Rumeysa Ciftci

Effect of carvedilol on silent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity assessed by strain imaging: A prospective randomized controlled study with six-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND The use of antracycline (ANT) in breast cancer has been associated with adverse cardiac events. Two-dimensional (2D) strain imaging (SI) can provide a more sensitive measure of altered left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of carvedilol administration assessed by SI in a patient with breast cancer treated with ANT. METHODS Patients receiving ANT were randomly assigned to the carvedilol- or placebo-receiving group. Each received an echocardiographic examination with conventional 2D echocardiography, pulsed tissue Doppler, and 2D SI prior to and 6 months post ANT treatment. RESULTS During the 6-month follow-up period there were no patient deaths or interrupted chemotherapy treatments due to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Both left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (FS) were within normal limits for all patients before and after ANT therapy. EF, FS and LV dimensions were measured using M-mode echocardiography and found to be similar in both groups before and after ANT therapy. The mean EF, FS, and LV echocardiograph baseline and control dimensions were similar in both groups after 6 months. Though baseline SI parameters were similar between the groups, there was a significant decrease in LV basal septal and basal lateral peak systolic strain in the control group compared to the carvedilol group. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that carvedilol has a protective effect against the cardiotoxicity induced by ANT.

Age is a prognostic factor affecting survival in lung cancer patients

Despite all efforts at management, prognosis of advanced lung cancer is extremely poor, with a median survival time of ~1 year. The number of cancer patients aged >70 years is significantly increased among the cancer patient population. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical importance of age in lung cancer. Data from 110 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer, who were treated and followed up in the Institute of Oncology, University of Istanbul, were recorded from medical charts. There were 100 (91%) males with a median age of 59 years (range, 35–88 years). The majority of patients had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 84%) and metastatic stage (56%). The rate of positive response to chemotherapy was lower in elderly patients (P=0.01) and the incidence of anemia was higher compared with that in younger patients (P=0.02). The majority of mortalities occurred in elderly patients (P=0.01). The median survival time of elderly patients was significantly lower compared with that of younger patients (37.8 vs. 57 weeks; P=0.009). The 1-year survival rates in younger and elderly patients were 67.3 and 42.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, elderly patients also had significantly poorer survival (P=0.023). In the group of elderly patients, analyses revealed that significant prognostic factors, including stage of disease and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, were associated with survival. Elderly patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer had a poorer outcome compared with those with NSCLC (P=0.009), and older patients with elevated serum LDH levels had a shorter survival time compared with those with normal levels (P=0.042). In conclusion, age is one of the major prognostic factors affecting survival in lung cancer patients; therefore, patients should be managed according to age in clinical practice.

Does Beta-blocker Therapy Improve the Survival of Patients with Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?

AIM To determine whether beta-blockers (BBs) improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The medical charts of 107 patients with metastatic NSCLC were retrospectively assessed. Thirty-five patients (BB group) using BBs during chemotherapy (CT) were compared with 72 controls [control=(C) group] who did not use BBs following the diagnosis of NSCLC. The histological tumor subtype, performance status (ECOG), age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities, other medications and chemotherapeutics that were received in any line of treatment were recorded. We compared the overall survival (OS) of the patients in the BB and C groups. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 61 years (range 42-81 years) and all patients were administered CT. The BB group was more likely to have HT and IHD and was more likely to use RAS blockers (p<0.01 for all) compared with the C group, as expected. The mean follow-up time was 17.8 months (range 1-102 months) for the entire group. The most commonly prescribed BB agent was metoprolol (80% of cases). At the time of the analysis, 74 (69%) of all patients had died. In the univariate analysis the median overall survival (OS) was 19.25 (±2.87) months (95%CI: 13.62-24.88) in the BB group and 13.20 (±2.37) months (95%CI: 8.55-17.85) in the C group (p=0.017). However, the benefit of BBs on survival disappeared in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS The use of BBs during CT may be associated with an improved OS for patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Clinical and prognostic significance of coagulation assays in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Objective Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death among gynecological tumors and usually diagnosed at advanced stage. We aimed to identify the clinical and prognostic relevance of coagulation tests and their correlation with serum CA-125 levels in advanced EOC. Materials and Methods A total of 33 advanced-stage (stages III and IV) EOC patients were enrolled in the study. Of these patients, 17 had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 16 patients received chemotherapy after optimal debulking surgery. Several clinicopathologic factors, coagulation assays, routine biochemistry tests, and serum CA-125 levels were evaluated before treatment and compared with healthy subjects. Results All coagulation tests including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and platelet revealed statistically significant difference between patients and control subjects (P ⩽ 0.001). Elevated CA-125 levels were correlated with higher D-dimer values (P = 0.03). Prolonged PT was associated with poorer both overall (P = 0.03) and progression-free survival rates (P = 0.04). Conclusions Correlation of CA-125 with D-dimer is supposed to reflect hyperactivation of fibrinolytic pathway in the presence of a higher tumor load. Alterations in coagulation pathway reflected by prolonged PT support prognostic effects on survival of advanced-stage EOC patients.

Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Versus Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Survival and Response to Treatment.

AbstractMetaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) differs from classic invasive ductal carcinomas regarding incidence, pathogenesis, and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to compare patients with MBC with clinicopathologic and treatment-matched patients with triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) in terms of response to treatment, progression, and survival.Fifty-four patients with MBC and 51 with TNBC, who were treated at Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, between 1993 and 2014, were included in the study. After correctly matching the patients with 1 of the 2 groups, they were compared to determine differences in response to treatment, disease progression, clinical course, and survival.At a median follow-up of 28 months, 18 patients (17.1%) died and 27 (25.5%) had disease progression. Metaplastic histology was significantly correlated with worse 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) (51 ± 9% vs. 82 ± 6%, P = 0.013) and overall survival (OS) (68 ± 8% vs. 94 ± 4%, P = 0.009) compared with TNBC histology. Patients who received taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) regimens or adjuvant radiotherapy had significantly better PFS (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) compared with others. In the multivariate analysis, MBC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.09, P < 0.001), presence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (HR: 12.8, P = 0.05), and metastasis development at any time during the clinical course (HR: 38.7, P < 0.001) were significant factors that decreased PFS, whereas metastasis development was the only independent prognostic factor of OS (HR: 23.8, P = 0.009).MBC is significantly correlated with worse PFS and OS compared with TNBC. Patients with MBC are resistant to conventional CT agents, and more efficient treatment regimens are required.

D-dimer and international normalized ratio (INR) are correlated with tumor markers and disease stage in colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation of coagulation tests with various clinicopathological variables and tumor markers among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-four CRC patients were included for evaluation of clinicopathological factors, coagulation assays and tumor marker levels. RESULTS Metastatic disease was related with elevated INR (p= 0.03). Stage III patients had higher D-dimer values compared with stage II patients (p= 0.03). Correlation of tumor markers indicated a tendency towards elevated D-dimer levels for CEA values higher than median (p= 0.01). High CA 19-9 levels were also associated with higher INR (p= 0.007). Elderly age, distant metastasis, high CEA, CA-19-9 and LDH levels were associated with poorer overall-survival. CEA level was the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Coagulation assays can be utilized as predictors of disease extent in CRC. Elevated D-dimer and INR values may indicate higher disease stage. Correlation of D-dimer levels with CEA supports their value for assessing tumor burden.

Clinical and prognostic significance of coagulation assays in melanoma.

The activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis is frequently found among cancer patients. Such tumors are considered to be associated with a higher risk of invasion, metastases, and eventually worse outcome. The aim of this study is to explore the clinical and prognostic value of blood coagulation tests for melanoma patients. Pretreatment blood coagulation tests including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin activity (PTA), international normalized ratio (INR), D-dimer (DD), fibrinogen (F) levels, and platelet (PLT) counts were carried out. This prospective study included 61 melanoma patients [stage I–II (n=10), stage III (n=14), stage IV (n=37), M1c (n=26) disease], and 50 healthy controls. It included 34 (56%) men, median age 53 years, range 16–88 years. Over half of the patients (54%) were in the metastatic stage and most of them (70%) had M1c. The plasma level of pretreatment blood coagulation tests including DD, F, APTT, INR levels, and PLT counts showed a statistically significant difference between the patient and the control group (P<0.001 for all, but P=0.049 for INR). The levels of INR, DD, F, and PLT counts were higher and APTT was lower in the melanoma group, whereas the PT and PTA levels did not show any significant difference. There was a significant association between PT, PTA, INR, and PLT levels and the age of the patient. Patients with node metastasis in M0 disease had higher levels of PTA and PLT counts (P=0.002 and 0.048, respectively) and lower levels of PT and INR (P=0.056 and 0.046, respectively). The M1c patients tended to have higher plasma F levels (437 vs. 297 mg/dl, P=0.055) than M1a and M1b patients. The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 70%. In association with distant metastasis, advanced metastatic stage (M1c), elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, only elevated plasma F levels had a significantly adverse effect on survival among the coagulation parameters (P=0.031). The 1-year survival rates for patients with high and normal F levels were 58 and 88%, respectively. In conclusion, changes in the coagulation-fibrinolytic system are often present in melanoma and elevation in the plasma F level is associated with decreased survival.

Concomitant etoposide and cisplatin provided improved survival compared with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

AbstractPresently, there is no consensus regarding which chemotherapy regimen is best to administer with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Herein, our aim was to compare the outcome of patients treated with either etoposide–cisplatin (EP) or docetaxel–cisplatin (DP) in this curative setting.Patients treated with either EP or DP and concurrent radiotherapy from 2004 to2012 were identified and their detailed medical records and follow-up information were obtained for analysis in this retrospective study. Survival rates were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustments for confounding parameters provided by propensity score methods.A total of 105 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LA-NSCLC (stage IIB-IIIA-IIIB). The median ages were 54 years (range, 32–70 years) and 55 years (range, 37–73 years) in the EP (n = 50) and DP (n = 55) groups, respectively. The median follow-up time was 27 months (range, 1–132 months) in the EP group and 19 months (range, 1–96 months) in DP group. There was no significant difference in baseline clinicopathologic features including age, sex, performance status, histologic subtype, and clinical TNM stages between groups. In the univariate analysis, the median overall survival of patients treated with EP was higher than that of patients treated with DP (41 vs. 20 months, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis further revealed a survival advantage with EP compared with DP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.25–0.83; P = 0.009). The toxicity profile of the 2treatment groups was similar except that pulmonary toxicity was higher in the DP group (grade 3–4: 0% vs. 6%, P = 0.024).Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with EP may provide more favorable outcomes than DP and with an acceptable safety profile.

Clinical significance of serum M30 and M65 levels in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

M30 and M65 are relatively new assays that detect different circulating forms of the epithelial cell structural protein cytokeratin 18. This study was conducted to investigate the serum levels of M30 and M65 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA) and the relationship with tumor progression and known prognostic parameters. Twenty-six patients with MPA were investigated. Serum samples were obtained on first admission before treatment and follow-up. Both serum M30 and M65 levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years, range 32–80 years; 14 patients were men. All patients had metastatic stage, and most (n = 21, 81 %) had hepatic metastasis. The baseline levels of both serum M30 and serum M65 were significantly higher in patients with MPA than those in the control group (p < 0.001, for both assays). Serum M65 level was only significantly higher in the patients with elevated serum LDH levels than in others with normal serum LDH levels (p = 0.03). For serum M30 levels, no correlation was found. The significant relationship was found between the serum levels of M30 and M65 (rs = 0. 926, n = 26, p < 0.001, Spearman’s correlation). The median survival for all patients was 31.7 ± 2.2 weeks (95 % CI = 27.31–36.08). Although only the serum LDH level was found to be a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.01), neither serum M30 nor serum M65 had significant effect on survival (p = 0.28 and p = 0.15, respectively). In conclusion, although both serum levels of M30 and M65 assays were found to be of diagnostic value, no predictive and prognostic values were determined in MPA patients.

Current adjuvant treatment modalities for gastric cancer: From history to the future.

The discrepancy between the surgical technique and the type of adjuvant chemotherapy used in clinical trials and patient outcomes in terms of overall survival rates has led to the generation of different adjuvant treatment protocols in distinct parts of the world. The adjuvant treatment recommendation is generally chemoradiotherapy in the United States, perioperative chemotherapy in the United Kingdom and parts of Europe, and chemotherapy in Asia. These options mainly rely on the United States Intergroup-0116, United Kingdom British Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy, and the Asian Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Adjuvant Study in Stomach Cancer trials. However, the benefits were evident for only certain patients, which were not very homogeneous regarding the type of surgery, chemotherapy regimens, and stage of disease. Whether the dissimilarities in survival are attributable to surgical technique or intrinsic biological differences is a subject of debate. Regardless of the extent of surgery, multimodal therapy may offer modest survival advantage at least for diseases with lymph node involvement. Moreover, in the era of individualized treatment for most of the other cancer types, identification of special subgroups comprising those who will derive more or no benefit from adjuvant therapy merits further investigation. The aim of this review is to reveal the historical evolution and future reflections of adjuvant treatment modalities for resected gastric cancer patients.