Ruth Welsh

The importance of non-struck side occupants in side collisions

Current occupant protection assessment for side impact is focused on struck side occupants sitting alone. In a representative sample of tow-away side collisions from the UK, only one-third of front seat occupants in side collisions were alone, on the struck side of the car. The other two-thirds were either a non-struck side occupant alone or a situation where the adjacent seat was also occupied. In terms of restraint protection for non-struck side occupants, belts appeared to be less effective in perpendicular compared to oblique side crashes. Front seat occupancy had bearing on injury outcome. With both front seats occupied, there was a reduction in AIS 27+ injury to belted non-struck side occupants due to a reduction in chest and lower limb injuries. Struck side occupants sustained increased injury rates to the extremities when accompanied by a belted non-struck side occupant but no notable increases in moderate to serious injury to the head, chest, abdomen or pelvis.

Vehicle crashworthiness and the older motorist

This study examines the relationship between age and the injury outcomes for belted drivers in road vehicle crashes in the United Kingdom. The sample of 1,541 drivers was divided into three age groups: 889 drivers were aged 17–39 years (young drivers); 515 were 40–64 years (middle-aged), and 137 aged 65–84 years (older drivers). Both frontal and side impact crashes in which the vehicles sustained sufficient damage to be towed away from the scene are considered. In-depth information obtained from examinations of the crashed vehicles was combined with clinical data obtained from hospitals to throw light on the mechanisms that led to the injuries. Results show that in crashes of approximately equal severity, older drivers were significantly more likely than middle-aged and young drivers to be fatally injured in both frontal (p<0.001) and side (p<0.05) impact crashes. The results also show that older drivers sustained more injuries to the chest (p<0.0001) and that this body region is particularly problematic. The main sources of the chest injuries were found to be the seat belt in frontal crashes and the door in side impact crashes. As the number of older car users will increase rapidly in most OECD countries in the coming decades, the results suggest that vehicle re-designs are required, including in-vehicle crashworthiness systems, to take into account older peoples relatively low tolerance of crash impacts.

Is naturalistic driving research possible with highly instrumented cars? Lessons learnt in three research centres

This paper provides an overview of the experiences using Highly Instrumented Cars (HICs) in three research Centres across Europe; Spain, the UK and Greece. The data collection capability of each car is described and an overview presented relating to the relationship between the level of instrumentation and the research possible. A discussion then follows which considers the advantages and disadvantages of using HICs for ND research. This includes the obtrusive nature of the data collection equipment, the cost of equipping the vehicles with sophisticated Data Acquisition Systems (DAS) and the challenges for data storage and analysis particularly with respect to video data. It is concluded that the use of HICs substantially increases the depth of knowledge relating to the drivers behaviour and their interaction with the vehicle and surroundings. With careful study design and integration into larger studies with Low(ly) instrumented Cars (LICs), HICs can contribute significantly and in a relatively naturalistic manner to the driver behaviour research.

Study on serious road traffic injuries in the EU

The general objective of this study is to collect knowledge that will enable the future identification of measures for effective prevention of serious road traffic injuries. The specific objective is to provide fact-based analysis on the most common circumstances and types of road traffic crashes leading to serious injuries of MAIS3+ severity. More specifically, the study is directed at providing an understanding of the main circumstances and factors that affect the emergence of serious road traffic injuries, medically coded as MAIS3+, for the following road traffic modes in the EU: pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists and car occupants.

Time-to-collision analysis of pedestrian and pedal-cycle accidents for the development of autonomous emergency braking systems

The aim of this study was to describe the position of pedestrians and pedal cyclists relative to the striking vehicle in the 3 s before impact. This information is essential for the development of effective autonomous emergency braking systems and relevant test conditions for consumer ratings. The UK RAIDS-OTS study provided 175 pedestrian and 127 pedal-cycle cases based on in-depth, at-scene investigations of a representative sample of accidents in 2000-2010. Pedal cyclists were scattered laterally more widely than pedestrians (90% of cyclists within around ±80° compared to ±20° for pedestrians), however their distance from the striking vehicle in the seconds before impact was no greater (90% of cyclists within 42 m at 3 s compared to 50 m for pedestrians). This data is consistent with a greater involvement of slow moving vehicles in cycle accidents. The implication of the results is that AEB systems for cyclists require almost complete 180° side-to-side vision but do not need a longer distance range than for pedestrians.

Methodological Aspects of Field Operational Tests of After-Market and Nomadic Driver Support Systems and Impacts on Mobility

Background: This paper reports on the methodology undertaken and some results achieved within a study of drivers using aftermarket and nomadic devices (the TeleFOT project). Objective: To evaluate the methodology for conducting Field Operational Tests for Information and Communication Technology whilst also providing an example of the method applied in the context of mobility within the TeleFOT project. Method: ‘Top down, bottom up’ approach to the derivation of research questions and hypotheses is described. Statistical analysis has been undertaken on data collected through Field Operational Tests and Travel Diaries considering the impact of information functions (such as navigation, traffic information and green driving) upon journey length. Results: A summary of the results relating specifically to how the length of a journey can be affected by information functions indicates that Navigation and Traffic information can reduce the length of journeys whilst Green Driving functions tend to increase the journey length. Conclusion: The FOT methodology was successfully applied in the TeleFOT project as was the novel method for generating research questions. When turning the theoretical FOT method developed in FESTA into practice, several good innovations were made which and can be recommended for future FOTs; collation of metadata, the use of comparable origin / destination pairs for analysis, centralised processing of raw data into legs in order to simplify the analysis of the huge datasets collected in the project.

Lessons learnt from OS operations

This report focuses on the specific lessons learnt from the data collection in UDRIVE, derived from the difficulties encountered by the operation sites and the solutions applied to mitigate the problems where possible. These lessons learnt concern all aspects of the data collection. Such lessons learnt will provide useful insights for any future naturalistic driving study or field operational test. During the project, the operation sites provided three feedbacks related to their lessons learnt. These reports covered the pilot phase, the first six months of data collection and the last one at the end of the data collection. This iterative process gathered 71 lessons learnt. After the data collection, the final questionnaire was filled in by the participants and they provided with some interesting feedback. Most important lesssons learned were: Selecting only one or two vehicle types contributed to easier instrumentation of the Data Acquisaition System to the vehicles. However, this decision put some constraints in the recruitment of participants due the different fleet of vehicles across the European countries, especially some models were not very common in certain countries. One of the common problems across the Operation Sites (OS) was the participants’ drop-outs. The main lesson learnt was that it is important to maintain a set of replacement participants until the end of the project to cover any eventual drop out. Data protection was one of the most challenging aspects of the project. Dealing with images and personal data create some difficulties between the partners and their country data protection agencies. From the participants’ questionnaires, it was noted that even if they felt comfortable, their driving behaviour was somehow affected. Hide the equipment, and especially the cameras, the best it can be will help the participants drive normally. They also were pleased to have all the information beforehand and happy when dates, deadlines, incentives, etc., were respected as explained to them. When involving any external supplier (e.g. rental vehicle company, garage, equipment supplier, etc.). the role, responsibilities, response time, liability, etc., of every supplier have to be defined in more detail to avoid misunderstandings, delays or ambiguities. Developing as early as possible a very detailed and realistic plan of action allows to avoid delays, overspending, save resources and to achieve the project objectives.

Summary of OS Operations

This deliverable provides an overview of the OS operations during the data collection phase. It contains the vehicles instrumentation towards the start of full-scale operations, the operational tasks involved during the data collection to monitor the vehicles, the drivers and the data quality, the final stage including the de-installation and the exit questionnaire collection and an overview of the final sample and total data collected per OS and per vehicle type. The deliverable concludes with the summary of the learned lessons, in regards to recruitment, instrumentation and data collection.

Operation sites description and planning

This deliverable presents the seven operating sites (OS): Austria (PTWs, KFV), France (Cars, CEESAR), Germany (Cars, DLR), Netherlands (Trucks, TNO), Poland (Cars, IBDIM), Spain (PTWs, CIDAUT), UK (Cars, UNIVLEEDS/LOUGHBOROU). Each OS determines its geographical coverage and personnel responsible for trial operation. They confirm compliance with the global schedule and with site specific schedules. Further planning issues consider participant liaison strategies, collection of subjective data, data acquisition system installation and maintenance procedure, data collection and management, data and operational quality assurance, end of trial management and ethical ap-proval and legal issues. All OS planned the trials following the common guidelines, but also accommodated the trial preparation to local circumstances.

Overview of OS preparation, sample characteristics and piloting

The deliverable presents the preparation for data collection for each OS. It elaborates on prerequisites for each OS, in terms of logistics, documentation, and instrumentation. Moreover, it details the pilot test procedures to dictate the experimentation. Lastly, the feedback for each OS is reported through a checklist in all possible contexts of the trial and also through reporting of issues.