Rune Eriksen
Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rune Eriksen.
Wildlife Biology | 2011
Kari Bjørneraas; Erling Johan Solberg; Ivar Herfindal; Bram Van Moorter; Christer Moe Rolandsen; Jean-Pierre Tremblay; Christina Skarpe; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Rune Eriksen; Rasmus Astrup
Abstract Habitat alteration by humans may change the supply of food and cover for wild ungulates, but few studies have examined how these resources are utilised over time by individuals of different sex and reproductive status. We examined circadian and seasonal variation in habitat utilisation within a moose Alces alces population in central Norway. Our study area covers forests and open habitats, both influenced by human alterations (e.g. forestry and agriculture). We expected moose to select habitats with good forage and cover in all seasons, but to select open foraging habitats mainly during night-time. Moose selected good foraging habitats, such as young forest stands and cultivated land during night, whereas the utilisation of older forest stands providing cover increased during daytime. This circadian pattern changed throughout the year, seemingly related to variation in hours of daylight and provision of forage. Young forest stands provided higher density of preferred food plants compared to older stands and were highly selected from spring until autumn. Relative to young forest, the selection for older forest stands increased towards winter, likely due to provision of higher plant quality late in the growing season, and to reduced accumulation of movement-impeding snow during winter. Selection of cultivated land varied among seasons, being highest when crop biomass was high. We also found some indications of state-dependent habitat selection as reproducing females avoided open, food rich areas in the first months after their calves were born, whereas males and females without young selected these areas in spring and summer. Our results clearly show that moose exploit the variations in cover and food caused by forestry and agriculture. This is particularly relevant for moose in Norway as current changes in forestry practice lead to a reduction in young, food-rich forest stands, possibly aggravating the already declining body conditions and recruitment rates of moose.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2013
Tor Myking; Erling Johan Solberg; Gunnar Austrheim; James D. M. Speed; Fredrik Bøhler; Rasmus Astrup; Rune Eriksen
Sallow (Salix caprea L.) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) constitute small proportions of the deciduous tree volume in Scandinavia, but are highly preferred winter forage for moose and red deer, which occur at historically high densities. Thus, a possible decline of these tree species has been indicated. Against this background, we have reviewed the life histories of relevance for browsing, as well as the basic biology and genetics of sallow and rowan. The species show similarities with respect to short lifespan, small size and sympodial growth pattern, which are risk factors in a browsing context. They also have high juvenile growth rate, important for growing quickly out of reach of browsers. Sallow depends strongly on disturbance for establishment and is more demanding with respect to soil and light conditions than rowan, possibly important for the substantially lower abundance of sallow on the Norwegian Forest Inventory plots. Similarly, the relative recruitment of small size classes of sallow is less than for rowan. Although recruitment is reported to be hampered in wintering areas with high moose or red deer densities, the inventory data, however, dating only back to 1994, do not suggest a general decrease in any of the species. Sallow and rowan saplings show low mortality in moose and deer dominated areas and the species can be characterised as rather resilient to browsing. Of more concern is that browsing can constrain the development of mature rowan and sallow trees locally, with possible consequences for associated epiphytic biodiversity.
Archive | 2010
Tron Eid; Andreas Brunner; Gunnhild Søgaard; Rasmus Astrup; Stein Michael Tomter; Øivind Løken; Rune Eriksen
125 s. | 2017
Erling Johan Solberg; Olav Strand; Vebjørn Veiberg; Roy Andersen; Morten Heim; Christer Moe Rolandsen; Mai Irene Solem; Frode Holmstrøm; Per Jordhøy; Erlend B. Nilsen; Aksel Granhus; Rune Eriksen
49 | 2012
Gunnhild Søgaard; Rune Eriksen; Rasmus Astrup; Bernt-Håvard Øyen
67 | 2013
Kjell Andreassen; Rune Eriksen; Stein Michael Tomter; Aksel Granhus
116 | 2018
Gro Hylen; Aksel Granhus; Rune Eriksen
92 | 2017
Gro Hylen; Aksel Granhus; Rune Eriksen
55 | 2017
Johannes Breidenbach; Sebastian Eiter; Rune Eriksen; Knut Bjørkelo; Gregory Taff; Gunnhild Søgaard; Stein Michael Tomter; Lise Dalsgaard; Aksel Granhus; Rasmus Astrup
36 | 2017
Aksel Granhus; Rune Eriksen