Ryan J. Warth

Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available level I randomized controlled trials comparing single-row with double-row repair to statistically compare clinical outcomes and imaging-diagnosed re-tear rates. METHODS A literature search was undertaken to identify all level I randomized controlled trials comparing structural or clinical outcomes after single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair. Clinical outcomes measures included in the meta-analysis were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles, and Constant scores; structural outcomes included imaging-confirmed re-tears. Meta-analyses compared raw mean differences in outcomes measures and relative risk ratios for imaging-diagnosed re-tears after single-row or double-row repairs by a random-effects model. RESULTS The literature search identified a total of 7 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in preoperative to postoperative change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles, or Constant scores between the single-row and double-row groups (P = .440, .116, and .156, respectively). The overall re-tear rate was 25.9% (68/263) in the single-row group and 14.2% (37/261) in the double-row group. There was a statistically significant increased risk of sustaining an imaging-proven re-tear of any type in the single-row group (relative risk, 1.76 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.48]; P = .001), with partial-thickness re-tears accounting for the majority of this difference (relative risk, 1.99 [95% confidence interval, 1.40-3.82]; P = .039). CONCLUSION Single-row repairs resulted in significantly higher re-tear rates compared with double-row repairs, especially with regard to partial-thickness re-tears. However, there were no detectable differences in improvement in outcomes scores between single-row and double-row repairs.

Complications After Anatomic Fixation and Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments

Background: Reconstruction of the disrupted acromioclavicular (AC) joint has historically resulted in high complication rates. As a result, there has been a move toward anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation and reconstruction, owing to its numerous biomechanical advantages and perceived clinical advantages. Purpose: To report and analyze the unique complications associated with these anatomic CC ligament procedures using either cortical fixation buttons (CFBs) or tendon grafts (TGs) and to evaluate the effect that these complications have on patient outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From January 2006 until May 2011, a total of 59 primary anatomic CC ligament procedures were performed using either CFBs or TGs. Demographic, surgical, subjective (including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH], Short Form–12 [SF-12], and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE] scores), and radiographic data along with surgical complications were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Construct survivorship, defined as the maintenance of reduction of the AC joint, was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method at 12- and 24-month intervals. Results: Surgical treatment for AC joint dislocations was performed in 3 women (4 shoulders) and 52 men (55 shoulders) with a mean age of 43.6 years (range, 18-71 years); 13 shoulders (22.0%) underwent fixation using the CFB technique, and 46 shoulders (78.0%) underwent reconstruction using the TG technique. The overall complication rate was 27.1% (16/59) in this study. There were 3 complications (23.1%) in the CFB group, including 1 coracoid fracture and 2 cases of hardware failure resulting in a loss of reduction. There were 13 complications (28.2%) in the TG group, including 4 graft ruptures, 2 clavicle fractures, 1 case of hardware failure, 1 hypertrophic distal clavicle, 2 cases of hardware pain, 1 suture granuloma, 1 case of adhesive capsulitis, and 1 case of axillary neuropathy. Twelve- and 24-month construct survivorship was calculated to be 86.2% and 83.2%, respectively. Of the 43 shoulders that did not have a complication, mean ASES scores significantly improved from 57.5 (range, 0-97) to 91 (range, 63-100) (P < .001), and mean SF-12 physical component summary scores significantly improved from 45 (range, 25-58) to 56 (range, 43-65.8) (P < .001) after a mean 2.4-year follow-up (range, 1.0-5.7 years). There were no significant differences in outcomes between those that did and did not experience a complication, with the exception that those with complications had significantly decreased median patient satisfaction compared with those without complications (3.5 vs 9, respectively; P = .049). Conclusion: Anatomic procedures to treat disrupted CC ligaments using either CFBs or TGs resulted in an overall complication rate of 27.1% (16/59). Construct survivorship was calculated to be 86.2% at 12 months and 83.2% at 24 months. Good to excellent outcomes could only be reported in those patients who did not have a complication.

Clinical and Structural Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears With and Without Platelet-Rich Product Supplementation: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of all Level I and Level II studies comparing the clinical or structural outcomes, or both, after rotator cuff repair with and without platelet-rich product (PRP) supplementation. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify all Level I or II studies comparing the clinical or structural outcomes, or both, after arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with (PRP+ group) and without (PRP- group) PRP supplementation. Data included outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], University of California Los Angeles [UCLA], Constant, Simple Shoulder Test [SST] and visual analog scale [VAS] scores) and retears diagnosed with imaging studies. Meta-analyses compared preoperative, postoperative, and gain in outcome scores and relative risk ratios for retears. Meta-regression compared the effect of PRP treatment on outcome scores and retear rates according to 6 covariates. Minimum effect sizes that were detectable with 80% power were also calculated for each study. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in this review and a maximum of 8 studies were used for meta-analyses according to data availability. There were no statistically significant differences between the PRP+ and PRP- groups for overall outcome scores or retear rates (P > .05). Overall gain in the Constant score was decreased when liquid PRP was injected over the tendon surface compared with PRP application at the tendon-bone interface (-6.88 points v +0.78 points, respectively; P = .046); however, this difference did not reach the previously reported minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for Constant scores. When the initial tear size was greater than 3 cm in anterior-posterior length, the PRP+ group exhibited decreased retear rates after double-row repairs when compared with the PRP- group (25.9% v 57.1%, respectively; P = .046). Sensitivity power analyses revealed that most included studies were only powered to detect large differences in outcome scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS There were no statistically significant differences in overall gain in outcome scores or retear rates between treatment groups. Gain in Constant scores was significantly increased when PRPs were applied at the tendon-bone interface when compared with application over the top of the repaired tendon. Retear rates were significantly decreased when PRPs were used for the treatment of tears greater than 3 cm in anterior-posterior length using a double-row technique. Most of the included studies were only powered to detect large differences in outcome scores between treatment groups. In addition, an increased risk for selection, performance, and attrition biases was found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and Level II studies.

Acromioclavicular joint separations

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations are common injuries of the shoulder girdle, especially in the young and active population. Typically the mechanism of this injury is a direct force against the lateral aspect of the adducted shoulder, the magnitude of which affects injury severity. While low-grade injuries are frequently managed successfully using non-surgical measures, high-grade injuries frequently warrant surgical intervention to minimize pain and maximize shoulder function. Factors such as duration of injury and activity level should also be taken into account in an effort to individualize each patient’s treatment. A number of surgical techniques have been introduced to manage symptomatic, high-grade injuries. The purpose of this article is to review the important anatomy, biomechanical background, and clinical management of this entity.

Massive rotator cuff tears: pathomechanics, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes.

Rotator cuff tear size has an important effect on clinical outcomes after repair. Management options for massive rotator cuff tears are numerous, and selection of the most appropriate treatment method for individual patients can be a challenge. An understanding of the pathomechanics, treatment, and clinical outcomes in patients with massive rotator cuff tears can serve as a guide for clinical decision-making. The purpose of this article was to review treatment options and clinical outcomes for the management of massive rotator cuff tears.

Instability and degenerative arthritis of the sternoclavicular joint: a current concepts review.

Background: Injuries to the sternoclavicular (SC) joint typically occur with high-energy mechanisms such as those obtained in automobile accidents or contact sports. Many disorders of the SC joint can be treated nonoperatively. However, surgical treatment may be indicated for locked posterior dislocations; symptomatic, chronic instability; or persistent, painful osteoarthritis that fails nonoperative therapy. Purpose: To provide an updated review on the current diagnosis and management of instability and degenerative arthritis of the SC joint. Study Design: Current concepts review. Methods: A preliminary PubMed database search using the terms sternoclavicular instability, dislocation, arthritis, resection, and stabilization was performed in August 2012. All anatomic and biomechanical studies, review articles, case reports, case series, and technique papers that were relevant to the topic were included. Results: The search identified 929 articles, 321 of which, after screening of the titles and abstracts, were considered potentially relevant to this study. Of the 321 articles, 30 were anatomic or imaging studies, 2 were biomechanical studies, 69 were review papers, 189 were case series or reports, and 31 were technique papers. The majority of these studies were classified as evidence level 4, with a few scattered level 3 studies. Because the level of evidence obtained from this search was not adequate for systematic review (or meta-analysis), a current concepts review of the diagnosis and management of SC joint instability and degenerative arthritis is presented. Conclusion: Injuries to the SC joint are uncommon. Recognition and classification of these injuries are critical to proper management, thus minimizing potential long-term sequelae such as posttraumatic arthritis and recurrent instability. Although nonoperative therapy is the modality of choice in anterior dislocations, posterior dislocations require special attention because of the presence of vulnerable posterior hilar structures. Surgical management of chronic instability and degenerative arthritis of the SC joint includes resection arthroplasty of the medial clavicle with or without reconstruction of the sternoclavicular ligaments with graft material. Although resection is typically performed open, an arthroscopic technique is described that theoretically decreases operating and recovery times while also decreasing the risk of iatrogenic injury. Currently, when reconstruction is needed for stability, a figure-of-8 graft reconstruction is the recommended method based on biomechanical data and small clinical series.

Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Classification, Pattern Recognition, and Treatment

The posterosuperior rotator cuff, composed of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons, is the most common site for full-thickness rotator cuff tears and represents a significant source of shoulder disability worldwide. Recognition of and classification of full-thickness tear patterns are essential in order to optimize surgical treatment and to improve prognosis. Until recently, tear patterns have been described using one- or two-dimensional classification systems. Three-dimensional pattern recognition is critical to achieving the most successful outcome possible. For more complex patterns, a combination of side-to-side stitching, margin convergence, and interval slide techniques may be needed to achieve a tension-free tendon-bone repair. Biomechanical and anatomic evidence supports the use of linked double-row repairs for most full-thickness tears. Although double-row repairs seem to result in improved structural outcomes, clinical evidence has not shown differences in outcomes scores between single-row and double-row repairs. Single-row repair may be performed in partial-thickness, small full-thickness, or very massive, immobile tears, whereas double-row repair may be performed in most other cases.

Resorbable Collagen Scaffolds for the Treatment of Meniscus Defects: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and structural outcomes after resorbable collagen meniscus scaffold implantation through a systematic review of the published literature. METHODS A systematic search of both the PubMed and Embase databases was undertaken to identify all studies that reported clinical and/or structural outcomes after resorbable collagen meniscus scaffold implantation for the treatment of defects involving either the medial or lateral meniscus. Extracted data included study characteristics; surgical methods and rehabilitation protocols; objective outcomes; and preoperative and postoperative subjective outcome scores including Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, and visual analog scale scores. RESULTS Thirteen studies were included in this review. There were 10 Level IV studies, 2 Level II studies, and 1 Level I study with follow-up intervals ranging from 3 months to 12.5 years. With a few exceptions, the study designs used in each study generally followed those which had been previously performed. Substantial differences in rehabilitation protocols and concomitant procedures were noted that may have had an effect on overall clinical outcomes. Objective findings were mostly consistent and typically showed minimal degenerative changes on postoperative radiographs, decreased signal intensity of the scaffold over time on magnetic resonance imaging, the presence of meniscus-like tissue at second-look arthroscopy, and good integration of new tissue as evidenced by histologic analysis of biopsy specimens. Most studies reported satisfactory clinical outcomes, and most patients showed substantial improvements in comparison with mean preoperative baseline values. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of this systematic review, implantation of resorbable collagen scaffolds for the treatment of meniscus defects provides satisfactory clinical and structural outcomes in most cases. There is evidence that collagen meniscus scaffold implantation provides superior clinical outcomes when compared with partial meniscectomy alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level I, II, and IV studies.

Two-Year Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Recreational Athletes Older Than 70 Years:

Background: Outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in recreational athletes older than 70 years are not widely reported. Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears in recreational athletes aged 70 years or older. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained before initiation of this study. Data were collected prospectively and were retrospectively reviewed. From December 2005 to August 2012, patients who were at least 70 years of age, who described themselves as recreational athletes, and who underwent a primary or revision arthroscopic repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears by a single surgeon were identified from a surgical registry. Demographic data, surgical data, and the following pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes scores were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Short Form–12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Acromiohumeral distance and Goutallier classifications were recorded. Patient satisfaction (range, 1-10, 10 = best) and reasons for activity modification were collected at final follow-up. Results: Forty-nine shoulders (44 patients) were included. The mean age was 73 years (range, 70-82 years). There were 33 men and 11 women (5 bilateral). The mean preoperative acromiohumeral distance was 9.2 mm (range, 3.0-15.9 mm). All patients had Goutallier classifications of 0, 1, or 2. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years (range, 2.0-6.9 years) in 43 of 49 (88%) shoulders. No rotator cuff repairs were revised, however, 1 patient had surgical treatment for stiffness. All postoperative outcomes measures demonstrated significant improvements when compared with their preoperative baselines. The mean ASES score was 90.3 (range, 60-100), the mean SANE score was 85.1 (range, 29-100), the mean QuickDASH score was 11.3 (0-50), and the mean SF-12 PCS score was 51.6 (range, 38-58) with a median patient satisfaction of 10 (range, 1-10). Patients who modified their recreational activities due to postoperative weakness were significantly less satisfied (P = .018). In this study, 24 of 31 (77%) who responded were able to return to their sport at a similar level of intensity. Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was highly effective at reducing pain, improving function, and returning patients to sport in recreational athletes 70 years of age and older.

Scapulothoracic Bursitis and Snapping Scapula Syndrome A Critical Review of Current Evidence

Background: Symptomatic scapulothoracic disorders, such as painful scapular crepitus and/or bursitis, are uncommon; however, they can produce significant pain and disability in many patients. Purpose: To review the current knowledge pertaining to snapping scapula syndrome and to identify areas of further research that may be helpful to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: We performed a preliminary search of the PubMed and Embase databases using the search terms “snapping scapula,” “scapulothoracic bursitis,” “partial scapulectomy,” and “superomedial angle resection” in September 2013. All nonreview articles related to the topic of snapping scapula syndrome were included. Results: The search identified a total of 167 unique articles, 81 of which were relevant to the topic of snapping scapula syndrome. There were 36 case series of fewer than 10 patients, 16 technique papers, 11 imaging studies, 9 anatomic studies, and 9 level IV outcomes studies. The level of evidence obtained from this literature search was inadequate to perform a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. Therefore, a critical review of current evidence is presented. Conclusion: Snapping scapula syndrome, a likely underdiagnosed condition, can produce significant shoulder dysfunction in many patients. Because the precise origin is typically unknown, specific treatments that are effective for some patients may not be effective for others. Nevertheless, bursectomy with or without partial scapulectomy is currently the most effective primary method of treatment in patients who fail nonoperative therapy. However, many patients experience continued shoulder disability even after surgical intervention. Future studies should focus on identifying the modifiable factors associated with poor outcomes after operative and nonoperative management for snapping scapula syndrome in an effort to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.