Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ryan Jankord is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ryan Jankord.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2008

Limbic Regulation of Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Function during Acute and Chronic Stress

Ryan Jankord; James P. Herman

The hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenocortical (HPA) axis is responsible for initiation of glucocorticoid stress responses in all vertebrate animals. Activation of the axis is regulated by diverse afferent input to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). This review discusses brain mechanisms subserving generation and inhibition of stress responses focusing on the contribution of the limbic system and highlighting recent conceptual advances regarding organization of stress response pathways in the brain. First, control of HPA axis responses to psychogenic stimuli is exerted by a complex neurocircuitry that involves oligosynaptic networks between limbic forebrain structures and the PVN. Second, individual stress‐modulatory structures can have a heterogeneous impact on HPA axis responses, based on anatomical micro‐organization and/or stimulus properties. Finally, HPA axis hyperactivity pursuant to chronic stress involves a substantial functional and perhaps anatomical reorganization of central stress‐integrative circuits. Overall, the data suggest that individual brain regions do not merely function as monolithic activators or inhibitors of the HPA axis and that network approaches need be taken to fully understand the nature of the neuroendocrine stress response.


Brain Stimulation | 2016

Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede L. Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P. Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Q. Truong; Paulo S. Boggio; Andre R. Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette T. Gillick; Roy H. Hamilton; Benjamin M. Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen K. Loo; Michael A. Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D. Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E. Turkeltaub; Adam J. Woods

This review updates and consolidates evidence on the safety of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Safety is here operationally defined by, and limited to, the absence of evidence for a Serious Adverse Effect, the criteria for which are rigorously defined. This review adopts an evidence-based approach, based on an aggregation of experience from human trials, taking care not to confuse speculation on potential hazards or lack of data to refute such speculation with evidence for risk. Safety data from animal tests for tissue damage are reviewed with systematic consideration of translation to humans. Arbitrary safety considerations are avoided. Computational models are used to relate dose to brain exposure in humans and animals. We review relevant dose-response curves and dose metrics (e.g. current, duration, current density, charge, charge density) for meaningful safety standards. Special consideration is given to theoretically vulnerable populations including children and the elderly, subjects with mood disorders, epilepsy, stroke, implants, and home users. Evidence from relevant animal models indicates that brain injury by Direct Current Stimulation (DCS) occurs at predicted brain current densities (6.3-13 A/m(2)) that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by conventional tDCS. To date, the use of conventional tDCS protocols in human trials (≤40 min, ≤4 milliamperes, ≤7.2 Coulombs) has not produced any reports of a Serious Adverse Effect or irreversible injury across over 33,200 sessions and 1000 subjects with repeated sessions. This includes a wide variety of subjects, including persons from potentially vulnerable populations.


Progress in Brain Research | 2008

CHRONIC STRESS PLASTICITY IN THE HYPOTHALAMIC PARAVENTRICULAR NUCLEUS

James P. Herman; Jonathan N. Flak; Ryan Jankord

Proper integration and execution of the physiological stress response is essential for maintaining homoeostasis. Stress responses are controlled in large part by the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, which contains three functionally distinct neural populations that modulate multiple stress effectors: (1) hypophysiotrophic PVN neurons that directly control the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis; (2) magnocellular neurons and their secreted neurohypophysial peptides; and (3) brainstem and spinal cord projecting neurons that regulate autonomic function. Evidence for activation of PVN neurons during acute stress exposure demonstrates extensive involvement of all three effector systems. In addition, all PVN regions appear to participate in chronic stress responses. Within the hypophysiotrophic neurons, chronic stress leads to enhanced expression of secreted products, reduced expression of glucocorticoid receptor and GABA receptor subunits and enhanced glutamate receptor expression. In addition, there is evidence for chronic stress-induced morphological plasticity in these neurons, with chronic drive causing changes in cell size and altered GABAergic and glutamatergic innervation. The response of the magnocellular system varies with different chronic exposure paradigms, with changes in neurohypophysial peptide gene expression, peptide secretion and morphology seen primarily after intense stress exposure. The preautonomic cell groups are less well studied, but are likely to be associated with chronic stress-induced changes in cardiovascular function. Overall, the PVN is uniquely situated to coordinate responses of multiple stress effector systems in the face of prolonged stimulation, and likely plays a role in both adaptation and pathology associated with chronic stress.


Endocrinology | 2011

Stress Vulnerability during Adolescent Development in Rats

Ryan Jankord; Matia B. Solomon; Jennifer Albertz; Jonathan N. Flak; Rong Zhang; James P. Herman

Adolescent development is proposed to represent a time of increased susceptibility to stress. During adolescence, the brain demonstrates a high level of plasticity and can be positively or negatively affected by the environment. This study tests the hypothesis that adolescent development is a stage of enhanced vulnerability to chronic stress. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to our 14-d chronic variable stress (CVS) paradigm at three developmental stages: 1) early adolescence (35 d; age at initiation of CVS); 2) late adolescence (50 d); or 3) adulthood (80 d). We examined the effects of CVS on the following: 1) depression-like behavior; 2) somatic indices; 3) hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity; and 4) neuropeptide expression in the hypothalamus. Results show, regardless of age, CVS exposure: 1) decreased body weight; 2) increased adrenal size; 3) decreased fat weight; and 4) increased HPA response to stress. The somatic effects of CVS were exaggerated in late adolescent animals, and late adolescent animals were the only group where CVS decreased oxytocin expression and increased basal corticosterone. In response to CVS, adult animals increased immobility during the forced-swim test while early and late adolescent animals were resistant to the effects of chronic stress on depression-like behavior. Results show that adolescent animals were protected from the effect of chronic stress on depression-like behavior while late adolescent animals were more susceptible to the somatic, HPA axis, and neuropeptide effects of chronic stress. Thus, adolescent development is a unique window of vulnerabilities and protections to the effects of chronic stress.


European Journal of Neuroscience | 2012

Identification of chronic stress-activated regions reveals a potential recruited circuit in rat brain

Jonathan N. Flak; Matia B. Solomon; Ryan Jankord; Eric G. Krause; James P. Herman

Chronic stress induces presynaptic and postsynaptic modifications in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that are consistent with enhanced excitatory hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenocortical (HPA) axis drive. The brain regions mediating these molecular modifications are not known. We hypothesized that chronic variable stress (CVS) tonically activates stress‐excitatory regions that interact with the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, culminating in stress facilitation. In order to identify chronically activated brain regions, ΔFosB, a documented marker of tonic neuronal activation, was assessed in known stress regulatory limbic and brainstem sites. Four experimental groups were included: CVS, repeated restraint (RR) (control for HPA habituation), animals weight‐matched (WM) to CVS animals (control for changes in circulating metabolic factors due to reduced weight gain), and non‐handled controls. CVS, (but not RR or WM) induced adrenal hypertrophy, indicating that sustained HPA axis drive only occurred in the CVS group. CVS (but not RR or WM) selectively increased the number of FosB/ΔFosB nuclei in the nucleus of the solitary tract, posterior hypothalamic nucleus, and both the infralimbic and prelimbic divisions of the medial prefrontal cortex, indicating an involvement of these regions in chronic drive of the HPA axis. Increases in FosB/ΔFosB‐immunoreactive cells were observed following both RR and CVS in the other regions (e.g. the dorsomedial hypothalamus), suggesting activation by both habituating and non‐habituating stress conditions. The data suggest that unpredictable stress uniquely activates interconnected cortical, hypothalamic, and brainstem nuclei, potentially revealing the existence of a recruited circuitry mediating chronic drive of brain stress effector systems.


American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology | 2010

Stress activation of IL-6 neurons in the hypothalamus.

Ryan Jankord; Rong Zhang; Jonathan N. Flak; Matia B. Solomon; Jennifer Albertz; James P. Herman

An emerging literature attests to the ability of psychological stress to alter the inflammatory cytokine environment of the body. While the ability of stress to cause cytokine release is well established, the neural pathways involved in this control have yet to be identified. This study tests the hypothesis that IL-6 neurons of the hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system (HNS), a neural pathway proposed to secrete IL-6 into the circulation, are activated in response to psychological stress. Colocalization studies confirm robust expression of IL-6 in cell bodies and fibers of vasopressin (but not oxytocin) neurons of the paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic nucleus (SON) of the rat hypothalamus. In response to restraint, there was a greater increase in c-Fos expression in SON IL-6-positive (IL-6+) neurons. In addition, both psychogenic (restraint) or systemic stress (hypoxia) lead to phosphorylated ERK induction only in IL-6+ magnocellular neurons, indicating selective activation of the MAPK signaling pathway in the IL-6 subset of magnocellular neurons. Finally, restraint upregulated IL-6 mRNA expression in both the PVN and SON, which was accompanied by a four-fold increase in circulating IL-6. The data indicate that noninflammatory stressors selectively activate IL-6 magnocellular neurons, upregulate IL-6 gene expression in the PVN and SON, and increase plasma IL-6. In summary, results show that IL-6 neurons of the HNS are a recruited component of the response to psychological stress.


Journal of Endocrinology | 2009

The stimuli-specific role of vasopressin in the hypothalamus-pituitary- adrenal axis response to stress

Dóra Zelena; Ágnes Domokos; Subodh Kumar Jain; Ryan Jankord; Ludmila Filaretova

Adaptation to a constantly changing environment is fundamental to every living organism. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis is a key component of the adaptation process. The present study tests the hypothesis that vasopressin (AVP) is required for the HPA response to acute stimuli. To accomplish this, naturally AVP-deficient Brattleboro rats were exposed to a wide range of stimuli and their HPA response was compared with heterozygous littermates. The circadian rhythmicity of plasma ACTH and corticosterone was not different between the two genotypes. The ACTH and corticosterone response to volume load, restraint or aggressive attack were decreased in AVP-deficient rats. The stress-induced increase in ACTH, but not corticosterone, was significantly impaired in AVP-deficient animals after novelty, elevated plus-maze, forced swim, hypoglycaemia, ulcerogenic cold immobilisation, lipopolysaccharide, hypertonic saline and egg white injection. The HPA response to social avoidance, ether inhalation and footshock was not different between the genotypes. In vitro, the hypophysis of AVP-deficient animals showed a reduction in stimulated ACTH production and their adrenal glands were hyporeactive to ACTH. A dissociation between the ACTH and corticosterone response was observed in several experiments and could not be explained by an earlier ACTH peak or enhanced adrenal sensitivity, suggesting the existence of paraadenohypophyseal neuroendocrine regulators. Loss of AVP affected the HPA response to a wide variety of stressors. Interestingly, the contribution of AVP to the HPA response was not specific for, nor limited to, a known stressor category. Thus, there is a context-specific requirement for AVP in stress-induced activation of the HPA axis.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2015

Modulating Hippocampal Plasticity with In Vivo Brain Stimulation

Joyce G. Rohan; Kim A. Carhuatanta; Shawn M. McInturf; Molly K. Miklasevich; Ryan Jankord

Investigations into the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in relieving symptoms of neurological disorders and enhancing cognitive or motor performance have exhibited promising results. However, the mechanisms by which tDCS effects brain function remain under scrutiny. We have demonstrated that in vivo tDCS in rats produced a lasting effect on hippocampal synaptic plasticity, as measured using extracellular recordings. Ex vivo preparations of hippocampal slices from rats that have been subjected to tDCS of 0.10 or 0.25 mA for 30 min followed by 30 min of recovery time displayed a robust twofold enhancement in long-term potentiation (LTP) induction accompanied by a 30% increase in paired-pulse facilitation (PPF). The magnitude of the LTP effect was greater with 0.25 mA compared with 0.10 mA stimulations, suggesting a dose-dependent relationship between tDCS intensity and its effect on synaptic plasticity. To test the persistence of these observed effects, animals were stimulated in vivo for 30 min at 0.25 mA and then allowed to return to their home cage for 24 h. Observation of the enhanced LTP induction, but not the enhanced PPF, continued 24 h after completion of 0.25 mA of tDCS. Addition of the NMDA blocker AP-5 abolished LTP in both control and stimulated rats but maintained the PPF enhancement in stimulated rats. The observation of enhanced LTP and PPF after tDCS demonstrates that non-invasive electrical stimulation is capable of modifying synaptic plasticity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Researchers have used brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation on human subjects to alleviate symptoms of neurological disorders and enhance their performance. Here, using rats, we have investigated the potential mechanisms of how in vivo brain stimulation can produce such effect. We recorded directly on viable brain slices from rats after brain stimulation to detect lasting changes in pattern of neuronal activity. Our results showed that 30 min of brain stimulation in rats induced a robust enhancement in synaptic plasticity, a neuronal process critical for learning and memory. Understanding such molecular effects will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms by which brain stimulation produces its effects on cognition and performance.


Physiology & Behavior | 2011

Opposing effects of chronic stress and weight restriction on cardiovascular, neuroendocrine and metabolic function

Jonathan N. Flak; Ryan Jankord; Matia B. Solomon; Eric G. Krause; James P. Herman

Chronic stress is associated with dysregulation of energy homeostasis, but the link between the two is largely unknown. For most rodents, periods of chronic stress reduce weight gain. We hypothesized that these reductions in weight are an additional homeostatic challenge, contributing to the chronic stress syndrome. Experiment #1 examined cardiovascular responsivity following exposure to prolonged intermittent stress. We used radio-telemetry to monitor mean arterial pressure and heart rate in freely moving, conscious rats. Three groups of animals were tested: chronic variable stress (CVS), weight-matched (WM), and controls. Using this design, we can distinguish between effects due to stress and effects due to the changing body weight. WM, but not CVS, markedly reduced basal heart rate. Although an acute stress challenge elicited similar peak heart rate, WM expedited the recovery to baseline heart rate. The data suggest that CVS prevents the weight-induced attenuation of cardiovascular stress reactivity. Experiment #2 investigated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and metabolic hormone reactivity to novel psychogenic stress. WM increased corticosterone area under the curve. CVS blunted plasma glucose, leptin, and insulin levels in response to restraint. Experiment #3 tested the effects of WM and CVS on PVN oxytocin and corticotrophin-releasing hormone mRNA expression. CVS increased, while WM reduced PVN CRH mRNA expression, whereas both CVS and WM reduced dorsal parvocellular PVN oxytocin mRNA. Overall, the data suggest that weight loss is unlikely to account for the deleterious effects of chronic stress on the organism, but in fact produces beneficial effects that are effectively absent or indeed, reversed in the face of chronic stress exposure.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2010

Role of Glucocorticoids in Tuning Hindbrain Stress Integration

Rong Zhang; Ryan Jankord; Jonathan N. Flak; Matia B. Solomon; David A. D'Alessio; James P. Herman

The nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) is a critical integrative site for coordination of autonomic and endocrine stress responses. Stress-excitatory signals from the NTS are communicated by both catecholaminergic [norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E)] and noncatecholaminergic [e.g., glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)] neurons. Recent studies suggest that outputs of the NE/E and GLP-1 neurons of the NTS are selectively engaged during acute stress. This study was designed to test mechanisms of chronic stress integration in the paraventricular nucleus, focusing on the role of glucocorticoids. Our data indicate that chronic variable stress (CVS) causes downregulation of preproglucagon (GLP-1 precursor) mRNA in the NTS and reduction of GLP-1 innervation to the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. Glucocorticoids were necessary for preproglucagon (PPG) reduction in CVS animals and were sufficient to lower PPG mRNA in otherwise unstressed animals. The data are consistent with a glucocorticoid-mediated withdrawal of GLP-1 in key stress circuits. In contrast, expression of tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA, the rate-limiting enzyme in catecholamine synthesis, was increased by stress in a glucocorticoid-independent manner. These suggest differential roles of ascending catecholamine and GLP-1 systems in chronic stress, with withdrawal of GLP-1 involved in stress adaptation and enhanced NE/E capacity responsible for facilitation of responses to novel stress experiences.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ryan Jankord's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rong Zhang

University of Cincinnati

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessica A. Wagner

Air Force Research Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge