S. Burke-Spolaor
West Virginia University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S. Burke-Spolaor.
Nature | 2017
S. Chatterjee; C. J. Law; R. S. Wharton; S. Burke-Spolaor; J. W. T. Hessels; Geoffrey C. Bower; J. M. Cordes; Shriharsh P. Tendulkar; C. G. Bassa; Paul Demorest; Bryan J. Butler; A. Seymour; P. Scholz; M.W. Abruzzo; S. Bogdanov; V. M. Kaspi; Aard Keimpema; T. J. W. Lazio; B. Marcote; M. A. McLaughlin; Z. Paragi; Scott M. Ransom; Michael P. Rupen; L. G. Spitler; H. J. van Langevelde
Fast radio bursts are astronomical radio flashes of unknown physical nature with durations of milliseconds. Their dispersive arrival times suggest an extragalactic origin and imply radio luminosities that are orders of magnitude larger than those of all known short-duration radio transients. So far all fast radio bursts have been detected with large single-dish telescopes with arcminute localizations, and attempts to identify their counterparts (source or host galaxy) have relied on the contemporaneous variability of field sources or the presence of peculiar field stars or galaxies. These attempts have not resulted in an unambiguous association with a host or multi-wavelength counterpart. Here we report the subarcsecond localization of the fast radio burst FRB 121102, the only known repeating burst source, using high-time-resolution radio interferometric observations that directly image the bursts. Our precise localization reveals that FRB 121102 originates within 100 milliarcseconds of a faint 180-microJansky persistent radio source with a continuum spectrum that is consistent with non-thermal emission, and a faint (twenty-fifth magnitude) optical counterpart. The flux density of the persistent radio source varies by around ten per cent on day timescales, and very long baseline radio interferometry yields an angular size of less than 1.7 milliarcseconds. Our observations are inconsistent with the fast radio burst having a Galactic origin or its source being located within a prominent star-forming galaxy. Instead, the source appears to be co-located with a low-luminosity active galactic nucleus or a previously unknown type of extragalactic source. Localization and identification of a host or counterpart has been essential to understanding the origins and physics of other kinds of transient events, including gamma-ray bursts and tidal disruption events. However, if other fast radio bursts have similarly faint radio and optical counterparts, our findings imply that direct subarcsecond localizations may be the only way to provide reliable associations.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Shriharsh P. Tendulkar; C. G. Bassa; J. M. Cordes; Geoffrey C. Bower; C. J. Law; Shami Chatterjee; Elizabeth A. K. Adams; S. Bogdanov; S. Burke-Spolaor; Bryan J. Butler; Paul Demorest; J. W. T. Hessels; V. M. Kaspi; T. J. W. Lazio; Natasha Maddox; B. Marcote; M. A. McLaughlin; Z. Paragi; Scott M. Ransom; P. Scholz; A. Seymour; L. G. Spitler; H. J. van Langevelde; R. S. Wharton
The precise localization of the repeating fast radio burst (FRB 121102) has provided the first unambiguous association (chance coincidence probability p ≲ 3 × 10‑4) of an FRB with an optical and persistent radio counterpart. We report on optical imaging and spectroscopy of the counterpart and find that it is an extended (0.″6–0.″8) object displaying prominent Balmer and [Oiii] emission lines. Based on the spectrum and emission line ratios, we classify the counterpart as a low-metallicity, star-forming, mr‧ = 25.1 AB mag dwarf galaxy at a redshift of z =0.19273(8), corresponding to a luminosity distance of 972 Mpc. From the angular size, the redshift, and luminosity, we estimate the host galaxy to have a diameter ≲4 kpc and a stellar mass of M* ∼ (4–7) × 107 M⊙, assuming a mass-to-light ratio between 2 to 3 M⊙L⊙‑1. Based on the Hα flux, we estimate the star formation rate of the host to be 0.4 M⊙yr‑1 and a substantial host dispersion measure (DM)depth ≲324 pc cm‑3. The net DM contribution of the host galaxy to FRB 121102 is likely to be lower than this value depending on geometrical factors. We show that the persistent radio source at FRB 121102’s location reported by Marcote et al. is offset from the galaxy’s center of light by ∼200 mas and the host galaxy does not show optical signatures for AGN activity. If FRB121102 is typical of the wider FRB population and if futureinterferometric localizations preferentially find them in dwarf galaxies with low metallicities and prominent emission lines, they would share such a preference with long gamma-ray bursts and superluminous supernovae.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
B. Marcote; Z. Paragi; J. W. T. Hessels; Aard Keimpema; H. J. van Langevelde; Y. Huang; C. G. Bassa; S. Bogdanov; Geoffrey C. Bower; S. Burke-Spolaor; Bryan J. Butler; R. M. Campbell; S. Chatterjee; J. M. Cordes; Paul Demorest; M. A. Garrett; Tapasi Ghosh; V. M. Kaspi; C. J. Law; T. J. W. Lazio; M. A. McLaughlin; Scott M. Ransom; Christopher John Salter; P. Scholz; A. Seymour; Andrew Siemion; L. G. Spitler; Shriharsh P. Tendulkar; R. S. Wharton
The millisecond-duration radio flashes known as fast radio bursts (FRBs) represent an enigmatic astrophysical phenomenon. Recently, the sub-arcsecond localization (∼100 mas precision) of FRB 121102 using the Very Large Array has led to its unambiguous association with persistent radio and optical counterparts, and to the identification of its host galaxy. However, an even more precise localization is needed in order to probe the direct physical relationship between the millisecond bursts themselves and the associated persistent emission. Here, wereport very-long-baseline radio interferometric observations using the European VLBI Network and the 305 m Arecibo telescope, which simultaneously detect both the bursts and the persistent radio emission at milliarcsecond angular scales and show that they are co-located to within a projected linear separation of ≲40 pc (≲12 mas angular separation, at 95% confidence). We detect consistent angular broadening of the bursts and persistent radio source (∼2–4 mas at 1.7 GHz), which are both similar to the expected Milky Way scattering contribution. The persistent radio source has a projected size constrained to be ≲ 0.7 pc (≲0.2 mas angular extent at 5.0 GHz) and a lower limit for the brightness temperature of Tb ≳ 5× 107 K. Together, these observations provide strong evidence for a direct physical link between FRB 121102 and the compact persistent radio source. We argue that a burst source associated with a low-luminosity active galactic nucleus or a young neutron star energizing a supernova remnant are the two scenarios for FRB 121102 that best match the observed data.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
C. J. Law; M.W. Abruzzo; C. G. Bassa; Geoffrey C. Bower; S. Burke-Spolaor; Bryan J. Butler; T. Cantwell; S. H. Carey; S. Chatterjee; J. M. Cordes; Paul Demorest; J. Dowell; R. P. Fender; K. Gourdji; Keith Grainge; J. W. T. Hessels; Jack Hickish; V. M. Kaspi; T. J. W. Lazio; M. A. McLaughlin; D. Michilli; K. Mooley; Y. C. Perrott; Scott M. Ransom; Nima Razavi-Ghods; Michael P. Rupen; Anna M. M. Scaife; Paul F. Scott; P. Scholz; A. Seymour
We present results of the coordinated observing campaign that made the first subarcsecond localization of a fast radio burst, FRB 121102. During this campaign, we made the first simultaneous detection of an FRB burst using multiple telescopes: the VLA at 3 GHz and the Arecibo Observatory at 1.4 GHz. Of the nine bursts detected by the Very Large Array at 3 GHz, four had simultaneous observing coverage at other observatories at frequencies from 70 MHz to 15 GHz. The one multi-observatory detection and three non-detections of bursts seen at 3 GHz confirm earlier results showing that burst spectra are not well modeled by a power law. We find that burst spectra are characterized by a ∼500 MHz envelope and apparent radio energy as high as 1040 erg. We measure significant changes in the apparent dispersion between bursts that can be attributed to frequency-dependent profiles or some other intrinsic burst structure that adds a systematic error to the estimate of dispersion measure by up to 1%. We use FRB 121102 as a prototype of the FRB class to estimate a volumetric birth rate of FRB sources {R}{FRB}≈ 5× {10}-5/{N}r Mpc‑3 yr‑1, where N r is the number of bursts per source over its lifetime. This rate is broadly consistent with models of FRBs from young pulsars or magnetars born in superluminous supernovae or long gamma-ray bursts if the typical FRB repeats on the order of thousands of times during its lifetime.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
P. Scholz; S. Bogdanov; J. W. T. Hessels; R. Lynch; L. G. Spitler; C. G. Bassa; Geoffrey C. Bower; S. Burke-Spolaor; Bryan J. Butler; S. Chatterjee; J. M. Cordes; K. Gourdji; V. M. Kaspi; C. J. Law; B. Marcote; M. A. McLaughlin; D. Michilli; Z. Paragi; S. M. Ransom; A. Seymour; Shriharsh P. Tendulkar; R. S. Wharton
We undertook coordinated campaigns with the Green Bank, Effelsberg, and Arecibo radio telescopes during Chandra X-ray Observatory and XMM-Newton observations of the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102 to search for simultaneous radio and X-ray bursts. We find 12 radio bursts from FRB 121102 during 70 ks total of X-ray observations. We detect no X-ray photons at the times of radio bursts from FRB 121102 and further detect no X-ray bursts above the measured background at any time. We place a 5
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Zaven Arzoumanian; P. T. Baker; A. Brazier; S. Burke-Spolaor; S. J. Chamberlin; S. Chatterjee; B. Christy; J. M. Cordes; Neil J. Cornish; F. Crawford; H. Thankful Cromartie; K. Crowter; Megan E. DeCesar; Paul Demorest; T. Dolch; Justin Ellis; R. D. Ferdman; E. C. Ferrara; W. M. Folkner; E. Fonseca; N. Garver-Daniels; Peter A. Gentile; Roland Haas; J. S. Hazboun; E. A. Huerta; K. Islo; Glenn Jones; M. L. Jones; David L. Kaplan; V. M. Kaspi
sigma
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Vishal Gajjar; Andrew Siemion; Danny C. Price; C. J. Law; D. Michilli; J. W. T. Hessels; S. Chatterjee; Anne M. Archibald; Geoffrey C. Bower; C. Brinkman; S. Burke-Spolaor; J. M. Cordes; Steve Croft; J. Emilio Enriquez; Griffin Foster; N. Gizani; Greg Hellbourg; Howard Isaacson; V. M. Kaspi; T. J. W. Lazio; Matt Lebofsky; R. S. Lynch; David MacMahon; M. A. McLaughlin; S. M. Ransom; P. Scholz; A. Seymour; L. G. Spitler; Shriharsh P. Tendulkar; D. Werthimer
upper limit of
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2018
Zaven Arzoumanian; A. Brazier; S. Burke-Spolaor; S. J. Chamberlin; Shami Chatterjee; B. Christy; James M. Cordes; Neil J. Cornish; F. Crawford; H. Thankful Cromartie; K. Crowter; Megan E. DeCesar; Paul Demorest; T. Dolch; Justin Ellis; R. D. Ferdman; Elizabeth C. Ferrara; Emmanuel Fonseca; N. Garver-Daniels; Peter A. Gentile; Daniel Halmrast; E. A. Huerta; Fredrick A. Jenet; Cody Jessup; Glenn Jones; M. L. Jones; David L. Kaplan; M. T. Lam; T. Joseph W. Lazio; Lina Levin
3times10^{-11}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
C. G. Bassa; Shriharsh P. Tendulkar; Elizabeth A. K. Adams; Natasha Maddox; S. Bogdanov; Geoffrey C. Bower; S. Burke-Spolaor; Bryan J. Butler; Shami Chatterjee; J. M. Cordes; J. W. T. Hessels; V. M. Kaspi; C. J. Law; B. Marcote; Z. Paragi; Scott M. Ransom; P. Scholz; L. G. Spitler; H. J. van Langevelde
erg cm
Nature Astronomy | 2017
Chiara Mingarelli; T. Joseph W. Lazio; Alberto Sesana; Jenny E. Greene; Justin Ellis; Chung-Pei Ma; Steve Croft; S. Burke-Spolaor; Stephen Taylor
^{-2}