S Howlett

Dose response of various radiation detectors to synchrotron radiation

Accurate dosimetry is particularly difficult for low- to medium-energy x-rays as various interaction processes with different dependences on material properties determine the dose distribution in tissue and radiation detectors. Monoenergetic x-rays from synchrotron radiation offer the unique opportunity to study the dose response variation with photon energy of radiation detectors without the compounding effect of the spectral distribution of x-rays from conventional sources. The variation of dose response with photon energies between 10 and 99.6 keV was studied for two TLD materials (LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P), MOSFET semiconductors, radiographic and radiochromic film. The dose response at synchrotron radiation energies was compared with the one for several superficial/orthovoltage radiation qualities (HVL 1.4 mm Al to 4 mm Cu) and megavoltage photons from a medical linear accelerator. A calibrated parallel plate ionization chamber was taken as the reference dosimeter. The variation of response with x-ray energy was modelled using a two-component model that allows determination of the energy for maximum response as well as its magnitude. MOSFET detectors and the radiographic film were found to overrespond to low-energy x-rays by up to a factor of 7 and 12 respectively, while the radiochromic film underestimated the dose by approximately a factor of 2 at 24 keV. The TLDs showed a slight overresponse with LiF:Mg, Cu, P demonstrating better tissue equivalence than LiF:Mg, Ti (maximum deviation from water less than 25%). The results of the present study demonstrate the usefulness of monoenergetic photons for the study of the energy response of radiation detectors. The variations in energy response observed for the MOSFET detectors and GAF chromic film emphasize the need for a correction for individual dosimeters if accurate dosimetry of low- to medium-energy x-rays is attempted.

Dosimetric intercomparison for multicenter clinical trials using a patient-based anatomic pelvic phantom.

PURPOSE To assess dose delivery accuracy to clinically significant points in a realistic patient geometry for two separate pelvic radiotherapy scenarios. METHODS An inhomogeneous pelvic phantom was transported to 36 radiotherapy centers in Australia and New Zealand. The phantom was treated according to Phase III rectal and prostate trial protocols. Point dose measurements were made with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and an ionisation chamber. Comprehensive site-demographic, treatment planning, and physical data were collected for correlation with measurement outcomes. RESULTS Dose delivery to the prescription point for the rectal treatment was consistent with planned dose (mean difference between planned and measured dose - 0.1 ± 0.3% std err). Dose delivery in the region of the sacral hollow was consistently higher than planned (+1.2 ± 0.2%). For the prostate treatment, dose delivery to the prostate volume was consistent with planned doses (-0.49 ± 0.2%) and planned dose uniformity, though with a tendency to underdose the PTV at the prostate-rectal border. Measured out-of-field doses were significantly higher than planned. CONCLUSIONS A phantom based on realistic anatomy and heterogeneity can be used to comprehensively assess the influence of multiple aspects of the radiotherapy treatment process on dose delivery. The ability to verify dose delivery for two trials with a single phantom was advantageous.

Linear-accelerator X-ray Output: A Multicentre Chamber-based Intercomparison Study in Australia and New Zealand

This paper describes the process and results of a survey of linear accelerator outputs as part of an Australasian Level III Dosimetry Intercomparison. This study involved the measurement of accelerator output under reference conditions (‘Level I’) with a small-volume ionisation chamber in water for 47 beams at 36 radiotherapy centres using the IAEA TRS 398 dose-to-water protocol. The mean ratio of measured to locally-determined accelerator output was 1.003±0.009 (1 standard deviation) with a range from 0.981 to 1.024. No correlation could be found between output ratio and accelerator type or local output calibration protocol. The small-volume chamber used satisfied most requirements for the study though showed some variation in sensitivity via repeated cross-calibration with a chamber calibrated at a primary standards laboratory.

Workload and use factor of medical linear accelerators in radiotherapy

An important factor in the design of primary protective barriers is the use factor. The present study was aimed at obtaining historical data on the use factor of two dual modality linear accelerators in a radiotherapy department. Gantry angle, field size, and beam modifiers were recorded for all radiation qualities in use at two medical linear accelerators with 6 MV and 18 MV x-rays and multiple electron energies ranging from 4 MeV to 20 MeV. The data for one year of clinical use was extracted from a record and verifying system and an estimate of the physics workload on the machines was obtained by going through the quality assurance records and machine log books. Of the total dose of approximately 37,000 Gy delivered in one year at isocenter on each unit 80% was given as 6 MV x-rays. As can be expected, most x-ray beams were directed at the four cardinal gantry angles with the angular distribution for 6 MV and 18 MV x-rays being very similar. Electron fields were broadly distributed around the gantry pointing down position. Less than 25% of all clinical x-ray treatment fields extended beyond a field size of 200 cm2.