Sabine Barthlott

Process-evaluation of tropospheric humidity simulated by general circulation models using water vapor isotopologues: 1. Comparison between models and observations

The goal of this study is to determine how H2O and HDO measurements in water vapor can be used to detect and diagnose biases in the representation of processes controlling tropospheric humidity in atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs). We analyze a large number of isotopic data sets (four satellite, sixteen ground-based remote-sensing, five surface in situ and three aircraft data sets) that are sensitive to different altitudes throughout the free troposphere. Despite significant differences between data sets, we identify some observed HDO/H2O characteristics that are robust across data sets and that can be used to evaluate models. We evaluate the isotopic GCM LMDZ, accounting for the effects of spatiotemporal sampling and instrument sensitivity. We find that LMDZ reproduces the spatial patterns in the lower and mid troposphere remarkably well. However, it underestimates the amplitude of seasonal variations in isotopic composition at all levels in the subtropics and in midlatitudes, and this bias is consistent across all data sets. LMDZ also underestimates the observed meridional isotopic gradient and the contrast between dry and convective tropical regions compared to satellite data sets. Comparison with six other isotope-enabled GCMs from the SWING2 project shows that biases exhibited by LMDZ are common to all models. The SWING2 GCMs show a very large spread in isotopic behavior that is not obviously related to that of humidity, suggesting water vapor isotopic measurements could be used to expose model shortcomings. In a companion paper, the isotopic differences between models are interpreted in terms of biases in the representation of processes controlling humidity. Copyright

The Climatological Impacts of Continental Surface Evaporation, Rainout, and Subcloud Processes on δD of Water Vapor and Precipitation in Europe

All types of applications of stable water isotopes, e.g. for the reconstruction of paleotemperatures or for climate model validation, rely on a proper understanding of the mechanisms determining the isotopic composition of water vapor and precipitation. In this study, we use the isotope-enabled limited-area model COSMOiso to characterize the impacts of continental evapotranspiration, rainout, and subcloud processes on δD of European water vapor and precipitation. To this end, we first confirm a reliable implementation of the most important isotope fractionation processes in COSMOiso by comparing 5 years of modeled δD values with multi-platform δD observations from Europe (remote sensing observations of the δD of water vapor around 2.6 km a.g.l., in situ δD measurements in near-surface water vapor, and δD precipitation data from the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation). Based on six 15 year sensitivity simulations, we then quantify the climatological impacts of the different fractionation processes on the δD values. We find δD of European water vapor and precipitation to be most strongly controlled by rainout. Superimposed to this are the effect of subcloud processes, which especially affects δD in precipitation under warm conditions, and the effect of continental evapotranspiration, which exerts an important control over the δD of near-surface water vapor. In future studies, the validated COSMOiso model can be employed in a similar way for a comprehensive interpretation of European isotope records from climatologically different time periods.

Quality assessment of integrated water vapour measurements at St. Petersburg site, Russia: FTIR vs. MW and GPS techniques

The cross-comparison of different techniques for atmospheric integrated water vapour (IWV) measurements is the 10 essential part of their quality assessment protocol. We inter-compare the synchronised data sets of IWV values measured by Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer Bruker 125 HR (FTIR), microwave radiometer RPG-HATPRO (MW) and global navigation satellite system receiver Novatel ProPak-V3 (GPS) at St. Petersburg site between August 2014 and October 2016. Generally, all three techniques agree well with each other and therefore are suitable for monitoring IWV values at St. Petersburg site. We show that GPS and MW data quality depends on the atmospheric conditions; in dry atmosphere (IWV 15 smaller than 6 mm), these techniques are less reliable at St. Petersburg site than the FTIR method. We evaluate the upper bound of statistical measurement errors for clear-sky conditions as 0.33 ± 0.03 mm (2.0 ± 0.3 %), 0.54 ± 0.03 mm (4.5 ± 0.3 %), and 0.76 ± 0.04 mm (6.3 ± 0.7 %) for FTIR, GPS and MW methods, respectively. We conclude that accurate spatial and temporal matching of different IWV measurements is necessary for achieving the better agreement between various methods for IWV monitoring. 20