S. Koch
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S. Koch.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2007
T. S. Poole; Alice A. Breeveld; M. J. Page; Wayne B. Landsman; S. T. Holland; P. W. A. Roming; N. P. M. Kuin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; Sally D. Hunsberger; S. Koch; K. O. Mason; Patricia Schady; D. E. Vanden Berk; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; Margaret Chester; A. Cucchiara; Bruce R. Hancock; H. E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; F. E. Marshall; Adam N. Morgan; S. B. Pandey; M. De Pasquale; Penelope Smith
We present the photometric calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) which includes: optimum photometric and background apertures, effective area curves, colour transformations, conversion factors for count rates to flux and the photometric zero-points (which are accurate to better than 4 per cent) for each of the seven UVOT broad-band filters. The calibration was performed with observations of standard stars and standard star fields that represent a wide range of spectral star types. The calibration results include the position-dependent uniformity, and instrument response over the 1600‐8000 A operational range. Because the UVOT is a photon-counting instrument, we also discuss the effect of coincidence loss on the calibration results. We provide practical guidelines for using the calibration in UVOT data analysis. The results presented here supersede previous calibration results.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
Dirk Grupe; Caryl Gronwall; Xiang-Yu Wang; Peter W. A. Roming; J. R. Cummings; Bing Zhang; P. Meszaros; Maria Diaz Trigo; P. T. O’Brien; Kim L. Page; A. P. Beardmore; Olivier Godet; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Peter J. Brown; S. Koch; David C. Morris; M. C. Stroh; David N. Burrows; John A. Nousek; Margaret Chester; Stefan Immler; Vanessa Mangano; Patrizia Romano; Guido Chincarini; Julian P. Osborne; Takanori Sakamoto; Neil Gehrels
We report the results of the Swift and XMM observations of the Swift-discovered long Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 060729 (
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2010
Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; Martin D. Still; V. Yershov; A. J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; H. E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. O. Mason; Adam N. Morgan
T_{90}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Judith Lea Racusin; S. R. Oates; Patricia Schady; D. N. Burrows; M. De Pasquale; Davide Donato; N. Gehrels; S. Koch; J. E. McEnery; Tsvi Piran; P. W. A. Roming; Takanori Sakamoto; C. A. Swenson; Eleonora Troja; V. Vasileiou; Francisco J. Virgili; D. Wanderman; Bing Zhang
=115s). The afterglow of this burst was exceptionally bright in X-rays as well as at UV/Optical wavelengths showing an unusually long slow decay phase (
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2009
N. P. M. Kuin; Wayne B. Landsman; M. J. Page; Patricia Schady; Martin D. Still; Alice A. Breeveld; M. De Pasquale; P. W. A. Roming; Peter J. Brown; Michael P. Carter; Cynthia H. James; P. A. Curran; A. Cucchiara; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; Erik Andrew Hoversten; Sally D. Hunsberger; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; S. Koch; H. Lamoureux; F. E. Marshall; S. R. Oates; A. M. Parsons; David M. Palmer; Penelope Smith
\alpha
SPIE's International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation | 1998
John A. Nousek; Leisa K. Townsley; G. Chartas; David N. Burrows; E. I. Moskalenko; Rita M. Sambruna; Joseph E. Pesce; Catherine E. Grant; Kaori Nishikida; Laura J. Cawley; Patrick S. Broos; S. Koch; A. B. Garmire; Gordon Garmire; Mark W. Bautz; Stephen E. Jones; Beverly LaMarr; George R. Ricker
=0.14\plm0.02) suggesting a larger energy injection phase at early times than in other bursts. The X-ray light curve displays a break at about 60 ks after the burst. The X-ray decay slope after the break is
International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology | 2000
J. E. Hill; Michael E. Zugger; Jason Shoemaker; Mark E. Witherite; S. Koch; L. Chou; Traci Case; David N. Burrows
\alpha
SPIE's International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation | 1998
G. Chartas; Gordon Garmire; John A. Nousek; S. Koch; Steven E. Kissel; Gregory Y. Prigozhin; Mark W. Bautz
=1.29\plm0.03. Up to 125 days after the burst we do not detect a jet break, suggesting that the jet opening angle is larger than 28 degrees. In the first 2 minutes after the burst (rest frame) the X-ray spectrum of the burst changed dramatically from a hard X-ray spectrum to a very soft one. We find that the X-ray spectra at this early phase can all be fitted by an absorbed single power law model or alternatively by a blackbody plus power law model. The power law fits show that the X-ray spectrum becomes steeper while the absorption column density decreases. In Swifts UV/Optical telescope the afterglow was clearly detected up to 9 days after the burst in all 6 filters and even longer in some of the UV filters with the latest detection in the UVW1 31 days after the burst. A break at about 50 ks is clearly detected in all 6 UVOT filters from a shallow decay slope of about 0.3 and a steeper decay slope of 1.3. In addition to the \swift observations we also present and discuss the results from a 61 ks ToO observation by XMM. (Abriviated)We report the results of the Swift and XMM-Newton observations of the Swift -discovered GRB 060729 (T90 = 115 s). The afterglow of this burst was exceptionally bright in X-rays as well as at UV/optical wavelengths, showing an unusually long slow decay phase (? = 0.14 ? 0.02), suggesting a larger energy injection phase at early times than in other bursts. The X-ray light curve displays a break at about 60 ks after the burst. The X-ray decay slope after the break is ? = 1.29 ? 0.03. Up to 125 days after the burst we do not detect a jet break, suggesting that the jet opening angle is larger than 28?. We find that the X-ray spectra of the early phase change dramatically and can all be fitted by an absorbed single-power-law models or alternatively by a blackbody plus power-law model. The power-law fits show that the X-ray spectrum becomes steeper while the absorption column density decreases. In the blackbody model the temperature decreases from kT = 0.6 to 0.1 keV between 85 and 160 s after the burst in the rest frame. The afterglow was clearly detected up to 9 days after the burst in all six UVOT filters and in UVW1 even for 31 days. A break at about 50 ks is clearly detected in all six UVOT filters from a shallow decay slope of about 0.3 and a steeper decay slope of 1.3.The XMM-Newton observations started about 12 hr after the burst and show a typical afterglow X-ray spectrum with ?X = 1.1 and absorption column density of 1 ? 1021 cm-2.
arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics | 2010
Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; V. Yershov; Alexander J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; Howard E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. Mason; Adam N. Morgan; S. R. Oates
The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large-scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case, we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.
GAMMA‐RAY BURSTS 2007: Proceedings of the Santa Fe Conference | 2008
Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Dirk Grupe; Judith Lea Racusin; Pete Roming; S. Koch
The new and extreme population of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) shows several new features in high-energy gamma rays that are providing interesting and unexpected clues into GRB prompt and afterglow emission mechanisms. Over the last six years, it has been Swift that has provided the robust data set of UV/optical and X-ray afterglow observations that opened many windows into components of GRB emission structure. The relationship between the LAT-detected GRBs and the well-studied, fainter, and less energetic GRBs detected by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope is only beginning to be explored by multi-wavelength studies. We explore the large sample of GRBs detected by BAT only, BAT and the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), and GBM and LAT, focusing on these samples separately in order to search for statistically significant differences between the populations, using only those GRBs with measured redshifts in order to physically characterize these objects. We disentangle which differences are instrumental selection effects versus intrinsic properties in order to better understand the nature of the special characteristics of the LAT bursts.