Ryogo Minamimoto

Long fasting is effective in inhibiting physiological myocardial 18F-FDG uptake and for evaluating active lesions of cardiac sarcoidosis

BackgroundF-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising modality for detecting active lesions of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). However, determining whether 18F-FDG uptake in the myocardium is physiological is challenging due to metabolic shift in myocardial cells. Although methods for inhibiting physiological myocardial 18F-FDG uptake have been proposed, no standard methods exist. This study therefore aimed to compare the effect of an 18-h fast (long fasting (LF)) with heparin loading plus a 12-h fast (HEP) before 18F-FDG PET scan.MethodsWe analyzed the effects of LF and HEP on the inhibition of physiological myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in healthy subjects (18 in HEP and 19 in LF) and in patients with known or suspected CS (96 in HEP and 69 in LF). In CS, the lower uptake of 18F-FDG in the myocardium was evaluated. A visual four-point scale was used to assess myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in comparison with hepatic uptake (1 lower, 2 similar, 3 somewhat higher, 4 noticeably higher).ResultsMyocardial 18F-FDG uptake was 1.68 ± 1.06 in LF and 3.17 ± 1.16 in HEP in healthy subjects (p < 0.0001), whereas it was 1.48 ± 0.99 in LF and 2.48 ± 1.33 in HEP in CS patients (p < 0.0001). Logistic regression and regression trees revealed the LF was the most effective in inhibiting myocardial 18F-FDG uptake. In addition, serum free fatty acid levels on intravenous 18F-FDG injection were a possible biomarker.ConclusionsLF is effective in inhibiting myocardial 18F-FDG uptake, and consequently, it could be useful for evaluating active lesions of CS in 18F-FDG PET images.

FDG-PET for the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin: a Japanese multi-center study.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin (FUO), we performed a Japanese multi-center retrospective survey.MethodsA total of 81 consecutive patients with FUO who underwent FDG-PET at 6 institutions between July 2006 and December 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. FDG uptake was visually evaluated using a 4-grade scale. The efficacy of FDG-PET for the evaluation of FUO, the provision of additional diagnostic information, the clinical impact on therapeutic decisions (4-grade scale), and the diagnostic performance compared with the final diagnosis were evaluated.ResultsThe diagnostic results were analyzed according to 4 groups of final diagnoses: infection, arthritis/vasculitis/autoimmune/collagen disease (A/V), tumor/granuloma (T/G), and other/unknown (O/U). Sensitivity was highest in T/G, followed by infection, A/V and O/U [100%(7/7), 89%(24/27), 65%(11/17), 0%(0/1) respectively]. Clinical impact and mean FDG score showed the same tendency. Additional information was highest in infection followed by T/G, A/V, and O/U [76%(22/29), 75%(6/8), 43%(9/21), 23%(5/22), respectively]. The O/U group showed a high specificity (84%, 16/19) and accurately excluded active focal inflammatory diseases and malignancy. The use of steroids for the treatment of fever seemed to mask the lesions and modified the results, especially in the A/V group (4 false negatives in 8 steroid users out of 21 A/V patients). The prevalence of each disease in each hospital significantly affected the effectiveness of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of FUO. The mean FDG uptake score and additional information (70%, 31/44 vs. 30%, 11/37, respectively) in national hospital (NH) was significantly higher than in university hospitals (UH). A Grade 3 clinical impact, in which the FDG PET results changed the clinical decision, was seen in 50% (22/44) of the patients in the NH group and 13.5% (5/37) of the patients in the UH group. The sensitivity (91%, 30/33; 63%, 12/19) and specificity (60%, 6/10; 86%, 12/14) of the results in the NH and UH groups differed. The total sensitivity was 81% (42/52), specificity was 75% (18/24). The NH group included a large number of cases with infectious diseases (50%, 23/44), while the UH group included a large number of A/V cases (38%, 14/37) and O/U cases (41%, 15/37).ConclusionFDG-PET for the diagnosis of FUO provided additional diagnostic information and had a high clinical impact, especially among patients with infectious diseases. It was also helpful in cases with unknown or other miscellaneous diseases by allowing the exclusion of focally active diseases. The prevalence of diseases in hospitals significantly affected the effectiveness of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of FUO. FDG-PET is a useful examination providing various degrees of clinical impact for the management of FUO, depending on the characteristics of the patient and the hospital.

Early assessment by FDG-PET/CT of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is predictive of disease course

BackgroundWe reported previously that 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) had potential for evaluating early response to treatment by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This time we investigated the relation of the early assessment by FDG PET/CT to long-term prognosis with an expanded number of patients and period of observation.MethodsPatients for whom TKI treatment for advanced RCC was planned were enrolled. FDG PET/CT was performed before TKI treatment and after one month of TKI treatment. The relations of the FDGPET/CT assessment to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.ResultsThirty-five patients were enrolled (sunitinib 19 cases, sorafenib 16 cases). The patients with RCC showing high SUVmax in pretreatment FDG PET/CT demonstrated short PFS (P =0.024, hazard ratio 1.137, 95% CI 1.017-1.271) and short OS (P =0.004, hazard ratio 1.210 95% CI 1.062-1.379). Thirty patients (sunitinib 16 cases, sorafenib 14 cases) were evaluated again after 1 month. The PFS of the patients whose SUVmax decreased<20% was shorter than that of the patients whose SUVmax decreased<20% (P = 0.027, hazard ratio 3.043, 95% CI 1.134-8.167). The PFS of patients whose tumor diameter sum increased was shorter than that of the patient with tumors whose diameter sum did not (P =0.006, hazard ratio 4.555, 95% CI 1.543-13.448).The patients were classified into three response groups: good responder (diameter sum did not increase, and SUVmax decreased ≥ 20%), intermediate responder (diameter sum did not increase, and SUVmax decreased<20%), and poor responder (diameter sum increased, or one or more new lesions appeared). The median PFS of good, intermediate, and poor responders were 458 ± 146 days, 131 ± 9 days, and 88 ± 26 days (good vs. intermediate P = 0.0366, intermediate vs. poor P = 0.0097, log-rank test). Additionally the mean OSs were 999 ± 70 days, 469 ± 34 days, and 374 ± 125 days, respectively (good vs. intermediate P = 0.0385, intermediate vs. poor P = 0.0305, log-rank test).ConclusionsThe evaluation of RCC response to TKI by tumor size and FDG uptake using FDG PET/CT after 1 month can predict PFS and OS.

A meta-analysis of 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography for assessment of metastatic bone tumor

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared with bone scintigraphy (BS) planar or BS planar and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in evaluating patients with metastatic bone tumor.Materials and methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of all available studies addressing the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-Fluoride PET, 18F-Fluoride PET/CT, BS planar, and BS planar and SPECT for detecting the metastatic bone tumor. We determined sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios, and drew summary receiver operating characteristic curves using hierarchical regression models. We also compared the effective dose and cost-effectiveness estimated by data from the enrolled studies between 18F-Fluoride PET or PET/CT and BS planar or BS planar and SPECT.ResultsWhen comparing all studies with data on 18F-Fluoride PET or PET/CT, sensitivity and specificity were 96.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 93.5–98.9%] and 98.5% (95% CI 97.0–100%), respectively, on a patient basis and 96.9% (95% CI 95.9–98.0%) and 98.0% (95% CI 97.1–98.9%), respectively, on a lesion basis. The Az values of 18F-Fluoride PET or PET/CT were 0.986 for the patient basis and 0.905 for the lesion basis, whereas those of BS or BS and SPECT were 0.866 for the patient basis and 0.854 for the lesion basis. However, the estimated effective dose and average cost-effective ratio were poorer for 18F-Fluoride PET or PET/CT than those of BS planar or BS planar and SPECT.Conclusion18F-Fluoride PET or PET/CT has excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of metastatic bone tumor, but the estimated effective dose and average cost-effective ratio are at a disadvantage compared with BS planar or BS planar and SPECT.

FDG PET for rheumatoid arthritis: basic considerations and whole-body PET/CT

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is a tracer for glucose metabolism. Its distribution is not specific to cancer cells but is also observed in inflammatory tissue, including macrophages, capillaries, and fibroblasts. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic, chronic inflammation of the joints resulting in synovitis. The disease is characterized by fibrovascular proliferation leading to the formation of a pannus and causing high FDG uptake. Several clinical studies of RA have demonstrated that FDG uptake in affected joints reflects the disease activity of RA, with strong correlations between uptake and various clinical parameters having been noted. Furthermore, the use of FDG PET for the sensitive detection and monitoring of the response to RA therapy has been reported. FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) enables the detailed evaluation of disease in large joints throughout the whole body, which is a unique advantage of PET/CT. FDG PET/CT can also be used to detect high‐risk disease complications, such as atlanto‐axial joint involvement, at an early stage. The possible contribution of FDG PET to the management of patients with RA remains to be studied in detail.

Effects of blood glucose level on FDG uptake by liver: a FDG-PET/CT study

UNLABELLED In FDG-PET for abdominal malignancy, the liver may be assumed as an internal standard for grading abnormal FDG uptake both in early images and in delayed images. However, physiological variables of FDG uptake by the liver, especially the effects of blood glucose level, have not yet been elucidated. METHODS FDG-PET studies of 70 patients examined at 50 to 70 min after injection (60 ± 10 min: early images) and of 68 patients examined at 80 to 100 min after injection (90 ± 10 min: delayed images) were analyzed for liver FDG uptake. Patients having lesions in the liver, spleen and pancreas; patients having bulk tumor in other areas; and patients early after chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded; also, patients with blood glucose level over 125 mg/dl were excluded. RESULTS Mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of the liver, blood glucose level and sex showed no significant differences between early images and delayed images. However, liver SUV in the delayed image showed a larger variation than that in the early image and showed significant correlation to blood glucose level. The partial correlation coefficient between liver SUV and blood glucose level in the delayed image with adjustment for sex and age was 0.73 (P < .0001). Multivariate regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) of blood glucose was 0.017 (0.013-0.021). CONCLUSION Blood glucose level is an important factor affecting the normal liver FDG uptake in nondiabetic patients. In the case of higher glucose level, liver FDG uptake is elevated especially in the delayed image. This may be due to the fact that the liver is the key organ responsible for glucose metabolism through gluconeogenesis and glycogen storage.

Pilot Comparison of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBED-CC)] (68Ga-PSMA-11) is a PET tracer that can detect prostate cancer relapses and metastases by binding to the extracellular domain of PSMA. 68Ga-labeled DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2 (68Ga-RM2) is a synthetic bombesin receptor antagonist that targets gastrin-releasing peptide receptors. We present pilot data on the biodistribution of these PET tracers in a small cohort of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Methods: Seven men (mean age ± SD, 74.3 ± 5.9 y) with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer underwent both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI scans. SUVmax and SUVmean were recorded for normal tissues and areas of uptake outside the expected physiologic biodistribution. Results: All patients had a rising level of prostate-specific antigen (mean ± SD, 13.5 ± 11.5) and noncontributory results on conventional imaging. 68Ga-PSMA-11 had the highest physiologic uptake in the salivary glands and small bowel, with hepatobiliary and renal clearance noted, whereas 68Ga-RM2 had the highest physiologic uptake in the pancreas, with renal clearance noted. Uptake outside the expected physiologic biodistribution did not significantly differ between 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-RM2; however, 68Ga-PSMA-11 localized in a lymph node and seminal vesicle in a patient with no abnormal 68Ga-RM2 uptake. Abdominal periaortic lymph nodes were more easily visualized by 68Ga-RM2 in two patients because of lack of interference by radioactivity in the small intestine. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-RM2 had distinct biodistributions in this small cohort of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Additional work is needed to understand the expression of PSMA and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in different types of prostate cancer.

Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer

We prospectively evaluated the use of combined 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with breast and prostate cancer and compared the results with those for 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI. Methods: Thirty patients (15 women with breast cancer and 15 men with prostate cancer) referred for standard-of-care bone scintigraphy were prospectively enrolled in this study. 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI were performed after bone scintigraphy. The whole-body MRI protocol consisted of both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced sequences. Lesions detected with each test were tabulated, and the results were compared. Results: For extraskeletal lesions, 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI had no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (92.9% vs. 92.9%, P = 1.00), positive predictive value (81.3% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.68), or accuracy (76.5% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.56). However, 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than whole-body MRI (96.2% vs. 81.4%, P < 0.001, 89.8% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.01) and bone scintigraphy (96.2% vs. 64.6%, P < 0.001, 89.8% vs. 65.9%, P < 0.001) for the detection of skeletal lesions. Overall, 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than whole-body MRI (95.7% vs. 83.3%, P < 0.002, 87.6% vs. 76.0%, P < 0.02) but not statistically significantly so when compared with a combination of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy (95.7% vs. 91.6%, P = 0.17, 87.6% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.53). 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT showed no significant difference from a combination of 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI. No statistically significant differences in positive predictive value were noted among the 3 examinations. Conclusion: 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT is superior to whole-body MRI and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy for evaluation of skeletal disease extent. Further, 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI detected extraskeletal disease that may change the management of these patients. 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/CT provides diagnostic ability similar to that of a combination of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in patients with breast and prostate cancer. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these preliminary findings, ideally using the newly introduced simultaneous PET/MRI scanners.

Similarities and differences in fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings in spondyloarthropathy, polymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES We assessed fluorine-18 ((18)F)-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings in patients with seronegative spondyloarthritis (SpA), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS We studied 53 patients with SpA (n=21), PMR (n=16), or RA (n=16) admitted to our hospital between 2006 and 2011. Disease activity in the ischial tuberosities, greater trochanters, spinous processes, vertebral bodies, and sacroiliac joints (SIJ) were evaluated by determining FDG accumulation using maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) and FDG scores. RESULTS SUV(max) for ischial tuberosities was significantly higher in PMR than SpA or RA. SUV(max) for greater trochanters and spinous processes was significantly higher in PMR than RA (P<0.001) and significantly higher in SpA than in PMR or RA for SIJ (P=0.01). No significant difference in vertebral scores was observed among groups (P=0.488). FDG scores yielded similar results. X-ray findings were consistent with PET/CT findings in 3/15 (20%) patients with sacroiliitis, whereas magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with PET/CT findings in 4/7 (57.1%) patients. CONCLUSIONS PET/CT detection of inflammation in the ischial tuberosities, greater trochanters, and spinous processes discriminated between PMR and RA, but not between SpA and PMR. PET/CT findings can distinguish SpA from RA and PMR and are useful for the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis.

Simultaneous whole-body time-of-flight 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a pilot study comparing SUVmax with PET/CT and assessment of MR image quality.

Purpose The recent introduction of hybrid PET/MRI scanners in clinical practice has shown promising initial results for several clinical scenarios. However, the first generation of combined PET/MRI lacks time-of-flight (TOF) technology. Here we report the results of the first patients to be scanned on a completely novel fully integrated PET/MRI scanner with TOF. Materials and Methods We analyzed data from patients who underwent a clinically indicated 18F FDG PET/CT, followed by PET/MRI. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured from 18F FDG PET/MRI and 18F FDG PET/CT for lesions, cerebellum, salivary glands, lungs, aortic arch, liver, spleen, skeletal muscle, and fat. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed the MR data for image quality. Results Thirty-six patients (19 men, 17 women, mean [±standard deviation] age of 61 ± 14 years [range: 27–86 years]) with a total of 69 discrete lesions met the inclusion criteria. PET/CT images were acquired at a mean (±standard deviation) of 74 ± 14 minutes (range: 49–100 minutes) after injection of 10 ± 1 mCi (range: 8–12 mCi) of 18F FDG. PET/MRI scans started at 161 ± 29 minutes (range: 117 – 286 minutes) after the 18F FDG injection. All lesions identified on PET from PET/CT were also seen on PET from PET/MRI. The mean SUVmax values were higher from PET/MRI than PET/CT for all lesions. No degradation of MR image quality was observed. Conclusion The data obtained so far using this investigational PET/MR system have shown that the TOF PET system is capable of excellent performance during simultaneous PET/MR with routine pulse sequences. MR imaging was not compromised. Comparison of the PET images from PET/CT and PET/MRI show no loss of image quality for the latter. These results support further investigation of this novel fully integrated TOF PET/MRI instrument.