S. E. Higgins
University of Arkansas
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S. E. Higgins.
Poultry Science | 2009
Sherryll Layton; D. R. Kapczynski; S. E. Higgins; J. P. Higgins; A. D. Wolfenden; K. A. Liljebjelke; W. G. Bottje; D. Swayne; Luc Berghman; Young Min Kwon; B. M. Hargis; K. Cole
Avian influenza (AI) is a significant public health concern and serious economic threat to the commercial poultry industry worldwide. Previous research demonstrates that antibodies against M2e confer protection against influenza challenge. Using the Red recombinase system in combination with overlapping extension PCR, we recently developed several novel attenuated Salmonella Enteritidis strains that express a protective M2e epitope in combination with a potential immune-enhancing CD154 peptide sequence on the Salmonella outer membrane protein lamB. Commercial Leghorn chicks were orally immunized (immunization dose: 10(6) to 10(8) cfu/chick) with saline (negative control) or one of the recombinant Salmonella strains [DeltaaroA M2e-CD154, DeltahtrA M2e-CD154, DeltaaroA-DeltahtrA M2e(4)-CD154] on day of hatch and 21 d posthatch. These candidate vaccine strains were evaluated for their ability to invade, colonize, and persist in tissues and elicit an M2e-specific antibody response. The vaccine candidate strain DeltaaroA M2e-CD154 exhibited significantly greater organ invasion in the liver and spleen at d 7 (P > 0.05); however, no marked differences in colonization of the cecal tonsils were observed. Vaccinated chickens exhibited significantly increased M2e-specific IgG responses, which were further enhanced by simultaneous expression of CD154 (P < 0.05). Virus neutralization assays gave neutralizing indices of 6.6, 6.3, and 6.3 for DeltaaroA M2e-CD154, DeltahtrA M2e-CD154, and DeltaaroA-DeltahtrA M2e(4)-CD154 seven days post booster immunization, respectively, indicating effective neutralization of AI by serum IgG of vaccinated chickens. In a subsequent direct challenge study, specific-pathogen-free Leghorn chicks immunized with DeltaaroA-DeltahtrA M2e(4)-CD154 offered significant protection against direct challenge with low pathogenic AI H7N2, but not highly pathogenic H5N1 AI. Taken together, these data suggest that these Salmonella-vectored vaccines expressing M2e in association with CD154 are effective at protecting chickens against low pathogenic AI.
Avian Diseases | 2008
J. P. Higgins; R. L. Andreatti Filho; S. E. Higgins; A. D. Wolfenden; Guillermo Tellez; B. M. Hargis
Abstract Because of recent interest in bacteriophage therapy in poultry, information regarding the interaction of bacteriophages and potential host bacteria in the environment should be collected. The present studies were initiated with a rather typical commercial broiler integrator within the south-central United States to examine environmental Salmonella levels in two broiler complexes, attempt to isolate Salmonella-lytic bacteriophages, and elucidate a possible reason for differing apparent Salmonella prevalence. Significantly (P < 0.05) less Salmonella was isolated from houses in complex 1 (15/44 [34%] Salmonella-positive drag swabs) as compared to houses in complex 2 (22/24 [92%]). A total of seven Salmonella-lytic bacteriophages were isolated from Salmonella-positive environments, and two bacteriophages were isolated from a single Salmonella-negative house. During the initial bacteriophage isolation, individual bacteriophages did not replicate in the Salmonella host isolated from the same environment, and lysis of additional Salmonella hosts relied on high numbers of bacteriophage to be present. This suggests that the presence of these bacteriophages in the environment of a commercial broiler house had little to no effect on the presence of Salmonella. This study highlights the need to find additional bacteriophage sources, more effective isolation methods, and more innovative approaches to using bacteriophages to treat enteric disease.
Poultry Science | 2009
S. N. Henderson; J. T. Barton; A. D. Wolfenden; S. E. Higgins; J. P. Higgins; Wayne J. Kuenzel; C. A. Lester; Guillermo Tellez; B. M. Hargis
Beak trimming is necessary in commercial broiler breeders to prevent or decrease trauma as they mature. Two common beak-trimming methods were evaluated by early performance comparison with nontrimmed chicks (NBT). The robotic electrocautery device (ECD) trims and cauterizes the beak tip. The robotic infrared beak-trimming device (IBT) applies an infrared light beam to destroy the live basal tissue while leaving the hard corneum intact for the first approximately 10 d. In 2 experiments, day-of-hatch Ross 708 by-product chicks were obtained from a local hatchery, where 1/3 of the chicks were trimmed using IBT. All chicks were then transported to another hatchery where 1/3 were trimmed using ECD and 1/3 were NBT. Personnel at each hatchery were highly experienced and skilled with their respective technique. All chicks were then transported to University of Arkansas facilities. Before placement in each experiment, chicks were individually neck-tagged and weighed, and in experiment 1, beaks were measured using a digital caliper. A small but significant transient reduction in BW gain was observed at 14 d due to ECD as compared with NBT controls, although ECD was not different than IBT in experiment 1. In experiment 2, IBT birds were significantly heavier at 11 d by 7.8 and 8.7 g than the NBT or ECD, respectively. However, at d 21 and 42, no significant differences in BW or BW gain were observed. When beak trimming was performed on day of hatch by skilled and experienced personnel, little measurable effect on early performance was observed during the first 6 wk of life. Decreased broiler performance is generally considered a sensitive indication of physical or psychogenic stress. Given the marked reduction in beak-inflicted trauma with beak trimming birds as they reach sexual maturity, these results suggest that when properly performed, neither of these beak-trimming methods causes sufficient physical or psychogenic stress to markedly affect early growth rate.
Poultry Science | 2008
S. E. Higgins; J. P. Higgins; A. D. Wolfenden; S. N. Henderson; A. Torres-Rodriguez; Guillermo Tellez; B. M. Hargis
Poultry Science | 2007
J. P. Higgins; S. E. Higgins; J. L. Vicente; A. D. Wolfenden; Guillermo Tellez; B. M. Hargis
Poultry Science | 2007
R. L. Andreatti Filho; J. P. Higgins; S. E. Higgins; G. Gaona; A. D. Wolfenden; Guillermo Tellez; B. M. Hargis
Poultry Science | 2007
L. R. Bielke; S. E. Higgins; A. M. Donoghue; Daniel J. Donoghue; B. M. Hargis
Journal of Applied Poultry Research | 2006
Guillermo Tellez; S. E. Higgins; A. M. Donoghue; B. M. Hargis
International Journal of Poultry Science | 2007
A. D. Wolfenden; J. L. Vicente; J. P. Higgins; Raphael Lucio Andreatti Filho; S. E. Higgins; B. M. Hargis; Guillermo Tellez
Journal of Applied Poultry Research | 2005
S. E. Higgins; A. Torres-Rodriguez; J. L. Vicente; C. Sartor; C. M. Pixley; G. M. Nava; Guillermo Tellez; J. T. Barton; B. M. Hargis