Rune Dahlqvist

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors and Myotoxicity

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors specifically inhibit HMG-CoA reductase in the liver, thereby inhibiting the biosynthesis of cholesterol. These drugs significantly reduce plasma cholesterol level and long term treatment reduces morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease.The tolerability of these drugs during long term administration is an important issue. Adverse reactions involving skeletal muscle are not uncommon, and sometimes serious adverse reactions involving skeletal muscle such as myopathy and rhabdomyolysis may occur, requiring discontinuation of the drug. Occasionally, arthralgia, alone or in association with myalgia, has been reported.In this article we review scientific data provided via Medline, adverse drug reaction case reports from the Swedish Drug Information System (SWEDIS) and the World Health Organization’s International Drug Information System (INTDIS) database, focusing on HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor-related musculoskeletal system events.Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is the main isoenzyme involved in the metabolic transformation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Individuals with both low hepatic and low gastrointestinal tract levels of CYP3A4 expression may be at in increased risk of myotoxicity due to potentially higher HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor plasma concentrations. The reported incidence of myotoxic reactions in patients treated with this drug class varies from 1 to 7% and varies between different agents. The risk of these serious adverse reactions is dose-dependent and may increase when HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are prescribed concomitantly with drugs that inhibit their metabolism, such as itraconazole, cyclosporin, erythromycin and nefazodone. Electrolyte disturbances, infections, major trauma, hypoxia as well as drugs of abuse may increase the risk of myotoxicity. It is important that the potentially serious adverse reactions are recognised and correctly diagnosed so that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor may at once be withdrawn to prevent further muscular damage.

Effect of cigarette smoking on fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics in humans

Although fluvoxamine inhibits the biotransformation of drugs known to be metabolized by CYP1A2, there are no data available with regard to the importance of CYP1A2 for the metabolism of fluvoxamine itself. Because smoking induces the metabolism of drugs catalyzed by CYP1A2, this study investigated the pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine in smokers and nonsmokers.

Relationship between fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6/CYP2C19 phenotype polymorphisms

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the disposition of fluvoxamine is associated with the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 phenotype polymorphisms. Methods: The serum concentration of fluvoxamine was followed for 48 h after oral administration of a single dose of 50 mg fluvoxamine to five poor metabolizers of the CYP2D6 test drug dextromethorphan, five poor metabolizers of the CYP2C19 test drug mephenytoin, and five extensive metabolizers of both test drugs. Results: Poor metabolizers of dextromethorphan had significantly higher areas under the serum concentration-time curve than extensive metabolizers of dextromethorphan (mean 1.31 vs 1.00 μmol · h · l−1). There were no differences between poor and extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (mean, 1.00 vs 1.15 μmol · h · l−1). Conclusion: The results are consistent with a possible minor to moderate role of CYP2D6, but not CYP2C19, in fluvoxamine metabolism.

Seizures and myoclonus associated with antidepressant treatment: assessment of potential risk factors, including CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms, and treatment with CYP2D6 inhibitors

All adverse drug reaction reports labelled seizures or myoclonus during treatment with antidepressants and stored in the Swedish national database for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions were reviewed in order to evaluate possible risk factors. The reporting physicians were contacted and asked for complementary information, and blood samples for determination of the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes were obtained from patients available. In total, 25 cases of seizures and 7 cases of myoclonus were studied. The drugs included were maprotiline (n=8), mianserin (n=7), fluvoxamine (n=6), amitriptyline (n=3), clomipramine (n=3), citalopram (n=2), paroxetine (n=2) and lofepramine (n= 1). Previously suggested predisposing factors were identified in all but four cases (87%). None of the 11 patients genotyped were found to be poor metabolizers with respect to the enzymes CYP2D6 or CYP2C19. Thus, neither the CYP2D6 nor the CYP2C19 genotype were found to be associated with the occurrence of seizures/myoclonus during treatment with antidepressants. However, 15 patients (47%) were concomitantly treated with drugs with potential inhibitory effects on CYP2D6, such as neuroleptics and dextropropoxyphene, and the patients might thus have been converted from the extensive metabolizer to the poor metabolizer phenotype during this treatment. Concomitant treatment with drugs decreasing the seizure threshold and/or inhibiting the metabolism of antidepressants appeared to be an important risk factor for the occurrence of seizures/myoclonus.

Absence of interaction between erythromycin and a single dose of clozapine.

AbstractObjective: To study the suggested pharmacokinetic interaction between erythromycin, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4, and clozapine. Methods: Twelve healthy male volunteers received a single dose of 12.5 mg of clozapine alone or in combination with a daily dose of 1500 mg erythromycin in a randomised crossover study. Clozapine and its metabolites clozapine-N-oxide and desmethyl-clozapine were measured in serum samples which were collected during a 48 h period and in a sample of the urine secreted over the interval 0–12 h. Results: There were no significant differences in mean area under the serum concentration time curves (1348 (633) nmol h · 1−1 in the control phase and 1180 (659) nmol h · 1−1 in the erythromycin phase), terminal half-lives (19 (13) h and 15 (6) h, respectively), peak serum concentrations (92 (53) nmol · 1−1 and 77 (40) nmol · 1−1, respectively), time to peak serum concentrations (1.4 (0.7) h and 1.5 (1.0) h, respectively) or apparent oral clearances of clozapine (34 (15) l · h−1 and 46 (37) l · h−1, respectively). There were no significant differences in partial metabolic clearances to clozapine-N-oxide (5.1 (3.6) l · h−1 and 7.8 (9.4) l · h−1, respectively) or to desmethyl-clozapine (1.5 (1.3) l · h−1 and 1.8 (1.7) l · h−1, respectively) or in renal clearances of clozapine (0.8 (0.5) l · h−1 and 1.0 (0.7) l · h−1, respectively) between the two phases. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that erythromycin at a clinically relevant dosage does not inhibit the metabolism of clozapine. Hence, CYP3A4 seems to be of minor importance in the disposition of clozapine in humans at least when clozapine is taken at a low single dose.

Lack of correlation between fluvoxamine clearance and CYP1A2 activity as measured by systemic caffeine clearance.

AbstractObjective: Evidence exists to suggest that fluvoxamine is metabolized by CYP1A2. The present study was undertaken in order to further elucidate the role of CYP1A2 in fluvoxamine disposition. Methods: Twelve healthy non-smoking male volunteers participated in this cross-over study. Six subjects received first fluvoxamine 50 mg as a single oral dose and, some weeks later, caffeine 200 mg as a single oral dose. The other six subjects received the drugs in reverse order. Serum concentrations of fluvoxamine, caffeine and paraxanthine were measured and standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Results: There were no significant correlations between caffeine clearance and fluvoxamine oral clearance (rs = −0.30; P = 0.43) or between the paraxanthine/caffeine ratio in serum 6 h after caffeine intake and fluvoxamine oral clearance (rs = −0.18; P = 0.58). Conclusion: CYP1A2 does not appear to be of major importance in the metabolism of fluvoxamine.

Clinical pharmacological evaluation of an assay kit for intoxications with tricyclic antidepressants.

The performance of an enzyme immunoassay kit (EMIT) to diagnose intoxications with tricyclic antidepressants was compared with a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique in vitro and in vivo. The cut-off reference solution contained in the kit of nominally 1,140 nM nortriptyline varied from 1,250 to 1,600 nM. In vitro addition of antidepressants gave positive results (change in absorbance above the cut-off value) of approximately 1,100 nM for amitriptyline, imipramine, and desmethylimipramine and approximately 1,600 nM for clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine. In contrast, high concentrations of the tetracyclic antidepressant maprotiline (7,000 nM) and the bicyclic zimeldine (2,000 nM) gave negative results. False positive results were obtained with high concentrations of thioridazine (4,000 nM), chlorpromazine (300 nM), and alimemazine (trimeprazine) (5,000 nM). Of 51 patient samples, five gave readings above the cut-off value, consistent with a tricyclic antidepressant intoxication, but two of these were false positives as compared with the specific HPLC analysis. However, no false negative results were obtained with the EMIT. In conclusion, the EMIT kit is likely to detect intoxications with tricyclic antidepressants but miss intoxications with nontricyclic antidepressants. For a screening method, this is a serious drawback, since maprotiline and zimeldine together make up approximately 25% of the total of antidepressants used in Sweden. Users of the kit must also be aware that certain phenothiazines in high therapeutic doses or in intoxication cases could interfere with this test and might lead to the false diagnosis of intoxication with tricyclic antidepressants.

Urinary excretion of codeine, ethylmorphine, and their metabolites : Relation to the CYP2D6 activity

The formation of morphine from codeine and ethylmorphine is mainly mediated by the polymorphic enzyme CYP2D6. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM) and CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) would respond differently during testing for opiate drugs of abuse in urine after intake of these drugs. Five PM and five EM of dextromethorphan were administered single oral doses of codeine (25 mg) and ethylmorphine (25 mg), and the urinary excretion of parent compounds and selected metabolites was observed for 72 hours. Analysis was performed with GC-MS after hydrolysis of the glucuronide conjugates. Selected urine samples were screened for the presence of opiates by the Abbott ADx immunoassay method. The results from one PM and one EM were excluded because of technical analytical problems. EM excreted significantly more morphine than PM after intake of both codeine (6.5% vs. 1.1% of the dose; p < 0.05) and ethylmorphine (11.0% vs. 3.0% of the dose; p < 0.05). Screening results were positive significantly longer for EM than for PM after codeine intake (mean, 33 hours vs. 17 hours; p < 0.05), and the same trend, albeit nonsignificantly, was noted for ethylmorphine (mean, 33 hours vs. 24 hours). Regardless of CYP2D6 phenotype, significantly more morphine was formed after intake of ethylmorphine than after intake of codeine (7.0% vs. 3.8% of the dose; p < 0.05). There were high correlations between dextromethorphan metabolic ratios and the ratios of codeine to morphine, ethylmorphine to morphine, norcodeine to normorphine, and norethylmorphine to normorphine (r = 0.80 to 0.92; p = 0.030 to 0.001). Although this study should be interpreted with caution because of the few subjects included and the single-dose design, it demonstrates that the CYP2D6 phenotype clearly affects the results when testing for opiates in urine after intake of codeine and ethylmorphine.

Kinetics and dynamics of disopyramide and its dealkylated metabolite in healthy subjects

The kinetics and dynamics of total and free (unbound) disopyramide (D) after dosing with D, 1.5 and 2 mg/kg iv, were compared with those of the dealkylated metabolite (MND) after dosing with MND, 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg iv, in six healthy subjects. Dynamic parameters included ECG with measurement of the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc), systolic time intervals, vitamin C—stimulated saliva secretion, pupil size, and maximum accommodation capacity. Mean values of total clearance, apparent volume of distribution, and elimination t½ of MND were 5.9, 2.3, and 0.4 times those of total D, respectively. D significantly prolonged the QTc and systolic time intervals and induced transient inhibition of stimulated saliva secretion. In contrast, MND induced no substantial change in either the QTc or systolic time intervals, but did induce more persistent inhibition of salivary secretion. If anticholinergic potency is determined as the degree of inhibition of stimulated saliva flow per plasma concentration unit, MND was three times as potent as its parent when measured at maximum inhibition. There were no consistent drug effects on the ocular parameters. The effect of D on QTc correlated with both total and free plasma concentrations. Furthermore, its transient salivary inhibitory effect paralleled its initial rapid decline in plasma concentration. There was no relationship between the MND plasma concentration and its salivary inhibitory effect. We conclude that disopyramide significantly affected the QTc and systolic time intervals in healthy subjects, while MND in a similar dose had no such effects. MND more strongly inhibited stimulated saliva flow, indicating a more potent anticholinergic effect than D.

Association between the use of serotonin receptor 2A–blocking antidepressants and joint disorders

OBJECTIVE There are case reports about antidepressants causing arthritis and arthralgia, and the majority of these reports deal with atypical antidepressants, which are serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT(2A))-blocking substances. The aim of this study was to examine a possible association between joint disorders and the use of 5-HT(2A)-blocking atypical antidepressants. METHODS We performed a retrospective study using reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of 5-HT(2A)-blocking atypical antidepressant substances concerning joint disorders reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Committee and the World Health Organization (WHO) Adverse Reactions Database during the period January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2006. The reports of joint disorders were related to sales figures measured as defined daily doses and to the total number of ADR reports. RESULTS In the Swedish material, the 5-HT(2A) antagonists were 45 times more often reported to give joint ADRs when related to sales figures and compared with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; P < 0.001). Joint disorders constituted 6.6% of the total number of reports of possible ADRs for the three 5-HT(2A)-blocking substances mianserin, mirtazapine, and nefazodone compared with 0.5% for the SSRIs (P < 0.001). In the WHO material, the joint disorders constituted 1.3% of all ADRs for the 5-HT(2A)-blocking antidepressants and 0.6% for the SSRIs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In this study, joint disorders were considerably more frequently reported ADRs of 5-HT(2A)-blocking antidepressants than of other comparable drugs, suggesting a possible association between the use of 5-HT(2A)-blocking antidepressants and joint disorders.