Ruediger Bachmann
RWTH Aachen University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ruediger Bachmann.
2006 Meeting Papers | 2006
Ruediger Bachmann; Eduardo Engel; Ricardo J. Caballero
Microeconomic lumpiness matters for macroeconomics. According to our DSGE model, it explains roughly 60% of the smoothing in the investment response to aggregate shocks. The remaining 40% is explained by general equilibrium forces. The central role played by micro frictions for aggregate dynamics results in important history dependence in business cycles. In particular, booms feed into themselves. The longer an expansion, the larger the response of investment to an additional positive shock. Conversely, a slowdown after a boom can lead to a long lasting investment slump, which is unresponsive to policy stimuli. Such dynamics are consistent with US investment patterns over the last decade. More broadly, over the 1960-2000 sample, the initial response of investment to a productivity shock with responses in the top quartile is 60% higher than the average response in the bottom quartile. Furthermore, the reduction in the relative importance of general equilibrium forces for aggregate investment dynamics also facilitates matching conventional RBC moments for consumption and employment.
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2013
Ruediger Bachmann; Peter Zorn
The ifo Investment Survey asks firms in the German manufacturing sector about the importance of sales, technological factors, finance, return expectations, and macroeconomic policy for their investment activity in a given year. We show that these subjective investment determinants 1) capture economically what their labels suggest, and 2) have strong explanatory power for aggregate manufacturing investment growth fluctuations. In a second step, we use these determinants to identify aggregate demand and aggregate technology shocks and argue that the bulk of the variance of both aggregate manufacturing investment and output growth fluctuations (as much as approximately two thirds in both cases) is explained by aggregate demand shocks. Consistent with neoclassical views, however, technological factors are the most important investment determinant on average.
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics | 2013
Ruediger Bachmann; Steffen Elstner; Eric R. Sims
Journal of Monetary Economics | 2012
Ruediger Bachmann; Eric R. Sims
Journal of Monetary Economics | 2013
Ruediger Bachmann; Christian Bayer
2011 Meeting Papers | 2011
Ruediger Bachmann; Giuseppe Moscarini
2009 Meeting Papers | 2009
Ruediger Bachmann; Christian Bayer
2009 Meeting Papers | 2009
Ruediger Bachmann; Christian Bayer
The American Economic Review | 2014
Ruediger Bachmann; Christian Bayer
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy | 2015
Ruediger Bachmann; Tim Oliver Berg; Eric R. Sims