S. Höche
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S. Höche.
European Physical Journal C | 2008
Johan Alwall; S. Höche; Frank Krauss; Nils Lavesson; Leif Lönnblad; Fabio Maltoni; M. Mangano; M. Moretti; Costas G. Papadopoulos; F. Piccinini; Steffen Schumann; M. Treccani; J. Winter; Malgorzata Worek
We compare different procedures for combining fixed-order tree-level matrix-element generators with parton showers. We use the case of W-production at the Tevatron and the LHC to compare different implementations of the so-called CKKW and MLM schemes using different matrix-element generators and different parton cascades. We find that although similar results are obtained in all cases, there are important differences.
Computer Physics Communications | 2014
Simone Alioli; Simon Badger; J. Bellm; Benedikt Biedermann; F. Boudjema; Gavin Cullen; Ansgar Denner; H. van Deurzen; Stefan Dittmaier; Rikkert Frederix; Stefano Frixione; M.V. Garzelli; Stefan Gieseke; E.W.N. Glover; Nicolas Greiner; Gudrun Heinrich; Valentin Hirschi; S. Höche; J. Huston; H. Ita; N. Kauer; Frank Krauss; Gionata Luisoni; D. Maître; Fabio Maltoni; Paolo Nason; Carlo Oleari; R. Pittau; Simon Plätzer; Stefano Pozzorini
We present an update of the Binoth Les Houches Accord (BLHA) to standardise the interface between Monte Carlo programs and codes providing one-loop matrix elements.
European Physical Journal C | 2016
Simone Alioli; A. B. Arbuzov; D. Y. Bardin; L. Barzè; C. Bernaciak; S.G. Bondarenko; C. M. Carloni Calame; M. Chiesa; Stefan Dittmaier; G. Ferrera; Daniel de Florian; Massimiliano Grazzini; S. Höche; Alexander Huss; S. Jadach; L. V. Kalinovskaya; A. Karlberg; Frank Krauss; Y. Li; H. Martinez; G. Montagna; Alexander Mück; Paolo Nason; O. Nicrosini; Frank Petriello; F. Piccinini; W. Placzek; S. Prestel; E. Re; A. Sapronov
This report was prepared in the context of the LPCC Electroweak Precision Measurements at the LHC WG (https://lpcc.web.cern.ch/lpcc/index.php?page=electroweak_wg) and summarizes the activity of a subgroup dedicated to the systematic comparison of public Monte Carlo codes, which describe the Drell–Yan processes at hadron colliders, in particular at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This work represents an important step towards the definition of an accurate simulation framework necessary for very high-precision measurements of electroweak (EW) observables such as the W boson mass and the weak mixing angle. All the codes considered in this report share at least next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in the prediction of the total cross sections in an expansion either in the strong or in the EW coupling constant. The NLO fixed-order predictions have been scrutinized at the technical level, using exactly the same inputs, setup and perturbative accuracy, in order to quantify the level of agreement of different implementations of the same calculation. A dedicated comparison, again at the technical level, of three codes that reach next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) accuracy in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) for the total cross section has also been performed. These fixed-order results are a well-defined reference that allows a classification of the impact of higher-order sets of radiative corrections. Several examples of higher-order effects due to the strong or the EW interaction are discussed in this common framework. Also the combination of QCD and EW corrections is discussed, together with the ambiguities that affect the final result, due to the choice of a specific combination recipe. All the codes considered in this report have been run by the respective authors, and the results presented here constitute a benchmark that should be always checked/reproduced before any high-precision analysis is conducted based on these codes. In order to simplify these benchmarking procedures, the codes used in this report, together with the relevant input files and running instructions, can be found in a repository at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Main/DrellYanComparison.
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 2015
S. Höche
This lecture discusses the physics implemented by Monte Carlo event generators for hadron colliders. It details the construction of parton showers and the matching of parton showers to fixed-order calculations at higher orders in perturbative QCD. It also discusses approaches to merge calculations for a varying number of jets, the interface to the underlying event and hadronization.
Physical Review D | 2015
Francesco Coradeschi; Daniel de Florian; L. J. Dixon; Nerina Fidanza; S. Höche; H. Ita; Y. Li; Javier Mazzitelli
We compute the interference between the resonant process
Physical Review D | 2015
Francesco Coradeschi; S. Höche; Y. Li; H. Ita; Daniel de Florian; L. J. Dixon; Nerina Fidanza; Javier Mazzitelli
ppto H(rightarrow gammagamma)+2 text{ jets}
Proceedings of XXV International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects — PoS(DIS2017) | 2017
Gionata Luisoni; S. Höche; Marek Schönherr; J. Winter; Nicolas Greiner
and the corresponding continuum background at leading order in QCD. For the Higgs signal, we include gluon fusion (GF) and vector boson fusion (VBF) production channels, while for the background we consider all tree-level contributions, including pure EW effects (
European Physical Journal C | 2017
Simone Alioli; A. B. Arbuzov; D.Yu. Bardin; L. Barzè; C. Bernaciak; Serge Bondarenko; C. M. Carloni Calame; M. Chiesa; Stefan Dittmaier; G. Ferrera; Daniel de Florian; Massimiliano Grazzini; S. Höche; Alexander Huss; S. Jadach; L. V. Kalinovskaya; A. Karlberg; Frank Krauss; Y. Li; H. Martinez; G. Montagna; Alexander Mück; Paolo Nason; O. Nicrosini; Frank Petriello; F. Piccinini; W. Płaczek; Stefan Prestel; E. Re; A. Sapronov
{cal O}(alpha_{QED}^4)
Physical Review D | 2015
Francesco Coradeschi; Daniel de Florian; L. J. Dixon; Nerina Fidanza; S. Höche; H. Ita; Y. Li; Javier Mazzitelli
) and QCD contributions (
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 2011
F. Siegert; U Freiburg; S. Höche; Frank Krauss; Ippp Durham U.; Marek Schönherr; Tech. U. Dresden
{cal O}(alpha_{QED}^2 alpha_{s}^2)