Roy D. Parker
Texas A&M University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Roy D. Parker.
Journal of Economic Entomology | 2013
J. Scott Armstrong; Michael J. Brewer; Roy D. Parker; John J. Adamczyk
ABSTRACT The verde plant bug, Creontiades signatus (Distant), has been present in south Texas for several years but has more recently been documented as an economic threat to cultivated cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Our studies over 2 yr (2009 and 2010) and two locations (Weslaco and Corpus Christi, TX) investigated feeding-injury of the verde plant bug to a range of cotton boll age classes defined by boll diameter and accumulated degree-days (anthesis to the time of infesting) for first-position cotton bolls infested with the plant bugs. The most detrimental damage to younger cotton bolls from verde plant bug feeding was boll abscission. Cotton bolls <04 accumulating daily degree-days (ACDD), or a boll diameter of 1.3 cm were subject to 60–70% higher boll abscission when compared with the noninfested controls. Significantly higher boll abscission occurred from verde plant bug injured bolls compared with the controls up to 162 ACDD or a mean boll diameter 2.0 cm. Cotton seed weights were significantly reduced up to 179 ACDD or a boll diameter of 2.0 cm at Weslaco in 2009, and up to 317 ACDD or boll diameter 2.6 cm for Weslaco in 2010 when compared with the noninfested controls. Lint weight per cotton boll for infested and noninfested bolls was significantly reduced up to 262 ACDD or boll diameter 2.5 for Corpus Christi in 2010 and up to 288 ACCD or boll diameter 2.6 cm for Weslaco, TX, in 2010. Damage ratings (dependant variable) regressed against infested and noninfested seed-cotton weights showed that in every instance, the infested cotton bolls had a strong and significant relationship with damage ratings for all age classes of bolls. Damage ratings for the infested cotton bolls that did not abscise by harvest showed visual signs of verde plant bug feeding injury and the subsequent development of boll rot; however, these two forms of injury causing lint and seed mass loss are hard to differentiate from open or boll-locked cotton bolls. Based on the results of both lint and seed loss over 2 yr and four studies cotton bolls should be protected up to ≈300 ACDD or a boll diameter of 2.5 cm. This equilibrates to bolls that are 12–14 d of age dependent upon daily maximum and minimum temperatures.
Journal of Economic Entomology | 2013
Michael J. Brewer; J. Scott Armstrong; Roy D. Parker
ABSTRACT The ability to monitor verde plant bug, Creontiades signatus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae), and the progression of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., boll responses to feeding and associated cotton boll rot provided opportunity to assess if single in-season measurements had value in evaluating at-harvest damage to bolls and if multiple in-season measurements enhanced their combined use. One in-season verde plant bug density measurement, three in-season plant injury measurements, and two at-harvest damage measurements were taken in 15 cotton fields in South Texas, 2010. Linear regression selected two measurements as potentially useful indicators of at-harvest damage: verde plant bug density (adjusted r 2 = 0.68; P = 0.0004) and internal boll injury of the carpel wall (adjusted r 2 = 0.72; P = 0.004). Considering use of multiple measurements, a stepwise multiple regression of the four in-season measurements selected a univariate model (verde plant bug density) using a 0.15 selection criterion (adjusted r 2 = 0.74; P = 0.0002) and a bivariate model (verde plant bug density-internal boll injury) using a 0.25 selection criterion (adjusted r 2 = 0.76; P = 0.0007) as indicators of at-harvest damage. In a validation using cultivar and water regime treatments experiencing low verde plant bug pressure in 2011 and 2012, the bivariate model performed better than models using verde plant bug density or internal boll injury separately. Overall, verde plant bug damaging cotton bolls exemplified the benefits of using multiple in-season measurements in pest monitoring programs, under the challenging situation when at-harvest damage results from a sequence of plant responses initiated by in-season insect feeding.
Archive | 1995
Roy D. Parker; Allen Knutson; Raymond L. Huffman; Christopher G. Sansone; Jim Swart
Crop Protection | 2008
Fangneng Huang; Rogers Leonard; Steven Moore; Bisong Yue; Roy D. Parker; T. E. Reagan; Michael J. Stout; Don Cook; Waseem Akbar; Charles F. Chilcutt; W. H. White; Donna R. Lee; Stephen Biles
Archive | 1982
Patrick Porter; Gregory B. Cronholm; Roy D. Parker; Noel Troxclair; Carl D. Patrick; Stephen Biles; William P. Morrison
Journal of Economic Entomology | 2006
Charles F. Chilcutt; Gary N. Odvody; J. Carlos Correa; Jeff Remmers; Roy D. Parker
Journal of Economic Entomology | 1979
J. W. Norman; J. L. Henson; Dan A. Wolfenbarger; James A. Harding; E. V. Gage; Roy D. Parker; G. Collins
Archive | 2000
Patrick Porter; Greta Schuster; Pat Morrison; Noel Toxclair; Greg Cronholm; Carl Patrick; Roy D. Parker
2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, USA, 4-8 January, 2000: Volume 2. | 2000
Roy D. Parker; E. D. T. Bethke; D. dan Fromme; P. Dugger; D. Richter
Arthropod Management Tests | 1999
Roy D. Parker; Johnnie C. Cosper; Dan D. Fromme