Runqing Huang
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Runqing Huang.
Journal of The American Society of Echocardiography | 2016
Runqing Huang; Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Caroline A. Ball; Lara F. Nhola; Ann M. Farrell; Steven B. Feinstein; Sharon L. Mulvagh
BACKGROUND Intraplaque neovascularization is considered an important indicator of plaque vulnerability. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of carotid arteries improves imaging of carotid intima-media thickness and permits real-time visualization of neovascularization of the atherosclerotic plaque. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS-detected carotid atherosclerotic plaque. METHODS A systematic search was performed to identify studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2004 to June 2015. Studies evaluating the accuracy of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis (visual interpretation) for the diagnosis of intraplaque neovascularization compared with histologic specimens and/or clinical diagnosis of symptomatic plaque were included. Parameters evaluated were plaque quantitative CEUS intensity and the visual grading of plaque CEUS. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratios, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Corresponding areas under the curves were calculated. RESULTS The literature search identified 203 studies, 20 of which were selected for systematic review; the final meta-analysis included seven studies. For qualitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87), pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), the pooled positive LR was 3.22 (95% CI, 1.67-6.18), the pooled negative LR was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09-0.64), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 15.57 (95% CI, 4.94-49.03), and area under the curve was 0.894. For quantitative CEUS, pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83), pooled specificity was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), the pooled positive LR was 2.34 (95% CI, 1.69-3.23), the pooled negative LR was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.25-0.47), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 7.06 (95% CI, 3.6-13.82), and area under the curve was 0.888. CONCLUSIONS CEUS is a promising noninvasive diagnostic modality for detecting intraplaque neovascularization. Standardization of quantitative analysis and visual grading classification is needed to increase reliability and reduce technical heterogeneity.
Journal of The American Society of Echocardiography | 2015
Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Sharon L. Mulvagh; Feng Xie; Edward O'Leary; Mary Adolphson; Mohamed Omer; Lara F. Nhola; Runqing Huang; Sara J. Warta; Brenda Kirby; Thomas R. Porter
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of myocardial perfusion (MP) and wall motion (WM) analysis obtained with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) and two widely used contrast agents in detecting coronary artery disease after injection of the vasodilator regadenoson. METHODS One hundred fifty patients were studied at two academic centers using regadenoson (400-μg intravenous bolus) vasodilator stress RTMCE (7.5% Optison infusion [n = 50] or 1.5% Definity infusion [n = 100]). Both MP and WM with RTMCE were analyzed at rest and after regadenoson bolus. Comparisons of WM and MP sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were made. Quantitative angiography was performed in all patients within 1 month of the regadenoson stress study (>50% and >70% diameter stenosis was considered significant). Reviewers were blinded to all clinical and quantitative angiographic data. RESULTS Rate-pressure product after regadenoson was higher in Optison than Definity patients (P = .004). Using a 50% diameter stenosis on quantitative angiography as a reference standard, overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for combined WM and MP analysis were not different for both agents (Optison, 77%, 64%, and 73%; Definity, 80%, 74%, and 78%; P = NS). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WM analysis alone for Optison were 68%, 71%, and 69% compared with 60%, 72%, and 66% for Definity (P = NS). Adding MP analysis improved the sensitivity and accuracy of Definity for detecting both >50% and >70% stenoses (P < .001 vs WM), while MP analysis did not improve the sensitivity of Optison for detecting either >50 or >70% stenoses. CONCLUSIONS RTMCE during regadenoson stress using either Optison or Definity is a rapid and effective method for the detection of coronary artery disease. The ability of MP imaging to improve WM accuracy may depend on the rate-pressure product achieved.
Echocardiography-a Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques | 2016
Charles J. Lenz; Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Nandan S. Anavekar; Thomas A. Foley; Lara F. Nhola; Runqing Huang; Jae K. Oh; Sharon L. Mulvagh
Infarct mass as assessed by myocardial‐delayed enhancement imaging on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and myocardial blood flow as assessed by real time myocardial perfusion echocardiography (RT‐MPE) have been shown to predict adverse events following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). There has been no published comparison of quantitative assessment using these modalities as predictors of clinical outcomes to date. We compared RT‐MPE with CMR for prediction of cardiac events in reperfused STEMI patients.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2017
Runqing Huang; Matthew W. Urban; J. Kevin DeMarco; Waleed Brinjikji; John Huston; Thanila A. Macedo; Eric J. Dailey; Mary E. Hagen; Sharon L. Mulvagh
Background: Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) detects intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) associated with plaque vulnerability. Shear wave elastography (SWE) assesses mechanical stiffness of tissues by measuring shear wave speed (SWS): SWS is faster in stiffer tissues. We explored the
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014
Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Runqing Huang; Lara F. Nhola; Sharon L. Mulvagh
We examined the relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) pts using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE). We prospectively enrolled 24 pts (16 male; 66±12 yrs, DM duration 8±6 yrs, 42% smokers, 83% HTN,
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014
Lara F. Nhola; Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Runqing Huang; Brenda Kirby; Thomas R. Porter; Sharon L. Mulvagh
To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) during regadenoson (Reg) (Astellas Pharma Inc) vasodilator stress for detection of significant Left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis (≥ 50% or ≥ 70% by quantitative coronary
Journal of Womens Health | 2016
Caroline A. Ball; Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Runqing Huang; Sue Eifert-Rain; Francesca Mantovani; Susan Wilansky; Sharon L. Mulvagh
European Heart Journal | 2018
Runqing Huang; Matthew W. Urban; J K Demarco; John Huston; Waleed Brinjikji; Thanila A. Macedo; Eric J. Dailey; Mary E. Hagen; Patricia A. Pellikka; Sharon L. Mulvagh
Circulation | 2016
Runqing Huang; Matthew W. Urban; J. Kevin DeMarco; Waleed Brinjikji; Hideki Ota; John Huston; Thanila A. Macedo; Eric J. Dailey; Mary E. Hagen; Sharon L. Mulvagh
Maturitas | 2015
Caroline A. Ball; Sahar S. Abdelmoneim; Runqing Huang; Francesca Mantovani; Susan J. Eifert Rain; Dalene Bott-Kitslaar; Ramon Castello; Susan Wilansky; Patricia A. Pellikka; Sharon L. Mulvagh