Ruipeng Zhang

Negative-pressure therapy versus conventional therapy on split-thickness skin graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical outcomes of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus conventional therapy on split-thickness skin after grafting surgery. DESIGN Meta-analysis. BACKGROUND Split-thickness skin grafts are widely used in reconstruction of large skin defects. Conventional therapy causes pain during dressing changing. NPWT is an alternative method to cover the wound bed. METHODS The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies for articles published between 1993 and April 2017 comparing NPWT to conventional wound therapy for split-thickness skin grafts. The rate of graft take was the primary outcome of this meta-analysis. Wound infection and reoperation rate of the wound were secondary outcomes. Data analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS Five cohort studies and seven RCTs including 653 patients were eligible for inclusion. Patients treated with NPWT had a significantly higher rate of graft take compared to those treated with conventional therapy [MD = 7.02, (95% CI 3.74, 10.31)] (P = .00). NPWT was associated with a reduction in reoperation [RR = 0.28, (95% CI 0.14, 0.55)] (P = .00). The reduction in wound infection was not significant [RR = 0.63, (95% CI 0.31, 1.27)] (P = .20). CONCLUSION Compared with conventional therapy, NPWT significantly increases the rate of graft take and reduces the rate of reoperation when applied to cover the wound bed with split-thickness skin graft. No significant impact on wound infection was found in this study.

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw versus anterior plating for sacroiliac joint disruption: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND Sacroiliac joint disruption (SJD) is a common cause of pelvic ring instability. Clinically, percutaneous unilateral S1 sacroiliac screw and anterior plating are always applied to manage SJD. The objective of this study is to elaborate their respective therapeutic traits. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with SJD fixed with unilateral S1 sacroiliac screw or anterior plating from June 2011 to June 2015 were recruited into this study and were divided into two groups: group A (unilateral sacroiliac screw) and group B (anterior plating). Surgical time, blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and complications were reviewed. Postoperative radiograph and CT were conducted to assess the reduction quality. Fracture healing was evaluated by radiograph performed at each follow-up. Majeed score was recorded at the final follow-up to assess the functional outcome. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included in group A and thirty-two patients in group B in this study. There was no significant difference in the demographic data of the two groups. A significant difference existed in the results for average operation time (P = .022) and blood loss (P = .000) between group A and group B. The mean frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy was 15.82 in group A and 3.94 in group B (P = .000). All the fractures healed in this study. The rates of satisfactory reduction quality and functional outcome showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > .05). The complication rate was 15.79% (6/38) in group A and 9.38% (3/32) in group B (P = .660). CONCLUSION Compared with anterior plating, percutaneous unilateral S1 sacroiliac screw usage is less invasive; however, more intraoperative X-ray exposure and permanent neurologic damage may accompany this procedure.

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures

A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria of this study. The surgical time, blood loss, open reduction rate and complications were reviewed in this study. The fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at each follow-up. The functional outcome (hip and knee flexion, Harris Hip Score, and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated at the final follow-up. Average surgical time, blood loss, hip and knee flexion, and Harris Hip Score showed no difference (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the DRTR was superior to the traction table in fracture healing, Lysholm knee score, open reduction and complications rate (P < 0.05). Thus, we concluded that minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures could be obtained with the DRTR.

Percutaneous Placement of Iliosacral Screws Under the Guidance of Axial View Projection of the S1 Pedicle: a Case Series

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws under the guidance of axial view projection of the S1 pedicle clinically. This case series includes 58 consecutive unstable pelvic injury patients, which were treated with iliosacral screws between July 2011 and July 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: normal sacrum (n = 31) and dysmorphic sacrum (n = 27). A single orthopedic surgeon operated on all patients, with percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws under the guidance of axial view projection of the S1 pedicle. The time needed for screw insertion and the radiation exposure time were recorded. Chi-squared test and Student t-test were used to analyze the differences between the two groups. Sacral dysmorphism was present in 47% of patients. The median time for screw insertion and radiation exposure time in these two groups showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). No clinical complications or malpositioned screws occurred in any case. Preoperative pelvic CT is necessary to determine the sacral osseous anatomy. In patients with either a normal or dysmorphic sacrum, iliosacral screws can be placed by this method with less radiation exposure and complications than in the conventional method.

Minimally invasive treatment of both-column acetabular fractures through the Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach

Both-column fractures are the most complicated group of acetabular fractures. Although great progress of surgical technique has been made, the choice of approach is controversial. All the fragments could be exposed and managed through combined ilioinguinal and Kocher-Langenbeck (IL+KL) approaches, which has been widely used to conduct the both-column fractures. However, the clinical popularization may be restricted for high rate of complication. Most internal area of the hemipelvis could be exposed through Stoppa combined with iliac fossa (S+IF) approach. The majority of both-column fractures were managed through IL+KL approaches or S+IF approach in our institution. The comparison of the two surgical methods was done in this study. The purpose is to examine whether S+IF approach could achieve the satisfactory reduction and fixation for both-column fractures.

Posterior column acetabular fracture fixation using a W-shaped angular plate: A biomechanical analysis

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the stability and feasibility of four fixation constructs in a posterior column acetabular fracture: one reconstruction plate, one reconstruction plate and lag screw, two reconstruction plates, and a W-shaped acetabular angular plate. Methods Twenty embalmed cadaveric pelvises with a posterior column acetabular fractures were allocated to one of four groups: 1) a reconstruction plate, 2) a reconstruction plate with a posterior column lag screw, 3) double reconstruction plates, and 4) a W-shaped acetabular angular plate. These constructs were mechanically loaded on a testing machine, and construct stiffness values were measured. Strain gauges were utilized to measure the mechanical behavior in the condition of compressive force. Results Final stiffness was not different between the two reconstruction plates (445.81±98.30 N/mm) and the W-shaped acetabular angular plate (447.43±98.45 N/mm, p = 0.524), both of which were superior to a single reconstruction plate (248.90±61.95 N/mm) and a combined plate and lag screw (326.41±94.34 N/mm). Following the fixation of the W-shaped acetabular angular plate, the strain distribution was similar to the intact condition around the acetabulum. The parameters of the W-shaped acetabular angular plate that were observed at the superior region of the acetabulum were less than those of a single reconstruction plate (p<0.05), a single reconstruction plate with lag screw (p<0.05), and two reconstruction plates (p<0.05). Conclusions The novel W-shaped acetabular angular plate fixation technique was able to provide the biomechanically stiffest construct for stabilization of a posterior column acetabular fracture; it also resulted in a partial restoration of joint loading parameters toward the intact state.

Insertion of psoas minor tendon at pelvic brim, a novel anatomic landmark for extra-articular, screw placement through Stoppa approach

BACKGROUND The psoas minor partially inserted to the superior pelvic brim. And the plate used to fix the acetabular fracture has always been positioned at the pelvic brim after reduction through the Stoppa approach. However, there are few studies depicting the clinical significance of the psoas minor. The purpose of this paper was to explore the relationship between the insertion of the psoas minor tendon at the pelvic brim (IPMTPB) and screw placement through the Stoppa approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen cadavers were dissected for adequate exposure to IPMTPB in our study. However, not all specimens had a psoas minor. For the specimens with IPMTPB, the posterior and anterior edges were used as the first and second entry points, dividing the area from the sacroiliac joint to the pubic symphysis into three zones (d1, d2 and d3). The average proportion of each zone was obtained after measurement the three zones, to locate the two entry points for the specimens without a psoas minor. From the longitudinal Stoppa incision, the first wire was inserted horizontally, and the second wire was placed vertical to the bone surface. Fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) were conducted to examine the relationship between the wires and the acetabulum. RESULTS There was a psoas minor in sixteen hemipelvises (53.33%). After measurement and calculation, we determined that the average proportions of zones d1, d2, and d3 were 28.03%, 29.14%, and 42.83%, respectively. For all specimens, the wires were successfully inserted, and the trajectories of the wires were outside the hip joint cavity. CONCLUSIONS IPMTPB could be used as an anatomic landmark of safe zones for screw placement through the Stoppa approach. For cases without a psoas minor, the zones for extra-articular screw placement could be determined through the measurements in this paper.