Sabrina Chiara Cecere
Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sabrina Chiara Cecere.
Lancet Oncology | 2015
Sandro Pignata; Domenica Lorusso; Giovanni Scambia; Daniela Sambataro; Stefano Tamberi; Saverio Cinieri; Anna M Mosconi; Michele Orditura; Alba A. Brandes; Valentina Arcangeli; Pierluigi Beneditti Panici; Carmela Pisano; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Marilena Di Napoli; Francesco Raspagliesi; Giuseppa Maltese; Vanda Salutari; Caterina Ricci; Gennaro Daniele; Maria Carmela Piccirillo; Massimo Di Maio; Ciro Gallo; Francesco Perrone
BACKGROUND Inhibition of angiogenesis is a valuable treatment strategy for ovarian cancer. Pazopanib is an anti-angiogenic drug active in ovarian cancer. We assessed the effect of adding pazopanib to paclitaxel for patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS We did this open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 hospitals in Italy. We included patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer previously treated with a maximum of two lines of chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no residual peripheral neurotoxicity. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) with or without pazopanib 800 mg daily, and stratified by centre, number of previous lines of chemotherapy, and platinum-free interval status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01644825. This report is the final analysis; the trial is completed. FINDINGS Between Dec 15, 2010, and Feb 8, 2013, we enrolled 74 patients: 37 were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel and pazopanib and 37 were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel only. One patient, in the paclitaxel only group, withdrew from the study and was excluded from analyses. Median follow-up was 16·1 months (IQR 12·5-20·8). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the pazopanib plus paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group (median 6·35 months [95% CI 5·36-11·02] vs 3·49 months [2·01-5·66]; hazard ratio 0·42 [95% CI 0·25-0·69]; p=0·0002). We recorded no unexpected toxic effects or deaths from toxic effects. Adverse events were more common in the pazopanib and paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (11 [30%] in the pazopanib group vs one [3%] in the paclitaxel group), fatigue (four [11%] vs two [6%]), leucopenia (four [11%] vs one [3%]), hypertension (three [8%] vs none [0%]), raised aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (three [8%] vs none), and anaemia (two [5%] vs five [14%]). One patient in the pazopanib group had ileal perforation. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that a phase 3 study of the combination of weekly paclitaxel plus pazopanib for patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer is warranted. FUNDING National Cancer Institute of Napoli and GlaxoSmithKline.
Scientific Reports | 2015
Michele Cioffi; Crescenzo D’Alterio; Rosalba Camerlingo; Virginia Tirino; Claudia Consales; Anna Maria Riccio; Caterina Ieranò; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Nunzia Simona Losito; Stefano Greggi; Sandro Pignata; Giuseppe Pirozzi; Stefania Scala
CD133 and CXCR4 were evaluated in the NCI-60 cell lines to identify cancer stem cell rich populations. Screening revealed that, ovarian OVCAR-3, -4 and -5 and colon cancer HT-29, HCT-116 and SW620 over expressed both proteins. We aimed to isolate cells with stem cell features sorting the cells expressing CXCR4+CD133+ within ovarian cancer cell lines. The sorted population CD133+CXCR4+ demonstrated the highest efficiency in sphere formation in OVCAR-3, OVCAR-4 and OVCAR-5 cells. Moreover OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and NANOG were highly expressed in CD133+CXCR4+ sorted OVCAR-5 cells. Most strikingly CXCR4+CD133+ sorted OVCAR-5 and -4 cells formed the highest number of tumors when inoculated in nude mice compared to CD133−CXCR4−, CD133+CXCR4−, CD133−CXCR4+ cells. CXCR4+CD133+ OVCAR-5 cells were resistant to cisplatin, overexpressed the ABCG2 surface drug transporter and migrated toward the CXCR4 ligand, CXCL12. Moreover, when human ovarian cancer cells were isolated from 37 primary ovarian cancer, an extremely variable level of CXCR4 and CD133 expression was detected. Thus, in human ovarian cancer cells CXCR4 and CD133 expression identified a discrete population with stem cell properties that regulated tumor development and chemo resistance. This cell population represents a potential therapeutic target.
Cancer Treatment Reviews | 2015
Chiara Della Pepa; Giuseppe Tonini; Daniele Santini; Simona Losito; Carmela Pisano; Marilena Di Napoli; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Piera Gargiulo; Sandro Pignata
Low Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma, LGSOC, is certainly a rare disease, accounting for only a small proportion of all ovarian carcinomas, nevertheless in the last decade we have acquired many data about its molecular and clinical features and it has been largely accepted that it has distinct pathogenesis, genetic aberrations and clinical behavior compared to High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma, HGSOC, which is the most common ovarian cancer histotype. A large number of series pointed out the high rate of KRAS and BRAF mutations in LGSOCs and Serous Borderline Tumors, SBLTs, in contrast with their rarity in HGSOC. Such finding, together with the recurrent observation of focus of LGSOC associated with areas of SBLT in the same lesion, led to abandon the traditional histology classification, defining three types of serous carcinomas, in favor of a new dualistic grading system which recognizes only LG and HG carcinomas corresponding to distinct tumorigenesis pathways, the former based on KRAS/BRAF mutations and alteration of the MAP/ERK signaling, the latter characterized by early genetic instability and wild type status of KRAS and BRAF. LGSOC shows favorable overall survival, compared to general ovarian cancer population, but worrying resistance to conventional treatments. MEK inhibitors are emerging as active agents and may well represent an effective therapeutic strategy in the near future.
World Journal of Surgery | 2009
Gennaro Galizia; Michele Orditura; Francesca Ferraraccio; Paolo Castellano; Margherita Pinto; Anna Zamboli; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Ferdinando De Vita; Carlo Pignatelli; Eva Lieto
BackgroundThe number of harvested (LNs) and metastatic nodes (LNs+) represents the most significant factor to define postoperative treatment and prognosis in colon cancer. However, its assessment may be inadequate causing an incorrect cancer staging. The lymph node ratio (LNR: the ratio between metastatic and resected nodes) has shown prognostic significance in many tumors; however, its role in colon cancer is not clearly elucidated. This study investigated LNR as a prognostic factor in node-positive colon cancers.MethodsA total of 145 consecutive patients with node-positive colon cancer who underwent curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in a single oncologic unit entered this study.ResultsLNR ranged from 0.0416 to 0.9; it was clearly lower in pN1 than pN2 patients, and increased as tumor stage worsened. ROC analysis selected 0.1818 as the best LNR cutoff value. Low LNR patients did significantly better than high LNR patients; this difference was not dependent on the number of LNs and stronger than differences observed by grouping patients according to LNs or LNs+. When stratified by low and high LNR value, pN1 and pN2 patients, as well as stage III subgroups were shown to display substantially different outcomes. LNR was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival, and the only covariate related to disease-free survival.ConclusionsLNR was a robust prognostic indicator for node-positive colon cancers undergoing curative surgery. Because this ratio-based staging was demonstrated to reduce stage migration and to aid in identifying high-risk patients, it should be proposed as a standard tool for colon cancer staging.
Chinese Journal of Cancer | 2015
Chiara Della Pepa; Giuseppe Tonini; Carmela Pisano; Marilena Di Napoli; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Rosa Tambaro; Gaetano Facchini; Sando Pignata
Ovarian cancer remains a major issue for gynecological oncologists, and most patients are diagnosed when the disease is already advanced with a poor chance of survival. Debulking surgery followed by platinum-taxane chemotherapy is the current standard of care, but based on several different strategies currently under evaluation, some encouraging data have been published in the last 4 to 5 years. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of the available alternatives to conventional treatment and the most promising new combinations. For example, neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not seem to be inferior to primary debulking. Despite its outcome improvements, intraperitoneal chemotherapy struggles for acceptance due to the heavy toxicity. Dose-dense chemotherapy, after showing an impressive efficacy in Asian populations, has not produced equal results in a European cohort, and the results of alternative platinum doublets are not superior to those of carboplatin and paclitaxel. In this setting, adherence to a maintenance therapy after first-line treatment and multiple (primarily antiangiogenic) agents appears to be effective. Although many questions, including the duration of maintenance treatment and the use of bevacizumab beyond progression, remain unanswered, new biologic agents, such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, nintedanib, and mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors, have emerged as potential therapeutic options in the very near future. Based on the multiplicity of available strategies, the histological and molecular features of the tumor, in addition to patient’s clinical condition and disease state, continue to gain importance in guiding treatment choices.
Journal of Cellular Physiology | 2013
Daniela Califano; Sandro Pignata; Nunzia Simona Losito; Alessandro Ottaiano; Stefano Greggi; Veronica De Simone; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Concetta Aiello; Alfredo Fusco; Gennaro Chiappetta
HMGA2 is a small, non‐histone, chromatin‐associated protein with a key role in tumorigenesis and adipogenesis. Indeed, HMGA2 overexpression has been frequently detected in several malignant neoplasms and inhibition of its expression prevents thyroid cell transformation. Moreover, HMGA2 null mice show a pigmy phenotype with a great reduction in fat tissue. To investigate whether HMGA2 expression correlates with clinico‐pathological parameters and patient outcome, immunohistochemical analysis of HMGA2 expression was performed in ovarian cancer specimens from 117 patients. HMGA2 overexpression was found in 39% of the cases and, interestingly, positively correlated with the body mass index (BMI). Moreover, high BMI (≥25 kg/m2) and high HMGA2 expression/BMI combined evaluation predicted shorter disease‐free survival. High BMI (≥25 kg/m2), high expression of HMGA2 and high HMGA2 expression/BMI combined evaluation predicted shorter overall survival. In multivariate analysis, the concomitant high expression of HMGA2 and high BMI (≥25 kg/m2) was an independent prognostic factor. Finally, the BMI (≥25 kg/m2) negatively correlated with the patient response to chemotherapy (P = 0.039). Therefore, the data reported herein suggest that the combined evaluation of HMGA2 expression and obesity assessed through BMI can be considered a marker of poor prognosis in patients affected by ovarian carcinoma. J. Cell. Physiol. 229: 53–59, 2014.
Journal of drug delivery | 2013
Carmela Pisano; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Marilena Di Napoli; Carla Cavaliere; Rosa Tambaro; Gaetano Facchini; Cono Scaffa; Simona Losito; Antonio Pizzolorusso; Sandro Pignata
Among the pharmaceutical options available for treatment of ovarian cancer, increasing attention has been progressively focused on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), whose unique formulation prolongs the persistence of the drug in the circulation and potentiates intratumor accumulation. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has become a major component in the routine management of epithelial ovarian cancer. In 1999 it was first approved for platinum-refractory ovarian cancer and then received full approval for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease in 2005. PLD remains an important therapeutic tool in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer in 2012. Recent interest in PLD/carboplatin combination therapy has been the object of phase III trials in platinum-sensitive and chemonaïve ovarian cancer patients reporting response rates, progressive-free survival, and overall survival similar to other platinum-based combinations, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and convenient dosing schedule. This paper summarizes data clarifying the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in ovarian cancer, as well as researches focusing on adding novel targeted drugs to this cytotoxic agent.
Anti-Cancer Drugs | 2013
Raffaele Di Francia; Raffaella Stefania Siesto; Daniela Valente; Andrea Del Buono; Sergio Pugliese; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Carla Cavaliere; Guglielmo Nasti; Gaetano Facchini; Massimiliano Berretta
Oxaliplatin is an anticancer drug routinely used to treat colorectal, gastroesophageal, ovarian, breast, head/neck, and genitourinary cancers. Discontinuation of oxaliplatin treatment is mostly because of peripheral neuropathy, more often than for tumor progression, potentially compromising patient benefit. Several strategies to prevent neurotoxicity have so far been investigated. To overcome this life-threatening side effect, while taking advantage of the antineoplastic activities of oxaliplatin, we describe in detail recent findings on the underlying mechanisms of genetic variants associated with toxicity and resistance to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. A comprehensive panel of eight polymorphisms, previously validated as significant markers related to oxaliplatin toxicity, is proposed and discussed. In addition, the most common available strategies or methods to prevent/minimize the toxicity were described in detail. Moreover, an early outline evaluation of the genotyping costs and methods was taken in consideration. With the availability of individual pharmacogenomic profiles, the oncologists will have new means to make treatment decisions for their patients that maximize benefit and minimize toxicity. With this purpose in mind, the clinician and lab manager should cooperate to evaluate the advantages and limitations, in terms of costs and applicability, of the most appropriate pharmacogenomic tests for routine incorporation into clinical practice.
Cancer Treatment Reviews | 2017
Jole Ventriglia; Immacolata Paciolla; Carmela Pisano; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Marilena Di Napoli; Rosa Tambaro; Daniela Califano; Simona Losito; Giosuè Scognamiglio; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Laura Arenare; Sandro Pignata; Chiara Della Pepa
The tumors of the female genital tract represent a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Substantial progresses have been made in ovarian cancer, with the increasing knowledge about BRCA mutated tumors and the recent development of PARP inhibitors, and in cervical cancer, thanks to extensive screening and widespread of vaccination against Human Papilloma Virus. Nevertheless many needs remain unmet, advanced stage diseases are still incurable and cervical and endometrial carcinoma, as well as platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma, can certainly be classifiable among the cancers with poor sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy. Immunotherapy, including a number of approaches, checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cellular transfer, vaccines, has experienced a remarkable growth in the last few years and it is already an available option in melanoma, lung and renal malignancies. We reviewed the main findings about the immune microenvironment in ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer with a special focus on the clinical data, the therapeutic implications and the most promising novel agents.
Anti-Cancer Drugs | 2017
Chiara Della Pepa; Carla Cavaliere; Sabrina Rossetti; Marilena Di Napoli; Sabrina Chiara Cecere; Anna Crispo; Carlo de Sangro; Emanuela Rossi; Dino Turitto; Domenico Germano; Gelsomina Iovane; Massimiliano Berretta; Carmine D’Aniello; Salvatore Pisconti; L. Maiorino; Bruno Daniele; Cesare Gridelli; Sandro Pignata; Gaetano Facchini
The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) represents the future of the geriatric oncology to reduce toxicities and treatment-related hospitalization in the elderly. Most patients receiving docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are in their seventies or older. We explored the efficacy of the CGA in predicting chemotherapy feasibility and response to docetaxel in a cohort of 24 patients aged at least 70. This was an observational, prospective study involving 24 patients who were 70 years of age or older and about to start chemotherapy with docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; we performed a CGA including five domains and divided our patients into ‘healthy’ and ‘frail’; the relations between general condition and (i) early chemotherapy discontinuation and (ii) response to docetaxel were explored. We found a statistically significant relationship between frailty assessed by CGA and early docetaxel discontinuation; we also found an association between frailty and response to chemotherapy, but this did not reach statistical significance. A geriatric assessment before starting chemotherapy may help clinicians to recognize frail patients, and hence to reduce toxicities and early treatment discontinuation. Further analyses are required to simplify the CGA tools and to facilitate its incorporation into routine clinical practice.