Sabrina Doblas

Assessment of portal hypertension and high-risk oesophageal varices with liver and spleen three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography in liver cirrhosis

ObjectiveTo assess the value of the liver and spleen viscoelastic parameters at multifrequency MR elastography to determine the degree of portal hypertension and presence of high-risk oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.MethodsFrom January to September 2012, 36 consecutive patients with cirrhosis evaluated for transplantation were prospectively included. All patients underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements and endoscopy to assess oesophageal varices. Multifrequency MR elastography was performed within the liver and spleen. The shear, storage and loss moduli were calculated and compared to the HVPG with Spearman coefficients and multiple regressions. Patients with and without severe portal hypertension and high-risk varices were compared with Mann–Whitney tests, logistic regression and ROC analysis.ResultsThe liver storage and loss moduli and the spleen shear, storage and loss moduli correlated with the HVPG. At multiple regression, only the liver and the spleen loss modulus correlated with the HVPG (r = 0.44, p = 0.017, and r = 0.57, p = 0.002, respectively). The spleen loss modulus was the best parameter for identifying patients with severe portal hypertension (p = 0.019, AUROC = 0.81) or high-risk varices (p = 0.042, AUROC = 0.93).ConclusionsThe spleen loss modulus appears to be the best parameter for identifying patients with severe portal hypertension or high-risk varices.Key points1. Noninvasive HVPG assessment can be performed with liver and spleen MR elastography2. The spleen loss modulus enables the detection of high-risk oesophageal varices3. The spleen loss modulus enables the detection of severe portal hypertension

Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for the Regional Characterization of Liver Tumors

PURPOSE To determine if diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with measurements of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient, perfusion-related diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction can be used to differentiate between viable tumor and fibrous and necrotic regions within malignant liver tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS The prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-eight patients with 51 malignant tumors were assessed. MR images of the liver were obtained by using DW imaging with 11 b factors (0-500 sec/mm(2)) and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging. Tumors were segmented into viable tumor and fibrous and necrotic regions according to the enhancement pattern after injection of a nonspecific gadolinium chelate and, in surgically removed lesions, results of histopathologic correlation. The ADC, pure diffusion coefficient, perfusion-related diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were calculated, and values were compared between viable tumor and fibrous and necrotic regions with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. RESULTS The pure diffusion coefficient differed significantly between regions of viable tumor tissue and fibrosis (1.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.29 and 1.48 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.31, respectively; P = .016) and between regions of viable tumor tissue and necrosis (1.70 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.49, P = .002). There was a significantly lower perfusion fraction in necrotic regions (14% ± 6) than in viable tumor regions (21% ± 8, P = .005), but the perfusion fraction of the fibrous regions (21% ± 7) did not differ significantly from that of the other two regions. ADCs and perfusion-related diffusion coefficients did not differ significantly among the three regions. CONCLUSION Results of this study show that viable tumor regions in malignant liver tumors can be differentiated from fibrous and necrotic regions with use of the pure diffusion coefficient but not with the other diffusion parameters.

Determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived measurements.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) determined with 3 b values and the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)–derived parameters in the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type. Materials and MethodsSeventy-six patients with 86 solid hepatic lesions, including 8 hemangiomas, 20 lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia, 9 adenomas, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas, 13 metastases, and 6 cholangiocarcinomas, were assessed in this prospective study. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 11 b values to measure the ADCs (with b = 0, 150, and 500 s/mm2) and the IVIM-derived parameters, namely, the pure diffusion coefficient and the perfusion-related diffusion fraction and coefficient. The diffusion parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors and between tumor types, and their diagnostic value in identifying tumor malignancy was assessed. ResultsThe apparent and pure diffusion coefficients were significantly higher in benign than in malignant tumors (benign: 2.32 [0.87] × 10−3 mm2/s and 1.42 [0.37] × 10−3 mm2/s vs malignant: 1.64 [0.51] × 10−3 mm2/s and 1.14 [0.28] × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005), whereas the perfusion-related diffusion parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients provided similar accuracy in assessing tumor malignancy (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.770 and 0.723, respectively). In the multigroup analysis, the ADC was found to be significantly higher in hemangiomas than in hepatocellular carcinomas, metastases, and cholangiocarcinomas. In the same manner, it was higher in lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia than in metastases and cholangiocarcinomas. However, the pure diffusion coefficient was significantly higher only in hemangiomas versus hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas. ConclusionsCompared with the ADC, the diffusion parameters derived from the IVIM model did not improve the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.

Advanced fibrosis: Correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters at dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MR imaging and hepatocyte organic anion transporter expression in rat liver

PURPOSE To compare the value of enhancement and pharmacokinetic parameters measured at dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in determining hepatic organic anion transporter expression in control rats and rats with advanced liver fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional animal review board approval was received before the study began. Advanced liver fibrosis was created in rats by means of carbon tetrachloride injections over an 8-week period. In 17 rats with liver fibrosis and eight control rats, dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MR images of the liver were obtained during 1 hour after injection of 0.025 mmol gadoxetate per kilogram of body weight. Enhancement parameters (maximum enhancement [Emax], time to peak [Tmax], and elimination half-life) were measured on enhancement-versus-time curves, and pharmacokinetic parameters (hepatic extraction fraction [HEF] and mean residence time [MRT]) were obtained by means of deconvolution analysis of the concentration-versus-time curves in the liver and the portal vein. The parameters were correlated at simple and multiple regression analysis with the expression of the hepatic anion uptake transporter organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1A1 (Oatp1a1), the hepatobiliary transporter multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2), and the backflux transporter Mrp4, as determined with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS In rats with advanced liver fibrosis, the Emax, Tmax, HEF, and MRT decreased significantly relative to those in control rats, whereas the elimination half-life increased significantly. The enhancement and pharmacokinetic parameters correlated significantly with the expression of the transporters at simple regression analysis. At multiple regression analysis, HEF was the only parameter that was significantly associated with the expression of Oatp1a1 and Mrp2 (P < .001, r = 0.74 and P < .001, r = 0.70, respectively). CONCLUSION The pharmacokinetic parameter HEF at dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MR imaging is independently correlated with hepatic organic anion transporter expression.

Can we justify not doing liver perfusion imaging in 2013

Liver perfusion imaging is a quantitative functional investigation. Liver perfusion imaging is complicated because of the livers dual vascular supply, artefacts due to respiratory movements and the fenestrated sinusoidal capillaries which allow the contrast medium to diffuse out. Liver perfusion can be examined by ultrasound, CT or MRI: each technique has its limitations and specific features. The major indications in hepatology are oncology (detection, characterization and tumor response) and non-invasive investigation of patients with chronic liver disease. Work is needed to standardize acquisition and modeling methods to allow wider use of results and more widespread use of the technique.

Hepatic Fibrosis, Inflammation, and Steatosis: Influence on the MR Viscoelastic and Diffusion Parameters in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

Purpose To determine the relationship of liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis with the magnetic resonance (MR) viscoelastic and diffusion parameters in patients with chronic liver disease and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging parameters in staging liver fibrosis. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with chronic liver disease scheduled for liver biopsy were prospectively recruited from November 2010 to October 2012 for this institutional review board-approved study after they provided written informed consent. Sixty-eight patients underwent three-dimensional MR elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a 1.5-T MR system. Fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis were assessed with the METAVIR and steatosis, activity, and fibrosis (or SAF) scoring systems. Spearman correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between liver fibrosis, inflammation, steatosis, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and viscoelastic and diffusion parameters. The accuracy of three-dimensional MR elastography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the determination of fibrosis stage was assessed with Obuchowski measures. Results At multiple regression analysis, fibrosis was the only variable associated with viscoelastic parameters (β = 0.6, P < .001, R2 = 0.33 for shear modulus; β = 0.6, P < .001, R2 = 0.32 for elasticity). Fibrosis had a weaker independent association with the apparent diffusion coefficient (β = -0.3, P = .02, R2 = 0.33) than did steatosis (β = -0.5, P < .001, R2 = 0.33). Steatosis was the only factor independently associated with the pure diffusion coefficient (β = -0.4, P = .002, R2 = 0.22). Inflammation and ALT level were not associated with the viscoelastic or diffusion parameters. The diagnostic accuracy of fibrosis staging was significantly higher when measuring the shear modulus rather than the apparent diffusion coefficient (Obuchowski measures, 0.82 ± 0.04 vs 0.30 ± 0.06; P < .001). Conclusion Fibrosis is independently associated with the MR viscoelastic parameters and is less associated with the diffusion parameters than is steatosis. These results and those of diagnostic accuracy suggest that MR elastography should be preferred over diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the staging of liver fibrosis.

Viscoelastic parameters for quantifying liver fibrosis: three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography study on thin liver rat slices

Objective To assess in a high-resolution model of thin liver rat slices which viscoelastic parameter at three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography has the best diagnostic performance for quantifying liver fibrosis. Materials and Methods The study was approved by the ethics committee for animal care of our institution. Eight normal rats and 42 rats with carbon tetrachloride induced liver fibrosis were used in the study. The rats were sacrificed, their livers were resected and three-dimensional MR elastography of 5±2 mm liver slices was performed at 7T with mechanical frequencies of 500, 600 and 700 Hz. The complex shear, storage and loss moduli, and the coefficient of the frequency power law were calculated. At histopathology, fibrosis and inflammation were assessed with METAVIR score, fibrosis was further quantified with morphometry. The diagnostic value of the viscoelastic parameters for assessing fibrosis severity was evaluated with simple and multiple linear regressions, receiver operating characteristic analysis and Obuchowski measures. Results At simple regression, the shear, storage and loss moduli were associated with the severity of fibrosis. At multiple regression, the storage modulus at 600 Hz was the only parameter associated with fibrosis severity (r = 0.86, p<0.0001). This parameter had an Obuchowski measure of 0.89+/−0.03. This measure was significantly larger than that of the loss modulus (0.78+/−0.04, p = 0.028), but not than that of the complex shear modulus (0.88+/−0.03, p = 0.84). Conclusion Our high resolution, three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography study of thin liver slices shows that the storage modulus is the viscoelastic parameter that has the best association with the severity of liver fibrosis. However, its diagnostic performance does not differ significantly from that of the complex shear modulus.

Apparent diffusion coefficient is highly reproducible on preclinical imaging systems: Evidence from a seven-center multivendor study

To evaluate between‐site agreement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems.

Gadoxetate-enhanced MR imaging and compartmental modelling to assess hepatocyte bidirectional transport function in rats with advanced liver fibrosis

ObjectivesChanges in the expression of hepatocyte membrane transporters in advanced fibrosis decrease the hepatic transport function of organic anions. The aim of our study was to assess if these changes can be evaluated with pharmacokinetic analysis of the hepatobiliary transport of the MR contrast agent gadoxetate.MethodsDynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI was performed in 17 rats with advanced fibrosis and 8 normal rats. After deconvolution, hepatocyte three-compartmental analysis was performed to calculate the hepatocyte influx, biliary efflux and sinusoidal backflux rates. The expression of Oatp1a1, Mrp2 and Mrp3 organic anion membrane transporters was assessed with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.ResultsIn the rats with advanced fibrosis, the influx and efflux rates of gadoxetate decreased and the backflux rate increased significantly (p = 0.003, 0.041 and 0.010, respectively). Significant correlations were found between influx and Oatp1a1 expression (r = 0.78, p < 0.001), biliary efflux and Mrp2 (r = 0.50, p = 0.016) and sinusoidal backflux and Mrp3 (r = 0.61, p = 0.002).ConclusionThese results show that changes in the bidirectional organic anion hepatocyte transport function in rats with advanced liver fibrosis can be assessed with compartmental analysis of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI.Key Points• Expression of hepatocyte transporters is modified in rats with advanced liver fibrosis.• Kinetic parameters at gadoxetate-enhanced MRI are correlated with hepatocyte transporter expression.• Hepatocyte transport function can be assessed with compartmental analysis of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI.• Compartmental analysis of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI might provide biomarkers in advanced liver fibrosis.

Magnetic resonance elastography of liver and spleen: Methods and applications

The viscoelastic properties of the liver and spleen can be assessed with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Several actuators, MRI acquisition sequences and reconstruction algorithms have been proposed for this purpose. Reproducible results are obtained, especially when the examination is performed in standard conditions with the patient fasting. Accurate staging of liver fibrosis can be obtained by measuring liver stiffness or elasticity with MRE. Moreover, emerging evidence shows that assessing the tissue viscous parameters with MRE is useful for characterizing liver inflammation, non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatic congestion, portal hypertension, and hepatic tumors. Further advances such as multifrequency acquisitions and compression‐sensitive MRE may provide novel quantitative markers of hepatic and splenic mechanical properties that may improve the diagnosis of hepatic and splenic diseases.