Rupert Evans

Safety of surfaces and equipment for children in playgrounds

BACKGROUND The safety of playgrounds is important to protect children from injury, but studies are mostly done mainly under laboratory conditions without epidemiological data. We investigated the safety of different playground surfaces, and types and heights of equipment in public playgrounds in the City of Cardiff, UK. METHODS We did a correlational study of 330 children aged between 0 and 14 years. All children were hurt when playing in playgrounds in Cardiff and presented to the Accident and Emergency Department in Cardiff Royal Infirmary during summer (April to September) 1992 and 1993, and the whole of 1994. We studied the childrens hospital records to establish the type of injury and interviewed their parents to find out the playground and type of equipment involved. The main outcome measures were the number of children injured whilst playing, and injury rates per observed number of children on different surfaces, types, and heights of equipment. FINDINGS Children sustained significantly more injuries in playgrounds with concrete surfaces than in those with bark or rubberised surfaces (p < 0.001). Playgrounds with rubber surfaces had the lowest rate of injury, with a risk half that of bark and a fifth of that of concrete. Bark surfaces were not significantly more protective against arm fractures than concrete. Most injuries were equipment related. Injury risk due to falls from monkey bars (suspended parallel bars or rings between which children swing) was twice that for climbing-frames and seven times that for swings or slides. The height of the equipment correlated significantly with the number of fractures (p = 0.005) from falls. INTERPRETATION Rubber or bark surfacing is associated with a low rate of injuries and we support their use in all public playgrounds. Bark alone is insufficient, however, to prevent all injuries, particularly arm fractures. Rubberised impact-absorbing surfaces are safer than bark. We believe that playing on monkeys bars increases the risk of injury in playgrounds and that they should generally not be installed. Safety standards should be based on physical and epidemiological data. Our data suggest that the proposed raising of the maximum fall height from 2.5 m to 3.0 m in Europe is worrying.

The United Kingdom pre-hospital study of active compression-decompression resuscitation

This prospective, controlled trial with crossover group design compares the effectiveness of active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and standard CPR on the outcomes of victims of prehospital cardiac arrest. In three UK cities, victims of non-traumatic, out of hospital cardiac arrest, over the age of 8 years received either standard or ACD-CPR on arrival of ambulance personnel. Main outcome measures were return of spontaneous circulation, survival to be admitted to the intensive care unit, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcome. A total of 576 patients (STD-CPR, n=309; ACD-CPR, n=267) were analysed. The treatment groups were similar with respect to age, gender, proportion of witnessed arrests, initial cardiac rhythm, and call to advanced life support interval. The proportion of patients receiving bystander CPR was higher in the ACD group (37.1% vs. 28.5%; P=0.028). The interval between collapse and defibrillation was longer in the ACD group (12.3 min vs. 10.4 min; P=0.028). There was no difference between the STD-CPR and ACD-CPR groups in survival to admission to the intensive care unit (13.6% vs. 13.8%; P=0.93) or hospital discharge (4.8% vs. 6.0%; P=0.67). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the neurological outcome of those patients surviving to hospital discharge. Analysis of important subgroups also showed no benefit for ACD-CPR. We conclude that there was no improvement in outcome with ACD-CPR when used by ambulance personnel in Cardiff and Portsmouth.

Video recording of cardiac arrest management: an aid to training and audit

A video camera and microphone are used to record the management of cardiac arrests in the accident and emergency department. The recordings provide a useful tool for training and audit.

Trauma admissions in the elderly: how does a patient's age affect the likelihood of their being admitted to hospital after a fracture?

In two projects we have studied patients presenting to Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments with a fracture, to examine how their age influences their likelihood of admission. Over 1 year from April 1994 we collected data on all 6467 Cardiff residents who presented to the citys A&E department with a fracture. In total 1226 (19%) were admitted. Overall, only 12% of those under 65, but 47% of older patients required admission. This was largely a reflection of the age-distribution of hip fracture, an injury for which admission is inevitable. In a subsequent study of eight A&E departments in South Wales we therefore considered the proportion of patients admitted following fractures at specific anatomical sites. In people over the age of 55 we identified 6889 fractures, 2115 (31%) of which led to admission. After standardisation to control for the age-distribution of incidence for different fracture sites, we found that the likelihood of admission was 22% greater for people aged over 65 years. Elderly people very often require hospital admission after a fracture, primarily as a consequence of the types of fractures that they tend to sustain. Admissions directly attributable to the effects of age and age-related medical, psychiatric and social comorbidity appear of more limited significance.

Ear piercing and children's rights.

EDITOR, - Over 12 months at our accident and emergency department in Cardiff we saw 32 cases of embedded earrings, mostly in children. Nine of the 32 cases showed signs of infection and these were all in the younger age groups. All patients presenting with an embedded earring required a minor surgical procedure under local anaesthetic to remove the retained piece. In a survey of ear …