Rozanne van Donkersgoed

A manual-based individual therapy to improve metacognition in schizophrenia: protocol of a multi-center RCT

BackgroundMetacognitive dysfunction has been widely recognized as a feature of schizophrenia. As it is linked with deficits in several aspects of daily life functioning, improvement of metacognition may lead to improvement in functioning. Individual psychotherapy might be a useful form of treatment to improve metacognition in patients with schizophrenia; multiple case reports and a pilot study show promising results. The present study aims to measure the effectiveness of an individual, manual-based therapy (Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy, MERIT) in improving metacognition in patients with schizophrenia. We also want to examine if improvement in metacognitive abilities is correlated with improvements in aspects of daily life functioning namely social functioning, experience of symptoms, quality of life, depression, work readiness, insight and experience of stigma.Methods/DesignMERIT is currently evaluated in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Thirteen therapists in six mental health institutions in the Netherlands participate in this study. Patients are randomly assigned to either MERIT or the control condition: treatment as usual (TAU).DiscussionIf proven effective, MERIT can be a useful addition to the care for schizophrenia patients. The design brings along some methodological difficulties, these issues are addressed in the discussion of this paper.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN16659871.

Deficits in metacognitive capacity distinguish patients with schizophrenia from those with prolonged medical adversity

Research has suggested that many with schizophrenia experience decrements in synthetic metacognition, or the abilities to form integrated representations of oneself and others and then utilize that knowledge to respond to problems. Although such deficits have been linked with functional impairments even after controlling for symptoms and neurocognition, it is unclear to what extent these deficits can distinguish persons with schizophrenia from others experiencing significant life adversity but without psychosis. To explore this issue we conducted logistic regression analysis to determine whether assessment of metacognition could distinguish between 166 participants with schizophrenia and 51 adults with HIV after controlling for social cognition and education. Metacognition was assessed with the Metacognitive Assessment Scale Abbreviated (MAS-A), and social cognition with the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Test. We observed that the MAS-A total score was able to correctly classify 93.4% of the schizophrenia group, with higher levels of metacognition resulting in increased likelihood of accurate categorization. Additional exploratory analyses showed specific domains of metacognition measured by the MAS-A were equally able to predict membership in the schizophrenia group. Results support the assertion that deficits in the abilities to synthesize thoughts about oneself and others into larger representations are a unique feature of schizophrenia.

Practical Implications of Metacognitively Oriented Psychotherapy in Psychosis: Findings From a Pilot Study

Abstract In preparation for a multicenter randomized controlled trial, a pilot study was conducted investigating the feasibility and acceptance of a shortened version (12 vs. 40 sessions) of an individual metacognitive psychotherapy (Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy [MERIT]). Twelve participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were offered 12 sessions of MERIT. Effect sizes were calculated for changes from baseline to treatment end for metacognitive capacity measured by the Metacognition Assessment Scale—Abbreviated. Nine of twelve patients finished treatment. However, nonsignificant moderate to large effect sizes were obtained on the primary outcome measure. This study is among the first to suggest that patients with schizophrenia will accept metacognitive therapy and evidence improvements in metacognitive capacity. Despite limitations typical to a pilot study, including a small sample size and lack of a control group, sufficient evidence of efficacy was obtained to warrant further investigation.

Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) With a Patient With Severe Symptoms of Disorganization

One recent development within the realm of psychotherapeutic interventions for schizophrenia has been a shift in focus from symptom management to consideration of metacognition, or the processes by which people synthesize information about themselves and others in an integrated manner. One such approach, metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT); in particular, offers a description of 8 therapeutic activities that should occur in each session, resulting in the stimulation and growth of metacognitive capacity. In this report, we present a description of 12 sessions with a patient suffering from schizophrenia manifesting significantly disorganized symptoms. Each MERIT element is described along with observed clinical and metacognitive gains. As illustrated in this report, these procedures helped the patient move from a state of having no complex ideas about himself or others, to one in which he could begin to develop integrated and realistic ideas about himself and others and use that capacity to think about life challenges.

F105. MEASURING EMPATHY IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: THE EMPATHIC ACCURACY TASK AND ITS CORRELATION WITH OTHER EMPATHY MEASURES

Abstract Background Empathy is a complex interpersonal process thought to be impaired in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Past studies have mainly used questionnaires or performance-based tasks with static cues to measure cognitive and affective empathy. In contrast, we used an Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) designed to capture the more dynamic aspects of empathy by using video clips in which perceivers continuously judge emotionally charged stories of various targets. We compared individuals with schizophrenia to healthy controls on the EAT and assessed correlations among the EAT and three other commonly used empathy tasks. Methods Patients (n=92) and healthy controls (n=42) matched for age and education, completed the EAT, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and the Faux Pas task. Differences between groups were analyzed and correlations were calculated between empathy measurement instruments. Results The groups differed in EAT performance, with controls outperforming patients. A moderating effect was found for the emotional expressivity of the target: while both patients and controls scored low when judging targets with low expressivity, controls performed better than patients with more expressive targets. Though there were also group differences on the cognitive and affective empathy questionnaires (with lower scores for patients in comparison to controls), EAT performance did not correlate with questionnaire scores. Reduced empathy performance did not seem to be part of a generalized cognitive deficit, as differences between patients and controls on general cognition was not significant. Discussion Individuals with schizophrenia benefit less from the emotional expressivity of other people than controls, which contributes to their impaired empathic accuracy. The lack of correlation between the EAT and the questionnaires suggests a distinction between self-report empathy and actual empathy performance. To explore empathic difficulties in real life, it is important to use instruments that take the interpersonal perspective into account.

F50. METACOGNITIVE REFLECTION AND INSIGHT THERAPY: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background Difficulties in metacognition, or the ability to think about thinking and feeling, form an impediment to daily life functioning for persons with a psychotic disorder. In the past years, our research team has undertaken a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of a new intervention designed to assist persons with a psychotic disorder to improve their metacognitive functioning (Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy; MERIT). Methods After training thirteen therapists from seven mental healthcare institutes in the Netherlands, participants (n=70) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included and randomized into either the MERIT condition or a treatment-as-usual condition. Persons randomized into the MERIT condition received 40 sessions of metacognitive psychotherapy, while persons in the control condition received care as usual. Measures of primary outcome (metacognition), secondary outcomes (empathy, depression, insight, stigma, social functioning, symptoms and quality of life) and control variables (neurocognition, premorbid IQ) were collected at baseline (pre), directly after therapy end (post) and at 6-month follow-up. After the follow-up measurement, research assistants were unblinded in order to conduct an interview with the participants regarding their experience of the therapy. Results Multilevel intention-to-treat and sensitivity analyses demonstrated that in both groups metacognition had improved, with no significant differences between the groups (χ2 (1)=0.435, p=.51). At 6-month follow-up, however, participants in the MERIT condition demonstrated they had continued to improve on metacognition, while scores from the control condition dipped back down (χ2 (1)=3.763, p=.05). Gains mainly seemed to be on metacognitive Self-Reflectivity (χ2 (1)=10.295, p=.001). No effects were found on secondary measures in either condition. Discussion During this presentation, we will discuss our findings and the therapy protocol, including a discussion of the clinical relevance of the current intervention, analysis of post-therapy interviews surrounding the participant’s experiences of the therapy, as well as practical limitations that were encountered during this five-year trial. Note S. de Jong (speaker) and R.J.M van Donkersgoed are early career scientists, expected to defend their dissertations in 2018.

Social-cognitive risk factors for violence in psychosis : A discriminant function analysis

It has been proposed that mixed findings in studies investigating social cognition as a risk factor for violence in psychosis may be explained by utilizing a framework distinguishing between social-cognitive tests which measure relatively more basic operations (e.g. facial affect recognition) and measures of more complex operations (mentalizing, metacognition). The current study investigated which social cognitive and metacognitive processes are related to a violent history over and above illness-related deficits. Data from control participants (n = 33), patients with a psychotic disorder and no violent history (n = 27), and patients with a psychotic disorder in a forensic clinic (n = 23) were analyzed utilizing discriminant analysis. Metacognition and associative learning emerged as significant factors in predicting group membership between the three groups. In a follow-up analysis between only the patient groups, metacognitive Self-Reflectivity and Empathic Accuracy emerged as statistically significant predictors of group membership. The control group presented with higher levels of social cognitive and metacognitive capacity than patient groups, and the forensic patient group had lower levels than the non-forensic patient group. Our findings support previous research findings implying impaired metacognitive Self-Reflectivity in particular as a risk factor for violence.