Sabine Loos

Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS)

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to develop and evaluate psychometric properties of the Clinical Decision Making Style (CDMS) scale which measures general preferences for decision making as well as preferences regarding the provision of information to the patient from the perspectives of people with severe mental illness and staff.MethodsA participatory approach was chosen for instrument development which followed 10 sequential steps proposed in a current guideline of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation of measures. Following item analysis, reliability, validity, and long-term stability of the CDMS were examined using Spearman correlations in a sample of 588 people with severe mental illness and 213 mental health professionals in 6 European countries (Germany, UK, Italy, Denmark, Hungary, and Switzerland).ResultsIn both patient and staff versions, the two CDMS subscales “Participation in Decision Making” and “Information” reliably measure distinct characteristics of decision making. Validity could be demonstrated to some extent, but needs further investigation.ConclusionsTogether with two other five-language patient- and staff-rated measures developed in the CEDAR study (ISRCTN75841675) – “Clinical Decision Making in Routine Care” and “Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction” – the CDMS allows empirical investigation of the complex relation between clinical decision making and outcome in the treatment of people with severe mental illness across Europe.

Content and implementation of clinical decisions in the routine care of people with severe mental illness

Abstract Background: Clinical decision making (CDM) in the treatment of people with severe mental illness relates to a wide range of life domains. Aims: To examine content of CDM in mental health care from the perspectives of service users and staff and to investigate variation in implementation of decisions for differing content. Method: As part of the European multicenter study clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (ISRCTN75841675), 588 service users and their clinicians were asked to identify the decisions made during their last meeting. Decisions were then coded into content categories. Two months later, both parties reported if these decisions had been implemented. Results: Agreement between patients and staff regarding decision making was moderate (κ = 0.21–0.49; p < 0.001). Decisions relating to medication and social issues were most frequently identified. Overall reported level of implementation was 73.5% for patients and 74.7% for staff, and implementation varied by decision content. Conclusions: A variety of relevant decision topics were shown for mental health care. Implementation rates varied in relation to topic and may need different consideration within the therapeutic dyad.

Erratum to: Courses of helping alliance in the treatment of people with severe mental illness in Europe: a latent class analytic approach

Purpose The helping alliance (HA) between patient and therapist has been studied in detail in psychotherapy research, but less is known about the HA in long-term community mental health care. The aim of this study was to identify typical courses of the HA and their predictors in a sample of people with severe mental illness across Europe over a measurement period of one year.

Helping Alliance and Unmet Needs in Routine Care of People With Severe Mental Illness Across Europe: A Prospective Longitudinal Multicenter Study

Abstract The helping alliance (HA) refers to the collaborative bond between patient and therapist, including shared goals and tasks. People with severe mental illness have a complex mixture of clinical and social needs. Using mixed-effects regression, this study examined in 588 people with severe mental illness whether an increase in the HA is associated with fewer unmet needs over time, and whether change in the HA precedes change in unmet needs. It was found that a reduction in unmet needs was slower in patients with higher HA (B = 0.04, p < 0.0001) only for patient-rated measures. Improvement in both patient-rated and staff-rated HA over time was associated with fewer subsequent patient-rated (B = −0.10, p < 0.0001) and staff-rated (B = −0.08, p = 0.0175) unmet needs. With positive changes in the HA preceding fewer unmet needs, findings provide further evidence for a causal relationship between alliance and outcome in the treatment of people with severe mental illness.

Lost in transition? Professional perspectives on transitional mental health services for young people in Germany: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe transition of young patients from child and adolescent to adult mental health services often results in the interruption or termination of care. At this intersection, mental health professionals function as gatekeepers between systems, and their personal views on current clinical practice can contribute to a broader understanding of procedures and help identify reasons for service gaps. This qualitative study investigated the views of mental health professionals on services for young people during the transition from child and adolescent to adult mental health care, as well as on factors which facilitate or hinder continuity of care.MethodsFour group discussions with 24 mental health professionals with various backgrounds were conducted. Groups were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed following the reconstructive approach of R. Bohnsack’s documentary method.ResultsA main theme and six subthemes emerged. Participants’ overall concern was an increasing lack of patient centeredness in care provision. They criticized the limited flexibility and time constraints of their work, which was held to be incompatible with the time-consuming process of engaging young patients in care and coping with their individual needs. A lack of adequate interprofessional exchange and networking was seen as resulting in a diffuse sense of responsibility and a lack of clarity for all involved parties. Participants focused on the adverse impact of neglecting developmental characteristics in care procedures for young patients and revealed personal issues they experienced in their work with young patients (e. g. personal difficulties with diagnosing).ConclusionsMental health professionals at this transitional point face a number of complex tasks as well as limitations in terms of time and personal support. An emphasis should be placed on forming and maintaining partnerships within and between systems which could contribute significantly to relieving professionals’ workload. Furthermore, an open style of communication to engage young patients in care is essential. Strengthening communicative skills, improving knowledge about this life stage (especially when working in adult services), and promoting interprofessional encounters can help to develop new procedures in clinical practice. On higher system levels, heightened awareness of the need to reduce fragmentation of care and administrative barriers is needed.

Clinical Decision Making and Mental Health Service Use Among Persons With Severe Mental Illness Across Europe

OBJECTIVE The study explored relationships between preferences for and experiences of clinical decision making (CDM) with service use among persons with severe mental illness. METHODS Data from a prospective observational study in six European countries were examined. Associations of baseline staff-rated (N=213) and patient-rated (N=588) preferred and experienced decision making with service use were examined at baseline by using binomial regressions and at 12-month follow-up by using multilevel models. RESULTS A preference by patients and staff for active patient involvement in decision making, rather than shared or passive decision making, was associated with longer hospital admissions and higher costs at baseline and with increases in admissions over 12 months (p=.043). Low patient-rated satisfaction with an experienced clinical decision was also related to increased costs over the study period (p=.005). CONCLUSIONS A preference for shared decision making may reduce health care costs by reducing inpatient admissions. Patient satisfaction with decisions was a predictor of costs, and clinicians should maximize patient satisfaction with CDM.

Erratum to Courses of helping alliance in the treatment of people with severe mental illness in Europe: a latent class analytic approach[Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 10.1007/s00127-014-0963-4]

Purpose The helping alliance (HA) between patient and therapist has been studied in detail in psychotherapy research, but less is known about the HA in long-term community mental health care. The aim of this study was to identify typical courses of the HA and their predictors in a sample of people with severe mental illness across Europe over a measurement period of one year.

Erratum to: Courses of helping alliance in the treatment of people with severe mental illness in Europe

Purpose The helping alliance (HA) between patient and therapist has been studied in detail in psychotherapy research, but less is known about the HA in long-term community mental health care. The aim of this study was to identify typical courses of the HA and their predictors in a sample of people with severe mental illness across Europe over a measurement period of one year.