Ruediger Spitz

Localized infant neuroblastomas often show spontaneous regression: results of the prospective trials NB95-S and NB97.

PURPOSE The excellent prognosis of localized neuroblastoma in infants, the overdiagnosis observed in neuroblastoma screening studies, and several case reports of regression of localized neuroblastoma prompted us to initiate a prospective cooperative trial on observation of localized neuroblastoma without cytotoxic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS For infants with localized neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification, chemotherapy was scheduled only in cases with threatening symptoms; otherwise, the tumor was either resected or observed by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS Of 340 eligible participants, 190 underwent resection, 57 were treated with chemotherapy, and 93 were observed with gross residual tumor. Of those 93 patients with unresected tumors, spontaneous regression was seen in 44, local progression in 28, progression to stage 4S in seven, and progression to stage 4 in four. Time to regression was quite variable, with first signs of regression noted 1 to 18 months after diagnosis and in 15 of 44 patients even after the first year of life. So far, complete regression was observed in 17 of 44 patients 4 to 20 months after diagnosis. Known clinical risk factors were not able to differentiate between patients with regression and regional or metastatic progression. Overall survival (OS; 3-year OS, 0.99 +/- 0.01) and metastases-free survival (rate at 3 years, 0.94 +/- 0.03) for patients with unresected tumors was excellent and was not different from patients treated with surgery or chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Spontaneous regression is regularly seen in infants with localized neuroblastoma and is not limited to the first year of life. A wait-and-see strategy is justified in those patients.

Oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) of 90 neuroblastomas reveals aberration patterns closely associated with relapse pattern and outcome.

The study of genomic alterations in neuroblastoma is of particular importance since several cytogenetic markers proved to be closely associated with the clinical phenotype. To disclose patterns of gains and losses, we performed high‐resolution oligonucleotide array‐based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). A total cohort of 90 patients was classified into 6 subsets according to tumor stage and outcome: Stages 1‐3+ (with event), Stage 1‐3− (no event), Stage 4+/−, and Stage 4S+/−. The aberration patterns in Stages 1‐3− and 4S− tumors differed from all other groups as they were predominantly characterized by losses (3, 4, 14, X) and gains (7, 17) of whole chromosomes. However, 59/65 (91%) tumors of Stages 1‐3+ or Stage 4 revealed numerous structural copy number alterations (sCNA). While deletions in chromosomes 1, 3, and 11 discriminated outcome in Stage 4, there were no specific sCNA that distinguished tumor stage within the subgroup of unfavorable tumors. sCNA in 1p, 3p, 11q, 17q, or MYCN amplification (MNA) was seen among 22/24 patients who died, 10/12 with metastatic relapses, and 5/9 with local recurrences. Detailed breakpoint analyses on chromosomes 1, 3, 11, and 17 disclosed preferred breaking areas, although breakpoints were not identical. Amplifications were found in 18 patients and involved 2p24 (MYCN) and other segments of chromosome 2, as well as regions on chromosome arms 6q, 12q, and 17q. One single feature in 21q21.1 (BU678720, without known function yet) attracted particular attention since five patients showed a homozygous loss of this sequence.

Loss in Chromosome 11q Identifies Tumors with Increased Risk for Metastatic Relapses in Localized and 4S Neuroblastoma

Purpose: To improve risk prediction in neuroblastoma and to specify the type of a possible relapse, alterations in the long arm of chromosome 11 were analyzed. Experimental Design: A representative cohort of 611 neuroblastomas was investigated for deletion events in distal chromosome 11q using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: Alterations in 11q were found in 159 of 611 tumors in the whole cohort (26%) and were associated with stage 4 disease (P < 0.001) and age at diagnosis of >2.5 years (P < 0.001). Event-free survival and overall survival were significantly poorer for patients with 11q loss in the whole cohort (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001) and in different subsets: neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification (MNA) (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001), with MNA (event-free survival, P = 0.03; overall survival, P = 0.02), and MYCN-nonamplified stage 1, 2, 3, and 4S tumors with and without del 1p (event-free survival and overall survival, P < 0.001). In stage 4, the 11q status did not discriminate outcome. By multivariate analysis, the 11q status proved prognostic for event-free survival in the whole cohort (P = 0.008; hazard ratio, 1.573) and in the subgroup of stages 1, 2, 3, and 4S without MNA (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 3.534). Moreover, 11q alterations were strongly correlated with the occurrence of metastatic relapses (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In addition to the current risk stratification, the status of 11q enables the identification of patients with an increased risk for relapses in general and metastatic relapses in particular.

Heterogeneity of the MYCN Oncogene in Neuroblastoma

Purpose:MYCN amplification is an important therapy-stratifying marker in neuroblastoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with signal detection on the single-cell level allows a critical judgement of MYCN intratumoral heterogeneity. Experimental Design: The MYCN status was investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization at diagnosis and relapse. Heterogeneity was defined as the simultaneous presence of amplified cells (≥5 cells per slide) and nonamplified cells within one tumor or sequential change of the amplification status during the course of the disease. Likewise, heterogeneity can be detected between primary tumor and metastasis. Results: From 1,341 patients analyzed, 1,071 showed no amplification, 250 showed homogeneous amplification, and 20 patients showed MYCN heterogeneity. Of the patients with heterogeneity, 12 of 20 had clusters of MYCN amplifications, 3 of 20 had amplified single cells, 3 of 20 showed MYCN amplifications in the bone marrow but not in the primary tumor, and 2 of 20 acquired MYCN amplification during the course of the disease. All stage 4 patients were treated according to high-risk protocols; 7 of 8 later progressed. Four patients with localized disease were treated according to high-risk protocol because of MYCN-amplified clusters; 1 of 4 later progressed. One patient treated with mild chemotherapy experienced progression. Seven patients with localized/4S disease underwent no chemotherapy: 4 of 5 patients with MYCN heterogeneity at diagnosis remained disease-free, and 1 of 5 experienced local progression. Two patients had normal MYCN status at diagnosis but acquired MYCN amplification during the course of the disease. Conclusion:MYCN heterogeneity is rare. Our results suggest that small amounts of MYCN-amplified cells are not correlated to adverse outcomes. More patients with heterogeneity are warranted to clarify the role of MYCN heterogeneity for risk classification.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of chromosome band 1p36 in neuroblastoma detect two classes of alterations.

Chromosomal alterations in 1p36 were investigated in 196 neuroblastoma tumors using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Additionally, by using the same technique, it was determined whether MYCN was amplified in 149 of these. The most frequent finding was a deletion in 1p36, leading to monosomy of this region (29 cases, 15%). Furthermore, we found tumors with at least two intact copies of chromosome 1 and additional 1p36‐deleted copies. Altogether, 21 tumors (11%) displayed this imbalance of 1p36. Similar to the cases with deletion, imbalances were predominantly found in stage 4 tumors (81%), and they were significantly associated with an increased patient age (P = 0.01). Nearly all 1p‐deleted tumors showed amplification of MYCN (24/27 analyzed samples, 89%), whereas only 8 of 21 (38%) with imbalance did. Eight cases with imbalance were investigated for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using microsatellite markers in 1p35–36. Only 4 displayed 1p36 LOH, whereas the remaining 4 were heterozygous. Both patients with deletion of 1p and with imbalance had a poor outcome [3‐year rate of event‐free‐survival (EFS): 33±15% and 41±15%], which was significantly worse compared to the outcome of patients without 1p alterations (3‐year EFS: 70±5%; P = 0.01 and P = 0.0059). We conclude that besides monosomic short arm deletions, imbalance of 1p36 is a strong marker of a poor prognosis in neuroblastoma and not necessarily associated with MYCN amplification and LOH.

Integrated genomic profiling identifies two distinct molecular subtypes with divergent outcome in neuroblastoma with loss of chromosome 11q.

Imbalances in chromosome 11q occur in approximately 30% of primary neuroblastoma and are associated with poor outcome. It has been suggested that 11q loss constitutes a distinct clinico-genetic neuroblastoma subgroup by affecting expression levels of corresponding genes. This study analysed the relationship of 11q loss, clinical phenotype and global transcriptomic profiles in four clinico-genetic subgroups (11q alteration/favourable outcome, n=7; 11q alteration/unfavourable outcome, n=14; no 11q alteration/favourable outcome, n=81; no 11q alteration/unfavourable outcome, n=8; tumours with MYCN amplification and/or 1p loss were excluded). Unsupervised and supervised comparisons of gene expression profiles consistently showed significantly different mRNA patterns between favourable and unfavourable neuroblastomas, both in the subgroups with and without 11q loss. In contrast, favourable tumours with and without 11q loss showed highly similar transcriptomic profiles. Disproportionate downregulation of 11q genes was observed only in unfavourable tumours with 11q loss. The diverging molecular profiles were neither caused by considerable differences in the size of the deleted regions nor by differential methylation patterns of 11q genes. Together, this study shows that neuroblastoma with 11q loss comprises two biological subgroups that differ both in their clinical phenotype and gene expression patterns, indicating that 11q loss is not a primary determinant of neuroblastoma tumour behaviour.

Chromosome 17/17q gain and unaltered profiles in high resolution array-CGH are prognostically informative in neuroblastoma.

The prognostic relevance of chromosome 17 gain in neuroblastoma is still discussed. This investigation specifies the frequency, type, size, and transcriptional relevance in a large patient cohort. Primary tumor material of 202 patients was analyzed using high‐resolution oligonucleotide array‐based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and correlated with clinical and survival data. A subset (n = 145) was correlated for differentially expressed genes (DEG) by microarray analysis. Chromosome 17 aCGH analysis showed numerical gain in 94/202 patients (47%), partial gain in 93/202 patients (46%), and no gain in 15/202 patients (7%). The frequency of partial gain was higher in stage 4 neuroblastoma (stage 1 15%; stage 2 12%; stage 3 16%; stage 4S 7%; and stage 4 50%). Overall survival (OS) was superior in patients with numerical gain compared with patients with partial gain or no gain (5‐y‐OS: 0.95 ± 0.02 vs. 0.63 ± 0.05 vs. 0.60 ± 0.13; P < 0.001). Gene expression analysis demonstrated 95/130 DEGs between tumors with numerical or partial chromosome/no gain. Only one DEG (CCKBR) was detected comparing tumors with partial gain and those with no gain. In patients with partial gain, the distribution of breakpoints did not correlate with stage and 11q status, but with MYCN amplification and 1p status. The “best” breakpoints in cases with partial 17q gain were at 42.5 Mb for event‐free and 26.6 Mb for OS. Numerical gain of chromosome 17 is associated with a better prognosis than partial and no gain. The group of tumors with partial gain was similar to the group without gain with respect to stage distribution, outcome, and gene expression profile.

Quantitative real-time PCR for quick simultaneous determination of therapy-stratifying markers MYCN amplification, deletion 1p and 11q.

Amplification of the oncogene MYCN as well as deletions in 1p and 11q are important prognostic and in part therapy-stratifying factors in human neuroblastoma. Due to the increasing clinical relevance of these molecular markers, accurate and fast assessment of the status of MYCN, 1p, and 11q is essential. As 2 techniques are recommended to avoid artefacts and to circumvent technical limitations, we developed a real-time q-PCR assay using genomic DNA from frozen and paraffin-embedded tissue as template as an alternative to LOH analyses and Southern blot (SB) and in addition to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Determination of deletion or amplification was achieved by comparing the copy number of a target gene (TG from the region of interest) to an unaffected reference gene (RG) within the same chromosome. PCR raw data were normalized to a serial dilution standard curve and a ratio TG/RG was created. The ratio to define a deletion was set as 0.5 (= expected ratio 1 TG copy/2 RG copies), the amplification threshold was set as >10.0. Data were compared to results obtained by FISH and were consistent in 10 of 13 (77%) tumors with deletion 1p, 18 of 20 (90%) with deletion 11q, 12 of 12 (100%) with MYCN amplification, and 146 of 151 (97%) samples without any aberration. Three tumors with aberrations in 1p and 2 tumors with aberrations in 11q were detectable by FISH but not by PCR. Three cases indicated a deletion 11q, 1 tumor a deletion 1p by PCR only. Specificity was 98% for 1p and MYCN each and 92% for 11q. Sensitivity was 77% for 1p, 90% for 11q, and 100% for MYCN. The discrepant results were mostly caused by heterogeneous cell populations of the investigated tissue; the use of real-time q-PCR for the detection of chromosomal aberrances in NB enables a fast and reliable assessment of the 3 most relevant chromosomal aberrations simultaneously. As the assay does not require reference tissue, can be performed with small amounts of DNA, and allows the investigation of paraffin-embedded material for the MYCN-status, it can be regarded alternative to LOH or SB analyses and in addition to FISH.