Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where S. K. Krughoff is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by S. K. Krughoff.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Spurious shear in weak lensing with the large synoptic survey telescope

C. Chang; S. M. Kahn; J. G. Jernigan; J. R. Peterson; Yusra AlSayyad; Z. Ahmad; J. Bankert; Deborah Bard; Andrew J. Connolly; Robert R. Gibson; Kirk Gilmore; E. Grace; M. Hannel; M. A. Hodge; M. J. Jee; Lynne Jones; S. K. Krughoff; S. Lorenz; Philip J. Marshall; S. L. Marshall; A. Meert; S. Nagarajan; E. Peng; Andrew P. A Rasmussen; Marina Shmakova; N. Sylvestre; N. Todd; M. Young

The complete 10-year survey from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will image {approx} 20,000 square degrees of sky in six filter bands every few nights, bringing the final survey depth to r {approx} 27.5, with over 4 billion well measured galaxies. To take full advantage of this unprecedented statistical power, the systematic errors associated with weak lensing measurements need to be controlled to a level similar to the statistical errors. This work is the first attempt to quantitatively estimate the absolute level and statistical properties of the systematic errors on weak lensing shear measurements due to the most important physical effects in the LSST system via high fidelity ray-tracing simulations. We identify and isolate the different sources of algorithm-independent, additive systematic errors on shear measurements for LSST and predict their impact on the final cosmic shear measurements using conventional weak lensing analysis techniques. We find that the main source of the errors comes from an inability to adequately characterise the atmospheric point spread function (PSF) due to its high frequency spatial variation on angular scales smaller than {approx} 10{prime} in the single short exposures, which propagates into a spurious shear correlation function at the 10{sup -4}-10{sup -3} level on these scales. With the large multi-epoch dataset that will be acquired by LSST, the stochastic errors average out, bringing the final spurious shear correlation function to a level very close to the statistical errors. Our results imply that the cosmological constraints from LSST will not be severely limited by these algorithm-independent, additive systematic effects.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2013

EFFECT OF MEASUREMENT ERRORS ON PREDICTED COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM SHEAR PEAK STATISTICS WITH LARGE SYNOPTIC SURVEY TELESCOPE

D. Bard; Jan M. Kratochvil; C. Chang; M. May; S. M. Kahn; Yusra AlSayyad; Z. Ahmad; J. Bankert; Andrew J. Connolly; Robert R. Gibson; Kirk Gilmore; E. Grace; Zoltan Haiman; M. Hannel; K. M. Huffenberger; J. G. Jernigan; Lynne Jones; S. K. Krughoff; S. Lorenz; S. L. Marshall; A. Meert; S. Nagarajan; E. Peng; J. R. Peterson; Andrew P. A Rasmussen; Marina Shmakova; N. Sylvestre; N. Todd; M. Young

We study the effect of galaxy shape measurement errors on predicted cosmological constraints from the statistics of shear peak counts with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). We use the LSST Image Simulator in combination with cosmological N-body simulations to model realistic shear maps for different cosmological models. We include both galaxy shape noise and, for the first time, measurement errors on galaxy shapes. We find that the measurement errors considered have relatively little impact on the constraining power of shear peak counts for LSST.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2010

Simulating the LSST system

Andrew J. Connolly; J. R. Peterson; J. Garrett Jernigan; Robert Abel; J. Bankert; C. Chang; Charles F. Claver; Robert R. Gibson; David K. Gilmore; E. Grace; R. Lynne Jones; Zeljko Ivezic; James Jee; Mario Juric; Steven M. Kahn; Victor L. Krabbendam; S. K. Krughoff; S. Lorenz; James Lawrence Pizagno; Andrew P. A Rasmussen; Nathan Todd; J. Anthony Tyson; M. Young

Extracting science from the LSST data stream requires a detailed knowledge of the properties of the LSST catalogs and images (from their detection limits to the accuracy of the calibration to how well galaxy shapes can be characterized). These properties will depend on many of the LSST components including the design of the telescope, the conditions under which the data are taken and the overall survey strategy. To understand how these components impact the nature of the LSST data the simulations group is developing a framework for high fidelity simulations that scale to the volume of data expected from the LSST. This framework comprises galaxy, stellar and solar system catalogs designed to match the depths and properties of the LSST (to r=28), transient and moving sources, and image simulations that ray-trace the photons from above the atmosphere through the optics and to the camera. We describe here the state of the current simulation framework and its computational challenges.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2010

Simulation of autonomous observing with a ground-based telescope: the LSST experience

Stephen T. Ridgway; Kem Holland Cook; Michelle Miller; Catherine Petry; Srinivasan Chandrasekharan; Abhijit Saha; Robyn A. Allsman; Timothy S. Axelrod; Charles F. Claver; Francisco Delgado; Zeljko Ivezic; R. Lynne Jones; S. K. Krughoff; Francesco Pierfederici; Phillip Pinto

A survey program with multiple science goals will be driven by multiple technical requirements. On a ground-based telescope, the variability of conditions introduces yet greater complexity. For a program that must be largely autonomous with minimal dwell time for efficiency it may be quite difficult to foresee the achievable performance. Furthermore, scheduling will likely involve self-referential constraints and appropriate optimization tools may not be available. The LSST project faces these issues, and has designed and implemented an approach to performance analysis in its Operations Simulator and associated post-processing packages. The Simulator has allowed the project to present detailed performance predictions with a strong basis from the engineering design and measured site conditions. At present, the Simulator is in regular use for engineering studies and science evaluation, and planning is underway for evolution to an operations scheduling tool. We will describe the LSST experience, emphasizing the objectives, the accomplishments and the lessons learned.


Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union | 2010

LSST Observations of RR Lyrae Stars for Mapping the Galactic Halo

Hakeem M. Oluseyi; Andrew Cameron Becker; C. C. Culliton; Muhammad Furqan; Keri L. Hoadley; Paul Regencia; Akeem J. Wells; Lynne Jones; S. K. Krughoff; Branimir Sesar; Suzanne Jacoby

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is an anticipated to undertake a 10– year, 3π steradian survey that promises to observe millions of new periodic variable stars. We report on a study to determine the efficiency of the LSST to recover the light curve properties of RR Lyrae stars. An LSST light curve simulation tool was used to sample input idealized light curves or RR Lyrae stars observed in SDSS Stripe 82 data, returning each as it would have been observed by LSST, including realistic photometric scatter, limiting magnitudes, and telescope downtime. Our results show that the LSST will be capable of mapping the spatial distributions and chemical compositions of halo stellar overdensities using RR Lyrae discovered across 3π steradians and out to nearly 1.5 Mpc. LSST will thus enable the mapping of halo merger streams, the discovery of new dwarf galaxies, and the mapping galactic halos throughout the Local Group galaxies.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

THE MILKY WAY TOMOGRAPHY WITH SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. IV. DISSECTING DUST

Michael Berry; Željko Ivezić; Branimir Sesar; Mario Juric; Edward F. Schlafly; Jillian Bellovary; Douglas P. Finkbeiner; Dijana Vrbanec; Timothy C. Beers; Keira J. Brooks; Donald P. Schneider; Robert R. Gibson; Amy E. Kimball; Lynne Jones; Peter Yoachim; S. K. Krughoff; Andrew J. Connolly; Sarah Loebman; Nicholas A. Bond; David J. Schlegel; Julianne J. Dalcanton; Brian Yanny; Steven R. Majewski; Gillian R. Knapp; James E. Gunn; Masataka Fukugita; Steve Kent; John C. Barentine; Jurek Krzesinski; Dan Long


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

The Effective Number Density of Galaxies for Weak Lensing Measurements in the LSST Project

C. Chang; M. Jarvis; Bhuvnesh Jain; S. M. Kahn; D. Kirkby; Andrew J. Connolly; S. K. Krughoff; E. Peng; J. R. Peterson


Archive | 2010

Astronomical Image Processing with Hadoop

Keith Wiley; Andrew J. Connolly; S. K. Krughoff; Jeff Gardner; Magdalena Balazinska; Bill Howe; YongChul Kwon; Yingyi Bu


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2012

Atmospheric PSF Interpolation for Weak Lensing in Short Exposure Imaging Data

C. Chang; J. G. Jernigan; J. R. Peterson; A. Meert; Z. Ahmad; Yusra AlSayyad; M. Young; S. Lorenz; Andrew P. A Rasmussen; S. F. Gull; Lynne Jones; E. Grace; M. Hannel; Robert R. Gibson; E. Peng; J. Bankert; N. Todd; Marina Shmakova; S. M. Kahn; Kirk Gilmore; S. Nagarajan; Philip J. Marshall; Hodge; N. Sylvestre; S. L. Marshall; Andrew J. Connolly; Deborah Bard; S. K. Krughoff


arXiv: Astrophysics | 2007

Sky in Google Earth: The Next Frontier in Astronomical Data Discovery and Visualization

Ryan Scranton; A. Connolly; S. K. Krughoff; Jeremy Brewer; A. Conti; Carol A. Christian; Brian McLean; Craig Sosin; Greg Coombe; Paul Heckbert

Collaboration


Dive into the S. K. Krughoff's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deborah Bard

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge