Sadık Eryilmaz

Comparative study of microfibrillar collagen hemostat (Colgel) and oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) in high transfusion-risk cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE The effects of microfibrillar collagen hemostat (Colgel) and oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) on bleeding and allogeneic transfusions were compared in cardiac operations with a predicted high risk of bleeding. METHODS Between August 1999 and November 2001, 71 patients undergoing elective, high risk of bleeding operations were studied after giving informed consent. The procedures included repeat cardiac operations (aorta-coronary bypass operations or valvular operations), ascending aortic aneurysm repair necessitating deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and ascending aortic grafting without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Subjects were excluded if they had recent (<5 days) acetylsalicylic acid ingestion, thrombolytic therapy, or anticoagulant therapy (heparin <4 hours preoperatively or warfarin <3 days preoperatively). Consenting subjects were randomized to receive either Colgel or Surgicel. RESULTS Chest tube drainage in the first 24 hours was 373 +/- 143 mL in the Colgel group and 571 +/- 144 mL in the Surgicel group (P =.01). Total postoperative chest tube drainage was 423 +/- 154 mL (range, 280-1100 mL) in the Colgel group and 677 +/- 128 mL (range, 285-1350 mL) in the Surgicel group (P =.01). In addition, chest tube drainage was compared between the 2 groups every 3 hours after operation. Blood loss in the first 3 postoperative hours was significantly less in the Colgel group (132 +/- 41 vs 228 +/- 57 mL, P <.001). In the following 3-hour interval, this significant difference persisted (67 +/- 24 vs 121 +/- 49 mL, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the easy application, low cost, and significant blood-loss reduction effect of microfibrillar collagen powder renders this agent attractive for cardiac operations associated with high risk of bleeding.

Coronary endarterectomy with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to review our experience in coronary artery endarterectomy performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS Between May 1998 and June 2000 off-pump coronary endarterectomy was performed on 11 patients who had unstable angina pectoris. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 26.3 +/- 4.4, and all of the patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV. Off-pump open left anterior descending (LAD) endarterectomy was performed on 7 patients, and closed endarterectomy of the right coronary artery (RCA) was done on the remaining 4. RESULTS There were no deaths. None of the procedures was converted to on-pump operation; all the endarterectomies and bypasses were performed on the beating heart. All patients were completely revascularized, the left internal mammary artery was bypassed to the LAD in all operations, and all other grafts were of saphenous vein. At the end of the first year all bypasses to the endarterectomized arteries were patent. The overall patency rate was 95.6%. The mean postoperative EF was 34.7 +/- 9.1, which was significantly higher than the preoperative one (p < 0.05). At the end of the first year 9 patients were NYHA I or II and all were angina free in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 0 or I. CONCLUSIONS Endarterectomy without cardiopulmonary bypass can be performed in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who are expected to benefit from the complete revascularization.

The effect of preoperative digitalis and atenolol combination on postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence

PURPOSE The most frequent arrhythmia after coronary artery bypass surgery is atrial fibrillation (AF). The prevention and treatment of this type of arrhythmia is subobtimal. Digitalis, beta-blockers, diltiazem and amiodarone are the preferred drugs for the treatment. This study was designed to compare the effects of preoperatively started digitalis and atenolol in combination and separately, on the incidence of AF that occurs within 7 days following the operation. MATERIALS AND METHOD One-hundred and sixty patients who had similar demographic properties were randomly grouped as group I, that preoperatively received combined drug therapy (n=40), group II preoperatively used digitalis (n=40), group III atenolol (n=40), and group IV was the control group (n=40). RESULTS Postoperative AF incidence was 25, 15,4, and 17,9% in groups IV, III, and II, respectively, whereas it was 5% in group I which was lower than all other groups, but the difference was only significant between groups I and IV (P=0.012). CONCLUSION The combined use of atenolol and digitalis preoperatively was considered as an efficient treatment for lowering the incidence of AF following coronary artery bypass surgery.

Vacuum-assisted closure and bilateral pectoralis muscle flaps for different stages of mediastinitis after cardiac surgery

PurposeTo assess the results of bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps (BPMMF) and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) at different stages of postcardiac surgery mediastinitis.MethodsOf 65 patients with a deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiac surgery, 33 with a stable sternum were treated with VAC (59.3 ± 11.7 years of age) and 32 with an unstable sternum or osteomyelitis (63.3 ± 9.8 years of age) were treated with early BPMMF and continuous irrigation. Delayed BPMMF reconstruction was necessary in six VAC patients.ResultsThe overall incidence of DSWI was 1.04% within the study period. Deep sternal wound infection was diagnosed 15.9 ± 10.8 days (range 5–62 days) after surgery. Diabetes was more common in the BPMMF group than in the VAC group (P = 0.046). Hospital mortality after treatment was 4.6% (n = 3) overall. Causes of death were septic multiorgan failure and respiratory failure. The infective pathogens were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; n = 2) and Acinetobacter species (n = 1). The median hospital stay was 29 days (range 15–110 days). After 6 months, only one recurrent sternal infection had occurred in the VAC group.ConclusionsEarly BPMMF is an effective surgical treatment for DSWI in patients with an unstable sternum and osteomyelitis. VAC may be considered for patients without osteomyelitis but a stable sternum, or as adjuvant therapy in patients with comorbidity.

Native valve Brucella endocarditis.

Brucellosis is frequently seen in Mediterranean and Middle East countries, including Turkey. We report the medical and surgical management of 31 cases of native endocarditis.

The efficacies of modified mechanical post conditioning on myocardial protection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BackgroundCoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardioplegic cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with myocardial injury. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a modified mechanical post-conditioning (MMPOC) technique has a myocardial protective effect by enhancing early metabolic recovery of the heart following revascularization.MethodsA prospective, randomized trial was conducted at a single-center university hospital performing adult cardiac surgery. Seventy-nine adult patients undergoing first-time elective isolated multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively randomized to MMPOC or control group. Anesthetic, cardiopulmonary bypass, myocardial protection, and surgical techniques were standardized. The post reperfusion cardiac indices, inotrope use and biochemical-electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial injury were recorded. The incidence of postoperative complications was recorded prospectively.ResultsOperative characteristics, including CPB and aortic cross-clamp time, were similar between the two groups (p>0.05). The MMPOC group had lower troponin I and other cardiac biomarkers level post CPB and postoperatively, with greater improvement in cardiac indices (p<0.001). MMPOC shortened post surgery hospitalization from 9.1 ± 2.1 to 7.5 ± 1.6 days (p<0.001).ConclusionsMMPOC technique promotes early metabolic recovery of the heart during elective CABG, leading to better myocardial protection and functional recovery.

Primary pericardial mesothelioma.

Pericardial mesothelioma is a rare cancer for which treatment options are limited. Operative intervention in pericardial mesothelioma is primarily for effusion control, for cytoreduction before multimodal therapy, or to deliver and monitor innovative intrapericardial therapies. Misdiagnosis is common. Early detection of the disease is the only hope for survival. Echocardiography, pathologic examination of pericardial fluid and pericardial biopsy, Gallium-67 scintigraph, Ber-EP4 antibody, and immunohistochemical procedures can be used. Magnetic resonance imaging is emerging as the best modality for demonstrating the nature and extent of the constrictive process, and the infiltration to the cardiac wall and great vessels. Failure of surgical techniques is usually associated with mesothelioma with entrapped heart, a large solid tumor mass, and a long history of pericardial effusion. If the tumor is localized, resection is the only hope for this rare, but lethal, entity. No single treatment modality is efficient by itself. The exact role of intracavitary chemotherapy or irradiation remains to be defined. Preliminary clinical application of photodynamic therapy and attempts at inhibiting the effects of growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor, and vaccine treatments are being explored. Adenoviral molecular chemotherapy recently completed phase I testing. Clinical trials for pleural mesothelioma remain important as clinicians seek to improve the outcome for patients with pericardial mesothelioma. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary patient care is essential for improved surgical outcome. In the future, combined therapeutic strategies involving radical surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and immunomodulation may have a role in the treatment of pericardial mesotheliomas.

Coexistence of left-sided inferior vena cava, deep vein thrombosis of the upper and lower extremities and prothrombotic polymorphisms in a young patient: a case report.

A literature review suggests an interaction between an anomaly of the inferior vena cava and thrombophilia in the pathogenesis of deep vein thrombosis. Genetic thrombotic abnormalities have been found in some of the subjects having venous thromboembolic diseases. We report a case of a young man presenting with venous thrombosis of the upper and lower extremities, left-sided vena cava inferior and with combination of heterozygosity of the mutation of the genes Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677 and Factor V 1691.

Conduction disturbances in coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND Conduction disturbances are very common after coronary artery bypass grafting (18-45%). Long cross-clamp time, method of cardioplegia, depth of hypothermia, and patient age are some of the risk factors. We planned this study to ascertain the effect of crystalloid or tepid blood cardioplegia (CP) on conduction disturbances. METHODS One hundred patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received tepid blood CP and the second received cold crystalloid CP. St. Thomas II CP was used as CCP and the same CP was mixed with blood with a ratio of 4:1 in the tepid CP group. In both groups as an initial bolus, a 10 to 15 ml/kg CP was infused with a pressure of 75 mmHg. Additionally, 400 ml of CP were given every 20 min during the cross clamping period in addition to infusion of 50-100 ml of CP after each distal anastomosis. Blood samples for CK, CK-MB, LDH and Troponin T measurements were obtained at induction, before bypass, after cross clamping, before de-clamping, after de-clamping and after bypass. Postoperative ECGs were analyzed by a cardiologist. RESULTS There were no deaths in both groups but the mean hospitalization was 8.4 +/- 1.7 days in group I, and 14.4 +/- 3.1 days in group II (P=0.004). Although there were significant rises in CK, CK-MB, LDH and Troponin T levels in both groups after CPB or de-clamping, the difference in increment between the two groups was not significant. Twelve patients in group II (24%) developed new fascicular blocks, four of these caused hemodynamic instability and needed inotropic treatment but only one was discharged with LAHB. Four patients in group I (8%) also developed new conduction disturbances within the first hour, but all completely resolved. Incidence of conduction disturbances was significantly increased in the crystalloid CP group (P=0.019). CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in cardiac enzyme measurements between cold crystalloid and tepid blood CP, but crystalloid CP caused more fascicular blocks. We conclude that myocardial protection was equal in both cardioplegia methods whereas conduction disturbances have been assumed to be caused by cold injury to the conduction tissues.

Effects of prophylactic indomethacin treatment on postoperative pericardial effusion after aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE This prospective, randomized study assessed the prophylactic effects of indomethacin treatment on pericardial effusion after aortic surgery. METHODS Eighty-five patients were found eligible to participate in this double-blind study. Patients were assigned to a control group receiving oral placebo or to an indomethacin group receiving 25 mg oral indomethacin 3 times daily for 7 days preoperatively. After aortic surgery, patients were followed up clinically and evaluated for pericardial effusion with transthoracic echocardiography on the first and seventh postoperative days during hospitalization and at the second and sixth weeks after discharge. RESULTS The demographic and the operative data were similar between groups. The surgical interventions included Bentall procedure in 63 patients, valve-sparing procedures in 7 patients, and supracoronary ascending aorta replacement in 15 patients. Hemiarch replacement was performed in 16 patients. No patient in either group had pericardial effusion after the first postoperative day. At the end of the first week, however, 2 patients had pericardial effusion, at the end of the second week after discharge, 3 patients had pericardial effusion, and at the end of the sixth week after discharge, 4 patients had PEs. One of the patients who had PE at the end of the sixth week received indomethacin; the others were all in the control group, a significant difference (P=.019). Five patients underwent transthoracic echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis; 4 underwent surgical pericardiocentesis. CONCLUSIONS Indomethacin may have beneficial effects on the outcomes and incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion after aortic surgery.