Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where S. Deger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by S. Deger.


Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 2001

Presentation of a new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia

Andreas Jordan; Regina Scholz; Klaus Maier-Hauff; Manfred Johannsen; Peter Wust; Jacek Nadobny; Hermann Schirra; Helmut K. Schmidt; S. Deger; Stefan A. Loening; Wolfgang R. Lanksch; Roland Felix

Magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH) selectively heats up tissue by coupling alternating current (AC) magnetic fields to targeted magnetic fluids, so that boundaries of different conductive tissues do not interfere with power absorption. In this paper, a new AC magnetic field therapy system for clinical application of MFH is described. With optimized magnetic nanoparticle preparations it will be used for target-specific glioblastoma and prostate carcinoma therapy.


The Prostate | 2009

A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases

Carsten Stephan; Anna-Maria Kahrs; Henning Cammann; Michael Lein; Mark Schrader; S. Deger; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung

The aim of this study was to combine the new automated Access [‐2]proPSA (p2PSA) assay with a percent free PSA (%fPSA) based artificial neural network (ANN) or logistic regression (LR) model to enhance discrimination between patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and with no evidence of malignancy (NEM) and to detect aggressive PCa.


Urology | 2003

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy—an analysis of factors affecting operating time

Ahmed El-Feel; John W. Davis; S. Deger; J. Roigas; A. Wille; D. Schnorr; Stefan A. Loening; Amr Abdel Hakiem; Ingolf Tuerk

OBJECTIVES Although laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is accomplished within 2 to 3 hours by experienced surgeons, less is known about the operating times (OTs) for recently trained surgeons or the influence of additional factors. As of November 2001 at our institution, two senior surgeons had each performed more than 100 cases of LRP and two junior surgeons had each performed fewer than 30. We prospectively studied the next 100 consecutive LRPs to assess the factors influencing the OT. METHODS Transperitoneal LRPs were performed by two senior (n = 62) and two junior surgeons (n = 38) with random case assignment. We assessed body mass index, prostate size, prior abdominal surgery, androgen deprivation, surgeon experience, procedures in addition to LRP, lymph node dissection, nerve sparing, and sural nerve grafting as potential predictors of the OT. RESULTS Prostate weight, androgen deprivation, and prior abdominal surgery did not significantly affect the OT, but grade 1 obesity increased the OT by an average of 38 minutes. The mean OT by surgeon experience was 214 minutes for seniors and 347 minutes for juniors (P <0.001). By procedure type, the OT ranged from 180 minutes for LRP only by seniors to 459 minutes for LRP plus lymph node dissection plus sural nerve grafting by juniors. Lymph node dissection and sural nerve grafting significantly increased the OT by 46 and 101 minutes, respectively, and nerve sparing did not. For each combination of procedures, seniors averaged significantly shorter times than did juniors. A multiple regression model with stepwise selection showed that prostate weight, sural nerve grafting, pelvic lymph node dissection, use of a surgical robot, and surgeon experience significantly affected the OT. CONCLUSIONS The results of this prospective study of 100 cases of LRP showed that the OT for senior surgeons averaged 2 to 3 hours, but less experienced surgeons, and additional procedures, add significantly to the OT.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2003

Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: A new technique with preservation of vascular length

Ingolf Türk; M. Giessing; S. Deger; John W. Davis; Michael D. Fabrizio; B. Schönberger; Gerald H. Jordan; Stefan A. Loening

Purpose: We report our initial experience with right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy using a modified vascular clamp for achieving maximal length of the renal vein. Materials and Methods: Since 1999, 34 patients have undergone laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy at ChariteHospital in Berlin, including 30 on the left and 4 on the right side. The right technique involves a 4-port transperitoneal laparoscopic approach with a muscle splitting lumbar incision for kidney extraction. To duplicate completely the comparable open operation a modified Satinsky atraumatic vascular clamp (Aesculap, Inc., Center Valley, Pennsylvania) was introduced throug ha1c m.lateral incision and placed across the vena cava, enabling harvest of the full length of the renal vein flush with the vena cava. The vena cavotomy is closed with a running suture placed in intracorporeal fashion. Results: All procedures were successfully accomplished without technical or surgical compli- cations. Mean operative time was 170 minutes. Mean renal warm ischemia time from endoscopic cross clamping of the renal vessels to cold perfusion on the bench was 2.1 minutes. In all 4 kidneys it was possible to harvest the whole length of the renal vein, so that the recipient operation was performed under optimal vascular conditions. All 4 kidneys were transplanted successfully in the recipients and showed immediate function. Conclusions: Right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is technically feasible, safe and a viable option for minimally invasive organ donation when left kidney donation is not desired. The Satinsky atraumatic vascular clamp enabled harvest of the whole right renal vein. We believe that this laparoscopic technique effectively duplicates the open operation with less morbidity.


Surgical Innovation | 2009

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using FloSeal for Hemostasis: Technique and Experiences in 102 Patients

A. Wille; Manfred Johannsen; Kurt Miller; S. Deger

Objectives. The authors report their techniques, perioperative data, and oncological outcome for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a single-center experience with 3 different surgeons. Patients and methods. A total of 102 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy for exophytic tumors using FloSeal for hemostasis. Mean age was 58 years (range = 26-79 years), and median tumor size was 2.6 cm (range = 0.5-8.5 cm). In 84 cases, the renal artery was clamped using endoscopic bulldog clamps, and tumor resection was performed using scissors or the harmonic scalpel. Hemostasis was achieved by application of FloSeal; lesions of the collecting system were closed with Lahodny sutures in 33 cases (31%). Frozen sections were obtained for margin status. Results . All 102 procedures were successful with no intraoperative complications. Mean surgical time was 201 minutes (range = 60-355 minutes); clamping time was 25.8 minutes (range = 6-75 minutes) in 64 cases. Margins were negative in 92 cases; in 8 cases secondary resection was necessary to achieve negative margin status, and in 2 cases radical nephrectomy was performed. Histological findings were clear-cell carcinoma in 51 (50.0%), papillary carcinoma in 26 (25.5%), and others in 25 (24.5%) cases. At a mean follow-up of 32 months (12-62 months), no recurrence was observed. Conclusions. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with the use of FloSeal is a feasible and safe method for treatment of small renal masses. The technique is reproducible by surgeons who are used to complex laparoscopic procedures. Patient outcome during follow-up was comparable with data published for open standard procedures.


Transplant International | 2005

Laparoscopy for living donor nephrectomy – particularities of the currently applied techniques

M. Giessing; Türk I; J. Roigas; B. Schönberger; Stefan A. Loening; S. Deger

Today, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in many centers features the standard approach for kidney retrieval in living donors. More than 60% of the centers in the USA currently perform LDN and numbers are rising in Europe as well. Todays variety of laparoscopic approaches reflects the evolution in the field of LDN. Multiple modifications have been made for the laparoscopic approach, with consequences for intraoperative handling of the kidney, operating and ischemic times and with impact on donor, organ, and recipient. We reviewed the literature from 1995 to 2004 and critically evaluated the different technical modifications, their specific advantages and disadvantages and their impact for the operation. The article aims to help the surgeon choose the technique he feels most safe with for performing laparoscopic kidney retrieval safely and with good results for donor and recipient.


World Journal of Urology | 2011

Erratum to: No need for systemic heparinization during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with short warm ischemia time

Frank Friedersdorff; Ingmar Wolff; S. Deger; Jan Roigas; John Buckendahl; Hannes Cash; Markus Giessing; Lutz Liefeldt; Kurt Miller; Tom Florian Fuller

Purpose Systemic heparin administration during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) may prevent microvascular thrombus formation following warm ischemia. We herein present our experience with and without systemic heparinization during LDN.


Urology | 2009

Kidney transplantation into urinary conduits with ureteroureterostomy between transplant and native ureter: single-center experience.

Lyubov Chaykovska; S. Deger; A. Wille; Frank Friedersdorff; Antje Kasper; Duska Dragun; Lutz Liefeldt; Kurt Miller; M. Giessing; T. Florian Fuller

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the functional outcomes and complications after allogeneic kidney transplantation into recipients with a urinary conduit using ureteroureterostomy between the transplant and native ureter. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of 6 patients with a pre-existing urinary conduit undergoing kidney transplantation at a single tertiary academic center from May 1982 to February 2007. RESULTS The study included 1 female and 5 males aged 16 to 65 years. Two patients received a living donor transplant. The indications for pretransplant conduit formation were neurogenic bladder in 3 and bladder contraction with vesicoureteral reflux in 3. One patient received a colon conduit. All patients underwent kidney transplantation into a urinary conduit using ureteroureterostomy between the transplant ureter and the ipsilateral native ureter. The average interval between conduit formation and kidney transplantation was 83.5 months and the average time of requiring hemodialysis was 56.3 months. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years. The patient and graft survival rate was 100% and 83.3%, respectively. The 3-year serum creatinine averaged 1.4 mg/dL. One graft was lost because of chronic rejection. Transplant ureter obstruction occurred in 2 patients and required endoscopy or open revision. Four patients underwent post-transplant native nephrectomy for recurrent pyelonephritis. Three patients were hospitalized for treatment of graft pyelonephritis. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, ureteroureterostomy between the transplant and native ureter is technically feasible and provides good functional results despite a high incidence of urinary tract infection. We recommend this approach in renal transplant recipients with a short contracted conduit or in those in whom the donor ureter is too short to warrant a tension-free ureteroileal anastomosis.


Urologe A | 2006

Nierentransplantation im Kindes- und Jugendalter

B. Winkelmann; Thumfart J; Dominik Müller; M. Giessing; A. Wille; S. Deger; D. Schnorr; U. Querfeld; Stefan A. Loening; J. Roigas

ZusammenfassungDie Ursachen der terminalen Niereninsuffizienz im Kindesalter unterscheiden sich deutlich von denen des Erwachsenenalters. Die Therapie der Wahl besteht in der Nierentransplantation. In Deutschland wurden im Jahre 2003 117 Kinder und Jugendliche nierentransplantiert. Spezifische Probleme bestehen in der Immunsuppression und den daraus resultierenden Komorbiditäten im Kindesalter. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt eine Übersicht über die Möglichkeiten und Probleme der Vorbereitung, der Transplantation und des weiteren Verlaufs von Nierentransplantationen im Kindesalter.AbstractThe reasons for end-stage renal disease in pediatric patients differ from adults. The therapy of choice is renal transplantation. A total of 117 children and adolescents were treated with renal transplantation in 2003 in Germany. Immunosuppressive therapy and related comorbidities are the main problems in pediatric patients. The following article provides a summary of transplantation in children, preparation, and follow-up.


European Urology Supplements | 2012

316 Pre-operative assessment of living renal transplant donors with state-of-the-art imaging modalities: Computed tomography angiography vs. magnetic resonance angiography in 118 patients

Frank Friedersdorff; Florian Engelken; Bernd Hamm; Tom Florian Fuller; S. Deger; Ahmed Magheli; Klemens Budde; Kurt Miller; Gerd Diederichs

Purpose To compare current technology multislice computed tomography angiography (CTA) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the pre-operative evaluation of vascular anatomy of living renal transplant donors.

Collaboration


Dive into the S. Deger's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge