Rozemarijn van der Ploeg
University of Groningen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rozemarijn van der Ploeg.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology | 2015
Beau Oldenburg; Marijtje van Duijn; Miranda Sentse; Gijs Huitsing; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; Christina Salmivalli; René Veenstra
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools. We used data of 3,385 elementary school students (M age = 9.8) and 139 of their teachers (M age = 43.9) and employed Poisson regression analyses to explain the classroom victimization rate. Results showed a higher victimization rate in the classrooms of teachers who attributed bullying to external factors—factors outside of their control. In addition, the results suggest that both teachers’ perceived ability to handle bullying among students and teachers’ own bullying history were positively associated with the classroom victimization rate. We also took into account classroom composition characteristics and found lower victimization rates in multi-grade classrooms and in classrooms with older students. The results support the notion of an association between teacher characteristics and peer victimization. Findings are discussed with regards to current literature and suggestions for future research are made.
Educational Research | 2016
Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; Christian Steglich; René Veenstra
Abstract Background: School bullying is a wide-spread problem with severe consequences for victims, bullies and bystanders. Schools are strongly encouraged to implement both schoolwide, preventive interventions and reactive measures to handle existing bullying situations. In the Dutch implementation of the KiVa anti-bullying programme, pervasive-bullying situations are addressed according to the support group approach. The support group approach is widely used for addressing bullying situations, but little is known about its effectiveness. Purpose: We investigated the effectiveness of the support group approach in reducing victimisation, increasing defending and improving the victim’s well-being over the course of a school year, over and beyond of the effects of the universal KiVa intervention. Programme description: The support group approach is a non-punitive, problem-solving strategy to address pervasive-bullying situations. In this intervention, trained teachers form a support group that consists of 6–8 children, including the bullies and their assistants, defenders or friends of the victim and prosocial classmates. The purpose of the support group is to create mutual concern for the well-being of the victim and to trigger the bullies’ willingness to alter their behaviour. Sample: We used data from 66 Dutch elementary schools that participated in the KiVa intervention study. Data were collected in October 2012 and 2013, and May 2013 and 2014. The sample used in the analyses consisted of 38 victims for whom a support group intervention was organised (44.7% boy, Mage = 9.24; SDage = 1.20). Design and method: To get insight into the effects above and beyond those of the KiVa programme itself, victims with a support group (N = 38) were matched to similar victims without a support group (N = 571). Statistical analyses were undertaken to examine whether the changes in victimisation, defending and well-being at school differed between the two groups. Result: Victims reported positive effects of the support group approach in reducing victimisation in the short term, but this decrease in victimisation was not lasting over the course of a school year. The intervention also did not improve the victims’ well-being at school in the longer term. Victims with a support group, however, were found to have more defenders at the end of the school year than victims without a support group. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the support group approach in tackling bullying situations appears to fade over time. The findings of this study illustrate that for future evaluations of anti-bullying interventions it is essential to investigate longer term effects.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research | 2013
Hanneke van den Akker; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; P.L.H. Scheepers
PLOS ONE | 2015
Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; Christian Steglich; Christina Salmivalli; René Veenstra
Journal of School Psychology | 2017
Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; Tina Kretschmer; Christina Salmivalli; René Veenstra
Kind En Adolescent Praktijk | 2013
René Veenstra; Gijs Huitsing; René Koens; Femke Munniksma; Beau Oldenburg; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; Miranda Sentse; Freek Velthausz
Journal of International Migration and Integration | 2016
Mérove Gijsberts; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg
International Psychiatry | 2013
H.M. van den Akker; J. Blaauw; Marcel Lubbers; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; P.L.H. Scheepers; E. Verbakel
Archive | 2018
J.M. Buil; Bram Orobio de Castro; Saskia Mulder; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; Simone Onrust; Yvonne van der Berg; Sabine Stoltz; Inge de Wit; Laurie Buitenhuis; Toon Cillessen; René Veenstra; P.A.C. van Lier; Maja Deković; Ron Scholte
Schooljournaal | 2016
Rozemarijn van der Ploeg