S. Restaino

Development of a Novel Echocardiography Ramp Test for Speed Optimization and Diagnosis of Device Thrombosis in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The Columbia Ramp Study

OBJECTIVES This study sought to develop a novel approach to optimizing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) function and diagnosing device malfunctions. BACKGROUND In CF-LVAD patients, the dynamic interaction of device speed, left and right ventricular decompression, and valve function can be assessed during an echocardiography-monitored speed ramp test. METHODS We devised a unique ramp test protocol to be routinely used at the time of discharge for speed optimization and/or if device malfunction was suspected. The patients left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, frequency of aortic valve opening, valvular insufficiency, blood pressure, and CF-LVAD parameters were recorded in increments of 400 rpm from 8,000 rpm to 12,000 rpm. The results of the speed designations were plotted, and linear function slopes for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, pulsatility index, and power were calculated. RESULTS Fifty-two ramp tests for 39 patients were prospectively collected and analyzed. Twenty-eight ramp tests were performed for speed optimization, and speed was changed in 17 (61%) with a mean absolute value adjustment of 424 ± 211 rpm. Seventeen patients had ramp tests performed for suspected device thrombosis, and 10 tests were suspicious for device thrombosis; these patients were then treated with intensified anticoagulation and/or device exchange/emergent transplantation. Device thrombosis was confirmed in 8 of 10 cases at the time of emergent device exchange or transplantation. All patients with device thrombosis, but none of the remaining patients had a left ventricular end-diastolic dimension slope >-0.16. CONCLUSIONS Ramp tests facilitate optimal speed changes and device malfunction detection and may be used to monitor the effects of therapeutic interventions and need for surgical intervention in CF-LVAD patients.

Cardiac transplantation using extended-donor criteria organs for systemic amyloidosis complicated by heart failure.

Background. Systemic amyloidosis complicated by heart failure is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Heart transplantation for patients with systemic amyloidosis is controversial due to recurrence of disease in the transplanted organ or progression of disease in other organs. Methods. All patients with systemic amyloidosis and heart failure referred for heart transplant evaluation from 1997 to 2004 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. An interdisciplinary protocol for cardiac transplantation using extended-donor criteria organs, followed in 6 months by either high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for patients with primary (AL) or by orthotopic liver transplantation for familial (ATTR) amyloidosis, was developed. Survival of the transplanted amyloid cohort was compared to survival of those amyloid patients not transplanted and to patients transplanted for other indications. Results. A total of 25 patients with systemic amyloidosis and heart failure were included in the study; 12 patients received heart transplants. Amyloid heart transplant recipients were more likely female (58% vs. 8%, P=0.02) and had lower serum creatinine (1.3±0.5 vs. 2.0±0.7 mg/dL, P=0.01) than nontransplanted amyloid patients. Survival at 1-year after heart transplant evaluation was higher among transplanted patients (75% vs. 23%) compared to patients not transplanted (P=0.001). Short-term survival posttransplant did not differ between transplanted amyloid patients and contemporaneous standard and extended-donor criteria heart transplant patients (P=0.65). Conclusions. Cardiac transplantation for amyloid patients with extended-donor criteria organs followed by either stem cell or liver transplantation is associated with improved survival compared to patients not transplanted. Short- to intermediate-term survival is similar to patients receiving heart transplantation for other indications. This clinical management strategy provides cardiac amyloid patients a novel therapeutic option.

Heart Transplantation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Positive Patients

BACKGROUND Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is widely considered a contraindication for cardiac transplantation. However, with the newer anti-retroviral drugs, the estimated 10-year survival after seroconversion is exceeds 90%. This case series describes the intermediate range outcome of HIV-positive cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 1679 cardiac transplant patients was undertaken to identify HIV-positive recipients. RESULTS Seven patients were identified. Five (4 men) were diagnosed with HIV before transplantation and 2 patients seroconverted after transplantation. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the indication for transplant in all patients. The 5 HIV recipients were aged 42 +/- 8 years, and time after HIV seroconversion averaged 9.5 years. All underwent cardiac transplantation as high-risk candidates. The CD4 count was 554 +/- 169 cells/microl, and viral load was undetectable in all patients at the time of transplantation. Two patients seroconverted to HIV-positive status at 1 and 7 years after transplant. No AIDS-defining illness was observed in any patient before or after transplant. Six patients received highly active anti-retroviral therapy. Viral load remained low in the presence of immunosuppression. All patients are alive with a follow-up from transplant of 57 +/- 78.9 months. CONCLUSION Excellent intermediate term outcome is noted in carefully selected HIV-positive patients. No significant AIDS-related infections or complications occurred.

Severe vitamin D deficiency among heart and liver transplant recipients.

Abstract:  Introduction:  Although patients with end‐stage organ failure are at high risk for vitamin D deficiency because of limited sunlight exposure and hepatic dysfunction, few studies have measured 25‐hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) at the time of transplantation.

Human immunodeficiency virus infection and left ventricular assist devices: a case series.

Historically, advanced heart failure therapies were considered inappropriate for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As HIV has become a chronic illness with the advent of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), cardiac transplantation has been used for selected HIV patients with end-stage heart failure. We present a case series describing the clinical outcomes with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use in 4 patients with HIV. Three of the patients are alive: 1 after a successful bridge to transplant and the other 2 on continued device support at 18 and 13 months after implantation. No infectious complications occurred in 3 patients, and no opportunistic infections occurred in the fourth patient. De novo allosensitization did not occur in our patients after LVAD implantation. With the ongoing donor shortage, implantation of an LVAD in advanced heart failure patients with HIV with controlled viremia on HAART represents a viable option.

The role of kidney biopsy in heart transplant candidates with kidney disease.

Background. Kidney disease is common in patients with advanced heart failure and can result from intrinsic parenchymal disease or to reversible hemodynamic factors. Distinguishing the two is difficult but is important when selecting patients who will benefit from combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) versus heart transplantation (OHT) alone. The goal of this study was to characterize kidney biopsy findings in this population and follow the outcome of patients based on the biopsy results. Methods. Thirty heart transplant candidates with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 40 mL/min or proteinuria greater than 500 mg/day or a history of amyloidosis underwent kidney biopsies between June 2001 and March 2009. The renal pathologic diagnosis as well as the percent tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis on renal biopsy were assessed. Results. Proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate at the time of evaluation for heart transplant did not correlate with the degree of fibrosis on biopsy. On the basis of the biopsy results, nine patients were listed for OHT and eight patients were listed for HKT. One patient originally triaged to receive OHT and was listed for HKT due to subsequent worsening of renal function. Eight patients received OHT, none required dialysis during a median follow-up period of 18 months. Conclusions. Renal biopsy provides useful diagnostic information to differentiate intrinsic renal disease from renal hypoperfusion and helps guide the decision for OHT alone versus combined HKT.

Ventricular assist device support as a bridge to heart transplantation in patients with giant cell myocarditis

Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) carries a poor prognosis and many patients require end‐stage therapies. This study sought to determine the outcome of patients bridged with ventricular assist devices (VAD) to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT).

New-onset graft dysfunction after heart transplantation—incidence and mechanism-related outcomes

BACKGROUND Graft dysfunction (GD) after heart transplantation (HTx) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The impact of different pathophysiologic mechanisms on outcome is unknown. In this large, single-center study we aimed to assess the incidence of GD and compare the outcomes with different histopathologic mechanisms of rejection. METHODS We analyzed a data set of 1,099 consecutive patients after their HTx at Columbia University Medical Center between January 1994 and March 2008, and identified all patients hospitalized with new-onset GD. Based on the histopathologic data, patients were divided into GD-unexplained (Group-GD-U), GD-antibody-mediated rejection (Group-GD-AMR), GD-cardiac allograft vasculopathy (Group-GD-CAV) and GD-acute cellular rejection (Group-GD-ACR) groups. We compared the in-hospital and 3-, 6- and 12-month mortality across these groups using the chi-square test. We also compared the 3-, 6- and 12-month survival curves across groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS Of 126 patients (12%) identified with GD, complete histology data were available for 100 patients. There were 21, 20, 27 and 32 patients identified in Group-GD-U, Group-GD-AMR, Group-GD-CAV and Group-GD-ACR, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rates were 52%, 20%, 15% and 6%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in Group-GD-U compared with all other groups (p = 0.0006). The 3-, 6- and 12-month survival rate was also significantly lower in Group-GD-U compared with all other groups. CONCLUSION A significant proportion of patients presenting with new-onset GD have unexplained histopathology. Unexplained GD is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate. New diagnostic tools are necessary to better understand and detect/predict this malignant phenotype.

Preoperative Assessment of High-Risk Candidates to Predict Survival After Heart Transplantation

Background—Alternate waiting list strategies expand listing criteria for patients awaiting heart transplantation (HTx). We retrospectively analyzed clinical events and outcome of patients listed as high-risk recipients for HTx. Methods and Results—We analyzed 822 adult patients who underwent HTx of whom 111 patients met high-risk criteria. Clinical data were collected from medical records and outcome factors calculated for 61 characteristics. Significant factors were summarized in a prognostic score. Age >65 years (67%) and amyloidosis (19%) were the most common reasons for alternate listing. High-risk recipients were older (63.2±10.2 versus 51.4±11.8 years; P<0.001), had more renal dysfunction, prior cancer, and smoking. Survival analysis revealed lower post-HTx survival in high-risk recipients (82.2% versus 87.4% at 1-year; 59.8% versus 76.3% at 5-year post-HTx; P=0.0005). Prior cerebral vascular accident, albumin <3.5 mg/dL, re-HTx, renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min), and >2 prior sternotomies were associated with poor survival after HTx. A prognostic risk score (CARRS [CVA, albumin, re-HTx, renal dysfunction, and sternotomies]) derived from these factors stratified survival post-HTx in high-risk (3+ points) versus low-risk (0–2 points) patients (87.9% versus 52.9% at 1-year; 65.9% versus 28.4% at 5-year post-HTx; P<0.001). Low-risk alternate patients had survival comparable with regular patients (87.9% versus 87.0% at 1-year and 65.9% versus 74.5% at 5-year post-HTx; P=0.46). Conclusions—High-risk patients had reduced survival compared with regular patients post-HTx. Among patients previously accepted for alternate donor listing, application of the CARRS score identifies patients with unacceptably high mortality after HTx and those with a survival similar to regularly listed patients.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies with antibody-mediated rejection and long-term outcomes following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are common after heart transplantation and are associated with rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and mortality. A noninvasive diagnostic test for pathologic antibody-mediated rejection (pAMR) does not exist. METHODS From January 1, 2010, through August 31, 2013, 221 consecutive adult patients underwent heart transplantation and were followed through October 1, 2015. The primary objective was to determine whether the presence of DSA could detect AMR at the time of pathologic diagnosis. Secondary analyses included association of DSA (stratified by major histocompatibility complex class and de novo status) during AMR with new graft dysfunction, graft loss (mortality or retransplantation), and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. RESULTS During the study period, 69 patients (31.2%) had DSA (24% had de novo DSA), and there were 74 episodes of pAMR in 38 patients. Sensitivity of DSA at any mean fluorescence intensity to detect concurrent pAMR was only 54.3%. The presence of any DSA during pAMR increased the odds of graft dysfunction (odds ratio = 5.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-21.47; p = 0.018), adjusting for age, sex, and timing of AMR. Circulating class II DSA after transplantation increased risk of future pAMR (hazard ratio = 2.97; 95% CI, 1.31-6.73; p = 0.009). Patients who developed de novo class II DSA had 151% increased risk of graft loss (contingent on 30-day survival) compared with patients who did not have DSA (95% CI, 1.11-5.69; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS DSA were inadequate to diagnose pAMR. Class II DSA provided prognostic information regarding future pAMR, graft dysfunction with pAMR, and graft loss.