S Gölder

Long-term symptomatic control of Zenker diverticulum by flexible endoscopic mucomyotomy with the hook knife and predisposing factors for clinical recurrence

ABSTRACT Objective Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker diverticulum (ZD) is well established. Although recurrence of symptoms is relatively frequent, it has hardly been studied. In the present study, we analyse the long-term development of ZD patients’ symptoms after successful endoscopic mucomyotomy, as well as interventional safety, sustainability of success, and predisposing factors for clinical recurrence. Methods Forty-six consecutive patients (54% male, mean age 67 years) with symptomatic ZD were treated using a hook knife and soft diverticuloscope. Follow-up interviews at 1 and 6 months inquired about a broad pool of symptoms and the dysphagia score. For further analysis, patients were retrospectively stratified into a ‘recurrence’ and ‘no recurrence’ group. Results After 100% initial success, 30% of patients reported recurrence of symptoms after 4.4 months (range 1-40) and were re-treated (mean 1.39 sessions/patient). Though the ‘recurrence’ group showed a higher dysphagia score and frequency past intervention, endoscopic re-treatment achieved equally good results as in the ‘no recurrence’ group. Before treatment, ‘recurrence’ patients had more severe symptoms, such as vomiting (frequency score 2.13 vs. 0.92; p < 0.05), ZD-related insomnia (1.65 vs. 1.08, n.s.), and a higher dysphagia score (2.25 vs. 1.59, n.s.). Also, the ‘recurrence’ group had larger diverticula, more men, slightly younger age and a longer duration of symptoms. Conclusions Endoscopic treatment of ZD with hook knife and soft diverticuloscope is safe and effective. Despite considerable clinical recurrence, re-treatment achieved a long-lasting freedom of symptoms. Male patients with a high dysphagia score and severe symptoms were more likely to experience recurrence.

Verbesserung der Kostenkalkulation in der Gastroenterologie durch Einführung eines neuen Leistungskatalogs für alle endoskopischen Prozeduren

BACKGROUND The German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) is incomplete for endoscopic interventions and fails to differentiate between complex and simple procedures. This is caused by outdated methods of personnel-cost allocation. METHODS To establish an up-to-date service catalogue 50 hospitals made their anonymized expense-budget data available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS). 2.499.900 patient-datasets (2011-2013) were used to classify operation-and-procedure codes (OPS) into procedure-tiers (e.g. colonoscopy with biopsy/colonoscopy with stent-insertion). An expert panel ranked these tiers according to complexity and assigned estimates of physician time. From June to November 2014 exact time tracking data for a total 38.288 individual procedures were collected in 119 hospitals to validate this service catalogue. RESULTS In this three-step process a catalogue of 97 procedure-tiers was established that covers 99% of endoscopic interventions performed in German hospitals and assigned validated mean personnel-costs using gastroscopy as standard. Previously, diagnostic colonoscopy had a relative personnel-cost value of 1.13 (compared to gastroscopy 1.0) and rose to 2.16, whereas diagnostic ERCP increased from 1.7 to 3.62, more appropriately reflecting complexity. Complex procedures previously not catalogued were now included (e.g. gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: 16.74). DISCUSSION This novel service catalogue for GI-endoscopy almost completely covers all endoscopic procedures performed in German hospitals and assigns relative personnel-cost values based on actual physician time logs. It is to be included in the national coding recommendation and should replace all prior inventories for cost distribution. The catalogue will contribute to a more objective cost allocation and hospital reimbursement - at least until time tracking for endoscopy becomes mandatory.

Endoskopische Therapie der unteren gastrointestinalen Blutung

Endoscopic hemostasis is the daily challenge that must be mastered by gastroenterologists. An emergency colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for lower gastrointestinal bleeding because of the diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Colonoscopy should be performed after oral preparation with 4-6 l polyethylene glycol solution within 12 h. In the case of massive hematochezia, colonoscopy without oral preparation employinga mechanical pump is possible and is not associated with a higher rate of complications. Many different endoscopic techniques are available (injection therapy, hemoclips, thermal coagulation, topical hemostatic substances). The suitable and most effective method must be chosen depending on the source of bleeding.

Endoscopic management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Endoscopic hemostasis is the daily challenge that must be mastered by gastroenterologists. An emergency colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for lower gastrointestinal bleeding because of the diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Colonoscopy should be performed after oral preparation with 4-6 l polyethylene glycol solution within 12 h. In the case of massive hematochezia, colonoscopy without oral preparation employinga mechanical pump is possible and is not associated with a higher rate of complications. Many different endoscopic techniques are available (injection therapy, hemoclips, thermal coagulation, topical hemostatic substances). The suitable and most effective method must be chosen depending on the source of bleeding.

Kosten endoskopischer Leistungen der Gastroenterologie im deutschen DRG-System – 5-Jahres-Kostendatenanalyse des DGVS-Projekts

Background In the German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) endoscopic procedures are listed in cost center 8. For reimbursement between hospital departments and external providers outdated or incomplete catalogues (e. g. DKG-NT, GOÄ) have remained in use. We have assessed the cost for endoscopic procedures in the G-DRG-system. Methods To assess the cost of endoscopic procedures 74 hospitals, annual providers of cost-data to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) made their data (2011 - 2015; § 21 KHEntgG) available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS) in anonymized form (4873 809 case-data-sets). Using cases with exactly one endoscopic procedure (n = 274 186) average costs over 5 years were calculated for 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers. Results Robust mean endoscopy costs ranged from 230.56 € for gastroscopy (144 666 cases), 276.23 € (n = 32 294) for a simple colonoscopy, to 844.07 € (n = 10 150) for ERCP with papillotomy and plastic stent insertion and 1602.37 € (n = 967) for ERCP with a self-expanding metal stent. Higher costs, specifically for complex procedures, were identified for University Hospitals. Discussion For the first time this catalogue for endoscopic procedure-tiers, based on § 21 KHEntgG data-sets from 74 InEK-calculating hospitals, permits a realistic assessment of endoscopy costs in German hospitals. The higher costs in university hospitals are likely due to referral bias for complex cases and emergency interventions. For 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers an objective cost-allocation within the G-DRG system is now possible. By international comparison the costs of endoscopic procedures in Germany are low, due to either greater efficiency, lower personnel allocation or incomplete documentation of the real expenses.

Endoskopische Therapie der unteren gastrointestinalen Blutung@@@Endoscopic management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Endoscopic hemostasis is the daily challenge that must be mastered by gastroenterologists. An emergency colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for lower gastrointestinal bleeding because of the diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Colonoscopy should be performed after oral preparation with 4-6 l polyethylene glycol solution within 12 h. In the case of massive hematochezia, colonoscopy without oral preparation employinga mechanical pump is possible and is not associated with a higher rate of complications. Many different endoscopic techniques are available (injection therapy, hemoclips, thermal coagulation, topical hemostatic substances). The suitable and most effective method must be chosen depending on the source of bleeding.

Clinical challenges and images in GI. Gastric metastases of an ovarian cystadenocarcinoma with psammoma bodies.

Question: A 70-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of attacks of vertigo and intermittent melena. Few days before admission the patient felt weak and not able to perform her regular housework. The initial hemoglobin level was 72 g/L. Ten years before admission the patient was operated because of disseminated ovarian cystadenocarcinoma with peritoneal carcinomatosis. After operation, the patient was treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and cyclophosphamide for 6 months. In the follow-up and until the current admission, there was no evidence for recurrence of the carcinoma. The patient underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for suspected upper GI hemorrhage. We found a large ulcerated mass at the greater curvature of the stomach with stigmata of hemorrhage (Forrest IIc) and hematin in the stomach (Image A: Large ulcerated mass at the greater curvature of the stomach with stigmata of hemorrhage [Forrest IIc] and hematin in the stomach). Multiple biopsies were taken and the pathologist described small roundish deposits of calcium inside a predominant malignant tumor infiltration into the regular stomach wall (Image B; Histology demonstrated small roundish deposits of calcium [arrows] inside a predominantly malignant tumor infiltration into the regular stomach wall (hematoxylin and eosin; original magnification, 200) (with kind permission of Dr Th. Wagner, Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg). What is the diagnosis? Look on page 372 for the answer and see the GASTROENTEROLOGY web site (www.gastrojournal.org) for more information on submitting your favorite image to Clinical Challenges and Images in GI. STEFAN KARL GÖLDER ANDREAS PROBST HELMUT MESSMANN Department of Medicine III Klinikum Augsburg Augsburg, Germany