S.E. Benes
California State University, Fresno
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S.E. Benes.
Animal Feed Science and Technology | 2004
P.H. Robinson; Stephen R. Grattan; G. Getachew; C.M. Grieve; J.A. Poss; Donald L. Suarez; S.E. Benes
A controlled study using a sand-tank system was conducted to evaluate 10 forage species (bermudagrass, ‘Salado’ and ‘SW 9720’ alfalfa, ‘Duncan’ and ‘Polo’ Paspalum, ‘big’ and ‘narrow leaf’ trefoil, kikuyugrass, Jose tall wheatgrass, and alkali sacaton). Forages were irrigated with sodium-sulfate dominated synthetic drainage waters with an electrical conductivity of either 15 or 25 dS/m. Forage yield was significantly reduced by the higher (25 dS/m) salinity level of irrigation water compared to the lower (15 dS/m) level. There was wide variation in the sensitivity of forage species to levels of salinity in irrigation water as reflected by biomass accumulation. With the exception of bermudagrass, which increased accumulation at the higher level of salinity, and big trefoil, which failed to establish at the higher level of salinity, ranking of forages according to the percent reduction in biomass accumulation due to the higher level of salinity of irrigation water was: Salado alfalfa (54%) = SW 9720 alfalfa (52%) > Duncan Paspalum (41%) > narrow leaf trefoil (30%) > alkali sacaton (24%) > Polo Paspalum (16%) > Jose tall wheatgrass (11%) = kikuyugrass (11%). Bermudagrass and Duncan Paspalum were judged to be the best species in terms of forage yield and nutritive quality. Kikuyugrass, which had the third highest biomass accumulation, was judged to be unacceptable due to its poor nutritional quality. Although narrow leaf trefoil had a relatively high nutritional quality, its biomass accumulation potential was judged to be unacceptably low. Alfalfa cultivar’s biomass accumulations were the most sensitive to the higher level of salinity, among forages that survived at the higher salinity level, although actual accumulations at the higher salinity were high relative to other forages. Increased salinity influenced several forage quality parameters, including organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), and in vitro gas production, generally leading to higher nutritional quality at the higher salinity level, although their significance varied amongst species and cuttings.
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis | 2007
Gary S. Bañuelos; Sajeemas Pasakdee; S.E. Benes; Craig A. Ledbetter
Abstract The use and disposal of biosolids, or wastewater treatment sludge, as a fertilizer and soil amendment is becoming increasingly widespread. We evaluated the multiyear use of biosolids in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) production, grown on productive agricultural soils. Class A biosolids were initially applied annually at rates of 0, 1.9, 5.8, and 11.7 Mg · ha−1 (dry basis) to a 2‐year‐old apricot orchard on the USDA‐ARS research site on the eastern side of the San Joaquin Valley, CA. These application rates provided estimated rates of 0 (control), 57, 170, and 340 kg total N · ha−1 yr−1, respectively. Compared to the control treatment, the applications of biosolids significantly increased soil salinity (electrical conductivity from 1:1 soil–water extract) and total concentrations of nutrients [e.g., calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu)] after 7 years but did not increase the concentrations of selected metals [cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb)] between 0‐ and 60‐cm soil depths. Mean concentrations of total nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) in soils (0‐ to 15‐cm depth) ranged from a low of 1.3 g kg−1 to a high of 5.2 g · kg−1 and from 14.1 g · kg−1 to 45.7 g · kg−1 for the control and high biosolids treated soils, respectively. Biosolids applications did not lead to fruit yield reductions, although fruit maturation was generally delayed and more fruits appeared at picking times at the high rate of application. Yellow fruits collected from all biosolids applications were significantly firmer than were fruit collected from control trees, and they had higher concentrations of Ca, potassium (K), S, iron (Fe), and Zn in the fruit. Among the fruit quality parameters tested, the juice pH, total acidity, and fruit skin color were not significantly affected by biosolids applications. Malic acid concentrations decreased most of the time, while citric acid concentrations increased with increasing rates of biosolids applications. Overall, our results suggest that nonindustrial biosolids applied at an annual rate at or less than 11.7 Mg N · ha−1 (340 kg N · ha−1) can be safely used for apricot production on sandy loam soils.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2007
David G. Masters; S.E. Benes; Hayley C. Norman
Agricultural Water Management | 2004
Stephen R. Grattan; C.M. Grieve; J.A. Poss; P.H. Robinson; D.L. Suarez; S.E. Benes
Animal Feed Science and Technology | 2007
H. Suyama; S.E. Benes; P.H. Robinson; G. Getachew; Stephen R. Grattan; C.M. Grieve
Agricultural Water Management | 2004
C.M. Grieve; J.A. Poss; S.R. Grattan; D.L. Suarez; S.E. Benes; P.H. Robinson
Agricultural Water Management | 2007
H. Suyama; S.E. Benes; P.H. Robinson; S.R. Grattan; C.M. Grieve; G. Getachew
Agricultural Water Management | 2004
Stephen R. Grattan; C.M. Grieve; J.A. Poss; P.H. Robinson; D.L. Suarez; S.E. Benes
Agricultural Water Management | 2013
Francisco J. Díaz; S.E. Benes; S.R. Grattan
Agricultural Water Management | 2012
S.E. Benes; Diganta Adhikari; S.R. Grattan; Richard L. Snyder