Ryan T. Cameron
University of Glasgow
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ryan T. Cameron.
Cellular Signalling | 2011
Helen V. Edwards; Ryan T. Cameron; George S. Baillie
The small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) are a highly conserved family of molecular chaperones that are ubiquitously expressed throughout nature. They are transiently upregulated in many tissue types following stressful stimuli. Recently, one member of the sHSP family, HSP20 (HspB6), has been shown to be highly effective as a protective mediator against a number of debilitating pathological conditions, including cardiac hypertrophy and Alzheimers disease. Hsp20 is also an important modulator of vital physiological processes, such as smooth muscle relaxation and cardiac contractility. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms employed by HSP20 that allow it to act as an innate protector in the context of cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Emerging evidence for a possible role as an anti-cancer agent is also presented.
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2016
Alexander McGirr; Tatiana V. Lipina; Ho-Suk Mun; John Georgiou; Ahmed Al-Amri; Enoch Ng; Dongxu Zhai; Christina Elliott; Ryan T. Cameron; Jonathan G. L. Mullins; Fang Liu; George S. Baillie; Steven J. Clapcote; John C. Roder
Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of dementia and a prominent feature in psychiatric disease. As non-redundant regulators of intracellular cAMP gradients, phosphodiesterases (PDE) mediate fundamental aspects of brain function relevant to learning, memory, and higher cognitive functions. Phosphodiesterase-4B (PDE4B) is an important phosphodiesterase in the hippocampal formation, is a major Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) binding partner and is itself a risk gene for psychiatric illness. To define the effects of specific inhibition of the PDE4B subtype, we generated mice with a catalytic domain mutant form of PDE4B (Y358C) that has decreased ability to hydrolyze cAMP. Structural modeling predictions of decreased function and impaired binding with DISC1 were confirmed in cell assays. Phenotypic characterization of the PDE4BY358C mice revealed facilitated phosphorylation of CREB, decreased binding to DISC1, and upregulation of DISC1 and β-Arrestin in hippocampus and amygdala. In behavioral assays, PDE4BY358C mice displayed decreased anxiety and increased exploration, as well as cognitive enhancement across several tests of learning and memory, consistent with synaptic changes including enhanced long-term potentiation and impaired depotentiation ex vivo. PDE4BY358C mice also demonstrated enhanced neurogenesis. Contextual fear memory, though intact at 24 h, was decreased at 7 days in PDE4BY358C mice, an effect replicated pharmacologically with a non-selective PDE4 inhibitor, implicating cAMP signaling by PDE4B in a very late phase of consolidation. No effect of the PDE4BY358C mutation was observed in the prepulse inhibition and forced swim tests. Our data establish specific inhibition of PDE4B as a promising therapeutic approach for disorders of cognition and anxiety, and a putative target for pathological fear memory.
Future Science OA | 2015
Ruth MacLeod; Ellin-Kristina Hillert; Ryan T. Cameron; George S. Baillie
Alzheimers disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly and its prevalence is set to increase rapidly in coming decades. However, there are as yet no available drugs that can halt or even stabilize disease progression. One of the main pathological features of AD is the presence in the brain of senile plaques mainly composed of aggregated β amyloid (Aβ), a derivative of the longer amyloid precursor protein (APP). The amyloid hypothesis proposes that the accumulation of Aβ within neural tissue is the initial event that triggers the disease. Here we review research efforts that have attempted to inhibit the generation of the Aβ peptide through modulation of the activity of the proteolytic secretases that act on APP and discuss whether this is a viable therapeutic strategy for treating AD.
Molecular BioSystems | 2014
Steven D. Quinn; Paul A. Dalgarno; Ryan T. Cameron; Gordon J. Hedley; Christian Hacker; John M. Lucocq; George S. Baillie; Ifor D. W. Samuel; J. Carlos Penedo
The fluorescence response of the Thioflavin-T (ThT) dye and derivatives has become the standard tool for detecting β-amyloid aggregates (Aβ) in solution. However, it is accepted that ThT-based methods suffer from important drawbacks. Some of these are due to the cationic structure of ThT, which limits its application at slightly acidic conditions; whereas some limitations are related to the general use of an extrinsic-dye sensing strategy and its intrinsic requirement for the formation of a sensor-binding site during the aggregation process. Here, we introduce fluorescence-self-quenching (FSQ) between N-terminally tagged peptides as a strategy to overcome some of these limitations. Using a combination of steady-state, picosecond time-resolved fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy, we characterize the fluorescence response of HiLyte fluor 555-labelled Aβ peptides and demonstrate that Aβ self-assembly organizes the covalently attached probes in close proximity to trigger the self-quenching sensing process over a broad range of conditions. Importantly, we prove that N-terminal tagging of β-amyloid peptides does not alter the self-assembly kinetics or the resulting aggregated structures. We also tested the ability of FSQ-based methods to monitor the inhibition of Aβ1-42 aggregation using the small heat-shock protein Hsp20 as a model system. Overall, FSQ-based strategies for amyloid-sensing fill the gap between current morphology-specific protocols using extrinsic dyes, and highly-specialized single-molecule techniques that are difficult to implement in high-throughput analytical determinations. When performed in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) format, the method becomes a ratiometric platform to gain insights into amyloid structure and for standardizing in vitro studies of amyloid aggregation.
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience | 2014
Ryan T. Cameron; Steven D. Quinn; Lynn S. Cairns; Ruth MacLeod; Ifor D. W. Samuel; Brian O. Smith; J. Carlos Penedo; George S. Baillie
Up-regulation of Hsp20 protein levels in response to amyloid fibril formation is considered a key protective response against the onset of Alzheimers disease (AD). Indeed, the physical interaction between Hsp20 and Aβ is known to prevent Aβ oligomerisation and protects neuronal cells from Aβ mediated toxicity, however, details of the molecular mechanism and regulatory cell signalling events behind this process have remained elusive. Using both conventional MTT end-point assays and novel real time measurement of cell impedance, we show that Hsp20 protects human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells from the neurotoxic effects of Aβ. In an attempt to provide a mechanism for the neuroprotection afforded by Hsp20, we used peptide array, co-immunoprecipitation analysis and NMR techniques to map the interaction between Hsp20 and Aβ and report a binding mode where Hsp20 binds adjacent to the oligomerisation domain of Aβ, preventing aggregation. The Hsp20/Aβ interaction is enhanced by Hsp20 phosphorylation, which serves to increase association with low molecular weight Aβ species and decrease the effective concentration of Hsp20 required to disrupt the formation of amyloid oligomers. Finally, using a novel fluorescent assay for the real time evaluation of morphology-specific Aβ aggregation, we show that phospho-dependency of this effect is more pronounced for fibrils than for globular Aβ forms and that 25mers corresponding to the Hsp20 N-terminal can be used as Aβ aggregate inhibitors. Our report is the first to provide a molecular model for the Hsp20/Aβ complex and the first to suggest that modulation of the cAMP/cGMP pathways could be a novel route to enhance Hsp20-mediated attenuation of Aβ fibril neurotoxicity.
Cellular Signalling | 2014
Sabine Weninger; K. Van Craenenbroeck; Ryan T. Cameron; Fabrice Vandeput; Matthew A. Movsesian; George S. Baillie; Romain Lefebvre
Phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3 and PDE4, which degrade cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), are important regulators of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) 4 receptor signaling in cardiac tissue. Therefore, we investigated whether they interact with the 5-HT4(b) receptor, and whether A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs), scaffolding proteins that bind to the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) and contribute to the spacial-temporal control of cAMP signaling, are involved in the regulation of 5-HT4(b) receptor signaling. By measuring PKA activity in the absence and presence of PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitiors, we found that constitutive signaling of the overexpressed HA-tagged 5-HT4(b) receptor in HEK293 cells is regulated predominantly by PDE4, with a secondary role for PDE3 that is unmasked in the presence of PDE4 inhibition. Overexpressed PDE4D3 and PDE3A1, and to a smaller extent PDE4D5 co-immunoprecipitate constitutively with the 5-HT4(b) receptor. PDE activity measurements in immunoprecipitates of the 5-HT4(b) receptor confirm the association of PDE4D3 with the receptor and provide evidence that the activity of this PDE may be increased upon receptor stimulation with 5-HT. A possible involvement of AKAPs in 5-HT4(b) receptor signaling was uncovered in experiments using the St-Ht31 inhibitor peptide, which disrupts the interaction of AKAPs with PKA. However, St-Ht31 did not influence 5-HT4(b) receptor-stimulated PKA activity, and endogenous AKAP79 and gravin were not found in immunoprecipitates of the 5-HT4(b) receptor. In conclusion, we found that both PDE3A1 and PDE4D3 are integrated into complexes that contain the 5-HT4(b) receptor and may thereby regulate 5-HT4(b) receptor-mediated signaling.
Biochemical Pharmacology | 2013
Ryan T. Cameron; Ryan G. Coleman; Jon P. Day; Krishna C. Yalla; Miles D. Houslay; David R. Adams; Brian K. Shoichet; George S. Baillie
Graphical abstract
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2015
Euan Parnell; Andreas Koschinski; Manuela Zaccolo; Ryan T. Cameron; George S. Baillie; Gemma L. Baillie; Alison Porter; Stuart P. McElroy; Stephen J. Yarwood
Recent studies have demonstrated that the actin binding protein, ezrin, and the cAMP-sensor, EPAC1, cooperate to induce cell spreading in response to elevations in intracellular cAMP. To investigate the mechanisms underlying these effects we generated a model of EPAC1-dependent cell spreading based on the stable transfection of EPAC1 into HEK293T (HEK293T–EPAC1) cells. We found that direct activation of EPAC1 with the EPAC-selective analogue, 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP (007), promoted cell spreading in these cells. In addition, co-activation of EPAC1 and PKA, with a combination of the adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin, and the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, rolipram, was found to synergistically enhance cell spreading, in association with cortical actin bundling and mobilisation of ezrin to the plasma membrane. PKA activation was also associated with phosphorylation of ezrin on Thr567, as detected by an electrophoretic band mobility shift during SDS-PAGE. Inhibition of PKA activity blocked ezrin phosphorylation and reduced the cell spreading response to cAMP elevation to levels induced by EPAC1-activation alone. Transfection of HEK293T–EPAC1 cells with inhibitory ezrin mutants lacking the key PKA phosphorylation site, ezrin-Thr567Ala, or the ability to associate with actin, ezrin-Arg579Ala, promoted cell arborisation and blocked the ability of EPAC1 and PKA to further promote cell spreading. The PKA phospho-mimetic mutants of ezrin, ezrin-Thr567Asp had no effect on EPAC1-driven cell spreading. Our results indicate that association of ezrin with the actin cytoskeleton and phosphorylation on Thr567 are required, but not sufficient, for PKA and EPAC1 to synergistically promote cell spreading following elevations in intracellular cAMP.
FEBS Open Bio | 2017
Ryan T. Cameron; Ellanor Whiteley; Jon P. Day; Anna I. Parachikova; George S. Baillie
Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors are currently under evaluation as agents that may facilitate the improvement of cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimers disease. Our aim was to determine whether inhibitors of PDEs 4, 5 and 9 could alleviate the cytotoxic effects of amyloid beta 1–42 (Aβ1–42) via a mechanism involving the small heatshock protein HSP20. We show that inhibition of PDEs 4, 5 and 9 but not 3 induces the phosphorylation of HSP20 which, in turn, increases the colocalisation between the chaperone and Aβ1–42 to significantly decrease the toxic effect of the peptide. We conclude that inhibition of PDE9 is most effective to combat Aβ1–42 cytotoxicity in our cell model.
Biological Trace Element Research | 2013
Apostolos Zarros; Ryan T. Cameron; Stylianos Tsakiris; George S. Baillie
Govil et al. [1] have recently provided an interesting report on the use of murine brain-derived postnuclear supernatants as an in vitro model for the assessment of neurotoxic effects of cadmium (Cd). The authors focus on an important topic within the neurotoxicity arena and describe an extensive neurochemical screening via the study of the in vitro effects of different Cd-chloride (CdCl2) concentrations (1, 5, and 10 mM) on the following crucial enzymatic and nonenzymatic parameters: catalase activity, superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione-S-transferase activity, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, sodium–potassium adenosinetriphosphatase (Na, K-ATPase) activity, reduced glutathione content, and thiol(s) content analysis [1]. It is our opinion that the methodology used by the authors for the neurochemical analysis is appropriate and so is the studied biomarker selection. However, there are certain important issues addressed within this report [1], on which we would like to comment. The use of postnuclear supernatants is a widely accepted approach for the in vitro study of brain diseases and is especially pertinent for the in vitro study of accumulative metabolic or toxic encephalopathies [2–5]. Should it, though, be considered as a stand-alone approach to these encephalopathies? We feel that the answer to this question is “no,” as one should always consider that: (a) an in vitro model is primarily judged on its ability to simulate the in vivo conditions in the most realistic way possible, (b) accumulative metabolic or toxic encephalopathies, in many cases, affect the hepatic and/or urinary functions (thus potentially inducing secondary neurotoxic phenomena in a time-dependent way), (c) postnuclear supernatants do not provide cell-type-specific data, (d) postnuclear supernatants do not reveal the potential cellular adaptive (neuroprotective) mechanisms that occur under different in vitro and (most importantly) under in vivo conditions, and finally, (e) postnuclear supernatants are a crude cellular fractionated environment suitable for the study of membrane-bound enzymes (such as AChE and Na, K-ATPase) and/or cytosolic parameters that can be altered by readily available solvents and/or lipid peroxidation within the test tube (as a result, a limited spectrum of cellular functions can be studied within this context and which, to some respect, can be considered as “biased”). Another important issue regarding the use of postnuclear supernatants as a substrate for the in vitro assessment of accumulative metabolic or toxic encephalopathies is the determination of the appropriate incubation conditions. The latter can be defined as: (a) the age of the studied brain tissue (the infancy-related metabolic encephalopathies are more appropriately simulated by a suckling murine brain postnuclear supernatant, as such is more representative of the vulnerability and the adaptivity of the infant human brain), (b) the potential selection of a specific region to focus on, rather than the use of a whole-brain homogenate (studies focusing on the neurotoxicity of xenobiotics known to affect cognitive performance and/or cause mental A. Zarros (*) :R. T. Cameron :G. S. Baillie Gardiner Laboratory (535), Wolfson Link Building, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Box 318, 111 West George str., G2-1QX, Glasgow, Scotland, UK e-mail: [email protected]