Ryan S. Glasby
University of Tennessee
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ryan S. Glasby.
54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2016
Ryan S. Glasby; J. Taylor Erwin; Douglas L. Stefanski; Steven R. Allmaras; Marshall C. Galbraith; W. Kyle Anderson; Robert H. Nichols
HPCMP CREATE-AV Conservative Field Finite Element (COFFE) is a modular, extensible, robust numerical solver for the Navier-Stokes equations that invokes modularity and extensibility from its first principles. COFFE implores a flexible, class-based hierarchy that provides a modular approach consisting of discretization, physics, parallelization, and linear algebra components. These components are developed with modern software engineering principles to ensure ease of uptake from a users or developers perspective. The Streamwise Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin (SU/PG) method is utilized to discretize the compressible Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations tightly coupled with a variety of turbulence models. The mathematics and the philosophy of the methodology that makes up COFFE are presented.
51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition | 2013
Ryan S. Glasby; Arnold Afb; Nicholas K. Burgess; W. Kyle Anderson; Li Wang; Dimitri J. Mavriplis; Steven R. Allmaras
In this paper computed results from Steamline Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin and Discontinuous Galerkin finite-element methods are compared for various two-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes applications. Identical meshes are utilized for each comparison with linear, quadratic, and cubic elements employed. The order of accuracy is assessed for each scheme for viscous flows using the method of manufactured solutions, and results from each scheme are compared to experimental data. Each scheme is notionally of design order, and results from both compare well with experimental data. Both schemes are viable finite-element discretization techniques, and neither applies an unnecessary amount of artificial dissipation.
46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference | 2016
Steve L. Karman; Jon T. Erwin; Ryan S. Glasby; Douglas L. Stefanski
55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2017
Jon T. Erwin; Ryan S. Glasby; Douglas L. Stefanski; Steve L. Karman
54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2016
Jon T. Erwin; Ryan S. Glasby
2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2018
Kevin R. Holst; Ryan S. Glasby; Jon T. Erwin; Douglas L. Stefanski; Ryan B. Bond
2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2018
Kevin R. Holst; Ryan S. Glasby; Jon T. Erwin; Douglas L. Stefanski; Ryan B. Bond
Journal of Aircraft | 2017
Todd R. Michal; Deric Babcock; Dmitry S. Kamenetskiy; Joshua Krakos; Mortaza Mani; Ryan S. Glasby; Taylor Erwin; Douglas L. Stefanski
55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2017
David Hine; Ryan S. Glasby; Jon T. Erwin; Douglas L. Stefanski
55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2017
Nicholas K. Burgess; Ryan S. Glasby; Jon T. Erwin; Douglas L. Stefanski; Steven R. Allmaras