Russell Weiner

Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays

AbstractThe Third AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop, entitled “Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays” was held on May 1–3, 2006 in Arlington, VA. The format of this workshop consisted of presentations on bioanalytical topics, followed by discussion sessions where these topics could be debated, with the goal of reaching consensus, or identifying subjects where addition input or clarification was required. The discussion also addressed bioanalytical validation requirements of regulatory agencies, with the purpose of clarifying expectations for regulatory submissions. The proceedings from each day were reviewed and summarized in the evening sessions among the speakers and moderators of the day. The consensus summary was presented back to the workshop on the last day and was further debated. This communication represents the distillate of the workshop proceedings and provides the summary of consensus reached and also contains the validation topics where no consensus was reached.ConclusionFor quantitative bioanalytical method validation procedure and requirements, there was a relatively good agreement between chromatographic assays and ligand-binding assays. It was realized that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of bioanalytical method validation should be reviewed and applied appropriately.1.Some of the major concerns between the 2 methodologies related to the acceptable total error for precision and accuracy determination and acceptance criteria for an analytical run. The acceptable total error for precision and accuracy for both the methodologies is less than 30. The 4–6–15 rule for accepting an analytical run by a chromatographic method remained acceptable while a 4–6–20 rule was recommended for ligand-binding methodology.2.The 3rd AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop clarified the issues related to placement of QC samples, determination of matrix effect, stability considerations, use of internal standards, and system suitability tests.3.There was a major concern and issues raised with respect to stability and reproducibility of incurred samples. This should be addressed for all analytical methods employed. It was left to the investigators to use their scientific judgment to address the issue.4.In general, the 3rd AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop provided a forum to discuss and clarify regulatory concerns regarding bioanalytical method validation issues.

CTLA4Ig-mediated blockade of T-cell costimulation in patients with psoriasis vulgaris

Engagement of the B7 family of molecules on antigen-presenting cells with their T cell-associated ligands, CD28 and CD152 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 [CTLA-4]), provides a pivotal costimulatory signal in T-cell activation. We investigated the role of the CD28/CD152 pathway in psoriasis in a 26-week, phase I, open-label dose-escalation study. The importance of this pathway in the generation of humoral immune responses to T cell-dependent neoantigens, bacteriophage phiX174 and keyhole limpet hemocyanin, was also evaluated. Forty-three patients with stable psoriasis vulgaris received 4 infusions of the soluble chimeric protein CTLA4Ig (BMS-188667). Forty-six percent of all study patients achieved a 50% or greater sustained improvement in clinical disease activity, with progressively greater effects observed in the highest-dosing cohorts. Improvement in these patients was associated with quantitative reduction in epidermal hyperplasia, which correlated with quantitative reduction in skin-infiltrating T cells. No markedly increased rate of intralesional T-cell apoptosis was identified, suggesting that the decreased number of lesional T cells was probably likely attributable to an inhibition of T-cell proliferation, T-cell recruitment, and/or apoptosis of antigen-specific T cells at extralesional sites. Altered antibody responses to T cell-dependent neoantigens were observed, but immunologic tolerance to these antigens was not demonstrated. This study illustrates the importance of the CD28/CD152 pathway in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and suggests a potential therapeutic use for this novel immunomodulatory approach in an array of T cell-mediated diseases.

Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement

Despite major advances in modern drug discovery and development, the number of new drug approvals has not kept pace with the increased cost of their development. Increasingly, innovative uses of biomarkers are employed in an attempt to speed new drugs to market. Still, widespread adoption of biomarkers is impeded by limited experience interpreting biomarker data and an unclear regulatory climate. Key differences preclude the direct application of existing validation paradigms for drug analysis to biomarker research. Following the AAPS 2003 Biomarker Workshop (J. W. Lee, R. S. Weiner, J. M. Sailstad, et al. Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development. A conference report. Pharm Res22:499–511, 2005), these and other critical issues were addressed. A practical, iterative, “fit-for-purpose” approach to biomarker method development and validation is proposed, keeping in mind the intended use of the data and the attendant regulatory requirements associated with that use. Sample analysis within this context of fit-for-purpose method development and validation are well suited for successful biomarker implementation, allowing increased use of biomarkers in drug development.

Recommendations for the Bioanalytical Method Validation of Ligand-binding Assays to Support Pharmacokinetic Assessments of Macromolecules

AbstractPurpose.With this publication a subcommittee of the AAPS Ligand Binding Assay Bioanalytical Focus Group (LBABFG) makes recommendations for the development, validation, and implementation of ligand binding assays (LBAs) that are intended to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments of macromolecules. Methods. This subcommittee was comprised of 10 members representing Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and the contract research organization industries from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Each section of this consensus document addresses a specific analytical performance characteristic or aspect for validation of a LBA. Within each section the topics are organized by an assays life cycle, the development phase, pre-study validation, and in-study validation. Because unique issues often accompany bioanalytical assays for macromolecules, this document should be viewed as a guide for designing and conducting the validation of ligand binding assays. Results. Values of ±20% (25% at the lower limit of quantification [LLOQ]) are recommended as default acceptance criteria for accuracy (% relative error [RE], mean bias) and interbatch precision (%coefficient of variation [CV]). In addition, we propose as secondary criteria for method acceptance that the sum of the interbatch precision (%CV) and the absolute value of the mean bias (%RE) be less than or equal to 30%. This added criterion is recommended to help ensure that in-study runs of test samples will meet the proposed run acceptance criteria of 4-6-30. Exceptions to the proposed process and acceptance criteria are appropriate when accompanied by a sound scientific rationale. Conclusions. In this consensus document, we attempt to make recommendations that are based on bioanalytical best practices and statistical thinking for development and validation of LBAs.

Workshop Report and Follow-Up—AAPS Workshop on Current Topics in GLP Bioanalysis: Assay Reproducibility for Incurred Samples—Implications of Crystal City Recommendations

The Conference Report of the 3rd AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop (Crystal City III) endorsed the concept that assay methods supporting bioanalytical data in submissions must demonstrate assay reproducibility by using incurred samples. The present Workshop was convened to provide a forum for discussion and consensus building about incurred sample assay reproducibility for both nonclinical and clinical studies. Information about current regulatory perspectives on incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) was presented, implications of ISR for both large and small molecules were discussed, and the steering committee put forth recommendations for performing ISR. These recommendations from the Workshop, along with the subsequent evolution of approaches leading to a robust ISR program, may be used by scientists performing bioanalytical assays for regulated studies to provide additional confirmation of assay reproducibility for incurred samples.

Workshop on bioanalytical methods validation for macromolecules: summary report.

1. To determine industry and regulatory standards established for bioanalytical method validation in support of the estimation and characterization of macromolecules in the preclinical and clinical stages of drug development. 2. To evaluate special validation considerations for quantitative, macromolecule-detecting technologies that have emerged since 1990 including immunoassays, cell-based assays, antibody titers, and automation in the laboratory. 3. To address the strengths/limitations and advantages/ disadvantages of assay-customized approaches to validation that focus on assay parameters specific to the intended use of the assay. 4. To develop a 2000 workshop report regarding appropriate bioanalytical validation criteria and standardization of terminology for the above to be used by regulatory agencies to draft new guidelines for the bioanalytical validation criteria for macromolecules quantitation.

Bioanalytical method validation for macromolecules in support of pharmacokinetic studies.

The development and validation of ligand binding assays used in the support of pharmacokinetic studies has been the focus of various workshops and publications in recent years, all in an effort to establish a guidance document for standardization of these bioanalytical methods. This summary report of the workshop from 2003 focuses on the issues discussed in presentations and notes points of discussion and areas of consensus among the participants.

Electrochemiluminescence in bioanalysis

The discovery of electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and its development as a means of detection is truly a success story. Although studies describing ECL were published in the early 1960s, most studies using ECL as a means of detection were not widely published until the mid 1990s. Incorporating ECL into assays provides increased sensitivity, several logs of dynamic range and the ability to electronically control the reaction. These characteristics provide advantages over assays that rely on radioisotopic labels, fluorescence and enzymatic activity. There have been many areas of science that have benefited from the use of ECL, including environmental microbiology, virology, neurobiology, molecular biology and immunology. ECL has improved the understanding and treatment of infectious diseases, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and even sleep apnea disorders. Drug development has also benefited from ECL via improved assessment of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and determining immune responses against protein-based therapeutics. This review provides an overview of ECL chemistry and principles with a more detailed emphasis on the applications of ECL-based assays in different areas of science and medicine. The primary purpose of this review is to provide an in-depth discussion of the impact that ECL-based analysis has had on microbiology, immunology, virology, neurodegenerative diseases, molecular biology and drug development. Examples of ECL-based bioanalysis in each of these fields are discussed in conjunction with an overview of ECL principles and instrumentation.

Assessment of Dose Proportionality, Absolute Bioavailability, and Immunogenicity Response of CTLA4Ig (BMS-188667), a Novel Immunosuppressive Agent, Following Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration to Rats

AbstractPurpose. The objectives of this study were: to delineate the pharmacokinetics of CTLA4Ig in rats after single and multiple intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses; to assess the relationship of the pharmacokinetic parameters of CTLA4Ig vs dose; to calculate the SC absolute bioavailability; and to assess the antibody response of CTLA4Ig. Methods. A total of 48 (24 male and 24 female) Sprague Dawley rats were divided into eight treatments with 3 rats per gender in each group: a single dose of 10, 80, or 200 mg/kg of CTLA4Ig given either IV or SC and a repeated dose of 10 mg/kg (once every other day for 7 doses over 13 days) given either SC or IV. Serial blood samples were collected up to 43 days after single dose administration and up to 50 days following the administration of the last multiple dose on day 13. The serum concentration of CTLA4Ig and anti-CTLA4Ig antibodies were measured using ELISA assays. Results. After single IV doses, Cmax and AUCinf increased in a dose proportional manner; CL appeared to be dose independent, while both Vss and T1/2 increased as the administered dose increased. Following single SC doses, Cmax and AUCinf increased in a linear manner but not proportionally; mean Tmax values were prolonged but similar among the three dose levels, while T1/2 increased as the administered dose increased. The absolute SC bioavailability of CTLA4Ig decreased as the dose increased from 10 (62.5%), 80 (55.7%), and 200 mg/kg (41.1%). Comparison of the AUCtau values between the first and last doses suggested an accumulation (3.1−4.7) of CTLA4Ig. However, regardless of the route of dosing, AUCtau after the last dose were comparable to AUCinf values following the single dose. Anti-CTLA4Ig antibodies were detected at the 10 mg/kg dose level after single or multiple doses for both routes of administration. However, regardless of single or multiple doses, antibody titers were relatively greater for the SC compared to the IV administration. Conclusions. The key findings of this study were: (i) the elimination characteristics of CTLA4Ig were comparable between the SC and IV routes; (ii) the repeated dosing did not alter the pharmacokinetics of CTLA4Ig; (iii) the SC absolute bioavailability tended to decrease as the administered dose increased; and (iv) a greater formation of anti-CTLA4Ig antibodies was observed after SC compared to IV at a single 10 mg/kg dose level; however, after multiple dosing, the formation of antibodies from either of the two routes was relatively slower, and (v) during the study period, no antibodies were observed at either the 80 or 200 mg/kg dose levels regardless of the route of administration.

Translational Biomarkers: from Preclinical to Clinical a Report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker Workshop

There have been some successes in qualifying biomarkers and applying them to drug development and clinical treatment of various diseases. A recent success is illustrated by a collaborative effort among the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and the pharmaceutical industry to provide a set of seven preclinical kidney toxicity biomarkers for drug development. Other successes include, but are not limited to, clinical biomarkers for cancer treatment and clinical management of heart transplant patients. The value of fully qualified surrogate endpoints in facilitating successful drug development is undisputed, especially for diseases in which the traditional clinical outcome can only be assessed in large, multi-year trials. Emerging biomarkers, including chemical genomic or imaging biomarkers, and measurement of circulating tumor cells hold great promise for early diagnosis of disease and as prognostic tests for managing treatment of chronic diseases such as osteoarthritis, Alzheimer disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. To advance the success of treating and managing these diseases, efforts are needed to establish the temporal relationship between changes in inflammatory or imaging biomarkers with the progression of the chronic disease, and in the case of cancer, between the extent of circulating cancer cells and tumor progression or remission.