S. Ducamp
Institut de veille sanitaire
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S. Ducamp.
Thorax | 2014
Aude Lacourt; C Gramond; Patrick Rolland; S. Ducamp; Sabyne Audignon; Philippe Astoul; Soizick Chamming's; A. Gilg Soit Ilg; M Rinaldo; Chantal Raherison; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Ellen Imbernon; Jean-Claude Pairon; M. Goldberg; Patrick Brochard
Objectives To estimate the proportion of pleural mesothelioma cases that can be attributed to asbestos exposure in France including non-occupational exposure. Methods A population-based case-control study including 437 incident cases and 874 controls was conducted from 1998 to 2002. Occupational and non-occupational asbestos exposure was assessed retrospectively by two expert hygienists. ORs of pleural mesothelioma for asbestos-exposed subjects compared to non-exposed subjects, and population-attributable risk (ARp) of asbestos exposure were estimated using a conditional logistic regression. Results A clear dose-response relationship was observed between occupational asbestos exposure and pleural mesothelioma (OR=4.0 (99% CI 1.9 to 8.3) for men exposed at less than 0.1 f/mL-year vs 67.0 (99% CI 25.6 to 175.1) for men exposed at more than 10 f/mL-year). The occupational asbestos ARp was 83.1% (99% CI 74.5% to 91.7%) for men and 41.7% (99% CI 25.3% to 58.0%) for women. A higher risk of pleural mesothelioma was observed in subjects non-occupationally exposed to asbestos compared to those never exposed. The non-occupational asbestos ARp for these subjects was 20.0% (99% CI −33.5% to 73.5%) in men and 38.7% (99% CI 8.4% to 69.0%) in women. When considering all kinds of asbestos exposure, ARp was 87.3% (99% CI 78.9% to 95.7%) for men and 64.8% (99% CI 45.4% to 84.3%) for women. Conclusions Our study suggests that the overall ARp in women is largely driven by non-occupational asbestos exposure arguing for the strong impact of such exposure in pleural mesothelioma occurrence. Considering the difficulty in assessing domestic or environmental asbestos exposure, this could explain the observed difference in ARp between men and women.
Annals of Occupational Hygiene | 2011
Joelle Fevotte; Brigitte Dananché; L. Delabre; S. Ducamp; L. Garras; M. Houot; D. Luce; Ewa Orlowski; Corinne Pilorget; Aude Lacourt; Patrick Brochard; M. Goldberg; Ellen Imbernon
OBJECTIVES Matgéné is a program to develop job-exposure matrices (JEMs) adapted to the general population in France for the period since 1950. The aim is to create retrospective exposure assessment tools for estimating the prevalence of occupational exposure to various agents that can then be correlated to health-related parameters. METHODS JEMs were drawn up by a team of six industrial hygienists who based their assessments on available occupational measurement, economic and statistical data, and several thousand job descriptions from epidemiological studies performed in France since 1984. Each JEM is specific to one agent, assessing exposure for a set of homogeneous combinations (occupation × activity × period) according to two occupational classifications (ISCO 1968 and PCS 1994) and one economic activities classification (NAF 2000). The cells of the JEM carry an estimate of the probability and level of exposure. Level is estimated by the duration and intensity of exposure-linked tasks or by description of the tasks when exposure measurement data are lacking for the agent in question. The JEMs were applied to a representative sample of the French population in 2007, and prevalence for each exposure was estimated in various population groups. All documents and data are available on a dedicated website. RESULTS By the end of 2010, 18 JEMs have been developed and eight are under development, concerning a variety of chemical agents: organic and mineral dust, mineral fibers, and solvents. By implementation in the French population, exposure prevalences were calculated at different dates and for complete careers, and attributable risk fractions were estimated for certain pathologies. Some of these results were validated by comparison with those of other programs. DISCUSSION Initial Matgéné JEMs results are in agreement with the French and international literature, thus validating the methodology. Exposure estimates precision, however, vary between agents and according to the amount of exposure measurement data available. These JEMs are important epidemiological tools, and improving their quality will require investment in occupational health data harvesting, especially in the case of low-level exposures.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2010
Patrick Rolland; Céline Gramond; Aude Lacourt; Philippe Astoul; Soizick Chamming's; S. Ducamp; C. Frenay; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Anabelle Gilg Soit Ilg; Ellen Imbernon; Nolwenn Le Stang; Jean Claude Pairon; M. Goldberg; Patrick Brochard
BACKGROUND Occupational exposure to asbestos, widely used in various industries for decades, is the most important risk factor for pleural mesothelioma. We report here the ranking of occupations and industries in France at high risk for this cancer among men and women. METHODS A population-based case-control study, conducted from 1998 to 2002, included 462 cases (80.3% men) and 897 controls. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews with a standardized questionnaire. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each occupation and industry; subjects never employed in each category were the reference. RESULTS For men, risks were high for several occupations and industries. Besides the expected high risks for non-metallic mineral product makers and manufacturing asbestos products, occupations such as plumbers (OR = 5.57, 95% CI: 2.90-10.69), sheet-metal workers, welders, metal molders, coremakers, and cabinetmakers were also at high risk. Elevated risks were found in the industries of shipbuilding (OR = 9.13, 95% CI: 5.20-16.06) and construction, but also in the manufacturing of metal products, chemicals, and railroad and aircraft equipment. The results for women showed increased but not significant risks in several occupational activities. CONCLUSIONS This report provides new insight into the epidemiology of mesothelioma, confirming risks for occupational activities reported earlier and pointing out risks in activities never previously reported. It offers guidance to authorities for the compensation of asbestos victims and for prevention in at-risk activities still involving asbestos-containing products.
Annales De Pathologie | 2014
Françoise Galateau-Sallé; A. Gilg Soit Ilg; N. Le Stang; P. Brochard; Jean-Claude Pairon; Philippe Astoul; C. Frenay; G. Blaizot; S. Chamming's; S. Ducamp; T. Rousvoal; A. De Quillacq; V. Abonnet; Issam Abd-Alsamad; Hugues Begueret; Elizabeth Brambilla; Frédérique Capron; Marie-Christine Copin; Claire Danel; A.Y. de Lajartre; A. Foulet-Roge; L. Garbe; Odile Groussard; S. Giusiano; Véronique Hofman; Sylvie Lantuejoul; J.M. Piquenot; Isabelle Rouquette; Christine Sagan; Françoise Thivolet-Béjui
Mesothelioma is a rare disease less than 0.3% of cancers in France, very aggressive and resistant to the majority of conventional therapies. Asbestos exposure is nearly the only recognized cause of mesothelioma in men observed in 80% of case. In 1990, the projections based on mortality predicted a raise of incidence in mesothelioma for the next three decades. Nowadays, the diagnosis of this cancer is based on pathology, but the histological presentation frequently heterogeneous, is responsible for numerous pitfalls and major problems of early detection toward effective therapy. Facing such a diagnostic, epidemiological and medico-legal context, a national and international multidisciplinary network has been progressively set up in order to answer to epidemiological survey, translational or academic research questions. Moreover, in response to the action of the French Cancer Program (action 23.1) a network of pathologists was organized for expert pathological second opinion using a standardized procedure of certification for mesothelioma diagnosis. We describe the network organization and show the results during this last 15years period of time from 1998-2013. These results show the major impact on patients management, and confirm the interest of this second opinion to provide accuracy of epidemiological data, quality of medico-legal acknowledgement and accuracy of clinical diagnostic for the benefit of patients. We also show the impact of these collaborative efforts for creating a high quality clinicobiological, epidemiological and therapeutic data collection for improvement of the knowledge of this dramatic disease.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2012
C. Gramond; Patrick Rolland; Aude Lacourt; S. Ducamp; Soizick Chamming's; Yvon Creau; M. Hery; Jacques Laureillard; Brahim Mohammed-Brahim; Ewa Orlowski; Christophe Paris; Jean-Claude Pairon; M. Goldberg; P. Brochard
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2013
Soizick Chamming's; Bénédicte Clin; P. Brochard; Philippe Astoul; S. Ducamp; Fançoise Galateau‐Salle; Annabelle Gilg Soit Ilg; M. Goldberg; C. Gramond; Ellen Imbernon; Patrick Rolland; J.-C. Pairon
Lung Cancer | 2006
P. Rolland; S. Ducamp; C. Gramond; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; J.-C. Pairon; Philippe Astoul; Soizick Chamming's; A. Gilg Soit Ilg; E. Imbernon; M. Goldberg; P. Brochard
Archives Des Maladies Professionnelles Et De L Environnement | 2018
A. Gilg Soit Ilg; S. Ducamp; S. Audignon-Durand; C. Gramond
Archives Des Maladies Professionnelles Et De L Environnement | 2017
A. Gilg Soit Ilg; D. Grange; N. Bonnet; S. Ducamp
Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2016
Irina Guseva Canu; Delphine Jezewski-Serra; Delabre Laurene; S. Ducamp; Audrey Lemaître; Kathleen Chami; Isabelle Jaegle; Yuriko Iwatsubo