S. Ritt
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by S. Ritt.
The 14th international conference on few‐body problems in physics | 1995
E. T. Boschitz; B. Brinkmöller; J. Bühler; R. Meier; S. Ritt; M. Wessler; J. A. Konter; S. Mango; B. van den Brandt
Vector and tensor analyzing powers were measured for π+‐6Li↘ and π+‐7Li↘scattering in the angular range between 50° and 110° at several pion energies in the region of the Δ(3,3) resonance. The data are compared to predictions from a coupled channel model. Within this model the sensitivity to variations of the nuclear structure input and the reaction mechanism are investigated.
Physical Review C | 1991
S. Ritt; E. T. Boschitz; R. Meier; R. Tacik; K. Junker; J. A. Konter; S. Mango; Dieter Renker; B. van den Brandt; V. Efimovyhk; A. Kovaljov; A. N. Prokofiev; R. Mach; P. Chaumette; J. Deregel; G. Durand; J. Fabre; W. Thiel
The vector analyzing power {ital iT}{sub 11} was measured for {pi}{sup +}-{sup 6}{rvec L}i elastic and inelastic scattering (3{sup +}, 2.19 MeV) at 100, 134, 164, and 219 MeV, in an angular range between 40{degree} and 125{degree} using a vector polarized {sup 6}LiD target. Sizable spin effects were observed over most of the angular range. The data were compared with a number of theoretical predictions based on different scattering models and nuclear structure input. None of the calculations is able to reproduce the data set; however, it appears that the vector analyzing power {ital iT}{sub 11} is mostly sensitive to the nuclear wave function chosen. The angular distribution of {ital iT}{sub 11} in {pi}{sup +}-{sup 6}Li elastic and inelastic scattering is discussed in terms of nuclear form factors and elementary {pi}{ital N} amplitudes.
Physical Review C | 1991
S. Ritt; E. T. Boschitz; Roland Meier; R. Tacik; M. Wessler; K. Junker; J. A. Konter; S. Mango; Dieter Renker; B. van den Brandt; V. Efimovyhk; A. Kovaljov; A. N. Prokofiev; R. Mach; P. Chaumette; J. Deregel; G. Durand; J. Fabre; W. Thiel
The vector analyzing power {ital iT}{sub 11} was measured for {pi}{sup +}-{sup 6}{rvec L}i elastic and inelastic scattering (3{sup +}, 2.19 MeV) at 100, 134, 164, and 219 MeV, in an angular range between 40{degree} and 125{degree} using a vector polarized {sup 6}LiD target. Sizable spin effects were observed over most of the angular range. The data were compared with a number of theoretical predictions based on different scattering models and nuclear structure input. None of the calculations is able to reproduce the data set; however, it appears that the vector analyzing power {ital iT}{sub 11} is mostly sensitive to the nuclear wave function chosen. The angular distribution of {ital iT}{sub 11} in {pi}{sup +}-{sup 6}Li elastic and inelastic scattering is discussed in terms of nuclear form factors and elementary {pi}{ital N} amplitudes.
Physical Review C | 1991
S. Ritt; E. T. Boschitz; R. Meier; R. Tacik; M. Wessler; K. Junker; J. A. Konter; S. Mango; D. Renker; B. van den Brandt; V. Efimovyhk; A. Kovaljov; A. N. Prokofiev; R. Mach; P. Chaumette; J. Deregel; G. Durand; J. Fabre; W. Thiel
The vector analyzing power {ital iT}{sub 11} was measured for {pi}{sup +}-{sup 6}{rvec L}i elastic and inelastic scattering (3{sup +}, 2.19 MeV) at 100, 134, 164, and 219 MeV, in an angular range between 40{degree} and 125{degree} using a vector polarized {sup 6}LiD target. Sizable spin effects were observed over most of the angular range. The data were compared with a number of theoretical predictions based on different scattering models and nuclear structure input. None of the calculations is able to reproduce the data set; however, it appears that the vector analyzing power {ital iT}{sub 11} is mostly sensitive to the nuclear wave function chosen. The angular distribution of {ital iT}{sub 11} in {pi}{sup +}-{sup 6}Li elastic and inelastic scattering is discussed in terms of nuclear form factors and elementary {pi}{ital N} amplitudes.
Physical Review C | 1990
R. Meier; E. T. Boschitz; S. Ritt; R. Tacik; M. Wessler; J. A. Konter; S. Mango; D. Renker; B. van den Brandt; W. Meyer; W. Thiel; R. Mach; P. Amaudruz; R.R. Johnson; G.R. Smith; P. Weber
Physical Review C | 1996
B. A. Raue; T. A. Greco; M. Khayat; F. Adimi; B.v. Brandt; H. Breuer; Thomas H. Chang; N. S. Chant; Hsuan Chen; Thomas Ashley Dooling; A. P. Dvoredsky; B. S. Flanders; Tingyi Gu; J. P. Haas; P. Hautle; J. Huffman; J. J. Kelly; Alexander Klein; K. Koch; J. A. Konter; Anatoly Kovalev; G. S. Kyle; J. J. Lawrie; Zhaohong Lin; S. Mango; P. Markowitz; R. Meier; T. M. Payerle; S. Ritt; P. G. Roos
Physical Review C | 1995
M. Wessler; E. T. Boschitz; B. Brinkmöller; J. Bühler; H. Garcilazo; W. Gyles; W. List; Roland Meier; S. Ritt; R. Tacik; J. A. Konter; D. Gill; S. Mango; Dieter Renker; B. van den Brandt; G. D. Wait; V.A. Efimovykh; Anatoly Kovalev; A. N. Prokofiev; W. Thiel; B. Blankleider
Physical Review C | 1994
S. Ritt; E. T. Boschitz; B. Brinkmoeller; J. Buehler; R. Meier; M. Wessler; J. A. Konter; S. Mango; B. van den Brandt; S.S. Kamalov; R.A. Eramzhyan; G.G. Ryzhikh
Physical Review C | 2001
M. Khayat; P. G. Roos; N. S. Chant; A. P. Dvoredsky; H. Breuer; J. J. Kelly; B. S. Flanders; T. M. Payerle; F. Adimi; Tingyi Gu; J. Huffman; Alexander Klein; Thomas Ashley Dooling; T. A. Greco; G. S. Kyle; Thomas H. Chang; Z. Lin; M. Wang; R. Meier; S. Ritt; K. Koch; J. A. Konter; S. Kovalev; S. Mango; B. van den Brandt; J. J. Lawrie
Physical Review C | 1996
B. A. Raue; T. A. Greco; M. Khayat; F. Adimi; B. van den Brandt; H. Breuer; Thomas H. Chang; N. S. Chant; Hsuan Chen; Thomas Ashley Dooling; A. P. Dvoredsky; B. S. Flanders; Tingyi Gu; J. P. Haas; P. Hautle; J. Huffman; John J. Kelly; Alexander Klein; K. Koch; J. A. Konter; Anatoly Kovalev; G. S. Kyle; J. J. Lawrie; Zhaohong Lin; S. Mango; P. Markowitz; Roland Meier; T. M. Payerle; S. Ritt; P. G. Roos