S. Cordio

Phase III Randomized Trial of FOLFIRI Versus FOLFOX4 in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell’Italia Meridionale

PURPOSE We performed this phase III study to compare the irinotecan, leucovorin (LV), and fluorouracil (FU) regimen (FOLFIRI) versus the oxaliplatin, LV, and FU regimen (FOLFOX4) in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 360 chemotherapy-naive patients were randomly assigned to receive, every 2 weeks, either arm A (FOLFIRI: irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 with LV 100 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-hour infusion before FU 400 mg/m(2) administered as an intravenous bolus injection, and FU 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-hour infusion immediately after FU bolus injection on days 1 and 2 [LV5FU2]) or arm B (FOLFOX4: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 with LV5FU2 regimen). RESULTS One hundred sixty-four and 172 patients were assessable in arm A and B, respectively. Overall response rates (ORR) were 31% in arm A (95% CI, 24.6% to 38.3%) and 34% in arm B (95% CI, 27.2% to 41.5%; P = .60). In both arms A and B, median time to progression (TTP; 7 v 7 months, respectively), duration of response (9 v 10 months, respectively), and overall survival (OS; 14 v 15 months, respectively) were similar, without any statistically significant difference. Toxicity was mild in both groups: alopecia and gastrointestinal disturbances were the most common toxicities in arm A; thrombocytopenia and neurosensorial were the most common toxicities in arm B. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were uncommon in both arms, and no statistical significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION There is no difference in ORR, TTP, and OS for patients treated with the FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 regimen. Both therapies seemed effective as first-line treatment in these patients. The difference between these two combination therapies is mainly in the toxicity profile.

Primary Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Pathologic Results of the STAR-01 Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE To investigate oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seven hundred forty-seven patients with resectable, locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or cN1-2) adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum were randomly assigned to receive pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) and concomitant infused fluorouracil (225 mg/m(2)/d) either alone (arm A, n = 379) or combined with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m(2) weekly × 6; arm B, n = 368). Overall survival is the primary end point. A protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative treatment is reported here. RESULTS Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were more frequent with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and radiation than with radiation and fluorouracil alone (24% v 8% of treated patients; P < .001). In arm B, 83% of the patients treated with oxaliplatin had five or more weekly administrations. Ninety-one percent, compared with 97% in the control arm, received ≥ 45 Gy (P < .001). Ninety-six percent versus 95% of patients underwent surgery with similar rates of abdominoperineal resections (20% v 18%, arm A v arm B). The rate of pathologic complete responses was 16% in both arms (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.44; P = .904). Twenty-six percent versus 29% of patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes (arm A v arm B; P = .447), 46% versus 44% had tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria (P = .701), and 7% versus 4% had positive circumferential resection margins (P = .239). Intra-abdominal metastases were found at surgery in 2.9% versus 0.5% of patients (arm A v arm B; P = .014). CONCLUSION Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly increases toxicity without affecting primary tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy end points.

Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial

BACKGROUND Patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma have a poor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival with standard treatment. We aimed to assess whether a four-drug regimen could improve 4 month progression-free survival compared with gemcitabine alone. METHODS In a randomised multicentre phase III trial, 52 patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg/m2 cisplatin and 40 mg/m2 epirubicin both given on day 1, 600 mg/m2 gemcitabine given intravenously over 1 h on days 1 and 8, and 200 mg/m2 fluorouracil a day given by continuous infusion on days 1-28 of a 4-week cycle (PEFG regimen), and 47 were assigned to 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine given intravenously over 30 min once a week for 7 of 8 consecutive weeks in cycle 1 and for 3 of 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was 4-month progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, objective response, safety, and quality of life. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS 51 patients assigned PEFG and 46 assigned gemcitabine alone had disease progression. 49 patients in the PEFG group and 46 in the gemcitabine group died from progressive disease. More patients allocated PEFG than gemcitabine alone were alive without progressive disease at 4 months (60% [95% CI 46-72] vs 28% [17-42]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.46 [0.26-0.79]). 1-year overall survival in the PEFG group was 38.5% (25.3-51.7) and in the gemcitabine group was 21.3% (9.6-33.0; HR 0.68 [0.42-1.09]). More patients assigned PEFG showed disease response than did those assigned gemcitabine (38.5% [25.3-51.7] vs 8.5% [0.5-16.5]; odds ratio 6.60 [2.11-20.60], p=0.0008). More patients in the PEFG group had grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than in the gemcitabine group (p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION The PEFG regimen could be considered for treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation with and without weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: Pathologic response analysis of the Studio Terapia Adiuvante Retto (STAR)-01 randomized phase III trial

CRA4008 Background: Oxaliplatin (OXA) enhances the efficacy of FU-based chemotherapy in colon cancer. This randomized phase III trial investigated the effect of adding OXA to preoperative (preop) FU-based pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) in patients (pts) with locally-advanced rectal cancer. METHODS Eligibility required a resectable, biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from the anal verge with radiological evidence of perirectal fat or lymphnode involvement. Randomization was between infused FU (225 mg/msq/day) concomitant to external-beam pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) (arm A) or the same regimen + weekly OXA (60 mg/msq × 6) (Arm B). Surgery was scheduled 6-8 weeks after completing CRT. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. A protocol-planned analysis of local tumor response to preop treatment (secondary end-point) is the object of this report. RESULTS 747 pts from 41 Italian centers were randomized between 12/2003 and 8/2008 (arm A/B: 379/368). Pretreatment characteristics in arm A/B: median age 63/62 years; male:female 2:1; median distance from anal verge 6 cm; T4 16/14%, N+ 63/65%. Overall grade 3-4 toxicity rates on treated pts (mainly diarrhoea) were 8% and 24% (arm A/B, p<0.001). 96/90% of pts (arm A/B) received > 90% of the planned RT. 82% of Arm B pts had > 5 oxa courses. 358/342 pts (arm A/B) had surgery at a median of 52/53 days from the end of CRT, 14 pts in each arm were not operated (progression 8, death 5, other/unknown 15) and surgery data are not yet available for 19 pts. Pathologic response data analyzed on the randomized population are reported in the table . CONCLUSIONS The addition of weekly OXA to standard FU-based preop CRT significantly increases toxicity without affecting local tumor response. The reduced pathologic M+ rate suggests a potential effect on distant micrometastases. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy endpoints. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II Trial of Oxaliplatin and Tegafur/Uracil and Oral Folinic Acid for Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Objectives: Colorectal cancer is usually diagnosed in elderly patients. Since there is clear evidence that such patients are under-treated and under-represented or even excluded from clinical studies and there are no reliable and prospective data on the feasibility and efficacy of an oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based chemotherapy in this setting, we have tested the L-OHP plus oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral folinic acid (FA) combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) aged 70 or older. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients with advanced or MCRC, aged over 70, were treated with L-OHP 65 mg/m2 as an intravenous 3-hour infusion on day 1 and 8 plus UFT 300 mg/m2 and FA 90 mg in 3 divided doses given orally on days 1–14 for each 3-week cycle. Patients were followed by a geriatric and a quality of life (QoL) assessment with specific scales and EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 45 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (4%) and partial response in 22 (47%) [overall response rate, 51%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7–61.2%]; 18 patients (38%) had stable disease, and 5 (11%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months (range, 3–19+ months). After a minimum follow-up of 17 months, the median time to disease progression and the median overall survival were 8.0 (95% CI: 6.7–9.3%) and 14.1 (95% CI: 11.0–17.1%) months, respectively. Regimen safety was manageable. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and this did not result in QoL impairment. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (17%), neutro- and thrombocytopenia (2%), laryngeal spasm (2%), and peripheral neuropathy (12.7%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: These results confirmed that this tested chemotherapy combination is active with acceptable tolerability and QoL maintenance in elderly patients with advanced or MCRC.

Capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND To determine the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) or irinotecan (CAPIRI) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer aged > or =70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged > or =70 years were randomly assigned to receive CAPOX [oxaliplatin 65 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d. days 1-14; q21d] or CAPIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d. days 1-14; q21d). The primary study end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS Ninety-four patients were enrolled. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 2 complete responses (CRs) and 16 partial responses (PRs) were reported with CAPOX (ORR 38%), and 2 CRs and 15 PRs with CAPIRI (ORR 36%; P = 0.831). Median time to progression was 8 months for CAPOX and 7 months for CAPIRI (P = 0.195), with median survival times of 19.3 months and 14.0 months (P = 0.165), respectively. Global health status was improved in 45% and in 21% of patients in the CAPOX and CAPIRI arms, respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events in CAPIRI versus CAPOX patients were diarrhea (32% versus 15%; P = 0.052) and neutropenia (23% versus 6%; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION CAPOX and CAPIRI had similar efficacy in elderly patients, although CAPOX seemed to be better tolerated.

Single-agent irinotecan as second-line weekly chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Aims and background Irinotecan is a standard option for relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer. Although in a recently reported, randomized trial it was found that a regimen of irinotecan once every 3 weeks was associated with a lower incidence of severe diarrhea than with weekly treatment with similar efficacy, there is no evidence in the literature that suggests the optimal dosing strategy for the drug, along with treatment efficacy and safety, following 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients. A phase II study has reported significantly reduced toxicity when irinotecan was administered once a week for 2 weeks, followed by a week rest. Patients and methods From January 2004 to April 2005, we analyzed, retrospectively, our data on single-agent irinotecan as a second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients (≥70 years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Twenty-three patients were evaluated. CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) was given as a 60-min intravenous infusion in repeated 21-day courses comprising weekly treatment for 2 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Tumor measurements were obtained after every third course of therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2. Results The median number of treatment courses received per patient was 4 (range, 1–8). All patients were assessable for toxicity and 21 for response. The most frequently observed severe toxicities were diarrhea (grade 3, 13%) and neutropenia (grade 3, 30.4%; grade 4, 8.6%). Only 1 case of neutropenic fever occurred. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Objective partial responses were observed in 3 patients (13%). An additional 10 patients (43%) had stable disease as their best response. To date, 12 patients have progressed with a median time-to-progression of 4.3 months and a median survival of 8.3 months. Conclusions A weekly irinotecan administration can induce tumor control in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer that has progressed during or shortly after 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, a careful monitoring of hematological toxicity and special instructions to prevent and manage diarrhea are mandatory in this setting of patients.

Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach (ITACA-S) trial: Comparison of a sequential treatment with irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (LV) followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus a 5-FU/LV regimen as postoperative treatment for radically resected gastric cancer.

LBA4001 Background: Following radical resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, a meta-analysis and randomized studies demonstrated better survival in pts treated with fluoropyrimidine regimens compared to surgery alone. ITACA-S trial is a no-profit, multicenter, randomized, open-label, superiority phase III study aimed at evaluating whether a more intensive postoperative chemotherapy improves efficacy, when replace fluoropyrimidine. METHODS Pts radically resected for gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, with ≥D1-lymphadenectomy, node involvement (pN+) or pN0 with pT2b-3-4; within 3-8 weeks after surgery were eligible. Treatment consisted in CPT-11 180 mg/m2 on d1, LV 100 mg/m2 d1-2, 5-FU 400-600 mg/m2 d1-2, q14; for 4 cycles (FOLFIRI regimen) followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 d1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d1, q 21; for 3 cycles (arm A) vs. LV 100 mg/m2 d1-2, 5-FU 400-600 mg/m2 d1-2, q 14 for 9 cycles (arm B). The primary hypothesis on disease-free survival (DFS) requires 636 events (first recurrence or death) to detect an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.80, with 2-sided 5% significance level for the log-rank test and a power of 80%. RESULTS From February 2005 to August 2009, 1,106 pts were randomized and 1,100 were analyzed (562 arm A, 538 arm B; 6 major violations) by 123 Italian centers. By March 2012, with a median follow-up of 49 months (quartile range: 36-62) we observed 558 events for DFS (HR 0.98; 95%CI 0.83-1.16;p=0.83) accounting for 88% of the target number and 440 deaths (HR: 1.00; 95%CI 0.83-1.20;p=0.98). Toxicity was consistent with literature. Given the data observed, both under the original hypothesis and the current trend, the probability to reach a statistically significant results at the target events is <0.0001. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer with more intensive regimen did not result in a significant prolongation of DFS and OS when compared to bolus/infusion FU/LV regimen.

A phase II trial of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and uracil-tegafur (UFT)/folinic acid (FA) for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) in elderly patients

3681 Background: Colorectal cancer is usually diagnosed in elderly patients (pts). Since the increase of life expectancy makes chemotherapy more appealing in this setting, we test the activity and toxicity of L-OHP and oral UFT/FA as first-line therapy in pts with ACC aged 70 or older. METHODS A two-stage trial was planned with an accrual goal of 44 pts. The treatment included L-OHP 65mg/m2 as an intravenous 3-hours infusion on day 1 and 8 plus UFT 300mg/m2 and FA 90mg in three divided doses given orally on days 1-14 of each three-week cycle. Pts with ACC with age ≥ 70 years, measurable lesions, adequate renal, hepatic and hematologic function and no previous treatment for advanced disease (adjuvant chemotherapy more than 6 months and/or radiotherapy out of the target lesion were allowed) were included. Pts were followed by a geriatric and a quality of life assessment with specific scales and EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 46 pts were enrolled. All pts were evaluable for toxicity and 40 (too early) for response, M/F 26/20, age 70 to 89, performance status 0/1/2 25/20/1, colon 29 and rectum 17. Metastases locations: liver 32, local (recurrent) 15, lung 11, peritoneal carcinomatosis 6. 14/46 had had prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 7 radiotherapy outside on target lesions. Only one case of unacceptable cardiotoxicity and one case of grade 4 diarrhea were registered. Grade 3 diarrhea and neutropenia occurred in 13%, and 2%, respectively. Most common grade 2 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and nausea/vomiting 15%, anemia 11%. On evaluable pts, 20 (50%) objective responses were observed; 15 pts (37.5%) had stable disease and progressive disease was diagnosed in 5 cases (12.5%). Median overall survival and median time to progression have not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results confirmed that this tested chemotherapy combination is active and tolerated in elderly pts with ACC. The updated analysis will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

[Sequential inhibition of angiogenesis in metastatic colorectal cancer: activity and efficacy of aflibercept].

We report a case of a young adult affected by an adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon with synchronous, unresectable liver metastases, diagnosed on April, 2011. The patient received a first-line of bio-chemotherapy with standard folfox regimen in association with bevacizumab. Deriving from which a good partial remission of the disease with its conversion to operability; so he underwent a right hemicolectomy with liver metastasectomy. Eleven months after radical surgery, the patient experimented an intrahepatic progression of the tumour, so he started a second-line therapy with FOLFIRI regimen plus aflibercept. Six months later than the beginning of the treatment he underwent a second liver metastasectomy. He subsequently received further twelve months of the same regimen. The patient is still alive forty-six months later than the diagnosis of the disease, expressing a good performance status and hes on fourth-line chemotherapy due to a relapse of its tumour.