Roxanne Moore
Georgia Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Roxanne Moore.
design automation conference | 2011
Roxanne Moore; Christiaan J.J. Paredis
Computer models and simulations are essential system design tools that allow for improved decision making and cost reductions during all phases of the design process. However, the most accurate models tend to be computationally expensive and can therefore only be used sporadically. Consequently, designers are often forced to choose between exploring many design alternatives with less accurate, inexpensive models and evaluating fewer alternatives with the most accurate models. To achieve both broad exploration of the design space and accurate determination of the best alternatives, surrogate modeling and variable accuracy modeling are gaining in popularity. A surrogate model is a mathematically tractable approximation of a more expensive model based on a limited sampling of that model. Variable accuracy modeling involves a collection of different models of the same system with different accuracies and computational costs. We hypothesize that designers can determine the best solutions more efficiently using surrogate and variable accuracy models. This hypothesis is based on the observation that very poor solutions can be eliminated inexpensively by using only less accurate models. The most accurate models are then reserved for discerning the best solution from the set of good solutions. In this paper, a new approach for global optimization is introduced, which uses variable accuracy models in conjuction with a kriging surrogate model and a sequential sampling strategy based on a Value of Information (VOI) metric. There are two main contributions. The first is a novel surrogate modeling method that accommodates data from any number of different models of varying accuracy and cost. The proposed surrogate model is Gaussian process-based, much like classic kriging modeling approaches. However, in this new approach, the error between the model output and the unknown truth (the real world process) is explicitly accounted for. When variable accuracy data is used, the resulting response surface does not interpolate the data points but provides an approximate fit giving the most weight to the most accurate data. The second contribution is a new method for sequential sampling. Information from the current surrogate model is combined with the underlying variable accuracy models’ cost and accuracy to determine where best to sample next using the VOI metric. This metric is used to mathematically determine where next to sample and with which model. In this manner, the cost of further analysis is explicitly taken into account during the optimization process.Copyright
design automation conference | 2009
Roxanne Moore; Christiaan J.J. Paredis
Modeling, simulation, and optimization play vital roles throughout the engineering design process; however, in many design disciplines the cost of simulation is high, and designers are faced with a tradeoff between the number of alternatives that can be evaluated and the accuracy with which they are evaluated. In this paper, a methodology is presented for using models of various levels of fidelity during the optimization process. The intent is to use inexpensive, low-fidelity models with limited accuracy to recognize poor design alternatives and reserve the high-fidelity, accurate, but also expensive models only to characterize the best alternatives. Specifically, by setting a user-defined performance threshold, the optimizer can explore the design space using a low-fidelity model by default, and switch to a higher fidelity model only if the performance threshold is attained. In this manner, the high fidelity model is used only to discern the best solution from the set of good solutions, so computational resources are conserved until the optimizer is close to the solution. This makes the optimization process more efficient without sacrificing the quality of the solution. The method is illustrated by optimizing the trajectory of a hydraulic backhoe. To characterize the robustness and efficiency of the method, a design space exploration is performed using both the low and high fidelity models, and the optimization problem is solved multiple times using the variable fidelity framework.Copyright
2015 Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) | 2015
Jason Freeman; Brian Magerko; Doug Edwards; Roxanne Moore; Tom McKlin; Anna Xambó
The EarSketch computer science learning environment and curriculum (http://earsketch.gatech.edu) seeks to increase and broaden participation in computing using a STEAM (STEM + Arts) approach. EarSketch creates an authentic learning environment in that it is both personally meaningful and industry relevant in terms of its STEM component (computing) and its artistic domain (music remixing). Students learn to code in JavaScript or Python, tackling learning objectives in the Computer Science Principles curricular framework as they simultaneously learn core concepts in music technology. They create music through code by uploading their own audio content or remixing loops in popular genres created by music industry veterans. No prior experience in music or computer science is required. EarSketch is entirely browser-based and free.
Journal of Mechanical Design | 2014
Roxanne Moore; David A. Romero; Christiaan J.J. Paredis
Advances in engineering education | 2014
Craig R. Forest; Roxanne Moore; Amit Shashikant Jariwala; Barbara Burks Fasse; Julie S. Linsey; Wendy C. Newstetter; Peter Ngo; Christopher Quintero
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition | 2016
Roxanne Moore; Douglas Edwards; Jason Freeman; Brian Magerko; Tom McKlin; Anna Xambó
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition | 2016
Raghu Pucha; Tristan T. Utschig; Sunni Haag Newton; Meltem Alemdar; Roxanne Moore; Caroline R. Noyes
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition | 2013
Donna Llewellyn; Marion Usselman; Douglas Edwards; Roxanne Moore; Pratik Mital
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology | 2018
Meltem Alemdar; Roxanne Moore; Jeremy Lingle; Jeffrey H Rosen; Jessica Gale; Marion Usselman
Journal on Policy and Complex Systems | 2017
Pratik Mital; Roxanne Moore; Donna Llewellyn