Roy Colven
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Roy Colven.
Telemedicine Journal and E-health | 2011
Roy Colven; Mi Hyun Mia Shim; Doug Brock; Gail Todd
OBJECTIVE Telemedicine holds promise as a tool for improving the delivery of specialty care, especially in underserved regions, including those in South Africa. However, data that demonstrate the extent of its sustainable benefits to referring providers are currently insufficient. This study investigates whether utilization of a teledermatology network enhances the diagnostic acumen of primary care providers (PCPs) in underserved areas of South Africa. MATERIALS AND METHODS A longitudinal descriptive pilot study was conducted after establishing a telemedicine network linking University of Cape Town dermatology consultants to six providers from five underserved primary care sites using store-and-forward technology between October 2004 and January 2007. Of 120 total referrals, trend analysis was performed using 72 sets of patient histories, digital images, and corresponding consultant responses to evaluate the diagnostic concordance between six PCPs and teleconsultants over 12 consecutive referrals. RESULTS Strong positive Spearman rank-order correlations were observed between the number of referrals sent per PCP and proportion of primary diagnostic agreement with teledermatologists, rs=0.86 (p <0.001). The mean primary diagnostic concordance trend that started at 13% for the first four referrals increased nearly fourfold after referring as few as nine patients to the network. CONCLUSIONS If a simple and inexpensive teledermatology solution is carefully implemented in a resource-limited setting, an improvement of PCP diagnostic acumen can be achieved with a relatively small number of referrals. This educational benefit to referring PCPs could be sustainable and would ultimately enhance the quality of dermatological care in these underserved regions.
Telemedicine Journal and E-health | 2011
Ardith Z. Doorenbos; George Demiris; Cara Towle; Anjana Kundu; Laura Revels; Roy Colven; Thomas E. Norris; Dedra Buchwald
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a telehealth network to deliver postdiagnosis cancer care clinical services and education to American Indian and Alaska Native patients, their families, and their healthcare providers. We also sought to identify the challenges and opportunities of implementing such a telehealth-based application for this rural and underserved population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We followed a participatory formative evaluation approach to engage all stakeholders in the telehealth network design and implementation. This approach allowed us to identify and address technical and infrastructure barriers, lack of previous experience with telehealth, and political, legal, and historical challenges. RESULTS Between September 2006 and August 2009, nine tribal clinics in Washington and 26 clinical sites in Alaska had participated in the telehealth network activities. Network programming included cancer education presentations, case conferences, and cancer survivor support groups. Twenty-seven cancer education presentations were held, with a total provider attendance of 369. Forty-four case conferences were held, with a total of 129 cases discussed. In total, 513 patient encounters took place. Keys to success included gaining provider and community acceptance, working closely with respected tribal members, understanding tribal sovereignty and governance, and working in partnership with cultural liaisons. CONCLUSION The telehealth network exceeded expectations in terms of the number of participating sites and the number of patients served. Following a participatory formative evaluation approach contributed to the success of this telehealth network and demonstrated the importance of community involvement in all stages of telehealth system design and implementation.
Academic Medicine | 2002
Teresa Mann; Roy Colven
OBJECTIVE In addition to the assessment and the management of patients with skin diseases, a considerable portion of dermatology residency involves examining clinical images and generating differential diagnoses from these images. This training, though helpful for recognizing manifestations of rare disorders, goes unused by most practicing dermatologists after certification. In contrast, dermatology residents learn and master verbal descriptions of skin diseases and continue to use this skill throughout their careers. However, problems arise when a dermatologist is not available and a non-dermatologist attempts to verbally describe a skin condition. An accurate description of a cutaneous disorder can facilitate effective triage management of a patient when a dermatologist is not available. Unfortunately, an inaccurate description by the referring provider can lead to diagnostic bias and ineffective, or even harmful, initial treatment. In recent years, digital photography has facilitated the electronic transfer of clinical images over distances. However, despite the promise that this technique shows in providing teledermatologic services to specialty-underserved areas and the availability of low-cost digital cameras, telephone consultation is still the standard of care when a dermatologist is not available. The purpose of this study is to compare the reliability of dermatologic consultations that use the telephone with that of dermatologic consultations that use both the telephone and digital images. DESCRIPTION After patient approval, an acute care provider randomly assigned patients with skin disorders of unclear etiology to two groups, with and without digital images. The acute care provider then performed an exam and took the patients history. Telephone data, with or without digital images, were then presented to the consulting dermatologist, who formulated a pre-physical exam differential diagnosis and treatment plan. The consulting dermatologist immediately examined the patient in person and refined the diagnosis and management. The confidence in diagnosis, both before and after the in-person exam, was compared in the patient group with digital images and in the patient group without digital images using a five-point scale (1 = no confidence, 5 = most confident). DISCUSSION The consulting dermatologist evaluated 12 patients (six with digital images and six without digital images). In the patient group with digital images, the consulting dermatologists confidence in diagnosis varied very little from before to after the in-person exam (from no change in five cases to a one-point increase in the sixth case). In the patient group without digital images, the consulting dermatologists confidence level increased significantly from before to after the in-person exam. This led to therapy changes for three of the six patients in the patient group without digital images, versus two of the six patients in the patient group with digital images. This study indicates that an acute care providers verbal description of a skin condition may be less reliable compared with a providers verbal description combined with digital images. Telephone-only descriptions may also lead to management discrepancies more frequently than telephone descriptions with digital images. This has at least two implications for medical education: (1) need for support of formal teaching of the language of dermatology to non-dermatologists and (2) justification of the time spent in two-dimensional clinical image interpretation by dermatology residents in light of digital image technology.
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2010
Jay C. Vary; Roy Colven; Philip Kirby
REFERENCES 1. Hoerster KD, Garrow RL, Mayer JA, Clapp EJ, Weeks JR, Woodruff SI, et al. Density of indoor tanning facilities in 116 large U.S. cities. Am J Prev Med 2009;36:243-6. 2. International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on artificial ultraviolet (UV) light and skin cancer. The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 2007;120:111622. 3. Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect 2008;70(suppl 2):310. 4. Lim HW, Cyr WH, DeFabo E, Robinson J, Weinstock MA, Beer JZ, et al. Scientific and regulatory issues related to indoor tanning. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:781-4. 5. New York State Department of Health Web site. Proposed regulations for the addition of subpart 72-1 to Title 10 (tanning facilities). Available at: http://w3.health.state.ny.us/dbspace/ propregs.nsf/108a43b5127d3477852569bc006381fb/a15b016 20a950a8d852574cc00651d91?OpenDocument&Highlight 1⁄4 0, tanning. Accessed April 7, 2009. 6. Fairchild AL, Gemson DH. Safety information provided to customers of New York City suntanning salons. Am J Prev Med 1992;8:381-3. 7. Bruyneel-Rapp F, Dorsey SB, Guin JD. The tanning salon: an area survey of equipment, procedures, and practices. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18(5 part 1):1030-8. 8. Perniciaro C, Dicken CH. Tanning bed warts. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18:586-7.
Annals of Internal Medicine | 2000
Roy Colven; Robert D. Harrington; David H. Spach; Calvin Cohen; Thomas M. Hooton
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 1999
David H. Spach; Roy Colven
Dermatology Online Journal | 2008
Jonathan Olson; David T. Robles; Phil Kirby; Roy Colven
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 1998
Jo Anne Van Burik; Roy Colven; David H. Spach
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2004
Andy J. Chien; Zsolt B. Argenyi; Roy Colven; Philip Kirby
Dermatologic Clinics | 2006
Roy Colven