Roy E. Kilgard
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Roy E. Kilgard.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
Maria del Carmen Polletta; Belinda J. Wilkes; Brian D. Siana; Carol J. Lonsdale; Roy E. Kilgard; Harding E. Smith; Dong-Woo Kim; Frazer N. Owen; A. Efstathiou; T. H. Jarrett; Gordon J. Stacey; A. Franceschini; Michael Rowan-Robinson; T. Babbedge; S. Berta; F. Fang; D. Farrah; E. Gonzalez-Solares; G. Morrison; Jason A. Surace; Dave Shupe
Using the large multi-wavelength data set in the chandra/SWIRE Survey (0.6 square degrees in the Lockman Hole), we show evidence for the existence of highly obscured (Compton-thick) AGN, estimate a lower limit to their surface density and characterize their multi-wavelength properties. Two independent selection methods based on the X-ray and infrared spectral properties are presented. The two selected samples contain 1) 5 X-ray sources with hard X-ray spectra and column densities > 10^24 cm-2, and 2) 120 infrared sources with red and AGN-dominated infrared spectral energy distributions (SEDs). We estimate a surface density of at least 25 Compton-thick AGN per square degree detected in the infrared in the chandra/SWIRE field of which ~40% show distinct AGN signatures in their optical/near-infrared SEDs, the remainings being dominated by the host-galaxy emission. Only ~33% of all Compton-thick AGN are detected in the X-rays at our depth (F(0.3-8 keV)>10^-15 erg/cm2/s. We report the discovery of two sources in our sample of Compton-thick AGN, SWIRE_J104409.95+585224.8 (z=2.54) and SWIRE_J104406.30+583954.1 (z=2.43), which are the most luminous Compton-thick AGN at high-z currently known. The properties of these two sources are discussed in detail with an analysis of their spectra, SEDs, luminosities and black-hole masses.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2001
Philip Kaaret; Andrea H. Prestwich; A. Zezas; S. S. Murray; Dong-Woo Kim; Roy E. Kilgard; Eric M. Schlegel; M. Ward
We have analyzed Chandra High Resolution Camera observations of the starburst galaxy M82, concentrating on the most luminous x-ray source. We find a position for the source of
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
Andrea H. Prestwich; Roy E. Kilgard; Paul A. Crowther; S. Carpano; Andrew M. Pollock; A. Zezas; S. Saar; T. P. Roberts; M. Ward
\rm R.A. = 09^h 55^m 50^s.2, decl. = +69^{\circ} 40\arcmin 46\arcsec.7
The Astrophysical Journal | 2002
Roy E. Kilgard; Philip Kaaret; M. I. Krauss; Andrea H. Prestwich; M. T. Raley; A. Zezas
(J2000) with a
The Astrophysical Journal | 2003
Andrea H. Prestwich; Jimmy A. Irwin; Roy E. Kilgard; M. I. Krauss; A. Zezas; F. A. Primini; Philip Kaaret; Bram Seth Boroson
1\sigma
The Astrophysical Journal | 2001
Saurabh W. Jha; Michael Andrew Pahre; Peter Marcus Garnavich; Michael L. Calkins; Roy E. Kilgard; Thomas Matheson; Jonathan C. McDowell; John B. Roll; Krzysztof Zbigniew Stanek
radial error of
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2006
T. P. Roberts; Roy E. Kilgard; R. S. Warwick; Michael R. Goad; M. Ward
0.7\arcsec
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2005
Roy E. Kilgard; John J. Cowan; M. R. Garcia; Philip Kaaret; M. I. Krauss; Jonathan C. McDowell; Andrea H. Prestwich; F. A. Primini; Christopher John Stockdale; G. Trinchieri; M. Ward; A. Zezas
. The accurate x-ray position shows that the luminous source is not at the dynamical centre of M82 nor coincident with any suggested radio AGN candidate. The source is highly variable between observations, which suggests that the source is a compact object and not a supernova or remnant. There is no significant short term variability within the observations. Dynamical friction and the off-center position place an upper bound of
The Astrophysical Journal | 2005
M. I. Krauss; Roy E. Kilgard; M. R. Garcia; T. P. Roberts; Andrea H. Prestwich
10^{5} - 10^{6} M_{\odot}
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2004
L. P. Jenkins; T. P. Roberts; R. S. Warwick; Roy E. Kilgard; M. Ward
on the mass of the object, depending on its age. The x-ray luminosity suggests a compact object mass of at least