Roxie M. Albrecht

Ten year experience of burn, trauma, and combined burn/trauma injuries comparing outcomes.

BACKGROUND Percent total body surface area (TBSA) burn, inhalation injury (INH), and age all have been shown to be independent predictors of mortality in burn victims. Little is known regarding patients sustaining combined thermal and mechanical injuries in relation to either injury sustained in isolation or with regard to these variables. This descriptive study profiles the 10-year experience of a single American Burn Association/American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma and burn center and the treatment of this patient population. METHODS A retrospective review of all burn and trauma patients admitted between 1990 and 2000. Patients were divided into three groups; Burn only (B), Trauma only (T), and combined Burn/Trauma (B/T). Groups were compared with respect to age, TBSA burn, length of stay (LOS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), INH and mortality. These groups were then compared with B, T and B/T patients from the National Burn Repository (NBR) and National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Students t test and chi tests were performed, as well as multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of mortality. p <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Through our trauma registry, 24,093 patients were identified (T=22,284, B=1717 and B/T=92). When comparing B and T, there was no difference in age, LOS, ISS, or mortality to those patients in the NBR or NTDB. B/T patients showed significantly increased percentage with INH (B/T=44.5% versus 11%), increased LOS (B/T=18 days versus 13.7 B and 5.3 T) and increased mortality (B/T=28.3% versus 9.8% B and 4.3% T). B/T were also significantly older (B/T=40.1 years versus 31.0 B and 35.1 T). When these variables are compared with the NBR and the NTDB benchmarks, mortality (28.3% versus 11.6% NBR and 7.0% NTDB) and ISS (23 versus 11.7 NTDB) were significantly higher with no difference in age (40.1 versus 33.4 NTDB, 35.9 NBR), LOS (18 days versus 23.3 NBR) or TBSA (20.8% versus 19.5% NBR). Multiple logistic regression comparing TBSA, age, ISS and INH of survivors versus non-survivors identified only ISS as an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION B combined with T presents a rare injury pattern that has a synergistic effect on mortality. Physicians and caregivers should be aware of a 2-3 fold increase in the incidence of INH in this population, and increased mortality despite similar TBSA burned when compared with patients with B as the sole mechanism; ISS appears to be an independent predictor of mortality in this combined injury pattern.

Directness of transport of major trauma patients to a level I trauma center: a propensity-adjusted survival analysis of the impact on short-term mortality.

BACKGROUND Whether severely injured patients should be transported directly to tertiary trauma centers, bypassing closer nontertiary facilities, or be transported first to nearby, less-specialized facilities for immediate care and stabilization has been studied with mixed findings. Differences in study locale, case mix, and variation in the structure and level of maturation of the trauma system may explain some of the discrepancy in findings. In addition, risk adjustment strategies used in these studies did not take into account prehospital baseline characteristics as well as time since injury. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,998 patients treated at a Level I trauma center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007. Propensity-adjusted survival analyses were used to compare short-term mortality outcomes in transferred versus directly transported major trauma patients. RESULTS A total of 1,398 patients were transported directly to the Level I trauma center and 600 patients were transferred from lower level facilities. After adjusting for the propensity to be transported directly, age, injury severity score, severe head injury, emergency medical service or emergency department intubation, comorbid conditions, and time to definitive Level I trauma care, the 2-week mortality risk in transferred patients was almost three-fold that of patients transported directly to a Level I trauma center (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-5.6). CONCLUSION Transferred patients in a predominantly rural region are at an increased risk of short-term mortality. This suggests that severely injured patients should be transported directly to tertiary trauma centers. For patients requiring immediate stabilization at nontertiary facilities, this should be performed promptly without unnecessary delays.

Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVES Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) transport of trauma patients has been used for decades. Its use, however, is still a subject of debate, including issues such as high costs, increasing numbers of crashes, and conflicting results regarding effectiveness in reducing mortality. The aim of this study was to examine whether mode of transport (HEMS vs. ground EMS) is independently associated with mortality among trauma patients transported directly from the scene of injury to definitive care. METHODS All trauma patients transported directly to a Level I or Level II trauma center by either air or ground EMS over a 4-year period were selected from the Oklahoma State Trauma Registry. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop propensity scores based on variables measured at the scene of injury. The propensity scores represented the predicted probabilities of a patient being transported by HEMS given a specific set of characteristics and were used as a composite confounding variable in subsequent models of the association of mortality and mode of transport. Along with the propensity scores, Injury Severity Scores (ISS), initial Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and distance from the trauma center were included in a Cox proportional hazards model of the association of mode of transport and 24-hour and 2-week mortality. RESULTS Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) for 2-week mortality in patients transported by HEMS was 33% lower (HR = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.84) than in patients transported by ground EMS from the scene of injury, after adjustment for the propensity score and other covariates. In subanalyses, the apparent association of a reduction in the hazard of early mortality among patients transported by HEMS was most evident for patients with an RTS based on injury scene vital signs of 3 to 7 (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.82). The point estimate of the HR was similar (HR = 0.65 95% CI = 0.34 to 1.2) in the 75% of cases who had normal vital signs at the scene of injury, although it was no longer statistically significant because crude mortality was very low (1.7%) in this group. Among those with a RTS of 3 or less at the scene, crude mortality was 58%, and mode of transport was not associated with mortality (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.6). CONCLUSIONS Helicopter EMS transport was associated with a decreased hazard of mortality among certain patients transported from the scene of injury directly to definitive care. Refinements in scene triage and transport guidelines are needed to more effectively select patients that may benefit from HEMS transport from those unlikely to benefit.

The use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of blunt and penetrating abdominal injuries: 10-year experience at a level 1 trauma center.

BACKGROUND Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) has decreased the rate of nontherapeutic laparotomy for patients suffering from penetrating injuries. We evaluated whether DL similarly lowers the rate of nontherapeutic laparotomy for patients with blunt injuries. METHODS All patients undergoing DL over a 10-year period (ie, 2001-2010) in a single level 1 trauma center were classified by the mechanism of injury. Demographic and perioperative data were compared using the Student t and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS There were 131 patients included, 22 of whom sustained blunt injuries. Patients suffering from blunt injuries were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 18.0 vs 7.3, P = .0001). The most common indication for DL after blunt injury was a computed tomographic scan concerning for bowel injury (59.1%). The rate of nontherapeutic laparotomy for patients sustaining penetrating vs blunt injury was 1.8% and nil, respectively. CONCLUSIONS DL, when coupled with computed tomographic findings, is an effective tool for the initial management of patients with blunt injuries.

Abdominal wall injuries occurring after blunt trauma: incidence and grading system

BACKGROUND Traumatic abdominal wall injuries (AWIs) are being increasingly recognized after blunt force injury. METHODS All available abdominal/pelvic computed axial tomography (CAT) scans of blunt trauma patients evaluated at our level I trauma center from January 2005 to August 2006 were reviewed for the presence of AWI. AWI was graded using a severity-based numeric system. AWI grade was then compared with variables from a prospectively maintained trauma registry. RESULTS Of 1,549 reviewed CAT scans, 9% showed AWI (grade I = 53%, grade II = 28%, grade III = 9%, grade IV = 8%, and grade V = 2%). There was no association between AWI and seatbelt use, Injury Severity Score, weight, or need for abdominal surgery. CONCLUSIONS AWI occurs in 9% of blunt trauma patients undergoing abdominal/pelvic CAT scans. The incidence of herniation on CAT at presentation after blunt trauma is .2%, and the incidence of patients at risk of future hernia formation is 1.5%. AWI can be effectively cataloged using a straightforward numeric grading system.

Traumatic flank hernias: acute and chronic management

BACKGROUND Traumatic flank hernias are increasingly recognized as occurring after severe blunt injury. To clarify the role and timing of operative therapy, we review here our recent experience. METHODS A prospectively maintained database at Oklahomas only level I trauma center was reviewed to identify all patients presenting with traumatic flank hernias. RESULTS During the period from July 2001 through February 2007, 25 patients (.2% of all blunt trauma patients) had traumatic flank hernias. The average age was 36.4 years (range 13 to 66), and all cases but 1 were related to motor vehicle crashes. All patients had at least 1 associated injury. Repairs were done by standardized approach. Eleven patients underwent immediate surgery; 8 underwent delayed repair; and 3 underwent late repair (range 4.5 to 10 years after injury). The other 3 patients were managed expectantly. There was 1 mortality and 3 recurrences. Length of stay for acute trauma ranged from 5 to 49 days and was dependent on the severity of associated injuries. Follow-up of 21 patients ranged from 7 to 710 days. CONCLUSIONS Traumatic flank hernias are rare but more common than previously recognized. Prompt recognition, proper timing, and technique are key to successful outcomes.

A Propensity Score Analysis of Prehospital Factors and Directness of Transport of Major Trauma Patients to a Level I Trauma Center

BACKGROUND Indications for direct transport may be strongly related to risk of future health outcomes, and these indications may not be adequately controlled by considering only in-hospital variables. This study was designed to identify prehospital factors associated with directness of transport. METHODS The study included 2,062 patients treated at a Level I trauma center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007. The outcome of interest was directness of transport to a Level I trauma center. A propensity score analysis was used to identify demographic, clinical, distance, and other injury scene-related variables associated with the probability of direct transport. RESULTS A total of 1,459 patients were directly transported to the Level I trauma center and 603 were transferred from lower level facilities. Patients were more likely to be transported directly if they had lower Glasgow Comma Scale scores, had penetrating injuries, were involved in traffic-related injuries, were closer to a Level IV or I trauma center, and if an advanced life support emergency medical service agency transported them from the scene. Patients were more likely to initially stop if they required advanced airway management, met at least one anatomic criterion, were further away from a Level I trauma center, or closer to an intermediate facility. CONCLUSIONS Confounding due to unadjusted prehospital factors may be present in studies evaluating the impact of directness of transport on short-term mortality outcomes. Propensity score analysis of treatment indications provides an additional and efficient method to reduce this bias.

Trocar Site Spigelian-type Hernia After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

A 71-year-old man with unilateral, Gleason score 7 (3 + 4), clinical Stage T1c prostate adenocarcinoma underwent bilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. On postoperative day 13, he developed a small bowel obstruction owing to incarceration of a spigelian hernia in the right lower-quadrant 8-mm trocar site. Surgical repair required small bowel resection and primary enteroenterostomy.

Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Management of pelvic fracture with hemodynamic instability—2016 updates

S ince the publication of the 2008 Western Trauma Association algorithm for the management of pelvic fracture with hemodynamic instability, the approach in general has not changed, but several components of the approach have come into sharper focus, and a new component is gaining some traction in a few centers (Fig. 1). This manuscript is an interim update to recognize some of the changes. The accompanying graphic is marked where it differs from the 2008 algorithm, and explanatory text follows. Pelvic ring injuries range from low-energy pubic ramus fractures to high-energy unstable patterns that can result in hemodynamic instability. The Young and Burgess system identified injury patterns correlating with the direction of the applied force. This classification system described four pelvic injury patterns: anterior posterior compression (APC), lateral compression (LC), vertical shear (VS), and combined injuries. LC and APC injuries are further classified into progressively numbered stages from I to III, which represent increasing displacement and severity of injury. The internal iliac vasculature and the presacral venous plexus are located just anterior to the

Initial inferior vena cava diameter on computed tomographic scan independently predicts mortality in severely injured trauma patients.

BACKGROUND In the trauma population, patients with physiologic compromise may present with “normal” vital signs. We hypothesized that the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter could be used as a surrogate marker for hypovolemic shock and predict mortality in severely injured trauma patients. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed at a Level I trauma center on 161 severely injured adult (aged ≥16 years) trauma patients who were transported from the scene and underwent abdominal computed tomography within 1 hour. Exposure of interest was dichotomously defined as having an infrarenal transverse to anteroposterior IVC ratio of ≥1.9 (flat IVC) or <1.9 (not exposed) based on the area under the curve analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Covariates included initial heart rate, systolic blood pressure, bicarbonate, base excess, creatinine, hemoglobin, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Correlation analysis between IVC ratio and other known markers of hypoperfusion was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine the independent effect of the IVC ratio on mortality. RESULTS Of the 161 patients, 30 had a flat IVC. The IVC ratio had a significant (p < 0.05) inverse correlation with initial bicarbonate, hemoglobin, and base excess and a direct correlation with Cr and ISS. After controlling for age, ISS, and presence of severe head injury, patients who had a flat IVC were 8.1 times (95% confidence interval, 1.5–42.9) more likely to die compared with the nonexposed cohort. Importantly, heart rate and systolic blood pressure had no predictive value in this patient population. CONCLUSION A flat IVC on initial abdominal computed tomographic scan has a significant correlation with other known markers of shock and is an independent predictor of mortality in severely injured trauma patients. This finding should heighten the awareness of the need for aggressive intervention and potential for physiological decompensation in patients with otherwise “normal” vital signs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level III.