Rui Gonçalo Martinho

Analysis of Rad3 and Chk1 protein kinases defines different checkpoint responses.

Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage and S phase replication blocks by arresting cell‐cycle progression through the DNA structure checkpoint pathways. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the Chk1 kinase is essential for mitotic arrest and is phosphorylated after DNA damage. During S phase, the Cds1 kinase is activated in response to DNA damage and DNA replication blocks. The response of both Chk1 and Cds1 requires the six ‘checkpoint Rad’ proteins (Rad1, Rad3, Rad9, Rad17, Rad26 and Hus1). We demonstrate that DNA damage‐dependent phosphorylation of Chk1 is also cell‐cycle specific, occurring primarily in late S phase and G2, but not during M/G1 or early S phase. We have also isolated and characterized a temperature‐sensitive allele of rad3. Rad3 functions differently depending on which checkpoint pathway is activated. Following DNA damage, rad3 is required to initiate but not maintain the Chk1 response. When DNA replication is inhibited, rad3 is required for both initiation and maintenance of the Cds1 response. We have identified a strong genetic interaction between rad3 and cds1, and biochemical evidence shows a physical interaction is possible between Rad3 and Cds1, and between Rad3 and Chk1 in vitro. Together, our results highlight the cell‐cycle specificity of the DNA structure‐dependent checkpoint response and identify distinct roles for Rad3 in the different checkpoint responses.

A Noncoding RNA Is Required for the Repression of RNApolII-Dependent Transcription in Primordial Germ Cells

RNApolII-dependent transcription is repressed in primordial germ cells of many animals during early development and is thought to be important for maintenance of germline fate by preventing somatic differentiation. Germ cell transcriptional repression occurs concurrently with inhibition of phosphorylation in the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNApolII, as well as with chromatin remodeling. The precise mechanisms involved are unknown. Here, we present evidence that a noncoding RNA transcribed by the gene polar granule component (pgc) regulates transcriptional repression in Drosophila germ cells. Germ cells lacking pgc RNA express genes important for differentiation of nearby somatic cells and show premature phosphorylation of RNApolII. We further show that germ cells lacking pgc show increased levels of K4, but not K9 histone H3 methylation, and that the chromatin remodeling Swi/Snf complex is required for a second stage in germ cell transcriptional repression. We propose that a noncoding RNA controls transcription in early germ cells by blocking the transition from preinitiation to transcriptional elongation. We further show that repression of somatic differentiation signals mediated by the Torso receptor-tyrosine kinase is important for germline development.

NatF Contributes to an Evolutionary Shift in Protein N-Terminal Acetylation and Is Important for Normal Chromosome Segregation

N-terminal acetylation (N-Ac) is a highly abundant eukaryotic protein modification. Proteomics revealed a significant increase in the occurrence of N-Ac from lower to higher eukaryotes, but evidence explaining the underlying molecular mechanism(s) is currently lacking. We first analysed protein N-termini and their acetylation degrees, suggesting that evolution of substrates is not a major cause for the evolutionary shift in N-Ac. Further, we investigated the presence of putative N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs) in higher eukaryotes. The purified recombinant human and Drosophila homologues of a novel NAT candidate was subjected to in vitro peptide library acetylation assays. This provided evidence for its NAT activity targeting Met-Lys- and other Met-starting protein N-termini, and the enzyme was termed Naa60p and its activity NatF. Its in vivo activity was investigated by ectopically expressing human Naa60p in yeast followed by N-terminal COFRADIC analyses. hNaa60p acetylated distinct Met-starting yeast protein N-termini and increased general acetylation levels, thereby altering yeast in vivo acetylation patterns towards those of higher eukaryotes. Further, its activity in human cells was verified by overexpression and knockdown of hNAA60 followed by N-terminal COFRADIC. NatFs cellular impact was demonstrated in Drosophila cells where NAA60 knockdown induced chromosomal segregation defects. In summary, our study revealed a novel major protein modifier contributing to the evolution of N-Ac, redundancy among NATs, and an essential regulator of normal chromosome segregation. With the characterization of NatF, the co-translational N-Ac machinery appears complete since all the major substrate groups in eukaryotes are accounted for.

Cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerases mediate cellular responses to S phase arrest

The S–M checkpoint delays mitosis until DNA replication is complete; cells defective in this checkpoint lose viability when DNA replication is inhibited. This inviability can be suppressed in fission yeast by overexpression of Cid1 or the related protein Cid13. Fission yeast contain six cid1/cid13-like genes, whereas budding yeast has just two, TRF4 and TRF5. Trf4 and Trf5 were recently reported to comprise an essential DNA polymerase activity required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. In contrast, we find that Cid1 is not a DNA polymerase but instead uses RNA substrates and has poly(A) polymerase activity. Unlike the previously characterized yeast poly(A) polymerase, which is a nuclear enzyme, Cid1 and Cid13 are constitutively cytoplasmic. Cid1 has a degree of substrate specificity in vitro, consistent with the notion that it targets a subset of cytoplasmic mRNAs for polyadenylation in vivo, hence increasing their stability and/or efficiency of translation. Preferred Cid1 targets presumably include mRNAs encoding components of the S–M checkpoint, whereas Cid13 targets are likely to be involved in dNTP metabolism. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation is known to be an important regulatory mechanism during early development in animals. Our findings in yeast suggest that this level of gene regulation is of more general significance in eukaryotic cells.

Drosophila aPKC is required for mitotic spindle orientation during symmetric division of epithelial cells.

Epithelial cells mostly orient the spindle along the plane of the epithelium (planar orientation) for mitosis to produce two identical daughter cells. The correct orientation of the spindle relies on the interaction between cortical polarity components and astral microtubules. Recent studies in mammalian tissue culture cells suggest that the apically localised atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is important for the planar orientation of the mitotic spindle in dividing epithelial cells. Yet, in chicken neuroepithelial cells, aPKC is not required in vivo for spindle orientation, and it has been proposed that the polarization cues vary between different epithelial cell types and/or developmental processes. In order to investigate whether Drosophila aPKC is required for spindle orientation during symmetric division of epithelial cells, we took advantage of a previously isolated temperature-sensitive allele of aPKC. We showed that Drosophila aPKC is required in vivo for spindle planar orientation and apical exclusion of Pins (Raps). This suggests that the cortical cues necessary for spindle orientation are not only conserved between Drosophila and mammalian cells, but are also similar to those required for spindle apicobasal orientation during asymmetric cell division.

Differential requirements of a mitotic acetyltransferase in somatic and germ line cells

During mitosis different types of cells can have differential requirements for chromosome segregation. We isolated two new alleles of the separation anxiety gene (san). san was previously described in both Drosophila and in humans to be required for centromeric sister chromatid cohesion (Hou et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2003). Our work confirms and expands the observation that san is required in vivo for normal mitosis of different types of somatic cells. In addition, we suggest that san is also important for the correct resolution of chromosomes, implying a more general function of this acetyltransferase. Surprisingly, during oogenesis we cannot detect mitotic defects in germ line cells mutant for san. We hypothesize the female germ line stem cells have differential requirements for mitotic sister chromatid cohesion.

Requirement for highly efficient pre-mRNA splicing during Drosophila early embryonic development

Drosophila syncytial nuclear divisions limit transcription unit size of early zygotic genes. As mitosis inhibits not only transcription, but also pre-mRNA splicing, we reasoned that constraints on splicing were likely to exist in the early embryo, being splicing avoidance a possible explanation why most early zygotic genes are intronless. We isolated two mutant alleles for a subunit of the NTC/Prp19 complexes, which specifically impaired pre-mRNA splicing of early zygotic but not maternally encoded transcripts. We hypothesized that the requirements for pre-mRNA splicing efficiency were likely to vary during development. Ectopic maternal expression of an early zygotic pre-mRNA was sufficient to suppress its splicing defects in the mutant background. Furthermore, a small early zygotic transcript with multiple introns was poorly spliced in wild-type embryos. Our findings demonstrate for the first time the existence of a developmental pre-requisite for highly efficient splicing during Drosophila early embryonic development and suggest in highly proliferative tissues a need for coordination between cell cycle and gene architecture to ensure correct gene expression and avoid abnormally processed transcripts. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02181.001

Developmental roles of protein N-terminal acetylation

Discovered more than 50 years ago, N‐terminal acetylation (N‐Ac) is one of the most common protein modifications. Catalyzed by different N‐terminal acetyltransferases (NATs), N‐Ac was originally believed to mostly promote protein stability. However, several functional consequences at substrate level were recently described that yielded important new insights about the distinct molecular functions for this modification. The ubiquitous and apparent irreversible nature of this protein modification leads to the assumption that N‐Ac mostly executes constitutive functions. In spite of the large number of substrates for each NAT, recent studies in multicellular organisms have nevertheless indicated very specific phenotypes after NAT loss. This raises the hypothesis that in vivo N‐Ac is only functionally rate limiting for a small subset of substrates. In this review, we will discuss the function of N‐Ac in the context of a developing organism. We will propose that some rate limiting NAT substrates may be tissue‐specific leading to differential functions of N‐Ac during development of multicellular organisms. Moreover, we will also propose the existence of tissue and developmental‐specific mechanisms that differentially regulate N‐Ac.

Absence of N-terminal acetyltransferase diversification during evolution of eukaryotic organisms

Protein N-terminal acetylation is an ancient and ubiquitous co-translational modification catalyzed by a highly conserved family of N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs). Prokaryotes have at least 3 NATs, whereas humans have six distinct but highly conserved NATs, suggesting an increase in regulatory complexity of this modification during eukaryotic evolution. Despite this, and against our initial expectations, we determined that NAT diversification did not occur in the eukaryotes, as all six major human NATs were most likely present in the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA). Furthermore, we also observed that some NATs were actually secondarily lost during evolution of major eukaryotic lineages; therefore, the increased complexity of the higher eukaryotic proteome occurred without a concomitant diversification of NAT complexes.

Early programming of the oocyte epigenome temporally controls late prophase I transcription and chromatin remodelling

Oocytes are arrested for long periods of time in the prophase of the first meiotic division (prophase I). As chromosome condensation poses significant constraints to gene expression, the mechanisms regulating transcriptional activity in the prophase I-arrested oocyte are still not entirely understood. We hypothesized that gene expression during the prophase I arrest is primarily epigenetically regulated. Here we comprehensively define the Drosophila female germ line epigenome throughout oogenesis and show that the oocyte has a unique, dynamic and remarkably diversified epigenome characterized by the presence of both euchromatic and heterochromatic marks. We observed that the perturbation of the oocytes epigenome in early oogenesis, through depletion of the dKDM5 histone demethylase, results in the temporal deregulation of meiotic transcription and affects female fertility. Taken together, our results indicate that the early programming of the oocyte epigenome primes meiotic chromatin for subsequent functions in late prophase I.