S.M. Biscette

Comparison of Industry-Leading Energy Devices for Use in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure Energy Devices

STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare 2 laparoscopic bipolar electrosurgical devices used in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). An articulating advanced bipolar device (ENSEAL G2; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) and an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were analyzed for differences in surgeon perception of ease of instrument use and workload using the NASA Raw Task Load Index (RTLX) scale. A second objective was to examine differences in operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and perioperative complication rates between the 2 devices. DESIGN Single-institution, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery in a university hospital. PATIENTS Eligibility required planned TLH, over age 18 years, and able to give informed consent; exclusions were stage III or IV endometriosis, known gynecologic malignancy, and early decision for conversion to laparotomy. One hundred seventy-eight patients screened, 142 enrolled, 2 withdrew, and 140 completed the study. Patients were followed 1 month postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS Preoperative randomization to articulating advanced bipolar device or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer to be used during TLH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS At the end of each hysterectomy the primary surgeon completed an ergonomic assessment tool, the RTLX. Results were analyzed to detect differences in workload between the 2 devices. For each case the time to ligation of the bilateral uterine arteries, EBL, and complications (including device failure, blood transfusion, or other injury) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test for normally distributed data, χ2 test for categorical data, and Mann-Whitney U-test for nonparametric data. There were no differences in age, body mass index, parity, prior surgery, uterine weight, race, indication, pathology, and comorbidities between the 2 groups. A statistically significant increase in RTLX scores (p < .0001), device failures (p = .0031), and time to ligation of bilateral uterine arteries (p = .0281) was noted in the articulating device group. No significant differences in EBL or complication rates were noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The articulating advanced bipolar device was shown to have a statistically significant increase in surgeon-perceived workload and rate of device failure when used in TLH; however, clinical and surgical outcomes were equivalent.

Adnexal masses requiring reoperation in women with previous hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy

OBJECTIVES To characterize the etiologies of adnexal masses requiring reoperation in women with prior hysterectomy and to compare incidence and pathology of these masses based upon whether total, partial or no adnexectomy was performed at time of hysterectomy. In addition, the average time interval between hysterectomy and reoperation for a pelvic mass is ascertained. STUDY DESIGN A single-institution, retrospective review spanning 10 years. Using pertinent ICD-9 and CPT codes, women with a history of hysterectomy who underwent a subsequent surgery for an adnexal or pelvic mass were identified. RESULTS Over ten years, 250 women returned for gynecologic surgery due to a pelvic mass after prior hysterectomy. Most had undergone hysterectomy only (76%). 64.8% of these women had masses of ovarian origin, 12.4% were tubal in origin, 20% of masses involved both the ovary and tube and a small proportion arose from non-gynecologic processes. 18% of these women had a malignancy; 80% were ovarian and 6.7% originated from the fallopian tube. Patients having had a prior hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy returned soonest (p<0.0001) and patients with malignant masses returned after the longest time intervals (HR 0.41, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The majority of adnexal masses requiring reoperation after hysterectomy are gynecologic in origin, benign, and arise from the ovary. Women returning with malignant masses after hysterectomy present after longer time intervals.