Ruth Powazki
Cleveland Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ruth Powazki.
Palliative Medicine | 1999
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh; Horvitz Hr; Lee; Jerome Burkons
This paper describes the application of an empirically-derived psychosocial assessment for use in advanced cancer. The patient population selected for this study was those patients no longer pursuing aggressive antitumour treatment, and the focus of care was on management of major symptoms and complications, and psychosocial support of the patient and family. The physical, cognitive, social and emotional dimensions were the framework for the assessment of both patient and caregiver functioning. Through this assessment of all patients admitted to our inpatient palliative medicine unit, care needs were identified and psychosocial interventions planned. The results of 150 assessments are reported, as well as observations of the process, implications for psychosocial care and modifications of the assessment based on this experience.
Journal of Palliative Medicine | 2014
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh; Katherine Hauser; Mellar P. Davis
AIM Family conferences are an important forum for communication, particularly for those with serious illnesses. DESIGN The strength of evidence was assessed by patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO). DATA SOURCE We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed), published articles, and multidisciplinary resource textbooks. RESULTS Four areas investigated family conferences: acute care, family medicine/geriatrics, intensive care units (ICU), and oncology/palliative medicine. A unifying theme was the importance of improved communication. A single randomized controlled ICU study demonstrated that family conferences positively influenced bereavement outcomes. A prospective (but single-arm) ICU study and several family medicine/geriatrics cohort studies, found that family conferences reduced hospital length of stay and/or decreased resource utilization. Other articles proposed guidelines or methods for the practical conduct of family conferences. CONCLUSIONS ICU studies supported the benefit of a family conference to the family, health care team, and hospital administration. The family conference in other clinical areas was not supported by a strong evidence base. Well-designed prospective studies are needed in multiple medical settings to assess the proposed and observed patient and financial benefits of the family conference, and determine their generalizability.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | 2002
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh
The family is essential to patients with advanced cancer. Family and caregiver distress, however, can impair optimal care and support of the patient. A five-item questionnaire, the Family APGAR Scale, was evaluated to determine family functioning levels of selected patients. The APGAR Scale has five components for measuring family functioning: Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve. Fifty consecutive patients admitted to a palliative medicine inpatient unit were reviewed for a pilot study. Eligibility requirements included admission to the unit for the first time, and the ability to speak English and give informed consent. Fifteen patients and 11 primary care-givers participated. Despite the small sample, some significant family functioning issues were identified. Completing the study later with a larger sample will provide information that will help the multidisciplinary team better meet the needs of both patient and family.
Seminars in Oncology | 2011
Ruth Powazki
The family conference (FC) is a forum for communication with both the patient and family to discuss essential information about medical, educational, and psychosocial needs. It ensures appropriate decision-making, which is integral to comprehensive cancer care. Inclusion of the family creates opportunities and challenges. The main opportunities are for the family to share support for the patient and collaborate with the medical team. This can ease adaptation throughout the illness course with better adherence to recommended treatment plans and greater satisfaction with medical care. The challenge is to manage communication to evolve understanding when treatment outcomes are not curative, and to meet the medical information and psychosocial needs of the patient and family. The FC aim is to give the family confidence by: (1) providing a calm discussion and understanding the illness and treatment; (2) offering a sense of safety that patients goals will be balanced by the impact on the family caregivers; (3) affording the opportunity to connect and sustain each other; (4) sharing hope and mutual empathy; and (5) maintaining self-efficacy to manage their needs. Using the FC to discuss the plan of care and at the same time assisting the family to process the impact of the illness optimizes benefit for the patient, family, and physician.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | 2014
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh
A family conference (FC) is an opportunity for the family and their physician to share their knowledge and concerns about the physical and psychosocial dimensions of care. Appropriate communication principles and practice are both important for an effective FC. The FCs guided by common sense principles and sound clinical practice (good structure, content, and process) have beneficial outcomes. (1) Creation of a therapeutic partnership so the family and medical team collaborate in the difficult task of sophisticated medical and psychosocial care of a complex illness. (2) Enhanced therapeutic management through education and support of the patient and primary caregiver (and other family members) to facilitate self-efficacy and convey realistic hope with careful sequencing of key messages. (3) Easier patient transitions from cure- to care-oriented management, with a formal (yet thoughtful and gentle) introduction to the principles and practice of modern palliative medicine.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | 2001
Vanina Dal Bello-Haas; Doreen Andrews-Hinders; Cathy Balsdon Richer; Carmen Blakely-Adams; Joan Hanson; Jeff Hammel; Daniel Kelly; Anne Kloos; Erik P. Pioro; Ruth Powazki; Terese Wheeler; Hiroshi Mitsumoto
The current status of evaluation and management provided by individual health-care professionals (HCP) at amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) centers and clinics needs to be analyzed. This paper describes one ALS centers experiences with the development, analysis, refinement, and utility of an interdisciplinary, HCP-driven ALS database. The purpose and conceptual framework of the database, the general data that needed to be collected, and the types of reports that needed to be generated were determined, and, in collaboration with a computer programmer, database management systems were developed. Data were collected on 234 patients between September 1996 and August 1998, and were analyzed by a data entry and biostatistician. Based on review of the biostatisticians report and discussion of problems encountered with the systems, the database was then refined. Benefits of the database system included: systematization of data collection and reporting, reduction of redundant data collection by individuals, decreased variability of evaluation methods and management decisions from patient to patient, and increased availability of a variety of uniform patient information to assist team members in making care decisions. Ongoing refinement will ensure that this HCP-driven ALS database continues to be informative, practical and effective for decision-making and enhancing delivery of care. (ALS 2001; 2: 39A46)
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | 2015
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh; Shiva Shrotriya
Structured interprofessional communication should improve the structure and clarity of the plan of care. The interdisciplinary team meeting (IDTM) is an opportunity for shared information on patients’ and family care needs. We report a prospective observations study of palliative medicine IDTM, which recorded the clinical issues discussed. One hundred and forty-five disparate clinical items were identified for 59 patients and were discussed by the IDTM in about 240 minutes. By content analysis and research meeting consensus, they were grouped into 9 agreed interdisciplinary themes. The 9 themes were then subjected to biostatistical analysis and 3 communication clusters identified. Themes consisted of 3 major communication clusters: (1) clinical services, (2) psychosocial, and (3) care plan. Two themes (information exchange and clinical transitions) did not cluster. The IDTM identified patient care need, reported concerns, and supported collaboration in proactive patient care plans. Future research projects with more patients and a large number of meetings can confirm our findings. This should also examine specific contributions by professional discipline.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | 2014
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh; Brenda Cothren; Lisa Rybicki; Shirley Thomas; Gloria Morgan; Diana Karius; Mellar P. Davis; Shiva Shrotriya
Seminars in Oncology | 2000
Ruth Powazki; Palcisco C; Richardson M; Stagno Sj
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2013
Ruth Powazki; Declan Walsh; Aynur Aktas; Katherine Hauser; Matthew Karafa; Ellen Schleckman