19 patients and after > or = two lines of chemotherapy in the remaining 57 patients. We observed a partial response (PR) in 16 patients for an overall response rate of 24%. Thirty-two patients (48%) experienced progressive disease; median time to progression (TTP) was 3.6 months and median overall survival was 10.3 months. NF-kB was positive in 46 patients (60%). All main clinical characteristics were well balanced between NF-kB-positive and NF-kB-negative patients. The response rate was 10% (four PRs) versus 48% (12 PRs; P = .0007) in NF-kB-positive and NF-kB-negative tumors, respectively. Median TTP in NF-kB-positive patients was 3 v 6.4 months in the remaining patients (P = .021). Median overall survival was 9.5 v 15.8 months for NF-kB-positive and NF-kB-negative patients, respectively (P = .036) CONCLUSION The difference in median TTP, overall survival, and response rate seem to confirm that NF-kB may play a crucial role in predicting the efficacy of cetuximab and irinotecan in advanced colorectal tumors.

Cetuximab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised, multicentre, phase II trial

BACKGROUND Preclinical data have suggested a synergistic effect of cetuximab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin and clinical data have shown a substantial improvement in response and survival when gemcitabine is combined with a platinum analogue compared with gemcitabine alone. The aim of this study was to assess the activity and feasibility of a combination of cetuximab with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with use of gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS In a multicentre, randomised phase II trial, 84 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to either 250 mg/m2 cetuximab weekly, after a loading dose of 400 mg/m2, plus 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 35 mg/m2 cisplatin on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle or to the same chemotherapeutic regimen without cetuximab. The primary endpoint was objective response (defined as the proportion of patients whose best response was either partial response or complete response). Secondary endpoints included disease control (defined as the proportion of patients whose best response was either partial response, complete response, or stable disease), progression-free survival, and overall survival. All assessments of response at each site were done blindly by a local experienced radiologist who was not directly involved in the trial. Responses were measured according to an intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial registry, number NCT00536614. FINDINGS 29 men and 13 women were randomly assigned to cetuximab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (median age 61 years [range 38-78]) and 22 men and 20 women were randomly assigned to gemcitabine and cisplatin (median age 64 years [range 40-76]). Seven of 40 (17.5%) patients had an objective response in the cetuximab group (95% CI 7.3-32.8) and five of 41 (12.2%) patients had an objective response in the non-cetuximab group (95% CI 4.1-26.2). No significant difference was noted between the groups both for objective response (5.3% higher in the cetuximab group [95% CI -16.5 to 27.1]; chi2 test=0.360; p=0.549) or for disease control (3.5% higher in the non-cetuximab group [-34.0% to 27.0%]; 0.446; p=0.504). Overall median follow-up was 11.8 months (range 2.5-18.5). No significant differences between the groups were noted in median progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.52, p=0.847) or in median overall survival (0.91, 0.54-1.55, p=0.739): median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI 2.4-5.1) in the cetuximab group and 4.2 months (2.6-5.4) in the non-cetuximab group; median overall survival was 7.5 months (5.1-8.8) and 7.8 months (5.3-15.0), respectively. 33 patients from both groups had at least one grade 3-4 toxic effect. INTERPRETATION The addition of cetuximab to a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin does not increase response or survival for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although toxic effects were not increased by cetuximab, this combination should not be further assessed in phase III trials.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) correlates with clinical activity of irinotecan-cetuximab in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a fluorescence in situ (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis

BackgroundK-RAS wild type colorectal tumors show an improved response rate to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Nevertheless 70% to 40% of these patients still does not seem to benefit from this therapeutic approach. FISH EGFR GCN has been previously demonstrated to correlate with clinical outcome of colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. CISH also seemed able to provide accurate EGFR GCN information with the advantage of a simpler and reproducible technique involving immunohistochemistry and light microscopy. Based on these findings we investigated the correlation between both FISH and CISH EGFR GCN and clinical outcome in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-cetuximab.MethodsPatients with advanced K-RAS wild-type, colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan-cetuximab after failure of irinotecan-based chemotherapy were eligible.A cut-off value for EGFR GCN of 2.6 and 2.12 for FISH and CISH respectively was derived from ROC curve analysis.ResultsForty-four patients were available for analysis. We observed a partial remission in 9 (60%) and 2 (9%) cases with a FISH EGFR GCN ≥ 2.6 and < 2.6 respectively (p = 0.002) and in 10 (36%) and 1 (6%) cases with a CISH EGFR GCN ≥ 2.12 and < 2.12 respectively (p = 0.03). Median TTP was 7.7 and 6.4 months in patients showing increased FISH and CISH EGFR GCN whereas it was 2.9 and 3.1 months in those with low FISH and CISH EGFR GCN (p = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively).ConclusionFISH and CISH EGFR GCN may both represent effective tools for a further patients selection in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

PD-1 blockade therapy in renal cell carcinoma: Current studies and future promises

RCC is considered an immunogenic tumor with a prominent dysfunctional immune cell infiltrate, unable to control tumor growth. Evasion of immune surveillance, a process defined immune-editing, leads to malignant progression. The striking improvement of knowledge in immunology has led to the identification of immune checkpoints (such as CTLA-4 and PD-1), whose blockage enhances the antitumor immunity. The interaction between PD-1, an inducible inhibitory receptor expressed on lymphocytes and DCs, and PD-L1 ligand, expressed by tumor cells, results in a down-regulation of the T-cell response. Therefore, the PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibition by targeted-antibodies, increasing the T-cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, represents a promising mechanism to stimulate the anti-tumor activity of the immune system, improving the outcomes of cancer patients. Several PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have been evaluated in different tumor types, showing promising results. The interesting correlation between lymphocytes PD-1 expression and RCC advanced stage, grade and prognosis, as well as the selective PD-L1 expression by RCC tumor cells and its potential association with worse clinical outcomes, have led to the development of new anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents, alone or in combination with anti-angiogenic drugs or other immunotherapeutic approaches, for the treatment of RCC. In this review we discuss the role of PD-1/PD-L1 in RCC, focusing on the biological rationale, current clinical studies and promising therapeutic perspectives to target the PD-1 pathway.

Emerging role of tumor-associated macrophages as therapeutic targets in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) derived from peripheral blood monocytes recruited into the renal cell carcinoma (RCC) microenvironment. In response to inflammatory stimuli, macrophages undergo M1 (classical) or M2 (alternative) activation. M1 cells produce high levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-12, IL-23 and IL-6, while M2 cells produce anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, thus contributing to RCC-related immune dysfunction. The presence of extensive TAM infiltration in RCC microenvironment contributes to cancer progression and metastasis by stimulating angiogenesis, tumor growth, and cellular migration and invasion. Moreover, TAMs are involved in epithelial–mesenchymal transition of RCC cancer cells and in the development of tumor resistance to targeted agents. Interestingly, macrophage autophagy seems to play an important role in RCC. Based on this scenario, TAMs represent a promising and effective target for cancer therapy in RCC. Several strategies have been proposed to suppress TAM recruitment, to deplete their number, to switch M2 TAMs into antitumor M1 phenotype and to inhibit TAM-associated molecules. In this review, we summarize current data on the essential role of TAMs in RCC angiogenesis, invasion, impaired anti-tumor immune response and development of drug resistance, thus describing the emerging TAM-centered therapies for RCC patients.

Natural history of bone metastasis in colorectal cancer: final results of a large Italian bone metastases study

BACKGROUND Data are limited regarding bone metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of this study was to survey the natural history of bone metastasis in CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective, multicenter, observational study of 264 patients with CRC involving bone examined cancer treatments, bone metastases characteristics, skeletal-related event (SRE) type and frequency, zoledronic acid therapy, and disease outcomes. RESULTS Most patients with bone metastases had pathologic T3/4 disease at CRC diagnosis. The spine was the most common site involved (65%), followed by hip/pelvis (34%), long bones (26%), and other sites (17%). Median time from CRC diagnosis to bone metastases was 11.00 months; median time to first SRE thereafter was 2.00 months. Radiation and pathologic fractures affected 45% and 10% of patients, respectively; 32% of patients had no reported SREs. Patients survived for a median of 7.00 months after bone metastases diagnosis; SREs did not significantly affect survival. Subgroup analyses revealed that zoledronic acid significantly prolonged median time to first SRE (2.00 months versus 1.00 month, respectively, P=0.009) and produced a trend toward improved overall survival versus no zoledronic acid. CONCLUSION This study illustrates the burden of bone metastases from CRC and supports the use of zoledronic acid in this setting.